Read Florida Supreme Court's Show Cause Order to Jack Thompson

Read Florida Supreme Court's Show Cause Order to Jack Thompson

February 23, 2008
In recent days GamePolitics has been tracking a drastic disciplinary step taken by the Florida Supreme Court against controversial attorney Jack Thompson.

Based on the court's February 19th order to Thompson (see: Florida Supreme Court Comes Down Hard on Jack Thompson), it appears that, pending a final decision by the Court, the anti-game violence activist may no longer be permitted to file motions with the Court. Rather, he would be required to have another lawyer file on his behalf.

This is problematic for Thompson's culture crusade for two reasons. The first is financial. When Thompson works pro se, that is, on his own behalf, he spends no money on legal fees. Some obersvers would, of course, say one gets what one pays for. But beyond that, Thompson files so many motions with so many courts and agencies that using the services of another lawyer could become quite costly.

And, of course, there is the question of whether another lawyer would be willing to take on Thompson's case.

A bizarre motion submitted by Thompson to the Supreme Court in December appears to have been the final straw for the justices. Described by Thompson as a children's picture book for adults, the document is, essentially, a rant with digital images attached. Obviously, the justices didn't take kindly to Thompson's submission, as the "picture book" gets prominent mention in Tuesday's show cause order:
One of Mr. Thompson's recent filings contains what Mr. Thompson refers to as a "children's picture book for adults" that rehashes his previous arguments in illustrated form that he believes was necessary due to "the Court's inability to comprehend" his arguments.

The full text of the Florida Supreme Court's order to Thompson is here (PDF).

Comments

Um...FINALLY.
Jack isn't going to use his wife unless he's totally insane. Sure he saves on filing fees... then she (quite likely) gets disbarred - and his household has gone from two lawyers' incomes to none in the space of a few months.

I can't see a guy like that flipping burgers for a living and anyway if I were the manager of McDonalds I wouldn't hire him.. he'd scare the customers.
@Al Wesker

The question would be would the other lawyer be willing to risk their reputation working with this, being.
@simon roberts
lol good one

im surprised they didnt hold him in contempt of court
Does anyone see any way Thompson might be able to get out of this? I don't want to get my hopes up if this turns out to be a bust.
trust me jack will be disbarred it cant be avoided now even the bar association journal is taking notice of his actions
@Questionmark

And as I said, any lawyer to do so would be risking their reputation
this is jack finishing his resume for faux news nothing more
And this was the 'ammo' he'd been given to him to allow him to prove the legal system wrong? I think its time we all come to the conclusion that JT isn't playing with a full deck of cards. ;)
I have a friend who Jacko is pretty smart.


He also believes that Bush did 9/11 and that Clinton was the greatest president ever.
Who knew.


Smell ya later, Jacko.
@cullarn

So, that why he tried to push assault charges on Janet Reno for touching his shoulder? Good lord.
@Steven Furtado

yup needless to say the courts saw it for what it was and refused to hear any arguements thompson was a huge ass about the campaign

and if you really want to be scared look up janet reno ion wikipedia and check the cases she oversaw!!!

jacky boy handling those, the country would have been blown to smithereens on his watch lol
Finally....Thank you judge....THANK YOU!.....
This is the response that Jackie boy has given to the court
Happy reading


