"Video Games Made Me Do It" Defense in Alabama Murder Trial

"Video Games Made Me Do It" Defense in Alabama Murder Trial

February 28, 2008
The lawyer for a man being tried for murder is trying to convince an Alabama jury that the defendant believed he was acting out a video game when he murdered an 80-year-old man on Halloween, 2005.

As reported by the Decatur Daily, Andrew Reid Lackey, 24, does not dispute that he stabbed, shot and gouged out the eye of his victim, Charlie Newman. However, Lackey's attorney, Randy Gladden, is pointing the finger at video games. From the newspaper report:
Actions that led to a deadly confrontation between a defendant and an 80-year-old widower resembled a video game to the accused...

[Attorney] Gladden described Lackey (seen at left) as a computer geek who had immersed himself in video games and lived in "a different world than you and I."

Tapes of a 911 call made by the victim during the fatal confrontation, however, indicate that old-school greed may have been the motive. Lackey is heard to demand of the victim, "Where's the vault?" seven different times. Charlie Newman's grandson had previously told Lackey that the victim kept a large sum of money in a vault under the stairs. However, no such vault existed.

No video games were specified in the news report. However, items recovered by the police from Lackey's car (ski mask, a knife, a police scanner, night vision goggles, stun gun) suggest that the defendant put a lot of real-world thought into planning the crime.

Lackey's trial resumes today.

Comments

This is lame. The lawyer must be desesperated. I hope he get his license revoked for stupidity.
He're a novel idea. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!
I fucking love this country. Don't want to accept responsibility for something you did? Just pin the blame on someone or something else.
I hope they reprimand the defense attorney for using this defense. Any attorney who decides to use a defense like that deserves to be hit upside the head with a ball bat and fined for utter stupidity.
@Monte'
Totally right. I would expect Jackie boy to chime in any minute as an expert, to get this poor soul the not guilty verdict he so deserves. The sad part is, Jack seems to be so brainwashed by himself he would see letting a murderer go free as a victory, since it would have been a blow against his enemy. From all I can tell he is well beyond the ability to think rationally and to step back from his crusade and see the big picture.

Luckily, I think most of the population isn't stupid enough to fall for it.. these defenses rarely seem to work out.
Anyone else find it hilarious that a man who's being pushed by a seemingly anti-game lawyer to blame videogames has the last name of "Lackey"?
As long as there is a compotent prosecutor on the job, he won't get away with this. This looks like a job for http://www.ace-attorney.net/content/images/artworks/gs1/edgeworth_pointi...!
@Rodrigo

I think we already all know of a lawyer who hasd proven that you don't get your license revoked for being stupid.
Things found in the victim's car according to the article

"Starter pistol

Knife*

Stun gun

Orange ski mask

Roll of tape

Flashlights

Night vision goggles

Police scanner

Mallet with a white towel taped around it

Sledgehammer

Hatchet

Five screwdrivers

Two tube socks stuffed with rope

Super Glue

Batteries

Utility belt that would hold extra gun clips "

Conclusion: He was influenced by MacGyver. End of discussion.
@Void

But nothing created God so . . . NOTHING IS KILLING PEOPLE.

And pieces of paper come with nothing on them so paper is killing people.

Yet trees and people make paper, so they're killing paper.

But if God created humans and trees and nothing created God.

My God I just a new paradox sort of like the who is a murderer the chicken or the egg? And if God created the chicken and gave it egg-laying powers. . .

Wait a minute humans were the victims that means no humans no murder

Humans are killing themselves!!! (Without Dr. Kevorkian)

But if God creates humans . . .

Wait a minute free will makes us kill humans, so if we had no free will.

Ah the fuck with it let's just imprison the guy.
[...] Another one of those Video Games Made Me Do It defence in a murder case: The lawyer for a man being tried for murder is trying to convince an Alabama jury that the defendant believed he was acting out a video game when he murdered an 80-year-old man on Halloween, 2005. As reported by the Decatur Daily, Andrew Reid Lackey, 24, does not dispute that he stabbed, shot and gouged out the eye of his victim, Charlie Newman. However, Lackey
Just to make sure what this is basically saying. They want to say that if we play video games, we can commit any crime we want and claim that the games made me do it?

None of us live in the same world as any of the rest of us. I live in a world of numbers and lines of code. That doesn't mean that I can hurt another person and claim that I didn't realize they were alive. It's quite simple, he heard this guy had money, he prepared himself, he broke in and hurt this man while asking where the money was, then he killed him.

