Report: Nintendo Surprised by Poor Greenpeace Rating

Report: Nintendo Surprised by Poor Greenpeace Rating

December 9, 2007
Recently Nintendo came under fire from Greenpeace, earning a big, fat zero on the environmental group's Guide to Greener Electronics.

Go Nintendo reported yesterday that a company rep claimed the Wii manufacturer never saw the Greenpeace slam coming:
We were surprised by the content of the Greenpeace report, given that we take great care to comply with all relevant regulations on avoiding the use of dangerous materials, recycling, etc. For example, all Nintendo products supplied worldwide are designed to comply with relevant global standards.

In order to certify that Nintendo products comply with standards for hazardous chemical substances, Nintendo has established the Green Procurement Standards, which require our component suppliers to certify that any parts they deliver do not include hazardous chemical substances, and ensure that Nintendo fully controls its products internally.

We are always actively looking at ways to continue to increase our environmental stewardship and hold this as a corporate priority worldwide.

Ars Technica called Greenpeace's research methodology into question shortly after the November release of the critical report.

Comments

This really shows the extent of Greenpeace's "research" went. Perhaps next time Greenpeace will actually ask for comments and policies from the companies they are "studying".
Nintendo was probably surprised because they never heard of Greenpeace either.
Greenpeace's methods get bitch slapped again.

Don't they ever get tired of lying. Didn't one guy get kicked out for asking questions? Bjorn Lomborg or something.
Well, if Nintendo is saying that they have now established this Green Procurement Standards initiative, then it seems they've created a policy in response to Greenpeace's slam. Which was probably what Greenpeacae wanted all along.

Unless I'm misreading this statement.
@ Xantar

No. What they are saying is that they have had "green" policies in place for several years and that Greenpeace are a bunch of idiots for not recognizing them.

Had Greenpeace done their homework and not been total ignorant morons they would have known that.
Greenpeace is an idicator of what is wrong with the environmental movement today- the biggest advocates of the issue are unethical, corrupt, or just plain foolish. It pisses me off how a noble cause like environmentalism is so utterly undermined by the folks who claim to profess it most.
@ Xantar

But it is understandable how you thought that. The comment regarding the Procurement Standards is worded such that it could have started yesterday. I believe it is much older than that, however.

This shouldn't even really be news. Greenpeace appears to have gone to Nintendo's website to find the information, and then gave Nintendo a 0 for not posting what they were looking for, rather than trying to contact someone within Nintendo. Anyone who does that kind of "testing" is simply going for reactions, not something worthwhile.
@Zerodash

Exactly! I could support Greenpeace, because I'd rather the Earth not become a unlivable place, but all we seem to hear about is how they're actions are amoral, illegal, unethical, or just plain stupid. I can't support them at all.
Greenpeace has changed a lot over the years. They use to do quite a lot of good and have helped a lot of people realize he environnement is in danger and something must be done about it. Sadly, they are now acting like gloryhounds and fearmongers. I read a lot of their studies (I'm a chemistry student) and most of them are so flawed it's hard to believe scientists are putting thieir names on them.
I don't understand how Nintendo got stuck with Greenpeace in the first place.
Sometimes to fight amoral, illegal, unethical or just plain stupid activity from lawless corporations, you have to get your hands dirty.

That being said Greenpeace's record is getting worse. As Olvan said they used to be a LOT better at advocating for their agenda than they are now.
I'm not surprised that Nintendo was surprised. Greenpeace seems to have slammed them solely for not having the information on their website.
if my memory serves me, isnt the reason they gave Nintendo a zero because Nintendo didn't disclose their practices to Greenpeace, correct me if im wrong, usually if you're 'grading' something and don't have the information wouldn't an Incomplete be more logical

damn hippies
@ Zaphyrus

No. Nintendo got a zero because the Nintendo US website did not have any green policies listed on their website. Greenpeace did not even check the Nintendo Japan website or contact Nintendo directly.

Websites and the information listed on the websites were the only way they gathered their information. THey did not contact any company directly.
Greenpeace is a lot like PETA. They have an admirable cause, but they screw themselves over with their methods.
@# Christian Astrup

Greenpeace is a lot like PETA. They have an admirable cause, but they screw themselves over with their methods.

PETA has an admirable cause? As far as I can tell, it's to rid the world of the concept of domesticated animals, which is not what I call admirable.
@Gray17

Not to mention get rid of our instincts, which is to eat meat...