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
THE FLORIDA BAR,

Complainant,

v. Case Numbers SC 07 - 80 and 07- 354

JOHN B. THOMPSON,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT’S
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Comes now respondent John B. Thompson (Thompson) and provides this court with a preliminary response to its show cause order of February 19, 2008, with a more detailed response to follow prior to the court’s March 5 deadline, noting:
Thompson deeply appreciates, more than this court could ever know, its show cause order as it opens the door to Thompson’s seeking and receiving relief from the federal courts.
The federal court system dismissed Thompson’s prior suit on abstention grounds, stating that Thompson had an “adequate state remedy” to seek redress for any infringement of rights by The Bar and by this Supreme Court that is supposed to oversee and remedy the misdeeds of The Bar.
This court’s panicked threat against Thompson, apparently stemming in part from the court’s having been caught by Thompson not complying with Florida Statute 876.05 (Loyalty Oath Law), has wonderfully proven not just that Thompson has no “adequate state remedy” but that he has no state remedy at all. This court threatens Thompson if he even files this pleading. This is a brazen attempt by this court to repeal the absolute right of every citizen, under the First Amendment, to “petition the government for a redress” of grievances.
This court’s misstep exquisitely proves his point to a federal tribunal that it no more understands the First Amendment than it understands the legal and constitutional issues on which it was so grandly reversed in Bush v. Gore.
Thompson has Fifth, Sixth, Fourteenth, and First Amendment rights that this court’s show cause order wildly infringes upon. Thompson has a right to represent himself in traffic court and before this court. Thompson is a competent lawyer with 31 years of continuous good standing within The Bar who has a string of victories against powerful corporate interests—the very interests who filed these SLAPP Bar complaints.
Ted Bundy, for Heaven’s sake, was not even a lawyer, and yet he was allowed to represent himself in this state within its courts. Thompson, who has committed no crime but whose “sin” is that he has waged a successful campaign against the very porn industry that helped train Bundy to kill, is being petulantly threatened by this court that he is to be muzzled and denied access to this state court. Nonsense.
US Supreme Court Justice Douglas in Lathrop v. Donohue warned that integrated state bars would eventually become “goose-stepping brigades.” This court has confirmed that those brigade are now here in this state and that this court is brazenly leading them. This court is free to enter a show cause order against the ghosts of Justices Douglas and of all the US Supreme Court Justices who handed down Keller v. State Bar of California
if it likes. Even King Canute knew he could not order the tide not to come in.
All this court with its panicked show cause threat has accomplished is handed Thompson the keys to the federal courthouse. Abstention is out the window, thanks to this High Court.
What “adequate state remedy” does any citizen have, let alone a lawyer have, when the very court that has negligently failed to oversee The Bar threatens a whistleblower with retribution because he dares to keep blowing the whistle?
This court has threatened Thompson. He does not threaten back. He hereby informs this court that he will see it in federal court. This court has just thrown Brer Rabbit into the briar patch.
Thank you so very, very much.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this has been provided this February 20 2008, to Bar staff counsel Sheila Tuma, to Kenneth Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation for The Bar, to Dava Tunis, and to all Bar Governors as well as to Bar President Frank Angones.
Dennis, the link to the PDF's giving me a 404...
They must be just so tired of his crap to try and put so much in his way.
Oh, I think Jack wouldn't have any problem findin' a lawyer to support his cause. You can always find someone to agree with you.
Well, considering other Florida based lawyers such as Norm Kent and Tom Buscaglia (is that right?) have said JT is basically a laughing stock among lawyers in Florida I would imagine he'd have a very hard time finding someone to sign off on his stuff.
jacks in twouble.
It's easy to see what Jack's real problem is - his middle name is Bruce. That can cause untold psychological damage.
I mean it's like Cecil or Humphrey. The years of torment over it must have driven him completely bonkers.
Lol, Jack - it's not that they don't understand your arguments, it's that your arguments lack merit!
isint his wife a lawyer?

so wouldnt he just get her to file them for him?
Oh jacky boy, the Feds,
The feds are calling
*bagpipe*

Also, Pix might have a point. He could just make his wife do it if she is also a lawyer.
@pix: The last JT thread discussed that very possibility - that his wife could sign his filings on his behalf.
Also, the courts are trying to limit JT's ability to waste the court's time. By knowingly being party to JT's continued abuse of the courts the wife would be just as guilty as JT himself on this matter, and she'd potentially also be exposed to disciplinary sanctions. There's also the obvious conflict of interest - in professions such as these you avoid situations that present even the illusion of conflict of interest, even if, say, she legitimately thought JT's filings did have merit. So doing so may also expose her to ethics violations.
Thanks for clearing that up Benji

I dint go through the posts in any sort of detail so was not aware that it was bought up...
How am I supposed to understand this order? There's no pictures!
See how they did that Jack? Simple, straight to the point and backed by facts. No gay porn, kagaroos or other nonsense and rambling inserted int there.
Wow thats is hilarous.
This has been a long time coming. Kudos to the Florida Supreme Court for finally sticking it to him as others should have done a long time ago.
Jack believs that he is the most important person in the world- why would he care that his spamming of the legal system denys other people access?