In my opinion, anyone that would hurt osmeone else to take their stuff is already broken. He should be held to the same standards as everyone else. He knew what he was doing, he knew it was wrong, and it was clearly premeditated and for the purpose of gain.

Fry 'im.
Normally with a story like this one I simply scoff at it. However with the name 'Lackey' I cant help but wonder if the chump was fated to do something really stupid in life. I guess it is one of those nature vs nurture things. Hell he is not even smart enough to blame the Devil for his actions in a highly conservative religious district. It sure makes one wonder -no?
@squonk
Not when passing said football or helping out injured comrades involves pressing a sequence of buttons, no. Just as playing Monster Hunter wouldn't help me fight off giant monsters and playing Pokemon won't make me in to some kind of wonderous animal breeder. And as for our current murderer being 24 excludes him from the world of Santa Clause and the Boogyman.
[...] Another Attempt To Blame The Video Game For Murder The rather infamous Jack Thompson gained his fame by picking up various lawsuits that involved kids shooting people and trying to get them off by blaming the video game. Rather than admit guilt, he was attempting to keep murderers from getting convicted by saying that it was the video game that made them do it. It appears that others are now picking up on this tactic. Adam Thierer points us to a recent case where a lawyer isn’t arguing that his client, a 24-year-old, didn’t commit a murder. He’s arguing that the guy thought he was playing a video game. This is a really weak way to try to get someone acquitted of murder — and says quite a bit about the lawyers who would use this sort of defense. As the article notes, the actual evidence suggests that video games had nothing to do with the murder, and that it was an old-fashioned robbery attempt. [...]
BOOKS MADE ME DO IT!
RELIGION MADE DO IT!!
MUSIC MADE ME DO IT!!!
FILMS MADE ME DO IT!!!

These claims have failed 9 times out of ten, Tv too failed and now the the blame game levels up to games...can we say fail too?
Here's*

No clue how i mistyped that
This is disgusting, pathetic and obscene, another example of these morally bankrupt jackholes trying to turn someones tragedy into their own profit!

And for what? so they can get videogames banned? Remove the greatest artistic movement of our time? what does that gain?

These people should be hung drawn and quartered, and it is coming to the point where I will gladly get in on the action.
He shoulda said "God made me do it". That's been a bigger defense lately. And it's more likely to get you a mental illness result than having to take responsibility for youractions.

After all, no one wants the church to take the blame for murder.

But then, that's Alabama for ya.

Gee, wonder where they got the idea for the defense? :/

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
"Jack Thompson made me do it!"
*sigh* Can we get the greedy little murdering bastard to just enter a plea of guilty? This defense equates to the same thing, aside the fact that it once again adds tarnish to the games industry.
The twinkies made me do it...
All together now! *facepalm*
Ugh, lawyers. Always trying to win no matter the cost.

I'm just surprised lawyers haven't tried to use this more often.
@pominator

I like the idea, but doesn't being hung eliminate the need to draw and quarter someone? *innocent whistle*
"I'm not a bad person you see. But when i drink, I do and say things that I normally wouldn't do"

"Oh no... it's the Mel Gibson defense"
In which game can you gouge out eyeballs? I want some of that! They'd make great serial killer trophies, you could shrink them & dangle them by the optic nerve from a charm bracelet!

Okay psycho hat off now. The guy's a typical modern cowardly knob trying to absolve himself of responsibility by citing whatever is remotely controversial. One day I'd like to see them say "rage & greed made me do it" as a defence, if nothing else the unprecedented burst of honesty might get a not guilty ruling simply from the shock...

@AgnostoTheo
You weren't hanged until you were dead, you were hanged until NEARLY dead. From wikipedia:

Until 1814, the full punishment for the crime of treason was to be hanged, drawn and quartered in that the condemned prisoner would be:

Dragged on a hurdle (a wooden frame) to the place of execution. (This is one possible meaning of drawn.)

Hanged by the neck for a short time or until almost dead. (hanged).

Disembowelled and emasculated and the genitalia and entrails burned before the condemned's eyes (This is another meaning of drawn — see the reference to the Oxford English Dictionary below.)[2]

Beheaded and the body divided into four parts (quartered).

