The debate over video game addiction has fallen off the radar ever since the American Medical Association
declined to classify it as an official diagnosis last summer.
However a local Canadian TV station revived the topic for a recent segment. Weighing in were Liz Woolley, founder of
Online Gamers Anonymous (and occasional
GamePolitics visitor), Mark Ouellette, professor of pop culture at Ontario's McMaster University, and Faith from Destructoid, who writes:
It really bothers me that the con side of the conversation got more air time... especially when I had the academic on my side... Games may be the stuff of peoples' addictions sometimes, but they are never the cause...
Liz Woolley, of course, got into the game addiction topic following the death of her 21-year-old son
Shawn, who committed suicide in 2001 while playing Everquest
Comments
Woooo d-toid!
bad. bad television personality.
(liz wooley and her entire "blame the games because I didn't help him myself" spiel)
STOP IT mrs Wooley. we've heard these lies enough. just STOP.
and i sort of lol'd at the end ("watching Pong like Tennis" lol, Pong IS pratically Tennis)
Now as you said why didn't she do anything if she saw this happening. When her son lost his job, when he got evicted. These things take money, resources, internet, computer. She could have refused to give him these things at any time and she could have broken the chain.
We have to face the fact that videogames can be addictive, just like anything else. But we also need to stand up and point out that addictive properties do not make something unusable or result in everyone becoming addicted to them. Videogames do need a support structure like AA, like psychological study and understanding in order to help the people who DO become addicted. However banning them, outlawing them and censoring them is not a valid answer.
@Questionmark
Well said.
Tough. She can't have one. It doesn't exist.
to be fair, she did try, when her son moved in with her, he was not using his computer (i can only assume he didn't have it based on the wiki on him) and she insisted he enter a group home to make some friends other then online friends, and over all this was working, however, when he moved out of the group home and got a new job it all started again when he went out and bought a new computer
(this information can all be found in his wiki which GP so nicely linked for us)
Boy, I can't wait until the medication commercials start rolling.
What doctors? That line is irresponsible. The only 'doctors' pushing to have it recognized as an addiction are the ones running detox clinics. Pseudo-pyschology and a grieving mother DO NOT MIX.
Get help Liz, and stop demonizing video games because you find it emotionally convenient to blame them for your son's suicide.
Well, I acclaim Marc Ouellette on giving good info (that I know of and I would have said the same) and I'd say he'd had a good reply to Liz Woolley's allegations of the negative effects of video games.
Although, i know there's little time for the journalists, I do find them rather confrontationalist.
I do understand Ms Wooleys' concerns, and I am saddened that her son got so obsessed with a computer game, however, if we are to prevent this happening again, maybe, instead of asking 'Where was he escaping to?', we should be asking 'What was he escaping from?', that would probably give a far greater clue to what the cause of addiction is than any amount soap-box phsychology.
I laughed at her comment about the psychologists working with EQ developers to make people want to play more. And why were they only showing Halo 3 Screen Shots? I mean to get the point across don't you think they should of shown screen shots from EQ, but then again does anyone still play EQ? If anyone wants proof of how bat loco this lady is, go on that site, join up and post a civil counter argument to any of hers in the forums. You will be banned from the forums and your post will be deleted. You are only allowed to post there if you agree with her.
Her son was an idiot, and this makes her a useful source of information?
Her son was living out an escapist reality, probably because his life sucked (could it have to do with Ms. Wooley being a helicopter mom?).
So, if one of my kids dies, can i start making up psychological findings too? Can I fudge reports and bullshit my way on TV?
Why does the news like to feed the idiots so much?
"Sorry, Marc, we have to cut you off, our sensationalism numbers aren't high enough yet."
I do feel sorry for Liz, but she really needs to stop blaming Everquest as the cause of her son's depression and recognize it as what it was; a symptom. I have little doubt that Shawn was addicted, but that addiction most likely developed because he was already depressed and lonely.
Unfortunately you hit the nail on the head in regard to science in this country.
Activists excel at convincing people. Academics excel at actually knowing things. Thus the public will always listen to the activist.