He managed to get out of the gay porn thing, so the same will probably happen here...until he spams the court again.
This may be bad, If Jack can't sue, the anti game crusade will find another that is less crazy and more able to get people on his side
OMFGWTFBBQ? This is gettin better and better. I can´t wait to see the end of this circus, even if he manage to save his sorry ass from this.

I can imagine him, thinking about himself like Jesus against Poncio Pilatus or King Herodes.
you just cost me $6000. Jack.
@RevenChrist

If they could find someone less crazy I'm sure they would've all ready done so.
@ Benji

It still wouldn't surprise me if he tried to bring her down with him. His son's already been used as a tool to him before...
@Gaffit:

Like he did with the pornographic filing in Judge Jordan's case, he may well dodge the bullet. First, he was slimy enough to sue the Supremes. That may well tinge the situation for the Court -- who may not want to appear retaliatory or to be otherwise unfairly or innappropriately responding to Mr. Thompson. Second, conditioning a litigant's free access to the courts is a pretty drastic -- but prefectly legitimate, given the circumstances -- sanction, which I doubt the Court will impose lightly. But, then again, Jack's left them little choice.
"That may well tinge the situation for the Court — who may not want to appear retaliatory or to be otherwise unfairly"

Funny, I think most of the time he's after just that reaction.
Yes! {^_^}
I think it's also worth noting that JT got out of the gay porn filing by saying something to the extent of, "whoops, my bad, won't happen again." And if that were the case, I think it's fair that he didn't get slapped with contempt. But, well, he is doing it again. Maybe not with gay porn, but he is filing lots of irrelevant materials and is basically insulting the court system. JT can only reasonably expect so many second chances before the court system gets tired of his antics.
Maybe his wife is such a wonderful lawyer and a good person, and the court don´t want to fire her housband for respect to her.

The woman must be a saint.
well i believe he could get his wife to file for him, as this would still save him in legal fee's, however, there would likely be a serious cut back in his amount of filing, and she would review all of his filing, as it's going in with her name on it to, and could be potentially damaging to her career, personally i think he realizes that his practice is in the toilet, and he doesn't think it can seriously drop much lower, so he's pulling out all the stops (lets be honest, he's a lawyer up for disbarment, what are they going to do when he goes slightly overboard? fire him? i think his current tactic is annoy them into saying that it isn't worth the effort and just let him off the hook

however, when there is the potential of someone else going down in flames with him (especially a loved one such as his wife) he will likely reign it in quite a bit
@Rodrigo Ybáñez García

She has the patience of one.
Huh, who would have thought that insulting the court's level of intellect with pictures would piss them off so badly?

I think his wife intentionally distances herself from him and his shenanigans. I suspect she values her career too much to let Jacky drag her down.
here's hoping we're looking at the straw that breaks the proverbial camel's proverbial back

in all seriousness though, can he seriously expect that document to not be an insult to the courts? the guy's freaking insane
@Selby: THe conflict of interest derails any hopes that JT will be able to file for free. If anything, this development is straining his marriage because when his career goes in the crapper, her career might be okay, but have her husband's shadow looming over head.

I honestly feel sorry for JT's son. He goes to school and any gamer friend with half a brain will tell him his father's insane and he comes home to that insanity. Granted, if the sting operations are any clue, he probably loves his father and is very loyal to him, but I can't help but wonder if any Teenager with a dad like that is just going to stop caring. Of, I'm sure that JT's son is a great kid who crosses every every T and dots every i, but then again I've never met any member of the Thompson clan.

If I ever met JT in person, I bet he's probably a very good, intelligent orator(He is a lawyer for goodness sake) and we'd get along fine until we talked about games, where he'd blame it for everything and I'd disagree, remaining calm and Buddhist-like while his face turns red and he accuses me of being a serial killer in VR training. I could really make him angry because if I knew before hand that I could meet him I'd point out every logical fallacy he makes in real time, quote his own words back to him and count how many times he's shouted at me.