Typically, the resulting five parts (i.e. the four quarters of the body and the head) were gibbeted (put on public display) in different parts of the city, town, or, in famous cases, country, to deter would-be traitors who had not seen the execution. After 1814 the convict would be hanged until dead and the mutilation would be performed after death. Gibbeting was abolished in England in 1843. Drawing and quartering was abolished in 1870.


See now that's a real man's deterrent! Bugger this girly 10 years in prison bollocks, bring it back at least for rapists, child molesters & paris hilton!
ooh the psycho hat seems to have fallen back on my head towards the end of my last post...
Oh, the poor victim. Say, they have games on the internets, right? THE INTERNETS IS KILLING PEOPLE!


He shoulda gone with the twinkie defense. That actually worked.
Shoot, I meant to have a </stupid> tag in there
They haven't found any proof on videogames (they didn't even FOUND video games (at leas no yet) in his home) so this defence will quickly fall apart. Beside, it's the attorney, not the perpetrator who blames the video games.
@Cyberskull

No, wait! The internet can be accessed via computer. COMPUTERS ARE KILLING PEOPLE!
Oy, reminds me of that kdi who beat a homeless man to death and just for kicks said video games made him do it, just so he could watch gamers be persecuted further
ahh stupidity its so fun afterall hes basically saying "I'm guilty but its not my fault" no one believes it when its a "god's work" thing or they think they're crazy at this point will the public really be sympathetic tyo a "games made me do it" defense from a 24-year old who killed and 80-year old for money...or am I just giving the general populace too much credit?
We have Jack Thompson to thank for this. Now if you want to commit a horrific crime, then get off easy withan insanity ruling and a cushy institution rather than prison, AND give your family the opportunity to sue an electronics company for millions, all you have to do is say "Video games made me do it".

As has been mentioned, metal and D&D have previously been blamed for crimes, yet now people laugh about those cases and the idiots that pursued them. I just wish we could reach that stage with video games.
@Pierre-Olivier

The games have been ditched!!!

We'll hear it when someone attaches himself to this.
@Void Munashii

But people access the computers that access the internet that access the games which means....

MY GOD!

PEOPLE ARE KILLING PEOPLE!!!!!
Does the prosecutor have a decent rebuttal for these claims?

Hopefully someone intelligent is handling the case and can show how games had little to do with this guy's actions.
@Max

If the proscecutor doesn't have one, may I suggest "STFU N00B!"...
So he's a murderous money-grabbing nutcase?
Love the 'God made me do it' defence people are stating on here!
I'm curious to know what game his attorney is claiming he re-enacted. No way you can do that in Grand Theft Auto so that eliminates that possibility. Mortal Kombat fatalities can be gruesome but not even close to that. Manhunt? Dream on.

Personally, based upon the items stated, I have come to the conclusion that he is guilty of Murder in the First Degree in that he planned and knew EXACTLY what he was doing.
Everyone who has tried this silly defense was convicted. This defense attorney is incompetent.
Let's watch this fail, i'm handing out popcorn, brownies, and beer for those old enough to drink.
"ski mask, a knife, a police scanner, night vision goggles, stun gun"

Splinter Cell?
"ski mask, a knife, a police scanner, night vision goggles, stun gun"

Splinter Cell?
Ok...he admits to shooting, stabbing and gouging the guy's eye out...yet it wasn't his fault? Alright then, I'm sure video games are giving out magical mind control rays. I agree with the hanged, drawn, and quartered approach to punishment.
All the judge needs to do is take one look at the case of Selby and Andrews (Hi-Fi Murders) and this defense will resemble a block of swiss cheese.

In that case, they tried to blame Magnum Force (could be one of the other movies in the Dirty Harry series) for the murders.
Sounds like the attorney is clutching at last straws before turning to Lackey and saying "You're boned buddy."

Or it could also be another attorney riding the moral media crusade wagon to blame games for his own purposes. I dunno.
"A big vault of money made me do it!"

Seriously, can we blame the government for the murder, for making money so valuable? I mean, they make money. They obviously are causing others to behave irrationally because of the stuff. Ban money!

Ok... I'm going to stop being silly now.
Objection!!

Sorry video games made me do it.
Well, I guess it's high time that we put video games on trial as an accessory to murder for putting a gun up to the head of this nut job to make him kill somebody else!

*insert eye roll*
@Aliasalpha

But God made the people who access the computers that access the internet that accesses the games which means that...

MY GOD!

GOD IS KILLING PEOPLE!

