U.S. Army Creates Video Game Squad

December 12, 2007 -
Training and Simulation Journal Online reports that the United States Army has established a project office to create and deploy video games for the training of soldiers.

Col. Jack Millar director of the Training and Doctrine Command’s (TRADOC) Project Office for Gaming, or TPO Gaming, said:
I haven’t seen a game built for the entertainment industry that fills a training gap, We will focus on the visualization piece of those technologies, not so much the entertainment piece.

One thing about the Army, there's no shortage of abbreviations. Robert Bowen, civilian chief of TPO Gaming, explained the game training concept to TSJO:
Immerse that soldier into a virtual or synthetic environment, then have them conduct a training task, using their SOP [standard operating procedures], and then AAR [after-action review] that capability.

There will be some cool user-side mod ability built in, Bowen added:
We will empower that soldier to build his own scenario rapidly so he can train for his specified task. You can take a leader, chaplain, sergeant major, anyone, and put them in front of two or three laptop screens, and they’re using gaming technology that’s integrated with the constructive simulation... They’re represented in the game. Their icon shows...

Brigadier General Thomas Maffey talked about the kind of games being used:
Currently, we are focusing on first-person shooter and real-time strategy games, but there are many other genres of games that have desirable training capabilities.

One reason for the creation of the new gaming office is a concern that units are currently buying commercial games. Said Col. Millar:
If Army units are expending training funds to purchase games, there is probably an unfilled training requirement. We do not want to tell the commanders in the field they cannot spend money and train with games. However, we do want to ensure that commanders get the best training tools and that the Army spends its limited resources wisely in the procurement of those tools.

An unnamed simulation consultant, however, felt that creating layers of Army bureaucracy devoted to game development was a waste of tax dollars:
If all they’re looking for is visualization, then they’ve shot themselves in the foot. [Units will buy commercially-available games because they] don’t have to go through umpteen layers of bureaucracy...

An Army officer agreed that soldiers enjoy training with commercial software:
The controls are easy to use to move, shoot, communicate and link things up. They can’t do that now in our normal training venues down at the local sim centers. They basically have to use their barracks and use their personal computers.

Via: Wired

Comments

FOrums

a dog owner should go here dog owner forums powerlifting freaks go here powerlifting forums

Nothing new here, except for the Army doing it themselves. Which doesn't thrill me too much since that's my job.

It would be intersting to see what the Army rolls out. From the description in this article, it kind of sounds like one of those 13 year old kids on GameDev with "the greatest video game idea ever."

I wonder what aspects of unit training are considered to be lacking in COTS software. At the least, this could give the industry an incentive to include game elements that would've been scrapped because they didn't add to the entertainment value for the public consumer.

It does certainly sound that way. After reading through it again it sounds more like they've set up an office of scripters/modders for using the tools they already have.

If it's the other way though I bet they're either using America's Army or Delta3D.

Don't they already have something like this? America's Army?

Yes and no. America's Army was developed as a recruiting tool originally. Its been applied to some training programs, but they usually use other tools/simulations instead of AA. Mostly when AA gets tossed around in the training space its just for name recognition.

AA was made to get people to come in to recruitment offices (it used to be available only on CD, back when we were suffering through dial-up), so you had to come and see a recruiter. It was meant to spark interest in the military while familiarizing yourself with concepts you would see in basic.

@Austin Lewis

While not actually teaching you to shoot..

@BlackIce:

Yes. However, basic military tactics can be emulated in-game. Sure, it's no substitute for actual experience, but at least should the guy go to basic, he may recall something he saw from the game as useful.

What bugs me about this is that somebody is gonna use this as proof that games are in fact murder simulators.

I'm also a bit skeptical to armed forces using games as part of the training (with the exception of flight/ship/hovercraft simulators). When Full Spectrum Warrior was released some local game reviewer got some members of the royal guard to play it. The officers said plainly that this kind of game was a bit disturbing because it could give people a wrong impression of how they did things.

Of course, we don't have to go recruiting among the populace, conscription and all that (or at least in theory, I haven't served and I'm both willing and able bodied).

But will the Chaplain have a powerful melee attack?

@ GRU,

Priceless.

Comissar!

And yet another project that will spark up some trouble.

@Anonymous

It's spelled "Commisar".

@GRU

I don't get it..