But then again, I'm also a person who still looks forward to the day he gets disbarred because from me he'd probably get a hand delivered basket full of Peanuts.
inability to comprehend? i mean, i dont know what a monkey is saying when he's flinging shit at me, but i know that he's having a hissy fit. now replace "a monkey" with jack thompson.
It's unlikely Jack will manage to get out of this one. He managed to squeeze out of the last one with a warning. This time, he's been specifically warned against the behavior listed in the show cause order. The legal filing equivalent of a child smashing their room in a temper tantrum is just the last straw. The court is fed up with Jack wasting their time and money simply because he's incapable of sitting and waiting.

Nearly all of Jack's current problems with the Florida Bar could have likely been avoided if he'd just kept quiet and accept a slap on the wrist and a forced "vacation". But instead, he just won't shut up, refuses to accept any responsibility for his actions, refuses to accept that he's managed to step over the line, and demands that anyone that dares to suggest that he's acted improper, or done anything wrong be silenced and punished.
the reason Thompson deserves disbarment (and, in my opinion, to be left by his wife, stripped of Earth citizenship, and hurtled into the cold, vacuum of space) is because he cannot and will not accept a lick of responsibility.

everyone else is wrong except Thompson, in his eyes. and since he did such a fine job of paying a shrink to say he's "sane" it means he's immoral and doesn't have the level of professionalism that is required of lawyers.
@Conejo

You've met a Lawyer with Morals?
Jack screws himself over, hilarity ensues.
this is one huge victory for us gamers in this war
but lets not get cocky
Nice. They got their point across quite clearly (precedence allows for people who constantly waste the court's time to be sanctioned), and they didn't have to use a single picture!
I doubt his wife has anything to do with this. It seems like there are certain legal "walls" preventing her from doing anything or having -any- effect, be it negative or positive, for Jack or anyone else.

I also doubt he's going to dodge the bullet just like last time. This time, it was a deliberate attack on them, and even he says so, so he can't BS his way that "Oh, I'm sorry, I must have messed up, here are the right files". He pretty much went up to them, spat in their face, punched them, and put a "kick me" sign on their backs, you can't lie your way out of that to someone of higher power than you.
//You’ve met a Lawyer with Morals?//

Granted this wasn't aimed at me, but comparing and contrasting seems to fit better.


@ previous post:

I meant the first part to be aimed at anything involving his wife's status as a lawyer. ^^;
I dunno...... Jack's squirmed out of a bad situation before (see gay porn fiasco), who's to say he doesn't get another slap on the wrist? Maybe his time really HAS come, but I doubt it.
We've already got a "Wacko Jacko", how about "Wacky Jacky" for Thompson?
@ Saladin

Yes, but a 'sorry, my bad' isn't going to save his butt a second time.
Does anybody know if the lawyer in GTA4 that says "guns don't kill people, videogames do!" is still in the game? Did JT get that taken out with a lawsuit threat?
@ DavCube

Perhaps. He can't even file his own legal documents at this point. I certainly wouldn't mind his lunacy if he's disbarred. He'd be just another raving ignoramus with sketchy "facts" about video games.
@Saladin

"Jack’s squirmed out of a bad situation before (see gay porn fiasco), who’s to say he doesn’t get another slap on the wrist?"

Except last time he got a slap on the wrist because he promised never to submit inappropriate filings again. Granted specifically it was never to submit gay porn again, but the spirit of the order was "don't waste our time". So he's already had his chance with this court, and he spat in their face.

I doubt he'll get a slap on the wrist this time. Especially since they have full precedent backing them up.

Demanding that someone else sign them first is no more restrictive than demanding he fork over docket fees before filing lawsuits. It's an acknowledgement that the court doesn't have infinite time and resources to deal with every Tom, Dick, and Spam-a-lot. Thanks to Jack's antics, he's denying other people reasonable relief from the court, because Jack is monopolizing it.
If you're trying to commit occupational seppuku, Jack, it's working.
Was there ever a point where Jack was a good lawyer and didn't file frivolous lawsuits? Or did he go through all that time in law school with the intention of pissing people off and attempting to take down video games?
You just keep on digging that hole Jack, soon enough you'll be too deep to shout for help.
@Geegnome,

As if Thompson could ever scare anyone into doing anything.
@Andrew C -- I don't think so. He started with ambulance chasing, took a detour into banning "pornography" like rap music and Howard Stern, and is now back at it with massacre chasing.
My roommates and I were discussing this. Even if he finds someone to sign for him it's going to start hitting his pocketbooks. I seriously doubt his wife would even be willing to put her law firms money up for is filings, seeing as how often he makes them, and any other lawyer is going to charge him.

Add in the fact that if he DOES lose his license he's going to have to start paying for all his courtroom tirades and Jack's looking at a serious financial crisis if he wants to continue his courtroom antics. Either way I see this turn of events lowering the amount of Jacko news.
@Jabrwock:

They probably should've, at least then JT might actually understand what's happening to him.
Jack did practice medical malpractice but it was never on the plaintiffs' side so, technically, he wasn't an "ambulance chaser." He actually was on the defendant hosptal's side (he was actaully catching work farmed out by the hospital's insurance carrier).
@JackDon'tKnowJack

So, this means that Jack has never done anything good in his career?
You know what the scary thing about this is? Jack thinks this is a sign of victory.
Jack will even claim getting disbarred as a "victory"
Here's a question for everyone:

Which is denser: Jack or a neutron star?

I had a scary revelation of what may happen with Jack (I don't even know if I should post this, as I don't want to give him any ideas). After he's disbarred he goes on a killing spree, then surrenders and blames video games for his actions. He can just say he was testing them out to see how bad they were, and even that amount of exposure drove him over the edge. It would be his final attempt to discredit the medium.
@Dog Welder-

You forgot his lengthy crusade against Former Attorney General Janet Reno and her "Ambiguous Sexuality". lol
@ JackDon'tKnowJack

In a way, that makes him even more despicable; helping doctors and hospitals cover their asses and trying to convince the court they weren't responsible whenever they screw up. :P

Kind of makes his quest for fame a little more understandable too. When representing the hospitals, he pretty much anonymous as he was working for them. Jack apparently dreamed of being bigger than that. I'm guessing he wanted to be another F. Lee Bailey or Melvin Belli.

Given also this is a guy with strong moral convictions, he sees a lot of things in contemporary popular culture that offends him. So he probably got it in his head and thought, "Hey! Why should I be another cog in the machine? I'm a lawyer! I can use my standing to fight all these companies who make things I don't like and sue them into bankruptcy! Why should I be nobody when instead I could be known as the guy who took down Rap Music? Or Howard Stern? Or video games?"

Of course, what he didn't count on with the last one was to have us as a community stand up to him, speak out and call attention to his tactics and his behavior. I think on some level that frustrated him, as he found that we were more intelligent that he bargained for and couldn't silence us with simple legal threats. And I think we here frustrated him to where it eventually wore him down to the point where he is now.
Give him the whole nine yards. He deserves it.
@Black Manta
Well, i wouldn't really call it "despicable" unless you call lawyering as a profession "despicable"... playing roles like that in the court room is standard for a lawyer. Despite what mind of ideals one might have, they have to do their job as a lawyer. If they are a defence attorney, then must defend their client wheather he is guilty or innocent; the plus side is getting an innocent man free, the downside is having to defend a guilty man. And it's Vice versa for the prosecution... the plus sde is putting away a guitly person and thus seeing justice through, and the downside is when you get the guilty verdict for a man that was innocent. either way, a lot of lawyers end up playing the bad guy in the court room... in the case of Hospitals, they are not always the ones guilty

Really, just practising law in and of it'self can make any lawyer look like the bad guy since he will sometimes play the role of the bad guy... what really separates the good lawyers from the bad ones like JT is how they practice the law. the medical malpractise stuff for the hospital in and of it's self is just standard lawyer work. And Jack's given us plenty of reason to tell use what kind of lawyer he is... not to mention he's got the title of massacre chaser; titled as such since he tries to profit from such horrible tragedies right after they occur showing no sign of remorse or compassion for what happened (honestly, the least he could do is wait sometime before profitting)
For those of you too lazy to read:

TL;DR

STFU newfag, GB2GAIA.
@ Tony:

Jack's not going toask her because thats a conflict of interests and as a few other posters have said those in the legal profession like to avoid conflicts of interest like the plauge and they usually have negitive reprocussions
@Lost Question

"Jack’s not going toask her because thats a conflict of interests and as a few other posters have said those in the legal profession like to avoid conflicts of interest like the plauge and they usually have negitive reprocussions"

Most other lawyers would know that insulting the intelligence of the court presiding over your disbarment by sending them a "picture book for adults" and making a mockery of our legal system would also be something to avoid like the plague. Don't underestimate Jack's madness at this point.
@Erik

Basically just associating let alone working with the guy is risking your reputation.

He may as well apply to Fox news now anyway. By his standards they are now the only reputable news source
@Erik: No one here thinks lightly of JT's madness, we have yet to know anything about his wife's madness. If she's reasonably sane and cares at all for her legal career she won't play any part in this.
Of course, it's possible that JT knows lawyers who aren't related to him but are sympathetic to his cause, and THEY might sign off for him, in some cases without even charging him. But there's still the issue that doing so means they're staking their reputation on JT's behavior and perhaps not everyone would want to risk that. This friend of JT's might also become a little concerned when he asks them to sign off on some new motion every single day.
@Steven Furtado -- that's his political career. It's different than his lawyering (though equally full of fail).
damn gamepolitics, can't edit my post. What I meant to say was that I have a friend who thinks Jacko is pretty smart, not "who Jacko is pretty smart"
I'm not sure why ya'll are so taken aback. As if Jack's suddenly upping his ante in the I'm Batshit Crazy Sweepstakes. FYI, he was pulling stunts like this 20 years ago. He would, for example, routinely file court papers signed with a picture of Batman pasted over his own driver license.
By the way, Jack's wife is no longer part of the bar disciplinary board. She used to be. I wonder when she left/quit/was told to leave?
@Eville1:

It's been a few years. I believe that the private practice attorneys (i.e., non-Florida Bar employed) who serve on that committee rotate on and off as a matter of course. It's voluntary, "do-good" work -- and, for some, a networking opportunity. A lot of big law firm partners volunteer for a stint.
@Black Manta,

And of course, as we see, using his experience as a lawyer isn't always the best solution to stop the things you don't like. Like I've said many times, Jack is the perfect example of a carpenter who sees every problem like a nail.
There's a pretty good Jack Thompson t-shirt at http://www.cafepress.com/gamegeist
@Dog Welder-

Holy Mackerel! He tried politics? *Imagines Jack Thompson as a Senator*
@Steven Furtado

actuaklly he tried to become the attorney general
By the way does Witty Jack earn anything as a lawyer? Or is his wife paying for stuff?
@blase

yeah thats why he goes on talk circuits and television they pay him
ROFLOMFGBBQ!
This was a triumph
I'm making a note here:
HUGE SUCCESS!
It's hard for me to contain my Satisfaction

Florida Courts System
We do what we must because we can
for the good of all of us
Except for John Bruce Thompson.

But there's no use crying over every mistake
You just keep on trying 'til you run out of cake
And the games get done, think of all the games we've won
For the people who still have lives.
[...] If you don’t know who Jack Thompson is, you can think of him a bit like the Prokofy Neva of the legal world.  He’s such a deluded, psychotic, busybody pain in the ass that the Florida Supreme Court had to bar him from filing motions with the court. [...]
Re: Read Florida Supreme Court's Show Cause Order to Jack

Jack Thompson needs to be held accountable and suffer the consequences of his behavior.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/23/09 at 07:56am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yl2vfw6 Here's the link, good for conspiracy theories.
Posted 11/23/09 at 07:42am
JDKJ: Leaders never follow. Followers never lead.
Posted 11/23/09 at 06:48am
DarkSaber: Anyone been following this Hadley Climatic Research Centre server hack story?
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:48pm
ZippyDSMlee: AE:they feeding you well? I am enjoying win7 and heading to bed...uhg I need to get up early and start back to cleaning/painting blahg >< need tog et stuff done befor thanksgiving....
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:41pm
Andrew Eisen: Just got home from an eight hour recording session at Capitol Records. A lot of fun but damn exhausting.
Posted 11/22/09 at 08:44pm
BearDogg-X: 10 N. O. Who Dat?
Posted 11/22/09 at 09:45am
ZippyDSMlee: JD:I think doc phill is still sout about the break up with his wife he dose not fill holes as much as make them bigger these day
Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: mentor07825:Well Brittan dose deserve it....
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: Alyric:I don;t hasliburton having to pay back billoins... don;t you love it when the rich roll over the goverment without a care?
Login or register to post shouts