Oh, no, hold on, He actually does do that, doesn't He?
The sad thing is, the trial is set in god-fearing Alabama, which would be more than happy to credit a video game as the influencing factor, rather than God or personal responsibility.
Charles Manson claimed the Beatles' White Album made him murder Roman Polanski's pregnant wife. He ended up in jail for a very long time and you can still buy the Beatles album.

I have every hope the judiciary will be as sensible this time round.
They should have a warning pop up in video games before it fully loads that states:

"Disclaimer: Claiming the video game made you do it dose not legally count as a get out of jail free card and will make you seem more guilty."
@Austin Lewis

What you call Beer is known to the rest of the world as Frozen Knat's Piss - Or Lager for the less well informed. Find a couple of pints of Stout and i'll take them from you.
Oh suck it up man. You did it and nothing MADE you do it. Now suffer the consequences for YOUR actions.

So what was it. Did the disk physically grab your hand and force it to do things? Some people just need to be beaten with a frozen slab of meat.
Hang him. I bet his lawyer told him to use this defense.
Bobby,
"Hang him."

... over a 1000 foot cliff with a wireless video game controller.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Whatever happened to temporary insanity?
Wow....Just when I thought Alabamas image couldn't get any worse....
lol wut?
do people still believe this?
unless they can categorically prove that the video games have a controlling interest in his brain patterns, i think greed can be largely associated with this.

in the words of a wikipedian : SNOW DELETE
Ah, behold, the world that Jack is trying to create; A world where one can use Video games as an actual defence for a crime much like a plea of insanity to get a weaker sentece than what you would normally would get. Really considering how likely it is that a criminal would have enjoyed violent games as a past time, who amongst them wouldn't use the "video games made me do it" defense if it meant getting a reduced sentence... and even if the criminals didn't think to use it, their are plenty of lawyers who would be quick to suggest it. Hell, this isn't even the first time we've seen someone try to plea a video game defense in attempt to get off
@ Black Ice

I'll bring a keg of Guiness and a keg of Bodingtons then, or Harp if one prefers. The question is for snacks during this farce defense. Should be have crisps and Fish & chips, or just go all out and roast a pig over hog coals?
I wonder... If some kid got himself a couple of big pieces of wood, made a big cross out of 'em, and nailed another kid's hands and feet to it... would everyone instantly jump to blame the Bible?

If there are any stupid impressionable kids out there? Do this.

(No, seriously, don't. I don't wanna get blamed for presenting the idea.)
Didn't some 13 y/o shoot his friend point blank with a loaded shot gun while playing GTA3, and then whent around saying "GTA MADE ME DO IT?"
[...] [Via GamePolitics] [...]
Wow, that grandson must be feeling guilty. If he hadn't told this guy about the fictional vault in his grandfather's house his grandfather may still be alive today.
I'm with Deus personally, mainly because I think that personal responsibility needs to make a major comeback in our society.
@GO

Fish and Chips with a side of Crisps, although a few chops off that Hog wouldn't be unwelcome.
Whatever happened to "I made me do it"?
@Billy:

Haven't you heard? "Videogames made me do it" is the new pleading insanity!

@Orange Soda:

As in, taking responsiblity for his own actions? LOL. Sadly in this day and age it doesn't work that way, I'm afraid.
Aw c'mon. Are you KIDDING me? This crap AGAIN? It doesn't work man!
As if my views of Alabama weren't bad enough...

Dude, you're 24 years-old. I don't think that defense is even close to valid here... you were greedy and wanted the old man's money. You're a selfish, greedy little prick with a hint of retardation... not a misguided youth.

I really hope stupidity doesn't prevail here.
I can see the judge now:

"Mr. Andrew Reid Lackey, I am sentencing you to prison, for life, without parole. Cus the game 'Who wants to a Judge', made me do it."
hell he would have a better chance if he pointed to his defence attorney and said "he made me do it"
He's got no proof if the police hasn't recovered any video games or paraphenalia. That defense is gonna get thrown out in court.
@JustChris

Of course not, the games were ditched. [/sarcasm]
i really hate it when thickies stand by video games after killing someone
Gouging eyes out? That doesn't sound like video games, that sounds like Clockwork Orange. That movie's far too old to sue over anyways.
"FILMS MADE ME DO IT!!!"

Actually there's quite a funny story to that one. Back in the 30s where Mobster movies were the new ungodly thing turning kids into crooks a judge blamed a kid's crime on the movies, even though the kid said himself that he wasn't influenced by the movies.
I can just imagine a new campaign to end murder using my logic.