@ BlackIce

He was making a connection to RPG clerics. THey often have some decent melee attacks to off set their crappy armor.

This is pointless. Games don't teach you anything.

Interesting to see the US military again wasting peoples tax dollars on things not really needed :p.

The media doesn't pitch a fit when the Army's involved!

@ EZK,

I think it went with the Warhammer 40k chaplain. He Is Mighty.

@DarknessDeku

Not true mate. Games teach all kinds of things. The basic shapes square, circle, triangle (Playstation 1-3) the number 1-4 and basic colors (XBox 360), which ways it up, down, left, right, forward and back. All those are useful skills... really.....

On the otherhand I have played flight and battle sims and having been in a real Apache I can tell you for a fact that the game did not teach me squat on how to fly one. Military sims... interesting thoughts there. Did firefighter training in both formats and I can say with certainty that the heat, smoke, smell and getting dowsed by your buddy to keep you from getting BBQ'd is a BIT different than the game. As mentioned many times, games do NOT teach you have to load, aim, fire and HIT with a rifle/pistol. The lack of recoil alone should be set off major red flags but of course some are just blind to any truth that is not theirs.

So they are going to try to make a game that is going to teach you how to make and protect (and be protected by) buddies or even how to march. Sorry not going to happen. Maybe they teach how to stow your locker correctly or make a bed but some things just need to be done in reality. All the sims in the world are not going teach what a real experience can.

Harvest moon taught me how to farm...

[...] Los van a usar como entornos de simulación para entrenar a las tropas. Tags:Tecnología [...]

@ the honoured Anonymous

"Hold the line damn you! You will not embarres the Emperor by dying today!"

Indeed. Good game that DoW.

The Legend of Zelda taught me how to defeat evil people like Ganondorf and Vaati. Trust me, THAT will be an important skill in my career. J/k. :P

@Internet Hate Machine

I love that game. "Ah, to walk upon the Bloodstained earth". That Chaplain has Epic Winsauce in his veins.

So we don't spam this thing, topic is now open on the forums (http://www.gamepoliticsforums.com/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3555) You'll need to register before you can post.

@DarknessDeku

Not entirely true. Games can be used in training, and can teach certain things, particularly strategy and tactics. While AA can't teach you how to shoot a gun, it can help teach some timing techniques, as well as how to coordinate with other soldiers in your squad in a safe environment. Now, at the same time, that doesn't mean if you play AA you can survive in wartime. *No* amount of training is going to fully prepare anyone for wartime conditions. Anyone in the military can tell you that.

When I was in the Army, we'd regularly go out into the field (that is, out in tents, living in the woods for a few days, simulating what we'd do in wartime). While in the field, we'd strap on what was called MILES gear (basically, laser tag, using a harness you wear, and some additional components attached to our rifles which shoot a laser that gets picked up by the other person's harness when a blank is fired), and we'd do some wargames, as well as run scenarios like if we got ambushed, hit with various kinds of attacks (including chemical attacks using CS grenades), etc, how to handle medical situations on the battlefield, etc.

For all we did there, it was a known factor that exactly none of the training would prepare people for what happens in war. When the lethality of war strikes home, when you come face to face with your own mortality, and that everything you do affects the lives of everyone around you, that raises the level of stress and fear considerably, and people have to very quickly learn to cope or die. Nothing can prepare for that grim reality.

However, training can help you, as a support to hold yourself together with while reality itself is beating you down. The intelligent leaders will look for more and more effective methods of training to ensure success -- training that serves a specific purpose. Video games can help considerably in some areas, like strategy, tactics, communication, and coordination. Hand-eye coordination even is helped, which being able to quickly react to a situation could be the difference between living and dying on the battlefield. As such, there are some commanders which have looked more into using video games as a tool to help train. Not exclusively, but inclusively with other training aids. What video games lack in being able to teach, there are other tools available to use. And when it comes down to it, video games simply become another tool to help with training, nothing more. And, it may be a pretty good and effective tool to use, because of the popularity with the troops, it will draw their interest potentially, rather than being something they feel constantly forced upon them.

Once someone finally develops a lightweight wearable display that covers all of your vision and someone makes something that accuratly responds to body movement, things like this could be a fairly useful tool.

Untill then, these will have limited use and will only be useful for teaching, or explaining the concepts behind something.

They will not be able to substitute for real training and the experience that comes from field work and simulated exercises.

