I wonder if John Bruce fully disclosed to his "client" that he's facing disbarment and may very well not be able to function as their attorney for much longer.

You'll notice how he doesn't mention his "client's" name.

Too bad the rules and regulations of law don't require an attorney to divulge the identity of a "client" that the attorney envokes while making legal threats.

But I guess that's something else John Bruce would oppose. After all, if he couldn't make legal threats against someone without anything to actually back up his threats, he'd claim it was a violation of his Rights as a Christian (much like the lawsuit he had brought claiming the Florida Bar was trying to prevent him from using his religious beliefs in the performance of his job, which the lawsuit failed of course).

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software

Leaked ESA poll? This is the first time I've heard of this. I'm sure it's another lie or exaggeration of his.

So did jacks' client waive attorney client privilage? Cause if they haven't Jack would be breaking the law by communicating his clients knowledge to EA or to anyone else. What a brilliant student of law this guy is.

And we were singing...

Bye bye Mr Mad Lawyer Guy,
You abused the Constitution and was happy to lie,
I wonder if you will ever figure out why,
You are standing in the benefit line...
Standing in the benefit line...

Sorry, was listening to Don Mclean earlier :)

Jack has done it again. It's difficult to comprehend such a level of stupidity! Forgive me, but I am a bit out of the loop when it comes to the "Poll" he mentions. :-/ Is it real? Is it yet another "fact" Jack's made up? Either way Video Games are art, and no one has any business censoring art.

Edit - hey it linked it automatically. How handy.

I think JT's on to something. Picture-book lawsuit threats could be the wave of the future.

Oh great, Jack's sending pictures again. Yeah, he passed the insane level way long ago. As for JT's client, it wouldn't surprise me if it was all in his head.

Hah, unless that "client" is a company as big as T2, I really doubt it'll affect the sale...

Posturing again.

I'm going to enjoy watching EA tell him to stuff it again and again.

At least it wasn't a picture of man-on-ostrich love...

I thought that he wasn't allowed to take legal action against Take Two. Doesn't what this "client" of his constitute legal action?

"I have in the last few days been contacted by a company with whom Take-Two does business. This company is now my client. "

congratulations. nobody cares.

I smell bullshit on a stick....minus the stick.

I think vollocet nailed it. Empty threats are empty. Especially when you're legally bound not to do what you're claiming.

How does a raving lunatic like Thompson become a lawyer who is obviously making enough money to spend all his time filing nutball lawsuits, while hard working sane people can barely scape by? Perhaps I'm living in the wrong state.

Time to put on my Crazy hat and start practicing law in Florida suing anyone who does not crack their eggs from the little end first.

He is probably pulling this out of his ass.

It's an empty threat. There is no "client."

And even if there was a client, they'd be crazy to hire JT as their lawyer since I'm guessing his ability in corporate law is about on par with his ability in Constitutional law.

@nightwng2000:
"You’ll notice how he doesn’t mention his “client’s” name. "

He never has to cite anything for it to be true, didn't you know that? He doesn't have to give references or cite studies as long as HE knows they exist and prove his point.

@MRK@
"How does a raving lunatic like Thompson become a lawyer who is obviously making enough money to spend all his time filing nutball lawsuits, while hard working sane people can barely scape by?"

Hi wife is also a lawyer, a normal one who does her job properly instead of sending out nonsensical lawsuits based on perceived persecution, and who I imagine has never written insulting letters and press releases regarding those who she has opposed in court.

This is patently false. EVERYONE in the gaming industry has heard of this idiot and they all know of his reputation and, unfortunately for him, of his current predicament. No-one in their right mind would take him on as a lawyer. That would be like signing a guy who's legs and arms are going to be amputated as your new quarterback.

Any game company that associates itself with Thompson is going to see a lot of gamers shunning their work.

[...] Gamepolitics.com are reporting a new statement from Jack Thompson in regards to both Take-Two and Electronic Arts. His saber rattling has begun against the rebuttal: I have in the last few days been contacted by a company with whom Take-Two does business.  This company is now my client.  [...]

go stick your head in the sand JT. do us all a favor. your arrogance and stupidity..are just getting to be a headache for us.