Don't let people be killed by the electric chair.

Kill yourself so a greedy bastard won't have to do it for you.
From "The News Courier":

"Defense: Lackey a ‘geek’"

http://www.enewscourier.com/local/local_story_058213742.html

"Computer geek

In his opening statement, Gladden said he could not “argue with the basics of the case,” but rather paint a portrait of a young man he called a “geek” and who spent hours daily trading over the on-line auction Web site e-Bay.

Testimony from Derrick Newman, the victim’s grandson, painted an even more bizarre picture of Lackey, who he said would have as many as four computers up and running at one time and simultaneously engaging in up to seven games with opponents around the globe.

Gladden said these activities, along with the array of items found in a rental car Lackey allegedly drove to the murder scene—hammers, mallet, hatchet, duct tape, Super Glue, stun gun, batteries, starter pistol, night-vision goggles, ski mask, screw drivers— make Lackey seem bizarre.

“You would have to say there’s got to be something wrong with this person’s mind. ""

A psychoitic genius maybe? I mean, maybe it's possible for the average player to have four computers and 7 games (of whatever) going on at once, but I could barely enjoy playing on one computer while the TV is on and enjoy both.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
"Andrew Reid Lackey, 24, does not dispute that he stabbed, shot and gouged out the eye of his victim" "Lackey is heard to demand of the victim, ”Where’s the vault?” seven different times."

might i add, daaaaaaaaamn

And while im at it which video game is he claiming made him stab shoot gouge and look for a safe which didnt exist?
[...] [Via Gamepolitics] [...]
@monkeyface:

I'm not sure... was that a mission in one of the GTAs? (even if it wasn't, I'm surprised they didn't cite that as what he played.)

Unless it was Postal, god only knows what you can get away with in *that* game...
@ Black Ice

I’ll bring a keg of Guiness and a keg of Bodingtons then, or Harp if one prefers. The question is for snacks during this farce defense. Should be have crisps and Fish & chips, or just go all out and roast a pig over hog coals?


What wine goes well with fish and chips?
LOL@ father time. That was funny "He was influenced by MacGyver." hahahaha

I wouldn't get that attorney ever even if he was the last attorney on earth. Wasn't he taught that he needs evidence before pointing fingers? The fact that no video games were mentioned, where is the evidence?

Besides, he's 24 years old, sheeesh! What they're gonna make the ESRB rating M 25+?

I hope a disciplinary action would be subjected against the attorney so it would serve an example to lawyers who love to point fingers without basis. He's a geek, so what? I have a lot of geek friends and their mad skillz and hobbies don't affect their way of thinking.
yeesh, it's these idiots that give nutjobs like Jack Thompson the ability to give concrete evidence of the matter. If I was that judge, I would dispose that notion and send the defendant to a mental institution.
I wonder if that'll be Osama bin Laden's defense.Probably.
@Orange Soda

"Whatever happened to “I made me do it?”

I couldn't have said what you did any better.
@BlackIce
I drink mostly stout, with the occasional crappy cheap american beer (like pabst, which I last drank with Nathan Maxwell, Flogging Molly's bassist).

I prefer a pint of Guinness to the local fare any day.
@white-haired

Lawyers use desperation tactics all the time, and who knows there may come a day when someone was so mentally unsound that he actually wasn't able to distinguish real life from the game or he really was influenced by the game.

Of course if that does happen that would in no way be justification for video game censorship since that hypothetical case would be an exception not proof of anything (also if such hypothetical case were real the game makers would probably not be held accountable).
Here's one for you Hitler told me to do it!
Well they saved hitlers brain, maybe the guy IS hitler!
That the guy has mental issues is not in doubt, but to attempt to draw a simile between computer 'geeks' and mental illness is despicable.
The lawyer's squeezing an insanity plea from the jury. It's a pretty desperate move and the judge'll see right through it and may even find it funny, but, thing is, the jury might buy it. Depending on who comprises the jury (older folks, parents, actual gamers), the verdict will be hard to predict.
[...] Lähde: GamePolitics [...]
Voices made him do it. Let's make Jack Thompson sue voices in his head.
http://www.enewscourier.com/local/local_story_059220833.html
"Computer yields clues "

"Thursday, Brian Kilmouth, a computer forensic analyst with the Regional Organized Crime Information Center in Huntsville, testified that at the request of Lt. Floyd Johnson of the Athens Police Department he made an “image file” of hard drive material on one of four computers seized from Lackey’s Sunlake Boulevard apartment a day after the murder.

Kilmouth testified that he used special software to decipher the image file he obtained and converted the information into voluminous text files that could be read.

In cross examination, Gladden asked Kilmouth if after reviewing Lackey’s online activities if he thought Lackey “lived in a fantasy world.”

Kilmouth answered that he had “never seen a computer with as much gaming on it as this.”"

----------------------------

http://www.decaturdaily.com/stories/5967.html

From this article, I call the Judge's statement a "Hooah!" (So there! :P )

"State rests case

District Attorney Kristi Valls asked if police charge suspects with robbery even if there was only a robbery attempt, and Johnson answered yes.

The state rested its case Thursday evening.

Gladden asked Circuit Court Judge Bob Baker to dismiss the charges of burglary, robbery and capital murder, saying the prosecution had not proven a robbery or burglary occurred.

Baker denied that request.

Baker also warned Gladden that because there was no plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, he will not let Lackey's mental competency become an issue.

Gladden has said Lackey had four computers and played up to seven online games at one time, and immersed himself in gaming. Gladden told reporters that Lackey lived "in a different world than you and I."

Baker said, "You can present your defense but whether he spends a lot of time gaming is not a consideration for mental competency."

The defense was to begin its case Friday at 9 a.m. "

-------------------------------------------

Note that though I quoted the references to gaming, there is a great deal more information reported. And this particular paper has a lot of articles on the case.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Kilmouth answered that he had “never seen a computer with as much gaming on it as this.”

He's sure as hell never seen mine! Until recently I had most of the games I ever bought installed. Oh no, I'm a psychopath!


Why this comes as a shock to me, I'm not quite sure...
hahahahaha

hahaha

oh boy shouting 'wheres the vault ' several times, then saying the money had nothing to do with it... d*ck head

um and oh by the way , i havent played a game ever, where on halloween you rob a guy shouting 'wheres the vault' then shoot him and hauge out his eye...

please tell me the name of this game.. oh oh.. thats right you cant because it DOESNT EXIST

i hope they lock him up n throw away the key
ps how the **** can you play 7 online games at a time..
i mean arms, legs head and trouser package only add up to 6 pushing implements. how did he operate the seventh?
He could be playing multiple turn based things. Say 3 sessions each of pool & scrabble (both well known as the most violent of all catalysts) and then he'd only need one of chess, battleships or something similar to make it up to 7.
You killed an 80 year old man to get at his vault. You are clearly insane and a danger to society, and need to be incarcerated for the rest of your life.

You killed an 80 year old man to get at his vault because you thought you were in a video game. You are clearly insane and a danger to society, and need to be incarcerated for the rest of your life.

Next case, please...
Not a chance, this is just another case of someone not wanting to take responsibility for their own actions.
@Austin Lewis

You are the smartest American I have ever met. I would be honoured to steal your beer and toss it in the pool when you go for a piss.
It didn't work last time, it won't work now.People have personal responsibility. Everybody knows this, just like everybody knows this guy's a greedy peice of crap who brutally killed an old man for money.
No video games found you say.....If he had a windows system they can allways blame solitare! I can just see it now...Mine Sweeper made me do it.
I hate it when people point the reason at things that aren't related on what they did. They should take responsibility for their own actions and not blame a video game, book, movie, or anything for it, unless of course the people who blame it have mental problems and need mental help?
Why are you so upset with the lawyer? His job is probably the hardest job in the world. You also must seperate the media as a reliable news source for your information based on information collected at the trial. You aren't on the jury, you weren't in the courtroom. We don't know if the judge allowed evidence to be accepted or denied. I don't trust the media and if you look into US History the media convinced the general public aliens landed in NYC. People ran around like babbling fools truly thinking that actually happened. After the trial is published, then you can speak your peace.

Does the question video games made me do it put doubt into your mind that this person is an innocent victim of a distorted reality claiming the defendant mentally ill? Without evidence as an attorney I would pursue that as a cause without a doubt in my mind. However, I am not an attorney and I don't know the evidence of the trial nor am I in the courtroom. I can see why the attorney would like to use video games that depict murder scenarios as a reasonable cause for a young man to commit an atrocity especially if the victim is caught red handed in the situation and has had no prior mental illness. What choice do you have to defend this guy? He has a right to legal counsel just because you want him dead isn't a reason for him not to get a trial. That is why we live here in America to be allowed the right to a trial guilty or not guilty of the crime that was committed. Too many times in our history have innocent people been put to death because of a media person placing blame based on race, or misleading information. Too many times in our history have we put people to death for just being a different color than the rest of the jurors. Think about it.

Just because the average person hasn't been effected by video games to commit murder, doesn't mean a conclusive study has been performed. The military uses video games to train its soldiers to deal with death easier before entering the battlefield. The military is composed of civillians and the games used aren't barney and dragon tales. Just so realize that games do have an actual benefit they're being used to simulate situations even in college football. Gaming has come really far in the last 20 years. The military uses a background and pyschological background check before admitting civillians to carry a weapon used for the primary purpose of killing. Weapons are dangerous and if they fall into the wrong hands they will be used for wrong purposes. The idea here is to keep weapons out of the hands of people who don't deserve them. Yet, the same kind of games the military uses to train its army that defends the US can be found at your local video store. A weapon used for subliminal images to let down the guard of death before death arrives is a weapon and it's a weapon that every civillian in America can get a hold of. There is no law stopping a 5 yr old kid from playing a video game that shows murder however there is a law for a 5 yr old kid from purchasing and firing a weapon. Just because you don't see the video game as a lethal weapon that may destroy humanity doesn't mean it couldn't be used to do so. Think outside of the box and look at the defense for what it is. You're telling me a simulated reality can't help out your fellow soldiers when dealing with death? You're telling me that a college football player can't use a video game to enhance his ability to throw a football to an open receiver? Yet these are already in practice so why can't it be conceivable that a person who had voices in the game telling him to kill *the sufferring for example* all of a sudden starts losing grip on reality... Did you ever watch scary movies as a kid? Did you ever believe Jason or Freddy or something was coming for you? They weren't real. Kids believe in Santa Clause living in the north pole with reindeer that fly with elves making presents for them because we tell them that is our world. We are the teacher, they are the student. A game could have been that kids only friend you don't know him and neither do I, but I could easily see how a video game could cause a tragedy to occur.
Isn't that claim just a wee bit unfounded?

He didn't specifiy a game.
There was no evidence.
This leads me to the conclusion that the lawyer told him to say it.
[...] The next logical step. Mario made me do it [...]
For some reason he reminds me of Aaron Stampler in Primal Fear.
[...] Games and Politics Tonight’s post is really about the idiocy of society and my passion as a gamer to stand up for games… not people. I am writing about the world at our finest after all [insert sarcastic smirk here]. See, I cannot sit quietly when someone starts blaming video games for their violent actions (in fact, I get into heated debates with friends every now and then). I’ve read quite a few articles about politics and video games. Maybe I’m getting my facts from all the wrong places. Personally, I think it is naive of some politicians to think that gamers suck at life (to make it an easy understanding to many of us gamers) [please insert another sarcastic smirk here… and this time, make it a BIG one]. [...]
[...] The rather infamous Jack Thompson gained his fame by picking up various lawsuits that involved kids shooting people and trying to get them off by blaming the video game. Rather than admit guilt, he was attempting to keep murderers from getting convicted by saying that it was the video game that made them do it. It appears that others are now picking up on this tactic. Adam Thierer points us to a recent case where a lawyer isn’t arguing that his client, a 24-year-old, didn’t commit a murder. He’s arguing that the guy thought he was playing a video game. This is a really weak way to try to get someone acquitted of murder — and says quite a bit about the lawyers who would use this sort of defense. As the article notes, the actual evidence suggests that video games had nothing to do with the murder, and that it was an old-fashioned robbery attempt. [...]
th if you think the "videogames made me do it" defence is stupid then you will be surprised to hear that a man (who guned down to political fugures) said in his defence that the reson he had killed them was....wait for it......twinkies!
I live outside of Decatur (facepalm). The prosecutor is probably laughing inside. But, the "connection" between video games and the murder will likely circulate around the local news for weeks, mabye even months(they never give a shit about anything important). Oh, and The Decatur Daily.... yeah, its a crap paper that lacks in real news (or anything else for that matter). Meh, I guess I'm going to hear about those "evil vidya games" once again.
Kid has autism. Learn how to read before shooting your mouths off.
ff7bef38bf4c...

ff7bef38bf4ced6e6617...

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.