New Parental Gaming Site Relies on Parents

New Parental Gaming Site Relies on Parents

January 15, 2008
Last year GamePolitics brought you news of a game content site aimed at parents.

Founded by former EGM editor John Davison and former Ziff-Davis colleague Ira Becker, What They Play aims to provide parents with "neutral, objective information" on games.

Yahoo! tech blogger Dory "The Mom" Devlin checked out What They Play at the recent Consumer Electronics Show (CES), and came away impressed. Combining game information and user-submitted review, Amazon.com sales charts, ESRB ratings, game categories, and age groups, the site works at being a complete resource for parents looking for information about any game, on any platform.

What wowed Devlin most was the community participation factor:
The real value of the site will be in the comments, where parents (and, obviously, anyone else) can ask questions of each other and post their opinions about the games.

CM: What They Play's information on games was surprisingly neutral and detailed. As an example, the info for Manhunt 2, described on Common Sense Media as "an appalling choice" and "a mediocre yet disgusting experience", was very descriptive, but made no judgment either way about the content. ESRB descriptors were expanded on, describing scenes, language, and actions that may have contributed to the ratings, and it even touched briefly on the controversy surrounding the rating. But I found it tried hard to stay neutral, aiming to provide as much information as possible to allow the parents to make the decision for themselves.

The only flaw I noticed in the community involvement theory was the idea that parents "vote" on age appropriateness for each game. Each game spouts a "Parents agree. [Game] is OK for kids over the age of : [age]". Somehow I doubt parents are voting for Manhunt 2 to be 14+...

- Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes

Comments

Looks to be a very helpful site in a similar vein to GamerDad. The value of the community participation factor will of course depend on the size of the community that sprouts around the site.
At last! We need sites like this.
If you have a sane and mature 14 year old(least mature enough to handle "media") then 14 is not that surprising, you also have to remember that film is much more graphic ad TV is nearly as graphic as well, if the game was uncut it would probably be shot up to 16-17.
I took a look at the Parents Approved age bit. It only goes to 17. Why is 18+ not the oldest age to choose. I mean, if a parent thinks that a game is not appropriate for any child of any age, why do they not have that option?

Not trying to criticize, but critique.

I like the site. I have not gone in depth into it, but I have looked around.
"Watchdog" websites are mainly subjective rather than objective, even though they'll never admit it. Then again, the target audience of places like "Common Sense Media" is the lowest common denominator-parents who can't or won't think for themselves.
see, there finally using the common sensor- THE PARENTS!
A certain lawyer claimed awhile back that John Davison is a whisteblower on the games industry because he made this site.
I'm kind of surprised that Johnny Bruce Thompson isn't trolling around here as usual.
@ gs2005

He's banned at the moment, I believe, what with the trial still going on.
Yeah, the community voting thing is not a good idea. Just another poll for Anonymous to mess with.
....Like this maters? its not that parents arnt given a chance to find these things out its that they choose not to

Sarcastic Gamer did a little story about it a little bit ago
http://sarcasticgamer.com/wp/index.php/2008/01/too-simple-for-parents.ht...
@MonkeyFace:

This is a pretty good clearing house for finding out "these things" if they choose to. After all, the ESRB descriptors on the box, though more detailed than film descriptors, can still be elaborated upon so that parents can truly understand what's going on in a game in as much detail as possible.

I have no idea what your beef with this website is, not at all.
to tell the truth I'm rather pleased with this site. while the reviews written on the site seems sometimes to exaggerate how violent some games are. like this excerpt from the CoD4 review:

"Bullets tear through body armor and into flesh, explosions throw combatants around like rag dolls, and corpses litter the battlefield in the aftermath of each skirmish."

while anyone who's played CoD4 knows that the blood only shows if the person getting shot is standing directly adjacent to a wall, and even then its nothing more than a simple blood decal on the wall that fades after a few minutes, and a grenade exploding at your feet only throws you back.