[...] SOURCES: Game Politics - US Army Creates Video Game Squad TSJ Online - Constructive Progress: U.S. Army embraces video games - sort of Wired.com - Army Sets Up New Office of Videogames [...]

@BlackIce
Obviously, no game can teach you to fire a weapon. No game can teach you how to fire a three shot burst with accuracy, or to hit a target 800M out with a rifle. This is the kind of thing you only learn through hard work.

GamePolitics.com » Blog Archive » U.S. Army Creates Video Game Squad...

[...][...]...

I just don't have much to say lately, but such is life. What can I say? I can't be bothered with anything. I've just been staying at home waiting for something to happen. I haven't been up to much these days, but pfft.


Grumbhr.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightYeah, the PS3. My son paid for the Steampunk Texture Pack and it would not work at all. No matter what I did, it wouldn't allow us to save.03/31/2015 - 10:56pm
Sora-ChanConsole version?03/31/2015 - 10:40pm
E. Zachary KnightSo, Mojang has been selling a broken texture pack for Minecraft since at least Dec. 2014 and it hasn't been fixed yet.03/31/2015 - 10:30pm
Andrew EisenI think TT Games gets away with multiple LEGO games a year because they're all based on different franchises. If there were two or three LEGO Star Wars games every year, I think people would feel the same fatigue as they do with Assassin's Creed.03/31/2015 - 6:40pm
Andrew EisenIn other words, a hero is male because that's the default. A hero is female because of a gender-related reason. So, male heroes are for everyone. Female heroes are for women.03/31/2015 - 5:32pm
Andrew EisenHer point is that "When archetypal fantasy heroes in games are overwhelmingly portrayed as men, it reinforces the idea that... women should be able to empathize with male characters but that men needn’t be able to identify with women’s stories."03/31/2015 - 5:30pm
Andrew EisenDaniel - She doesn't say that in any of the TvW videos and I doubt she's said elsewhere that all games with male protagonists are male power fantasies. Anyway, you seem to be conflating two different ideas.03/31/2015 - 5:30pm
MaskedPixelantehttps://twitter.com/Yuriofwind/status/583028257890635776 Oh snap!03/31/2015 - 5:14pm
WymorenceFor me it just boils down to the fact that, even at a giant company, when a game comes out annually it just gives it a vibe of being rushed out the door. And god knows Unity sucked some major lemur with all its bugs...03/31/2015 - 4:22pm
PHX CorpI launched my spotify account today, and I kinda went a little overboard with adding music03/31/2015 - 3:59pm
Sora-ChanCon't. Games like AC are a pain to someone like me who likes to play games in order. So when a game gets too many releases too quickly, it puts me off. Only exceptions are games that have no interconnected underlying stories like the FF games.03/31/2015 - 2:53pm
Sora-ChanWikipedia has rarely let me down on matters like this. But yeah... AC needs a break.. like two.. or three... or eight years.03/31/2015 - 2:51pm
ConsterThere's 9 already?! I think I played 1, 2, and the ones inbetween 2 and 3.03/31/2015 - 2:23pm
Sora-ChanCon't There are now Nine... of just the main entries into the series. There are 13 more in the "other games" department.03/31/2015 - 2:15pm
Sora-ChanI tried to get into AC. Was having a decent time with the first one, at which point they had already released three titles. Then a fourth came out... then a fifth... the wall kept growing before I could finish the first.03/31/2015 - 2:14pm
Daniel LewisI think ubisoft should give AC a break before it's milked to death,and i'm a big fan of the games03/31/2015 - 1:15pm
PHX Corphttp://www.polygon.com/2015/3/31/8320017/assassins-creed-chronicles-china-india-russia Assassin's Creed Chronicles is now a trilogy, goes to China, India and Russia03/31/2015 - 1:11pm
Daniel LewisThe only thing said i disagree with is the final quote on Men's experiences are seen to be universal but women are gendered,though doesn't anita say that games with male protagonists are male power fantasies,so in turn both are gendered03/31/2015 - 1:08pm
Daniel Lewisi found the video to be much better than any of the TvW series and it's about time the positive women are put in the spotlight03/31/2015 - 1:06pm
Daniel LewisSo feministfrequency released a positive female character video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXmj2yJNUmQ03/31/2015 - 1:05pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician