GamePolitics has learned that a New Mexico judge today dismissed Jack Thompson's wrongful death suit against Take Two Interactive and Sony.
The case, filed in 2006 by Thompson and a New Mexico attorney, claimed that
Grand Theft Auto Vice City played a role in 14-year-old Cody Posey's 2004 murder of his father, stepmother and stepsister.
In disposing of the case, Judge Huling ruled that the Court did not have jurisdiction over Take Two and Sony, since neither corporation has offices in New Mexico. Judge Huling also ruled that New Mexico laws did not support Thompson's wrongful death claim in the case.
Thompson and his co-counsel have 30 days to filed an appeal. The controversial is pictured at left holding a September, 2006 press conference to announce the lawsuit.
UPDATE: GamePolitics has received this comment from Take Two regarding yesterday's dismissal of the New Mexico GTA Vice City wrongful death suit:
We are pleased that the Court took decisive and appropriate action to dismiss a case that Take-Two has always known had no basis in law or in fact.
Thompson was asked, but did not provide a comment on the case.
Comments
He's Doomed.
Wait, that's Columbine and the Military......
So, yes, I am a bit surprise. Glad in a way too, but still surprised. So I'd like to hear the judge's decision (preferably without, or at least as a seperate take on, John Bruce's version).
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I have a 6 pack of Guiness down saying that Jack will claim that the judge is in the pocket of Take 2 Interactive and that this is the beginning of the end for them.
Any takers?
*rimshot*
His airplane seat didn't even have time to cool off....
Then again, Stoller may even be too sleazy for JT... maybe.
but more than likely his paranoia schizophrenia will kick in and its the vast conspiracy out to get him.
I wonder if the mentioning of his disbarment trial got mentioned?
I wasn't expecting to read this until some time next week. Definitely not on the first day.
My coworker refuses to happy dance with me :(
The thing that's hilarious is that this being a wrongful death suit, it would have been easier to prove. I have to wonder really what Jack was thinking that made him believe though that he stood any chance in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. I would have loved to have seen both him and Verlin Posey go home with their tails between their legs on this one.
Between his discplinary trial and this, it's been the capper for a very bad and embarrassing year for Jack.
Its like a football team losing every game in their season and then showing up at the Super Bowl as though you are going to play.
Perfect analogy.
Lack of common sense, offense, 20 yard penalty.
my initial reaction is akin to Strong Bad’s reaction when you score 0/10 on the Homestar Quiz
______________________
*ahem*
BWAHAHA! You're so stupid! What a moron! You're so dumb! You didn't get any right! That's so pathetic!... AHEM.
Like that?
And wasn't Cody himself one of the defendants? Of course, the judge did say NM law didn't cover this situation anyway. Still, I didn't see where Cody's attorney had filed a motion, only the company's attorney's.
Nightwgn2000
NW2K Software
No he didn't. ;D
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I'm sure parts 2 and 3 of my prediction aren't too far behind.
You'd think having another attorney involved that he'd have some clue as to the laws in his own state, but I guess a massacre chaser would be good at finding a like-minded person to help him with the case.
Anywho, back on topic here, I'm not surprised the lawsuit is thrown out. Who the hell listens to Thompson anyway?
Just be happy that Thompson hasn't run out of ideas. If he did, he'd start slamming the Wii Virtual Console version of Pokemon Snap claiming that it trains kids to become porn photographers.
So, when are you going on 60 Minutes again to declare your victory here?
hua.
http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/grail/jpgs/bknight3.jpg
This guy does not know the meaning of retreat.
yes he did, all see is "the controversial is pictured at left"
Exactly. He's a controversy, attorney or not. :D
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Phoenix: Objection! Those are gay porn, your honor!
Judge: Indeed! What is the meaning of this prosecutor Tack Jhompson?
Tack: Umm...it's called a court record! huaaa!
On the more serious side, an attorney should already know this fact in my opinion:
"Judge Huling ruled that the Court did not have jurisdiction over Take Two and Sony, since neither corporation has offices in New Mexico."
His suit was dismissed. Why was I not surprised?
Jack, just accept it: You... are... a... douche!
(If he has it all, i mean)
But hey, I'm sure there's room in his conspiracy theory-laden appeal to try to tie them in somehow...
Now the trial can be over ACTUAL crimes.
So, assuming Jack's going to be reading this thread, my only question would be, what does crow taste like? Chicken?
One more for the good guys!
Sorry, went a little crazy there...
The man is allowed to have his voice, there is no way we can "shut him up". The most we can do is reduce the volume of his voice.
Also, please try to avoid phrasing things that way, a phrase that can be taken even as vaugely threatening can cause GP unneeded trouble.
It is good to know that with you out there failing, life will be a little bit better, a little bit brighter. Thank you JT for being such a huge failure. You are the subject of much internet satire, which I find incredibly amusing.
This is the end for thompsons career. Or if you want to put it in a biblical sense, thompson falls for the third(or three-hundredth) time. Only a mater of time until he is metaphorically crucified by the american justice system. You just know he is stroking off to this imagery right now, because that is the kind of sick fucker he is.
I think for thompson, losing his license would actually be a victory in his eyes, because he wants to be seen as a martyr. He is a nut job. A wack-o. How the bar put up with him for this long is beyond me. All the wasted money with zero results has to be punishable in some way. He is definitely abusing his power as a lawyer to go after TT over his obsession with them. History tells us that thompson has a problem with obsession. Stalking a DJ and trying to ram him off the road, resulting in a restraining order is not something to be proud of. He has shown his obsession in relation to this site as well. He stalks gamepolitics and its audience. He believe so strongly that the games are to blame, that he will ignore the facts, and you really can't have a discussion with someone like that.