Anyways, I think Nintendo seems pretty green, relative to like auto companies and stuff. We've all pretty much established that Greenpeace cannot rate worth crap
@Gray17

Point noted. I was referring to the work against actual abuse of animals. Not the vege-nazism. To be honest theyre pretty crazy in most aspects.

Sorry if i was unclear :S
Maybe the people who did the study where Sony fanboys?
Greenpeace and PETA do have a lot in common, mostly coming from their radical demonstrations. There are more radical environmental groups, certainly, but Greenpeace is obviously the most pervasive.

The thing about "reports" like this is the way they tend to just appear from out of nowhere and criticize the company. If you try to establish communication with a company and they choose to ignore it, that's one thing. Then you can say "Hey, there are serious problems here and they aren't doing a thing about it." On the other hand, if you blindly shoot your missiles all over the place with the intent of saying "Look! Look! An F is them!" you're the one who looks foolish.
@Christian Astrup

PETA abuses animals, even if they try to paint it otherwise.
The Greenies couldn't be any more of a joke if they tried. Who took this report seriously? Anyone? Anyone at all?
@Saladin

Only those who don't know of Greenpeace history of lying and making out of proportion statements. If they lie to get their point across, they are not worthy of any credibility (if they had any).
Not suprised at all that Nintendo actually did have a plan, it was made more than clear in the summary that Greenpeace went to absolutely no effort at all to make that report.
It makes me really sad that Greenpeace has fallen this far. As many people have mentioned previously, they used to be a group that did a lot of good. At this point they seem to mostly be a joke, however. :-/
Good going. Nintendo sure put Greenpeace in their place. And you think Greenpeace and PETA are radical? Look for the Revolutionary Cells-Animal Liberation Brigade. They blow up the offices of people that they think run animal-testing labs and other facilities that they find to be cruel to animals. I saw some of these guys on America's Most Wanted yesterday.
Greenpeace will never be satisfied until everyone lives in recycled cardboard boxes and drinks rainwater.
soooooo if Nintendo hadn't responded like this the story would have died a week ago?
JusChris -- PETA is more or less a semi-legitimate front front for more extreme groups like the ALF, ELF, and Sea Shepard. While they claim they don't know about it, their tax records show a history of funneling money to people like Rodney Coronado shortly before a major bombing. And PETA themselves do harass people, but don't carry the bombings out themselves.

So when you say they aren't as radical as the ALF, just remember they're simply not doing it directly.
@Christian Astrup

Point noted. I was referring to the work against actual abuse of animals. Not the vege-nazism. To be honest theyre pretty crazy in most aspects.

Sorry if i was unclear :S


What work against the abuse of animals? Last I checked they apparently considered keeping domestic animals to be abusing them, and had a habit of just killing animals turned over to them.
JQuilty & JusChris

And... PETA is the number 1 killer of stray and abandoned animals in the United States of America. Says so right their in their publicly-filed animal corpse disposal record.

I'd rather wear nothing...
@jds and Gray 17

PETA does jack shit for animal rights and animal abuse. They just posture. It's the ASPCA that does the good work for animals. PETA's just their to attention whore and pretend to care, which is a great trick.

You see, the problem is that Greenpeace is made of a bunch of jackasses with a political agenda.

As for Nintendo, I'm suprised at them. Really, I would have told Greenpeace to fuck off and go chase after some other idea than global warming.

Seriously, has anyone looked at the places they put those devices they use to detect temperature? In California, they're all on top of metal roofs by the exhaust vent, which is how you get all these bits of data that say things like 146 degrees Farenheit.

That's a real good study, the ones that Al Gore talks about. And by real good, I mean complete bullshit.

Seriously, Global Warming is a crock of shit. Remember when everyone was freaking out about 'Global Cooling??'. The new ice age that was coming about? Yeah.
@Gray17

I have never laughed so hard. I sometimes think PETA favors animals to people.
Wait... what? I know this is off-topic, but PETA kills tons of animals themselves? Huh?

Some of you said they believe domesticating an animal is a form of abuse. So maybe they think that if an animal has already been domesticated, it can't really live in the wild properly, and can only survive by being taken care of, aka "abused", so it's best to just kill it and put it out of it's misery? Or something like that.