"So you've never heard of someone neglecting their work, school, or even their personal relationships for the sake of a game?"
"Of course, I have. It's called being a jerk!"
"What do you know about addiction anyway?"
"Whoa. Look at the time. I gotta go."
OK, now that I look like an ass...
I believe that her son may have been addicted to EverQuest. It's possible. But he could of just as easily been addicted to his car, or chocolate, the McDonald's Big Mac, or a myriad of other things. I wish people would stop saying that they are addicted to gambling, or video games, or even alcohol. You are not addicted to it. You have an addictive personality. You could just as easily become addicted to reading Time magazine as playing WoW. Like Christina (in the video) said, it's all a matter of whether or not it fills a void in your life and makes you happy.
I'm sorry that Liz Woolley's son, Shawn, died, but she has to face facts. He killed himself. No matter what else was happening in his life, his death was the result of his own actions. No one else was responsible. Not even EverQuest.
I can see myself doing a massive Headdesk when/if you reply to this, but what are your views on FOX?
Take away the computer, or password protect it. Engage her son in an intervention group. Treat him with medicine. All these things would have helped cut down on her son's addiction.
gg Liz
oh and the reason the negative was focused on more was because it sells better than "stupid bitch makes wild claim"
Let compare video games to the whole comic books. Comics were thought to be to violent/sexual (sound familiar?)
Comics first major hit..lets say superman was in 1938 the success drawing the attention of the vulture like lawyers then bang after a few years comic books got a little too gruesome for some people and tada The CCA was created(1954) which as of 2007 is only vaguely still around
Ok so if we use the same time line as comics video games start coming under fire about 20 years after the first major hit if we take that to be pong which came out in 1972 then lawsuits should have started building up around 1992 which is about when doom came out (1993)
And if also like comic books it takes roughly 50 years to break free of this then we have about 34 more years of this(2042)...what fun
Yikes and that’s your future predication for today
You're about right on the rates.
And while the paleness and such may not show with a mental addiction, irritability and a few other things can show. At least I think so. I ain't an expert on it.
The withdrawal symptoms aren't nearly as physical as say a heroine addict, but you can get shaky, nausea, headaches. More likely though you get psychological affects, depression, anger, paranoia, loss of sense of reality, sleep deprivation.
As many people have said though, it's the person not the game and needs to be considered a possibility for everyone, but not something that should be considered a real threat warranting a ban or censorship.
I always felt a certain degree of sympathy for Ms Woolleys' plight, but it certainly reduced a fair bit when she started making that accusation.
Its on sided, but so is every news service.
Then Liz Wooley busts in at the end and says "Because you already know about games, I bet that you're gonna, kinda watch your children so that they don't get too involved in the games".
Hmmm. Sounds like something that you should have done yourself Liz. It seems that she thinks that ignorance regarding video games is an excuse for her inaction, as if had she known about games, her son would still be alive. Previous knowledge about video games is not needed to recognise that your child is acting in an unhealthy manner with them. My mother has no idea about video games yet she will tell me at 27 years old that I've played enough World of Warcraft/TF2 if I spend more than 2 hours at the pc. You don't need to be an expert on chocolate to understand if someone is eating too much, nor an expert on gambling to recognise if someone is spending too much time and money on it.
All the lies she spouted have already been called out (thousands of suicides, pyschologists on staff, etc) but i thought this was a very revealing statement on her behalf.
People like Liz and JT aren't the real problem here, its the people who give them the podium.
Think about it, if they aren't given the podium, then they have no authority to say that they are right and as a result only a handful of loud mouth lemmings follow them off the cliff. They would be the modern day Nationalistic Socialists.
However, FOX and all of the other entertainment channels continue to imbue them with romantic power, giving him such dangerous poetic labels (in the words of Dr.Breen) as School Shooting Expert or Video Game Expert. I do not think that the entertainment channels do this to cause harm because the debate over violent video games is somewhat insignificant in the face of other problems that endanger our world today and the entertainment channels use it for holding people's attention so that they do not change the channel but I believe that to let this continue is potentially dangerous and irresponsible.
