
There's good news and bad news about
Telegraph columnist Jim White.
The good news is that White has criticized the nanny state approach to dealing with video games which he sees looming with next month's release of TV shrink Tanya Byron's (left) British
government-sponsored report.
The bad new is that he seems to support banning certain games and buys into the "games are kid stuff" stereotype. White writes:
Tanya Byron... is the latest of [Prime Minister] Gordon Brown's battalion of advisers to add to the incipient condition of panic gripping our daily lives...
The issue here is a pretty simple one: legislate fiercely to ensure that the uglier, nastier, sadistic end of the games market cannot gain distribution and then step back and stop worrying about the rest.
Ms Byron's report has not yet been released, but it seems from pre-publication leaks that she takes a different approach, one that will involve nannying ourselves into a state of sustained alarm about the nature of these games...
Here comes the stereotyping:
[Games] are overwhelmingly the preserve of adolescent boys... as yet no one has conclusively proved that playing games damages your health. Since we occasionally hear of some maniac shooting up his high school in middle America after a marathon session on some gory game, the assumption is they are entirely corrupting.
But in such cases it is more the easy availability of real guns, rather than their virtual counterparts, that lies at the heart of the problem.
Comments
Thou art old. Tell the wankers that you play games too, and we might get somewhere.
What they are trying to do is nitpick what their adult populace can do, they should relax and let "the boxing tits" alone(sex and violence) stick with kiddy porn,snuff films and weapons building(?).
That or do what the Japanese do and censor porn.....0-o
Seriously how can anyone condemn a nanny state while simultaneously suggesting the state censors games? One or the other, it cannot be both.
Oh and it's nearly a decade since I was a teen, that goes for my gamer girlfriend too... stereotypes are so tedious.
Gift.
Sixty-seven percent of American heads of households play computer and video games.
The average game player is 33 years old and has been playing games for 12 years.
Thirty-eight percent of all game players are women. In fact, women over the age of 18 represent a significantly greater portion of the game-playing population (31%) than boys age 17 or younger (20%).
In 2007, 24 percent of Americans over the age of 50 played video games, an increase from nine percent in 1999.
"legislate fiercely to ensure that the uglier, nastier, sadistic end of the games market cannot gain distribution and then step back and stop worrying about the rest."
Isn't that being a nanny state? I mean who decides which are the uglier, nastier, sadistic ones? Him? Or buh-dah-buh! The STATE!
Didn't expect to see that there.
-P
Really? Did he really just write that? Would he care to cite these occasions?
He's a pretentious jackass who shouldn't be allowed near a typewriter, let alone a computer and the internet. If he's so completely unable to understand the topic that he's writing about and to do the tiniest bit of research then he shouldn't speak in a public forum and his editor should fire him or, at the very least, refuse to publish this baseless crap.
So, no matter what, gamers are going to always lose an argument.
While he gets the assumptions wrong about gamers as many often do, at lest he acknowledges where the real problem lies.
"While he gets the assumptions wrong about gamers as many often do, at lest he acknowledges where the real problem lies."
Not really. As much as it would be easy to say "it's the prevalence of guns, stupid", it's deeper than that. There are so many factors.
Oh, spare me, Mr. White. Guns can do nothing without some whacked-up nut job pulling the trigger. What need is to watch for the signs and conditions that produce the kind of psychopaths that will shoot up a school.
Guns don't kill people
Gamers with guns kill people.
Though I like her assertion that video games are not the problem, I don't blame guns either. I agree with Jabrwock that this is a multi-faceted issue that no one has taken the time to explore.
i doubt that it will be allowed.
The UK seems to hate rockstar
What a nice way of saying "A oppressive, controlling, tyrannical police state"
I was going to go off on a huge point here about society, violence, etc., but then decided I just don't have the heart at the moment. Screw it. They never learn.
Not to sound like an echo or anything, but I really would appreciate at least some research being done by the journalists before they put pen to paper. It's this central assumption that forms the basis for all the erroneous and fatuous opinions expressed in this article. It's also pompous and more than a little patronising, even if it were true (which it isn't).
What can we do? Journalists like this don't even want to be educated - it seems they'd much rather just reach for the low hanging, out-of-date stereotypes. I dount they even pay much attention to their own comments field.
I just console myself that by 2015 or thereabouts, gaming will have become an accepted part of mainstream British culture by dint of it's sheert pervasiveness. That's not to say, though, that I don't find the bumps along the way uncomfortable in the extreme.
Anyway, here we go again:
@ Americans: Ignore his poorly expressed opinions on gun control - he's just playing to the choir, so to speak.
@ Zerodash: "Pretend"? Is this where we have to go into the whole schpiel on respecting other people's cultural values even if you don't agree with them? Again?
@ Shaesco: You rwalise that GTA4 is a British-made game, right? Scottish, to be exact.
@ Hawkeye: The only British newspaper wiorth its salt is The Independent IMHO, feel free to use the rest as loo roll.
