New Parental Gaming Site Relies on Parents

New Parental Gaming Site Relies on Parents

January 15, 2008
Last year GamePolitics brought you news of a game content site aimed at parents.

Founded by former EGM editor John Davison and former Ziff-Davis colleague Ira Becker, What They Play aims to provide parents with "neutral, objective information" on games.

Yahoo! tech blogger Dory "The Mom" Devlin checked out What They Play at the recent Consumer Electronics Show (CES), and came away impressed. Combining game information and user-submitted review, Amazon.com sales charts, ESRB ratings, game categories, and age groups, the site works at being a complete resource for parents looking for information about any game, on any platform.

What wowed Devlin most was the community participation factor:
The real value of the site will be in the comments, where parents (and, obviously, anyone else) can ask questions of each other and post their opinions about the games.

CM: What They Play's information on games was surprisingly neutral and detailed. As an example, the info for Manhunt 2, described on Common Sense Media as "an appalling choice" and "a mediocre yet disgusting experience", was very descriptive, but made no judgment either way about the content. ESRB descriptors were expanded on, describing scenes, language, and actions that may have contributed to the ratings, and it even touched briefly on the controversy surrounding the rating. But I found it tried hard to stay neutral, aiming to provide as much information as possible to allow the parents to make the decision for themselves.

The only flaw I noticed in the community involvement theory was the idea that parents "vote" on age appropriateness for each game. Each game spouts a "Parents agree. [Game] is OK for kids over the age of : [age]". Somehow I doubt parents are voting for Manhunt 2 to be 14+...

- Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes

Comments

Looks to be a very helpful site in a similar vein to GamerDad. The value of the community participation factor will of course depend on the size of the community that sprouts around the site.
At last! We need sites like this.
If you have a sane and mature 14 year old(least mature enough to handle "media") then 14 is not that surprising, you also have to remember that film is much more graphic ad TV is nearly as graphic as well, if the game was uncut it would probably be shot up to 16-17.
I took a look at the Parents Approved age bit. It only goes to 17. Why is 18+ not the oldest age to choose. I mean, if a parent thinks that a game is not appropriate for any child of any age, why do they not have that option?

Not trying to criticize, but critique.

I like the site. I have not gone in depth into it, but I have looked around.
"Watchdog" websites are mainly subjective rather than objective, even though they'll never admit it. Then again, the target audience of places like "Common Sense Media" is the lowest common denominator-parents who can't or won't think for themselves.
see, there finally using the common sensor- THE PARENTS!
A certain lawyer claimed awhile back that John Davison is a whisteblower on the games industry because he made this site.
I'm kind of surprised that Johnny Bruce Thompson isn't trolling around here as usual.
@ gs2005

He's banned at the moment, I believe, what with the trial still going on.
Yeah, the community voting thing is not a good idea. Just another poll for Anonymous to mess with.
....Like this maters? its not that parents arnt given a chance to find these things out its that they choose not to

Sarcastic Gamer did a little story about it a little bit ago
http://sarcasticgamer.com/wp/index.php/2008/01/too-simple-for-parents.ht...
@MonkeyFace:

This is a pretty good clearing house for finding out "these things" if they choose to. After all, the ESRB descriptors on the box, though more detailed than film descriptors, can still be elaborated upon so that parents can truly understand what's going on in a game in as much detail as possible.

I have no idea what your beef with this website is, not at all.
to tell the truth I'm rather pleased with this site. while the reviews written on the site seems sometimes to exaggerate how violent some games are. like this excerpt from the CoD4 review:

"Bullets tear through body armor and into flesh, explosions throw combatants around like rag dolls, and corpses litter the battlefield in the aftermath of each skirmish."

while anyone who's played CoD4 knows that the blood only shows if the person getting shot is standing directly adjacent to a wall, and even then its nothing more than a simple blood decal on the wall that fades after a few minutes, and a grenade exploding at your feet only throws you back.

For the most part though they stick to a very literal interpretation of what is actually in the game.

we've all heard the many people claiming that the popular game
Mass Effect has a explicitly graphic sex scene, and you can even have
a homosexual sex scene (heh that sounded funny). While lawyers, politicians, and online "journalist"

(I quote journalist because while a journalist is supposed to do research on his or her subject. All to often online "journalist" in place of actually doing research they simply jump to conclusions, make up "facts" and start the article with the preconceived notion of 'all games are bad, and game developers want nothing more than to ""corrupt todays youth"")

Anyway, while most of the recent articles that have been posted here on GP about Mass Effect have been some lawyers, politicians, and online "journalist" personal crusade against sex in games and how this game has been marketed to little 15 year old boys and now their little minds are ruined because they saw about 10-15 seconds of bare HIP.

Needless to say I was surprised when the review from "What They Play" had this to say of the scene

"While described as “the sex scene” by anyone that’s heard of it, what the player actually sees is little more than the naked hips of one of the female characters as she moves up the body of her lover. The scene then fades to black."

in the same paragraph the author goes on to say that in order for you to even get the option of sex in the game you have to create a relationship between characters in the game and continue it through out the entire course of the game. The Author also notes that it is entirely up to the player to chose to or not to pursue a relationship.

all and all i was glad to see a site that was honest and even the reviews of the parents were very fact-based and truthful
I would find it better if they brought review averages from metacritic or gamerankings.com.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am
Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am
Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am
JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Login or register to post shouts