I mean, I haven't had much respect for PETA ever since I heard about their "got bear" campaign, which coincidently enough was timed right around the time when various articles were reporting on how binge drinking was at an alltime high, but even so, I'm a bit surprised to hear all this about them, assuming it's true.
Greenpeace is a group known for it's stances against genetically engineered crops that can be planted in many different environments with no ill effects, crops which were approved by over 150 governmental and industry-financed studies as being safe to consume. A solution to world hunger, and these asstards would much rather resort to lying and scaremongering to prevent distribution rather than actual research and facts. Frankly, I wouldn't give a damn what they said about other people- if it weren't for the fact that there are loads of hungry people who could USE the food that they're trying to prevent distribution of.
Mad_Scientist: They kill over half the animals they claim to save.

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

Ingrid Newkirk (founder and president of PETA) has said numerous times they're opposed to pets. They're also opposed to zoos, medical testing, and guide dogs for the blind. And as previously stated, their tax records show a history of paying bombers like Rodney Coronado shortly before a major bombing.

A really good thing to watch is the episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit on PETA. While much of their show is biased as hell, this is a very no nonsense episode.
@ Austin Lewis

Wow, I'm impressed. You apparently know more about climate change than actual climatologists, who say the Earth is warming.

Well dern, I thought we had a pretty good explanation for millions of tons of melting glaciers at the polar icecaps, but I guess we're back at the drawing board.
Ace Tsiehta

Off the main topic, but thought you might enjoy the links below. There are an equal number of adherents to GW as there are skeptics, but the skeptics are never featured in the media. Regardless of your belief in GW, you should know what both sides have to say.

BTW, how do I prevent a URL from being a mile long???

Global Warming Scam
I got into an argument about this very thing a week or so after the initial report. The sides were pretty much defined as;

1. "Well, Greenpeace is calling attention to the environmental problems and calling for transparency. Why are you upset that they are calling out a company which doesn't have the facts plainly visible?"

2. "Nintendo did have the facts visible, it is just Greenpeace didn't do any real research. Greenpeace is doing more harm than good for the environmental movement by blatantly lying and crying wolf when there is no problem. If they keep it up, no one will believe anything any environmental group says, due to the fact that Greenpeace was a leader for so long."

1. "Well, I don't see why you are so upset with Greenpeace, there are so many more deserving groups."

2. Shake head, sigh, walk away.

That is what I get for arguing with someone more stubborn than I am (I was number 2 btw).
@ jds

type them this way.
<a href ="your URL here"> Text to display </a>

(if there is an x on href, don't type it. It keeps coming back.)
ack
if you start lying you will go to hell says so in the bible if you believe in it
@keenan
Not helping.
@ Keenan
I don't believe in it, a lot of people don't, and it's not even the point of the topic.

@ JQuilty
Can't say no to Penn and Teller- they might have people do their own homework, but at least it's factual.

I would have figured that industries in general would have had the nutsacks to give these special-interest/environmentalist groups the finger and tell them to munch on what their shoveling, particularly when all they're doing is just kicking sand in someone else's face and causing more problems instead of providing a logical means to solve them. Giving into these pricks is giving false credibility to such groups in public eyes, allowing them to push an agenda they needed push.
@Xlorep DarkHelm
@Kajex

i was just going off of what Anonymous said as posted here

Greenpeace’s methods get bitch slapped again.

Don’t they ever get tired of lying. Didn’t one guy get kicked out for asking questions? Bjorn Lomborg or something.
Zack: "Greenpeace did not even check the Nintendo Japan website or contact Nintendo directly."

Maybe they're boycotting Japanese sites until the whaling stops?
keenan -- Bjorn Lomborg is not, nor has ever been a member of Greenpeace. He's just environmentalist enemy #1 because he committed the horrible, horrible crime of disagreeing with them and even writing a book about it.
@ JQuilty

im just makin a statement and agreeing with some one dont shoot the messenger
So, can we, beyond a shadow of a doubt, laugh at Greenpeace without any regrets? Admittedly I was doing it before...
i believe we should
@Gray17

I looked it up (prompted somewhat by Austin Lewis' post). Turns out i have been attributing some of ASPCA's work to PETA.

/head desk

Im just gonna slink away. Sorry for dragging this off topic.
@keenan

I don't see the relationship between what Anonymous said:

Greenpeace’s methods get bitch slapped again.

Don’t they ever get tired of lying. Didn’t one guy get kicked out for asking questions? Bjorn Lomborg or something.


And what you said right above my comment:

ack
if you start lying you will go to hell says so in the bible if you believe in it


Which your statement was what I was responding to. That's why what I posted was, y'know, directly below it.
@Ace
Well, find me a place in California where the temperature hits 145 degrees farenheit on a regular basis (during summer months) and I'll be willing to take the information they glean from their poorly collected, biased, and absolutely faulty data.
whatever
Greenpeace.... lol
@Christian Astrup

They're very commonly confused.

Mainly, PETA throws paint on people and postures and demands things that are irrational.

The ASPCA is the group that fights against abuse, takes care of dogs in pounds, and provides funding to certain pounds. They are also the people who gained pet-shops the right to confiscate your dog if it has signs of abuse (I'm serious, I have SEEN this happen).
Is Peta not a terrorist organization?
@ Austin Lewis

Thanks for clarifying. :)
By the way; wasnt there a tv show about the ASPCA once? "Animal Police" or something? I remember it like a "COPS" spinoff with animals.

@ JJmug

They have been known to burn down research facilities and labs; without the leaders of the organisation condemning it. I guess technically they are.
Then could the patriot act be used against them?
Nah, it only works when the politicians make their spoooky voice.
well it was an idea.
@Christian Astrup
Animal Hospital was, I believe, funded by the ASPCA, as was Animal Police, which was actually probably the single most depressing thing I ever spent thirty minutes watching on TV in my life.
@Austin Lewis

I agree. Still, it was somewhat satisfying when they actually caught one of the scumbags.
Re:

Thank you!! I'm glad there are some people on here talking sense!!

Re: Report: Nintendo Surprised by Poor Greenpeace Rating

Well, Greenpeace is alright and all. But they got their flaws too. there's quite a numerous number of things I really disliked about them. But also some things I like.

I recall the Sea Shephard writing an article on what Greenpeace has turned into in the process.

So here's hoping Greenpeace gets their practices repolished.

(Only thing that perplexes me is that my Wii materials are said to be made in China..hahah)

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 10/07/08 at 01:32pm
DarkSaber: lol, guess it was a matter of time! They even madea Doom one! But you can't beat a game of FRAG!
Posted 10/07/08 at 01:30pm
gamepolitics: Halo board game showed up here today? Didn't even know there was one.
Posted 10/07/08 at 01:30pm
gamepolitics: u mean the ones in the countdown thread? they are verbatim...
Posted 10/07/08 at 12:12pm
sortableturnip: GP, can you post JT's emails into the JT thread over at the eca forums...I love a good laugh :D
Posted 10/07/08 at 11:31am
E. Zachary Knight: No, the link is the same
Posted 10/07/08 at 11:18am
gamepolitics: should the link be changed in the article, EZK?
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56am
E. Zachary Knight: http://www.ezknight.net/jtdisbar_ext.php
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56am
E. Zachary Knight: The JT Disbar add-on has been updated to version 0.7.5
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:33am
ZippyDSMlee: Dark Sovereign: the proper reply would be So you want a quick dry rub with cloths on? ba dum dum bish!
Posted 10/07/08 at 04:58am
gamepolitics: GP is on Twitter. Follow gamepolitics for Twitter updates.
Posted 10/06/08 at 07:06pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: @Dark Sovereign: Read "Countdown to JT's Disbarment"
Posted 10/06/08 at 07:00pm
Dark Sovereign: @Shadow: Say what now?
Posted 10/06/08 at 06:37pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Hey, EZK! I saw what you did there! Great job!
Posted 10/06/08 at 06:28pm
Dark Sovereign: Just noticed: Nikko asks Michelle to go for "hot coffee". Michelle says people get hurt and end up in court.
Posted 10/06/08 at 05:22pm
gamepolitics: If you registered but did not get ur validation email, contact me: dennisATgamepolitics.com I can fix that
Posted 10/06/08 at 04:04pm
Austin_Lewis: well, what with the article about the protests recently, I think its interesting they're opening a large 'center' in a mall.
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:52pm
BlackIce: @Austin Lewis: Any specific parts?
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:41pm
Austin_Lewis: OI, GAMEPOLITICS! Just got this emailed to me, thought you'd like to hop in on it: http://www.thearmyexperience.com
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:21pm
NovaBlack: oops i meant 'unbanned' in uk
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:21pm
NovaBlack: BBFC lose the appeal to.. revoke ..original ..appeal. manhunt 2 bannd in uk. what a buunch of timewasters.
Login or register to post shouts