I know this has been mentioned in other stories but I can't help but be reminded of that South Park episode "Manbearpig". I can just imagine JT acting like Al Gore in that episode "But Take-Two is trying to turn all our kids into Manchurian Candidates and selling murder simulators and I'm trying to tell everyone and no one is listening to me and I'm being super cereal!"

And who is this "client"? Is it the same "hardcore gamer" who was working with JT and found hidden sex and blood in Bully?

I seriously doubt there is any client involved.

I don't think mommy or daddy hugged him enough as a child.

Watch the lawsuit action as JT tries to jump over a shark, on a very special episode of Game Politics.

Seriously, now JT's just becoming desperate for attention. Someone should cancel his license to practice law already.

@Salen

When that day comes, someone really should bake a cake with texts stating "Happy Disbarment! Jack Thompson"

He's so freakin lying >_>.

When was that ruling on the disbarment supposed to happen?

It's a Dunkin' Donuts that says that T2 got a TWO dip cone, but only paid for a one dip cone.

To tell the truth, I have a question.

EA wants to buy T2.

T2 says "We don't want you to buy us."

Now, JT comes in and says "I'll help you buy T2!"

EA says "We don't want your help."

JT says "Fine! Then I know someone who knows someone who said that T2 sucks, you shouldn't buy them!"

Um... isn't JT playing into T2's hands right now?

I think that throughout all of this, JT doesn't know what he wants. Maybe JT isn't crazy. Maybe it's his other personalities that are crazy.

Within the month
:)

If you all at EA want to pursue a purchase of Take-Two without fully knowing what is “out there” in the form of liabilities, posed by my client and others, of your take-over target, you got [sic] right ahead. I’m sure EA’s shareholders will be impressed with your lack of “due diligence” exhibited first by your “don’t help us, Mr. Thompson” and now your anticipated “we don’t want to know about contractual liabilities of Take-Two” posture. Maybe the new corporate logo of EA should incorporate an ostrich…

Wow, J.B. Way to abuse the legal system for what is essentially blackmail once you remove all the grit.

@mogbert,

Maybe JT is trying to use reverse psychology.

J.B. does too have a client!

She's Canadian, she lives in Canada! You don't know her!

He talks to her on the phone after supper, and he's going to go visit her this summer!

DOES TOO!

Chris Wallace, Lawyer,
"Of course, an actual demand letter cannot be published so there is no client and there is no demand to be met."

We're talking about John Bruce here. Mr. "The Florida Bar is an illegal organization because it sets forth rules and policies that try to prevent me from doing whatever the hell I want to do to everyone else and dosen't prevent others from doing the same thing to me" and Mr. "It's my way or my way, there is no other way". Do you really think that if it were a REAL demand letter that he publicized and someone complained, he wouldn't jump on the "violation of my First Amendment Rights" bandwagon as he's done before?

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software

I have a client, that only I can see and hear. They only talk to me and they informed me that Take Two makes GTA games and they are the devil.

I swear to god I am going to laugh my ass off when he says his client is the ghost who never lies.

@Haiwali
Chef Brian seems to fit JT's persona perfectly in this instance.

What worries me is that in case JT is totally and absolutely cornered.

He can go totally berserk (so to speak) guns blazing, and blame games "GTA made me do it!" Just in vain try to prove him right (in his twisted way).

That scares bejesus out me. Seriously.

Thompson basically said, "oh yeah? Well fuck you!".

Dang it, Demontestament got both of mine. I was going to point out Haiwali
Checf Brian's impersonation (quite well too) and "the got who never lies."

Let's see how well you read my mind with my... mind ray blocking hat on!

I have to say, there isn't anything that makes one feel so good as a bumbling enemy. I mean, that's why Batman looks so cool, he keeps going up against rejects. I mean come on, they have no super powers and use the same MO so much they are predictable. Penguin escaped? Look for the art museum that is hosting a bird exibit. Or the Riddler, who's super power is to tell everyone what his plans are... in advance.

It's so easy fighting back against JT because he is so bad at what he does. I think it is because he didn't find his destiny. Think about it, with just a little more sanity, he could have been a very good chair for the CPSC, fighting back against lead tainted products. I could easily have seen him as a school vice principle. If we ever invent a time machine, we need to go to the past and set JT on the right course where he could live his life out happily where he fits in and would actually help humanity.

Ostriches don't stick their heads in sand. It has never been observed outside a cartoon. Instead, they kick your balls off.

I have to think that any company willing to go to someone as disreputable as Jack would have to be pretty disreputable themselves, leading to T2 wanting/needing to break a contract with them. If I had a legitimate gripe against Take 2 or Rockstar then Jack is the last person I would want representing me, but then maybe that is why they don't want him saying who they are.

Or maybe they don't exist at all.

Jack need to grow a Snidely Whiplash mustache.

"So you don't want my help, EA? Fine then , you shall rue this day, for I shall destroy you as well! Muahahaha" *twirls mustache villainously*

Although I have to say that the idea of Jack trying to take on Ea brings to mind the image of someone taking on a Borg cube with a hang glider armed only with a wooden sword.

"I have in the last few days been contacted by a company with whom Take-Two does business. This company is now my client."

O RLY..?

Please... no... more... JACK... THOMPSON!!!

(read it like Kirk would)

I can perhaps add something. Cue lip trembling:

JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!

Gamepolitics needs a spinoff blog just for JT stories, or maybe a biweekly Thompson roundup (kept behind a cut). Like the Sunday funnies, or Caturday.

Does Jack's "client" know he's never like... won a case in anything involving a games company?

Jack is a genuinely funny person.

Hm, I'm wondering if there are some kind of quota of posting...

One reply I posted earlier isn't up yet...

Even if he has a client, how much longer is he going to be able to have clients? A month?

Speaking of ostriches, how far do you think Jack has his career in the dirt by now?

He's shooting blanks on this one as always.

Isn't JT a Take Two shareholder?

Conflict of interests and all that.

He should be forced to disclose the identity of that "client" immediately or face libel charges.

Oh, come on! If there was such a company he would've come running and laughing manically AGES ago and saying he finally had SOMETHING to ruin T2 forever!

Little reminder to EA: Jack's boring, and your legs work.

I wonder if someday they will make a movie about Jack Thompson live?

Blah blah blah, what happened to Thompson having to show cause why he shouldn't have to show cause as to why he's not required to have another lawyer sign off on his ridiculous filings that was due on the 5th? If he doesn't submit anything does that mean he automatically loses?

Like the old saying goes, "a lawyer who defends himself has a fool for a client."

@Grayswandir

Conflict of interest is exactly the first thing that came to mind.

"Here, let me help you sue the company I'm a part of."

If EA stock holder care about what EA does, then they should know the gaming industry, which includes Jack Thompson. I think EA stock holders would ignore/defend against anything that Jack Thompson is going to say about EA.

@Richard:

So wait, he "showed" his cause on the 21st of Feb?

Dennis, why didn't we hear about any of this?! Thompson's filings are like a magazine subscription, "Crazy Lawyer Weekly" or something. It's one of my favorite subscriptions! D:

Oh man, Jack really better have a legitimate client now or he's about to enter a whole new world of pain. Making false public accusations to try and disrupt a business transaction is a very, very bad idea. IANAL but I think he could be getting into the SEC's domain and if so, he's really screwed now.

@getwellgamers:

Not as I recall. His Preliminary Response didn't in any way attempt to justify his actions as legitimate or otherwise excusable (which is what "showing cause" requires). Rather, his 2/21 filing -- as usual and as I suspect all his supplemental filings do -- just rants and raves against the Court and all the other usual suspects in the vast conspiracy. It's the old "Hide Behind a Cloud of Ink" trick that Jack so loves to perform.

@Zerodash:

As I understood it, the Supremes were requiring Mr. Thompson to physically appear in Tallahassee before them on March 5th for a hearing on the matter.

Go ahead and make threats to the son of a *****.
Let's see how he looks suing just a random person.

Second Jack it's you that doesn't understand the gaming industry.

who called it
who fucking called it

" As I understood it, the Supremes were requiring Mr. Thompson to physically appear in Tallahassee before them on March 5th for a hearing on the matter."

Postponed as Diana Ross was busy that night,,
I'll get my coat...

@Alcsethon

Valve are the digital publishers and programmers, but EA are the in-store CD/DVD/Blu-Ray publishers of CS:S.
If you buy it in a shop on DVD, its EA published. EA publish all of Valves work. Orange Box 360 & PS3 were EA published too.

Jack: I'd like to call my 1st witness.....GOD!
God: I saw Take Two plotting to turn our children evil…
Take-Two President : No, you told me to make this game for adults and not children!
Jack: Is it true my God?
God : Uh… Hey, hey! ... Well, I had not imagined that you two would be in the same place! Hum… Actually… Hum… I am a little embarrassed… Well, I will let you…[leaves]

His name is mud in the legal community and among gamers. What is his major malfunction?

Idiot needs to get disbarred and kicked out of the country.

Did anyone else catch the recent letter from Jack to Pres. Bush in which Jack complains to George (as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. military) that the courtroom where his Florida Bar proceeding was heard contained a U.S. flag with a gold fringe but by law a gold-fringed flag is only allowed to be displayed before a U.S. military tribunal and not a civilian court and therefore the Florida Bar proceeding is an illegal military tribunal which Bush, as Commander-in-Chief, must immediately halt? It's good stuff.

He's also been ranting and raving about the Loyalty Oath paperwork that Florida judges are required to file not being filed as required in several instances and therefore several judges -- including, of course, the judge in his disciplinarry proceeding, Dava Tunis and a few of the Supreme Court Justices -- are and have been without legal authority to decide cases. He's claiming that anyone who's had a decision recently rendered by these judges has a clear grounds upon which to seek reversal.

Wow. Just, "wow."

He really doesn't take his little "crusade" seriously.

And again, self importance isn't the same as actual importance.

@Jackdon'tknowjack

Where did you see that? The only places I know to keep up with Jack are here and the Justice Building Blog, neither of which have been reporting on him as much.

[...] This is proper bonkers. Jack Thompson has now accused EA of lack of due diligence in its attempt to take over Take-Two following the publishers rebuttal this morning of Jack’s offer to “help” with the deal. Thompson says he has a client that’s been heavily “stiffed” by Take-Two, a tale he sees an endemic to the way the publisher does business. [...]

I think Jack's client may just be a stuffed tiger who goes on many adventures with him :)

@Matriculated

Wow that is so hypocritical. He's so full of bs.

Ok, is he counting the kids he sent in to buy GTA3 as T2 clients?... Is the breach of contract that they realized they had to mod GTA3.. and it wasn't immediately in the game?

I like this quote the best:
"I’m sure EA’s shareholders will be impressed with your lack of “due diligence” exhibited first by your “don’t help us, Mr. Thompson” and now your anticipated “we don’t want to know about contractual liabilities of Take-Two” posture. "

Shareholders love when a company asks a loon for help!

Wait is JT actually getting me to defend EA????!?!?!? zOMG, he's a brilliant mastermind!

This 'client' is probably nonexistant... He's waving this 'threat' of his is like a bully going "I know something you don't know!" to a kid's face, and when the kid comes up to him to ask, he just punches the kid in the face.

Except, in this case, he threw the punch before giving the taunt.

So some "company" = either some random T2 stock holder, or Jack himself. Given his track record, I sure don't think any real company with such issues would contact Jack of all people...

"we don’t want to know about contractual liabilities of Take-Two"
More like: "we don’t want to know about the 'contractual liabilities' BS you made up..."

"ostrich…"
No, that sounds more like you Jack, you keep sticking your head under the ground when things don't go your way. See your current investigation by the bar, you keep going "LALLALALALLAAAI CAN'T HEAR YOU, I'M FILING MORE JUNK, LALALALAL" every day trying to escape the reality of being disbarred... Hmm, does your "client" know about this?

Again I ask, W(here)TF does he get this stuff, and what sane "company" would have him represent him(let alone believe his absurd claims)?

@ Matriculated
LOL, I hope his second comment is a troll, it is just filled with irony!

"I would suspect that someone, however, who has the time to type "dull" several hundred times needs to get out more and enjoy life a bit. Hop in, the water's fine."
Said the person who spends several hours online searching his name and posting, as well as spewing out several page court documents and press releases as soon as a gunshot is heard... And I take it Jack doesn't know about the wonderful cut & paste feature.

jack thompson? i call this dude all the time. he's a joke.

Jack's got about a month to sling all the crazy out of his system as possible.

I wonder where he goes for vacationing time? I just assumed he spent most of it on Planet Jack.

It seems to me, this is bad news for ol' JT. If EA takes over and makes it's games more 'correct' - he'll loose a lot of possible lawsuits!

My God. He's even crazier than he was before. How? I demand research!

Can GP pleeeease use this picture for the next Jack Thompson story (we know there will be one within a few days/hours)?

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/1193/hyperchickench0.jpg

Y'know what's probably a reason for Jack wanting to help EA take over T2... Jack has been promising to destroy T2 for god knows how long and now here comes EA about to do the job before him. Frankly, he just wants to steal the credit and be able to say "i helped destroy T2"... trust me, if EA were to agree to letting him help, he would spam his exaggerated interpretation of T2's take over... basically giving himself all the credit and saying EA could have never done it without him

EA, if you really think you can take over take two, then the least you can do is deny Jack that pleasure

@ JackDon'tKnowJack

OOooo good point! Didn't think of that angle. Jack's 'client' is total make believe because he is legally bound to not take action against T2.

Then again this is Jack we're talking about...

@ Patrick

LOL, that made me laugh outloud, good family guy reference, and apptly applied

@Aciesethon
Valve is the developer of CS and they self publish it but if you buy the box at the store it has EA on it. Perhaps EA is technically the dstributer? ANyway, EA is economically involved with Valve and Counter-Strike. http://www.gamespot.com/news/6129331.html
So either way Jacko is trying to cozy up to one of the companies that make money from Counter-Strike.

It would be very interesting to find out how much he is spending in total from each of those filings, how much money he has cost the court in total, and to get the actual amount from each specific case seperately...

Jack just wants to headline in the news. That's it. Everything the man ever does has to be CC'ed to every major news outlet in the country and world. Jack's face has to be on the front page of every paper. His cause must be heard by every parents on the planet. This man does what he does because he believes it to be right, and everyone has to know about it immediately.

*headdesk*

Well, this sucks. There's no way for EA to reply to that. And for Jack, no reply is worse than a reply. I'd say it's high time EA put Jack's e-mail in a filter that automatic responds. "Your E-mail has been blacklisted, and your message was automatically deleted. Have a nice day."

Please ignore Jack Thompson. We intentionally trained him wrong. As a joke.

@ JackDon'tKnowJack
Oh now I get it, it all makes sense now, Jack Thompson is suing on behalf of the John Bruce Thompson Company!

Well, that is what I am getting from his incoherent sentences....

I still say it is BS, again I ask that even if some company had a legit claim, why on earth would this unnamed "Anonymous" company use him of all people? This is a person who fails it at being a competent lawyer, and one that sometime soon will probably no longer be legally competent to practice law.

Doesn't witholding information on a possible business issue between two companies, and then releasing this information to one of the companies violate attorney-client privilage. That'd be like going to a star and saying:

I know you want to buy that car, and I'll help you do it.
no thanks.
well, just so you know, someone else is suing the owner of that car over something else entirely, ergo *nyah*.

did the client request to have this information shared with EA? Maybe it was hoping EA would buy out T2 so it could get a fat settlement? What damage has he done now?

http://hawkeyehayes.deviantart.com/art/God-Bless-You-Mr-Thompson-4912102...

Sorry, I have to do it...

jack owns share of tt??... and he can sue them.. than he can try to sue them again.. and it all be legal in his favor?? wow!!! maybe he isnt so stupid, the only thing he fd up on is not buying more shares.. id like to see ea and tt team up some how and get the gamers money back by sueing him id buy only ea and tt games for 1 year if they did that!!!

While I commend EA for acknowledging Jack and giving him a public rebuke, this pretty much illustrates the double-edged sword that is dealing with Jack Thompson and the conundrum of whether it is best to ignore him or deal with him directly.