For the most part though they stick to a very literal interpretation of what is actually in the game.

we've all heard the many people claiming that the popular game
Mass Effect has a explicitly graphic sex scene, and you can even have
a homosexual sex scene (heh that sounded funny). While lawyers, politicians, and online "journalist"

(I quote journalist because while a journalist is supposed to do research on his or her subject. All to often online "journalist" in place of actually doing research they simply jump to conclusions, make up "facts" and start the article with the preconceived notion of 'all games are bad, and game developers want nothing more than to ""corrupt todays youth"")

Anyway, while most of the recent articles that have been posted here on GP about Mass Effect have been some lawyers, politicians, and online "journalist" personal crusade against sex in games and how this game has been marketed to little 15 year old boys and now their little minds are ruined because they saw about 10-15 seconds of bare HIP.

Needless to say I was surprised when the review from "What They Play" had this to say of the scene

"While described as “the sex scene” by anyone that’s heard of it, what the player actually sees is little more than the naked hips of one of the female characters as she moves up the body of her lover. The scene then fades to black."

in the same paragraph the author goes on to say that in order for you to even get the option of sex in the game you have to create a relationship between characters in the game and continue it through out the entire course of the game. The Author also notes that it is entirely up to the player to chose to or not to pursue a relationship.

all and all i was glad to see a site that was honest and even the reviews of the parents were very fact-based and truthful
I would find it better if they brought review averages from metacritic or gamerankings.com.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 10/06/08 at 08:43am
Paulrus: 1up.com just reported that MadWorld may not seee release in "censor-heavy" countries like Australia, Germany, and even Japan. http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3170362
Posted 10/06/08 at 07:28am
Austin_Lewis: they're all about a month old, but if they do it again, I'll be sure to post the link here
Posted 10/06/08 at 06:41am
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : Hold up, Austin. Can we have the link to that Yahoo! Story?
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:26am
Austin_Lewis: I've been reading on yahoo things I read on here three days earlier, nearly word for word. I've insulted the writers, too.
Posted 10/05/08 at 09:29pm
PHOENIXZERO: @Austin_Lewis Just watched the video, I like how they mention Australia banning violent games and then show a list of games that includes some that weren't violent. <_< Think they could have given GP a little more credit too.
Posted 10/05/08 at 08:52pm
gamepolitics: Plus, with Yahoo's huge traffic, if they want to steer some peeps to GP I'm okay with that, too! ;-)
Posted 10/05/08 at 08:51pm
gamepolitics: thx, Austin, but it seems to be more along the lines of fair use.
Posted 10/05/08 at 08:16pm
Austin_Lewis: My link is to yahoo's playback or whatever they're calling it, which nearly always shows a gamepolitics article and seems to
Posted 10/05/08 at 08:15pm
Austin_Lewis: plagarize Gamepolitics' works and use his site, maybe without his permission. I just felt he ought be informed of it.
Posted 10/05/08 at 08:03pm
J.Alpha.Gamma: This is an interesting read: http://www.gameinformer.com/News/Story/200810/N08.1001.1532.23011.htm?Page=1
Posted 10/05/08 at 03:34pm
Haggard: Far Cry 2 and Fallout 3 in under 3 weeks now :D :D
Posted 10/05/08 at 03:09pm
Austin_Lewis: HEY DENNIS, CHECK THE LINK: http://videogames.yahoo.com/events/playback/playback-13/1246552
Posted 10/05/08 at 10:19am
HarmlessBunny: @black manta: Certainly felt like I did when I had a flu earlier this week :\
Posted 10/05/08 at 09:58am
black manta: "You have died of dysentery." ;)
Posted 10/04/08 at 09:06pm
DarkTetsuya: EZK: all that's missing is the 'rearview mirror' image he posted some time ago
Posted 10/04/08 at 07:30pm
VideolandHero: I prefer Oregon Trail.
Posted 10/04/08 at 07:08pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : BORING DAY IS EVIL
Posted 10/04/08 at 04:07pm
King of Fiji: @Ghede: Holy crap you just brought back nostalgia by mentioning that game. T_TT
Posted 10/04/08 at 03:19pm
Ghede: Number munchers is the only school game for me. MUNCH THOSE NUMBERS.
Posted 10/04/08 at 11:21am
ZippyDSMlee: nighstalker160:an industry that lives on selling crap to witless sheeple.
Login or register to post shouts