
Yesterday
GamePolitics reported that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is distancing himself from THQ's rather bloody, M-rated Conan game.
Schwarzenegger, of course, starred in the popular 1982 film Conan the Barbarian.
Sacramento's ABC-7 has a
video report, including interviews with Schwarznegger's press secretary, California State Senator Leland Yee and a gamer who said he can't help but link the Guv to his iconic portrayal of the Conan character
Comments
However, Conan is iconically his character, no matter how badly they destroyed the original story. It is hard to extrapolate him from the character.
Still doesn't make his idea of picking on games and ignoring movies any less unfair.
THe report really came across as a "dim ebil gamez' report disguised as something else.
http://pure-essence.net/stuff/funny/rapistTv.jpg
Sorry but that was the first thoughts I had when I saw the article :D
Its great to see them not to even describe the Conan movie as violent but the game is ultra in its violence.
@Scottland89
That should be the should be the shortest rapist search ever.
Yep, that was exactly my first thought as well *laughs*.
It's one of those snappy-phrases the media like to throw around that doesn't mean anything.
Yeah I was thinking the same thing, seriously it's getting to be as bad as my dad calling video games "videoes." Who the hell got everyone in politics and the media to agree to use that dumbass term?
Ultra-violence as a term comes from A Clockwork Orange, meaning random and unjustified violence against someone. Muggers, attacking people for no reason, these would all be "ultraviolence".
So the use of the term, whilst accurate, is being used in sensationalist ways.
It may be accurate to call the GTA games "ultra-violent" by that definition but, as I understand it, Conan is about killing monsters that are trying to kill you, doesn't that mean the player's violence is then justified and hence just violent not ultra-violent?
Then again, my local ABC affiliate also dedicates an unusual amount of time to reading high school sports scores out of the local paper, so I guess they do have trouble filling up all the time.
BTW: I beleive this is from Los Angeles' ABC 7. The ABC affiliate in Sacramento is channel 10.
Just what i was thinking.
May I suggest:
Mega Violent
Super Mega Violent
Mega Ultra Violent
Super Ultra Violent
And this one is reserved for Fox News use already:
Xtreme Super Mega Ultra Violent to the MAX
My question is, what does Arnie have to do with this game? He was hired to play a part twenty five years ago. I doubt he had anything to do with writing the script, coreagraphing the moves, or anything at all to do with the game. All that linking him to the game will do is increase his stance against the game as he tries to differentiate himself from his character.
And Yee acting like everybody's parents? Does he even have kids?
I meant Arnold being in the Conan movie, not the present day game
When I played the demo, I did nothing but kill other humans. There were more than the fair share of blood effects, including copious amounts on the floor.
Obviously I haven't played the whole game as the demo was so abysmally poor, but the demo itself was pretty gratuitous.
Which is a shame since a full-on action Conan game would be more enjoyable to me and have some capacity for some ridiculous deaths (God of War-esque).
Anyway, Schwarzzenagger's association with the Conan movie is just one more thing in the long line of his starring in ultra-violent R-rated action movies and now being hypocritical in wanting M-rated video games federally controlled while not supporting federal control of R-rated movies.
Ah right, I haven't the game so I just presumed that monsters where the main victim of ultra-violence.
I was wondering would RPGs like Final Fantasy count as ultra-violent because you walk about, get into a random battle and if you attack first then the violence was kinda unprovoked...
RPGs are too difficult for newscasters to explain in snappy soundbites that non-gaming alarmists will understand.
This all reminds me of the tv special about gaming and violence shown in the UK around 8 or 9 years ago, where they claimed that Quake 3 allowed players to map real human faces to the ingame characters and 'Stalk' them.
This was genius, as stalking was the big fear in the UK at that time, as everyone from Madonna, to yer Auntie Mary seemed to have a stalker. By mis-contextualising the use of the word they managed to try and make it sound like a completely different type of game.
They also never mentioned that pasting a photo onto a Q3 Model made it looke like a deformed potato-head creature.
On of these "journalists" must have walked into an EB to get something for one of their kids and saw this game and said..."hmmm, it is a slow news day..."
As for the battle with the ratings system...how about we impose fines on the parents for NOT knowing what their kids are playing and using the game systems as babysitters.
Growing up, I had an hour a day (IF I had been a good boy and finished my chores and homework) to play and Mom and Dad always knew what I was playing and explained things to me.
Parents do not say NO to their kids enough, they do not take the time to learn what is going on their life, and they no longer punish them properly when they have done wrong.
Put all this blame of video games and movies and TV on the parents for not knowing what the kids are doing and doing anything about it.
lessthan12parsecs
Tallahassee, Fl
"So they’re all ultra-violent. Including Guitar Hero III and skate."
But think of all the skinned knees and elbows! Skate is supposed to be the ultra-realistic skating game, right? ;)
Guitar Hero III is incredibly violent! It brainwashes the youth into attacking people with jumping scissor kicks!