Whcih is bizarre as the Guardian, Herald and teh Scotsman are all fairly Gamer-friendly. (it's a relative concept sadly)
Britain has a gun problem insofar as owning a gun is illegal (except in very rare circumstances, like farmers) and yet we still have horrible gun crime - especially within young, urban ethnic minorities. But you're right - there are more incidents of aggravated assault with a knife than there are of street shootings.
"Is this where we have to go into the whole schpiel on respecting other people’s cultural values even if you don’t agree with them?"
I do not appreciate your continuing attempts to silence critics by way of politically-correct appeals to respect for cultural diversity.
We should respect those cultural values that are worthy of respect, but none others. Some values are not worth defending. Let us never become so tolerant of other people's cultural values that we tolerate indefensible policies.
that makes them the perfect example
Whilst I'm sure a simple "fuck off" would suffice, allow me to explain my position. There are many areas of American culture that I (and I would imagine I'm not the only one) find abhorrent, but I don't feel it necessary to either rub it in your face or cast aspersions as to your character every time I have the opportunity to do so. It's impolite and it doesn't serve to further intelligent discourse.
Once you can come back to me with a conclusive argument on what makes you so incredibly sure that your beliefs accurately reflect what is and what is not objective morality, then I'd be happy to chat with you until the cows come home. Until then, I for one would greatly prefer these comments fields were free from under-researched jingoism.
I think you may have a point there, mores the pity. If only Westmister would realise what an artistic and economic goldmine they were sitting on, then maybe they wouldn't be so reactionary.
hind sight is 20/20(I hope i spelled that right)
hind sight is 20/20(I hope i spelled that right)
for the sake of arguement lets say that is does lead to a ban on video games of all kinds?
What happens to the gamers there?
That won't happen though. I could ask you what would happen if the US banned alcohol. The Magna Carta might not be as easy a read as the Constitution but the UK still has a guarantee that the government won't stiff the people.
I'm tired of feeling like I need to defend the UK all the time. It's not a perfect country, and people are chipping away at the civil liberties of its citizens (highest CCTV-to-people ration in Europe, looming national identity cards, etc.) but that's hardly a reason to come down on it so much all the time. The UK has some slightly more restrictive laws than the US does, but freedom is not an "all or nothing" concept. See also: DMCA, PATRIOT, extraordinary renditition.
I hope you're wearing asbestos underwear...
a)they did ban alcohol
b)Im not slamming the UK. I was saying what happens if a country bans video games and the only reason i used the UK as an example because thats where the article came from
c)You never actually answered my question. I wanted to know what you thought would happen if it did.
a) Quite. What if they did it again? Would it work any better this time?
c) Mass bans on games would be protested by the public, the industry, and other government members and bodies. It could happen but would not last. The UK has more wiggle room than the US for introducing stupid laws.
b) I know you're not, and I'm sorry if it sounded like I was sounding off against you. It was more disdain at seeing a UK-based article in the RSS feed and already knowing what 30% of the comment thread would be about. Time for a table!
US: Bans on any example of any media deemed unconstitutional. Games sometimes censored or heavily targeted when sex is involved (e.g. Fahrenheit/Indigo Prophecy, Mass Effect). Much lolling and money wasting when someone suggests a ban.
UK: Some media may be restricted for sale if it fails BBFC tests, but ownership is OK. Bans are appealed and generally lifted, or followed with tedious to-ing and fro-ing in the news and Westminster.
Germany: Games may be censored for particularly brutal or mid-1900's content. Citizens import.
China: Personal freedom is so hot-button that a sentence on a GP comment thread really can't do it justice.
City 17: Total ban on video games. Citizens not overly pleased with the decision; attempts made to go outside and play old-fashioned sports tend to result in violent beatings.
Can't. British health and safety regulations have removed my freedom to wear asbestos underwear as it constitutes a risk to myself and others around me. So I'm going commando instead.
Fact 3 -The average game player is 33 years old and has been playing games for 12 years.
Fact 8- Thirty-eight percent of all game players are women
wow.. guess we arent all adolescent boys are we. Nice you did your research Jim White
a)Of course not. most politicans drink heavily
c) if there are protest would the government use armed force to keep control?
c) I doubt it would be like that, but yes. Restriction of liberties tends to result in that sort of thing. As does having more than three British people outside together at any one time. It would be pleasantly ironic to violently protest a ban on violent games too, so I'm sure the public would jump at the chance.
You both have very little grasp of the soul-crushing policies of Labour. We're far too demoralised to do anything against them.
The Tories and the Lib Dems on the other hand.. That could make for a very interesting situation.
This is why we gotta fight for net neutrality. If you disconnect everyone on the internet for downloading something illegal, I could make for certain that about 75% of the people who populate the internet would be disconnected.