As one of the commentators said before, Activists draw a bigger crowd than Academics. This is most likely due to conventional wisdom being easier for the uneducated to understand and as more of the uneducated join the flock of lemmings, the lemmings grow in influence and power. To all those who say that lemmings cannot gain power, remember this:
Once upon a time, a group of lemmings who started in the 1920's in Germany, were allowed to grow. Within 20 years, they had declared war on the world.
So to stop JT and the other lemmings from growing any further, we must request or demand the podium from those who give it to the lemmings and challenge their coventional wisdom.
But this will probably not happen because we are Academics, not Activists.
From what I've read if anything he wasn't playing because it, itself was "addictive" he was playing it for the social interaction he wasn't getting in the "real world", developed a internet relationship, through the game, with someone who may or may not have been a girl who then betrayed him. That, along with his mental problems is probably what drove him over the edge.
But of course, it was the game's fault because it was supposedly designed, according to Liz Woolley and "sources" that told her this, to be addictive. Did she ever even file a suit lawsuit against Sony? If so then was it thrown out? Or did she have NO PROOF to back up her claims? Seriously, ANY lawyer would have taken this case if there was a real chance it'd be successful, hell they would even if it had no chance in hell. It's been over six years, high time for her to quit shifting blame to an inanimate object and handle her grief over her own guilt and denial and get help. No one even plays Everquest anymore.
Oh and okay so I guess people do still play Everquest, well Everquest II.
Everyone in this interview said their predictable line:
Journalist: "Videogames eat babies, right?"
Gamer: "No, irresponsible gamers eat babies."
Prof: "The youth-mastication link within the videogame spectrum is actually quite nuanced, dating back to the early research of Hansel and Gretel (1542). Baby eating is also quite a social pheno..."
Liz Wooley: "Certainly destroy the baby-eating games if you can (predictable), but let me also suggest that parents understand them better."
Whoa.
Ok, so I don't really follow Liz too closely - but she said something that I don't often hear. Near the end she suggested that by understanding gaming, Mark is going to be in a way better position to notice should his kids' gaming habits gets out of whack. Anybody want to argue against that?
In earnest, I'm not faulting the talking heads for having opinions - but rather for venerating the same tired lines. What I'd really like to see from talking heads like Faith are anecdotes that illustrate the peak joys of gaming. Tell us the thrill of winning a tournament, intrigue us with young gaming lovers you've seen - something that gets staunchly anti-gaming parents to think about games differently. Heads like Mark - you're a smart guy and you know what the journalists want, so condense the research and capture the issue before you get there. When they seek approval for game-hating ways, you have an opportunity to give the facts in a way that doesn't put normal people to sleep. Faith is the soft sell, you're the hard sell, and the journalists are out to sell advertisements.
Personally, I think that games are legitimately fun. So much more fun than anything else, in fact, that they can sometimes create their own problems. Sure, the people in Korea who get checked out for Internet Addiction (games often inclusive) will overwhelmingly have other disorders, but whose to say that something in a gamer's past gaming hasn't paved the way for one or two of those? We ultimately don't yet understand game addiction - and there are barriers to doing so.
There's outspoken denial as encouraged by this typical coverage, a rampant binge gaming culture as encouraged by peers and marketing, and who knows how many other things. Let's not keep them from our vigorously trying to understand our friends' and children's problems - or from helping our fellow gamers when they struggle.
I speak especially to the gamers. Don't laugh at your friends and fellow players who fall down, or stigmatize them for "giving us all a bad name." If that's the official gamer line, then the thought of being a gamer sickens me.
This is just further proof Woolley has no idea what she is talking about... This is a semi post in responce to someone going back to playing MMOs
lizwool
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2007, 02:55:07 PM »
Many people today, have little social skills in the real world, because all they do is play games. They cannot be supportive to you. for this very reason.
Liz
I like how she didn't incluse anything supportive...i like how she kept it in her lil cultic circle, her only safe area where she can't be hurt.
This is just further proof Woolley has no idea what she is talking about… This is a semi post in responce to someone going back to playing MMOs
lizwool
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2007, 02:55:07 PM »
Many people today, have little social skills in the real world, because all they do is play games. They cannot be supportive to you. for this very reason.
Liz
I like how she didn’t incluse anything supportive…i like how she kept it in her lil cultic circle, her only safe area where she can’t be hurt.
(reply 2)
well, i play mmo's , and i might be addictided, im also addicted to air, as well as food.
mmo's are good things for people who may have facial deformations or be taunted for appearance. they can have normal conversations with other people without the whole "FATTY" and "THE MONSTER" taunts accocated with any other social enviroment.
i have also found that as i have started playing mmo's my real world social skills have improved. i have also learned alot about economics by studing the prices of in game items. so to the liz that replied on reply 1, your statement is false
koku
No wonder politicians can pass their anti-game bills and not get called on it. Plenty of people would rather have scapegoats like video games, D&D, heavy metal music, or comic books to blame. The biggest factor in preventing addiction to nearly anything (gambling, drugs, escapist behavior) is MODERATION, not legislation. Making something illegal won't make it go away, it will just push it underground and make it more dangerous.
You pass the test..
After reading the responses, I see that most people here have no idea about the struggle we did go through, to try and get Shawn off of that game.
Shawn was not living at home during most of our struggle. He was an adult.
He became a different person, after he started playing Everquest.
I am a very "hands on" parent. We went to thereapists, I had him put in a group home and a Long Term Support program. I banned him from using my computer. I hid the modem and keyboard. He became a different person after he started playing Everqeust.
Understand, our organization is for people who have went overboard with the games and who are looking for help.
Gaming can be social, and fun for some people.
I get letters EVERY day from people looking for help, be it the parent, the spouse or the gamer. Gaming has ruined their lives. This DOES happen to some people. You all know it, just as well as I do.
There is no reason, that people who need help should be denied it, and be made fun of because of it.
My son is not the only person who died because of games. Here is an article about the "latest" death, that I have heard of:
http://www.nbc10.com/news/9824251/detail.html
Mother: Father Killed Child Over Video Game
Tyrone Spellman, 25, Faces Murder Charges And Others
POSTED: 7:27 pm EDT September 11, 2006
UPDATED: 12:52 pm EDT October 17, 2006
PHILADELPHIA -- A 25-year-old North Philadelphia man has been charged with killing his young daughter.
The mother said 17-month-old Alayiah was violently punched by Tyrone Spellman over a video game.
"My baby is gone at the hands of her father," Mia Turman said tearfully. "I have to put her in the ground, I shouldn't have to do this."
As the 21-year-old took a nap inside their row-home on the 1500 block of 29th Street, Turman left Alayiah in the care of Spellman, who also goes by the name Anwar Salahuddin.
Turman said that when she woke, "I asked why my baby not breathing. He says, 'She's breathing.' Her eyes were closed."
Turman phoned police around noon. Medics responded and took Alayiah to Temple University Hospital, where the little girl was pronounced dead at 12:37 p.m.
Police arrested Spellman, who lives on the 1500 block of North 29th Street, over the weekend.
He was charged with murder, endangering the welfare of a child and possessing an instrument of crime.
A medical examiner performed an autopsy on the child.
"His confession was she pulled the cords in the game, the system is -- the box itself -- fell, and he was upset and then responsible for paying for the game, so he hit her in her face twice," Turman said, adding that Spellman also allegedly slung the child over a chair.
Eight-months pregnant with another baby girl, Turman was struggling with how to cope. She said she fell in love with a man who had never been violent before, and she wanted to know what would possess someone to kill a child.
"You can't give me a good enough answer to say why you would kill your baby," Turman said.
The couple's second baby will be born with her dad charged with killing the sister she never met.
"I do not understand this. I will never understand this," Turman said.
NBC 10 reporter Deanna Durante said a note on the door of the North Philadelphia row-home Monday night said not to judge Spellman because he would never hurt a child.
Liz