Oh well like I said this brought a smile to my face. His absence from the comments is the icing on the cake.
@ Ken
Dude we keep telling you we DON'T want this guy silenced, cuz heaven forbid a more effective (and more likely less lulzy) crusader come along to take his place.
Goddamn, what an absolutely terrible lawyer, honestly.
-Mike Schwinger
@BlackIce:
0 for.... 10? I lost count, lol.
"There's only one explanation for this... VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES!" *spasms*
And that's all I have to say about that because... well, at this point what can you say about Jack that hasn't been said before? He's closed himself off from aid and reason so there's no way to save him, and this is yet another step down the road to his undoing.
I wish him and his family a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2007, enjoy the rest of this year Mr Thompson, as 2008 might not be too comfortable for you.
That's all I have to comment on the matter.
Thompson: "The world is flat!"
Judge: "No, it isn't. You are wrong and your theory is rejected. You have thirty days in which you may appeal my decision."
Thompson: "The world is flat!"
Judge: "No it isn't."
Thompson: "I demand you recuse yourself, you are obviously in league with GP and the video game industry to support and promote the mental molestation of blah blah blah blah...."
I would have preferred a more comprehensive demolition of Thompson's stupidity, as opposed to the jurisdiction decision, but I suppose the other reason is good enough. Saying that the laws do not support the claim is pretty much saying that the claim is complete BS anyway.
of him).
Has there actually been a case that he has one (I know the answer,
I just like hearing it :P )
-Twixn-
You'd think he'd learn about this provision at some point.
That is the most awesome idea ever... *goes to buy party snaps and takes off socks*
It's a different situation here though. I think the only way Rockstar or Sony would have had to rely on those laws is if he killed his family by bludgeoning them with the PS2 console, or using the GTA disk as a lethal frisbee.
Thompson's argument is that the content of the game, the display of violence combined with the feedback of the controller altered the poor boy's brain and caused him to act the way he did. However, this follows the same strategy as those used by the people who brought lawsuits blaming heavy metal artists for suicides. Nonwithstanding the fact that this concept is ludicrous, it completely disregards the horrific abuse the boy endured as a factor in his actions (against, *shock horror* his abusers).
I would love for Thompson, or any other critic of violent video games to find one murderer who played games, but did not suffer from any of the following: Depression. Poverty. A drug habit. Psychological problems. Bullying. Social and personal rejection. An unhealthy obsession with real firearms. Real or perceived persecution... The list of the real problems and causes of these tragedies goes on and on, but blinkered people with an agenda or hunger for votes, or especially Thompson with his personal vendetta, will only see VIDEO GAMES.
Not only is he making up those 'mind-altering' effects of video games, he has absolutely no idea what the technology IS. There are countless times he's called them (and i mean ALL video games here, not just violent ones, he has extended it as such before) "hyper-reality, virtual reality simulators" when there are literally NO video games on the commercial mainstream market that use such technology. Motion sensor bars are NOT virtual reality technology on their own.
...I WILL! HAHA! *foams at mouth* YOU'LL SEE! YOU'LL SEE!!
OMG! I can totally see JT as Craocker! If I was a better artist, I would SO do a flash parody of Fairly Odd Parents.
"Hmmm... my Videogame Violence Detector lead me here, this must be the work of... *VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES!*"
"Sir, that's a police scanner."
"Quiet, you! Now tell me the grisly details of this childs murderous rampage."
"Actually, he was 24."
"We are all children... on the INSIDE! What Take Two games was he *GRAND THEFT AUTO* playing that caused him to kill his college classmates?"
"Actually, we can't find any video game history... I mean other then Sonic the Hedgehog..."
"AHA! I'm not familiar with it, but I'm sure it is an ultra-violent virtual reality kill fest!"
"Actually, sir, I think you collect rings..."
"... yes... ultra violent kill fest with *HOMOSEXUAL OVERTONES*! It's all flaling into place. And this murder trainer changed his brain chemistry and made him kill his own friends!"
"Sir, we think it was caused by his girlfriend breaking up with him."
"You, Sir-"
"Officer"
"Whatever, your obviously in cahoots with Take Two and are likely playing *VIOLENT VIDEOGAMES* in your head right now! You are planning on killing me as soon as I turn around! Everyone is against me!"
"Sir, I'm afraid we are going to need to discuss this down town."
"AHA! *VIOLENT VIDEOGAMES* I have won again!"
Those who aren't familiar with Fairly OddParents probably won't get a lot o this. You would need to hear Crockers ranting to truly appriciate the similarities. Do yourself a favor and find it on NickToons today, if for no other reason then to be able to use Crocker's voice in your mind when you read JT's comments.
Do you remember when Manhunt was blamed for that murder in Britain? And then it turned out that it was the VICTIM, not the murderer who played the game.
Cho of V-Tech apparently did not play games, but did they check to see if his victims did? I'm pretty sure that a majority of the victims played more than Sonic the Hedgehog.
Maybe there IS a link between videogames and these crimes. But they don't cause the players to kill, they cause them to BE killed!
OMG! We need to do a study!
Now Jack can say he only lost because he filed it in the wrong court, but if he'd filed it in the right court he would have won! HOOAH
HEADDESK. Why didn't I think of that..?
Black Knight = WIN