Althou, if you think about it, this is the tightest part of the crap tunnel gamers have to go through to be accepted as an art and a medium that can be left alone, like movies or music. I think in a few years, games will stop taking so much flak. The retaliation of the Mass Effect story is a good start for gamers to start sticking up for themselves, but now more then ever, we need to stop playing defense and go on the offensive on these unlawful and unconstitutional movements on the industry we love and support.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/state_of_play/html/1.st...
I think he and well need to read this (again)
This is the moist current I have (from 2005).
It clearly shows that in the UK the average gamer now is around 30+ or a little older and that women also play games.
-ehm-
Most gamers that do a lot pirating etc. (not a recommendation, though!) will know to to work around such a ban from the government if they indeed sut their internet down. Just like the people who pirate the games still do it, regardless of what ever draconian efforts taken to prevent them from doing it. (still not a recommendation, though).
I don't how see how it would be possible to do what they're suggested - disconnecting people that doesn't do as the state tells them to do. Are we becoming much more like China each passing day?!? I hope not.
/Karsten
i loose IQ points every time
I would comment on the article but theres so much contradiction I don;t feel like pointing them out...I have enough time doing it with my own trains of thought...
and there goes another of the tracks....
Yeah, I know, right? If video games get banned, there are only gonna be people who work around that and will get them anyway. Honestly, politicians need to update their information and stop being misinformed d-bags.
Would you spare me all the BS about cultural sensitivity if I were British instead of American?
I'm sorry you feel it's impolite, but I honestly don't care. If you think about it long enough, this is not so much about the UK as it is about *any* government's alleged right to restrict their citizens access to expressive media. You are free to take refuge behind the notion of cultural sensitivity, but doing so gets us no closer to the facts about the merits of regulating video games.
Quit focusing so much on nationality and culture, and focus instead on the issue at hand.
When has that happened? Never in the history of school shootings has anyone said the killer(s) played videogames right before the shooting. I have heard that the Columbine shooters went bowling just before the incident, though.
Methinks you enjoy stirring us up since this isn't the first time something like this has happened.
I doubt they would even understand the point of Metal Gear and how, ironically enough, it's pretty anti-war when you understand hat the game is trying to say.
@Zippy
Like that would do anything. Althou it was kinda funny when one of the characters in Bible Black goes "with no mosaic, obviously."
About 30-50% of new hentai video is censored in japan and released stateside in a uncensored state, Japanese Porn is censored twice as much if not more thats why the underground stuff took off because its uncensored.
Censored(mosaic) porn is the most oxymoronic divide by zero stuff I have ever seen.
Father Time
because she wont let off on the subject and furthers misconceptions over it.
Also understanding that no matter what they say, those people in the media will never understand videogames...
Britain is currently in the crisis of the government losing the trust of the police due to pay rises which didn't happen(the police are meant to be given pay rises in accordance to the findings of an independent review which the government promises to follow but now haven't due to giving themselves a pay rise) and the realisation that the parents and education system have failed miserably at giving the youth a sense of culpability, mixed in with media hype. Nevermind the fact we messed up when it came to the fine details of human rights (yes humans have rights but the whole system in britain has become silly due to citizens having less rights than the criminals). We are also in the grip of a compensation culture where the criminals are more likely to sue the victims. Thus meaning the populace have lost faith in the government, prompting the government to create illogical laws to try and appease the situation.
"Ya know guns are not the problem take them away from sane people and insane people will still find a way to have them the black market will not disspaer the day you take the guns away."
yeah but that argument fails on the fact that if you treated everything like that, say for example drugs. If for instance we apply that logic we'd have to legalise all drugs because just on the rationale people can obtain them illegally anyway. BAD IDEA. it still makes it HARDER for them to get hold of an item if it is illegal. And (IMO) any method put into place to make it harder will have SOME effect (not total eradication but a step in the right direction)
i thought at the end of teh article he said
"That's usually what happens with kids and computer games: they grow out of them."
.. i mean i find the fact that the media repeatedly misrepresent a group, whilst claiming knowledge, is an important issue :S
(sorry if you meant the actual womans report instead! may have got wrong end of stick!)
When did 30 become old?! Life expectancy has risen considerably since my Birthdaye. Thirtye is ye newe fifteene. :P
And I've tried telling anti-game-paranoids that I'm a gamer, it makes no difference I'm afraid. If anything, the response is to view me as an immature moron.
The only compensation for enduring this snobbery is watching the gaggle of contradicting emotions play across the offending person's face (as they try to reconcile my age with their prejudice). It gets even more fun when I tell them my Dad is a gamer too (nearly 60) he's a real armchair general which is great as it makes Christmas and birthday presents easy :D
Gift.
When I make 30, 40 is old. When I make 40, 50 is old. And so on.
To answer your question, it is, because i'm not there yet. Fucking 26 is old.
That hurt, you bastard.
No she talks about her adventures as a kid torturing ants and plastic army soldiers, she then says that if those games existed back then they would simply replace those activities and that it wouldn't be a big deal.
:D