By publicly addressing and rebuking him, as has been posited by many, it serves to give him the attention he seeks and, as with feeding a stray dog, he comes back for more. From this standpoint, I can see then why many companies would prefer to ignore him and hope he would go away. Unfortunately, while we all know how much of a failure he is as a lawyer, we are also familiar with his tenacity. Either way he will keep badgering until he gets what he wants and nothing short of a legal smackdown by a judge or another authority will get him to back off. To use another dog analogy, it’s like having a Pit Bull clamped onto your arm until you whack his nose with a rolled-up newspaper.

So really, dealing with Jack is a no-win scenario. If you ignore him, he baits you until you respond to him. And if you do respond he attempts his usual tactic which seems to be to pull you into the equivalent of a tar baby (apparently he’s familiar with Uncle Remus, as he referenced the briar patch which was from the same story), as he files lawsuits, insults and threats which, while they may have no merit and be utterly without meaning, only serve to slow you down to the point where you are so distracted be dealing with him that nothing else can get done. This is exactly what he’s been trying to do with regards to the Florida Bar, though fortunately the Bar has seen through his ruses.

I think really this has been Jack’s tactic all along. I think he knows he’s a complete and utter failure at being a legitimate lawyer, but admitting that to us publicly would be a sign of weakness. However, he knows enough about the law and the legal process that any lawsuit filed, no matter how frivolous, needs to be followed-through on and that takes time and money which most companies would rather spend elsewhere. In so doing, he hopes to litigate them to the point where they can no longer do business.

If Jack is a dog, though, then no doubt he’s a mad one and his foaming at the mouth has become apparent by now for all to see. And hopefully the Florida Bar will do their job and put this mad dog to sleep once and for all.

Does anyone else think that J-Tizzle's original plan was to help EA aquire T2 in order to circumvent the gag order placed on him regarding lawsuits against T2? the agreement specifically states tha the can raise issue personally against T2 and its subsidiaries. In his own world he probably believed that a take over by EA would open a loophole that would allow him to resume his frivolous and, quite frankly, disgusting suits against any Rockstar game because they would then be a division of EA. Good thing 99.9% of the games industry is a lot smarter than JT

Completely off topic:

Actually the Ostrich comment makes a lot of sense. not because they stick their heads in the ground, but becouse the dominate pair in an area collect all the eggs of the other hens to hatch and raise as their own.

I thought he couldn't file anything in a florida court? Or maybe i missed something.

@Lost Question:

Nah, I think they're more like his 'stable of experts' that don't exist. :P

I call bullshit. Jack usually can't wait to name drop groups he's associated with, clients he represents, and tv programs he's appeared on.
The "mystery client" approach is a new one, and I think Jack is bluffing.

http://www.mentalhealth.com/dis/p20-pe07.html

Sorry don't know how to link properly here, but that's a link to a description of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

TL/DR, here are the American criteria for NPD. See if any sound familiar:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
6. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
7. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
8. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

I can't believe that Johnny Bruce Thompson keeps outdoing himself!

The guy has and endless supply of self-inflicted legal jokes to dispatch upon the gaming public...I am personally amazed.

@Ryno:

I think you missed one:

10. Jack Thompson

:P

I've been saying for years that Jack's a textbook example of narcisistic personality disorder. His behaviors so clearly satisfy the DSM-IV criteria for NPD (listed by Ryno above) that it's kinda creepy.

@getwellgamers -- "So wait, he “showed” his cause on the 21st of Feb?

Dennis, why didn’t we hear about any of this?! Thompson’s filings are like a magazine subscription, “Crazy Lawyer Weekly” or something. It’s one of my favorite subscriptions! D: "

His Show Cause response was posted up, sort of, by Dennis. But his response was sort of a, "HOW DARE YOU DENY ME MY RIGHT TO SUBMIT TO THIS COURT! I'LL SUE YOU!" response.

You know...if he was smart he'd have been buying T2 stocks, then when he started making such a big deal about everything causing controversy and therfore the sales to go up he'd actually make money.

Perhaps Harvey the Rabbit is his client. Wouldn't surprise me, to be totally honest. Harvey's been up to a lot since Mr. Dowd kicked him to the curb.

[...] GamePolitics.com Blog Archive Jack Thompson Fires Back at EA, Says He Has a Client with a T2 Claim The voices in his head want to sue EA? Wha!? __________________ ValhallaARK.com [...]

@Are'el

Doesn't smallpox have a cure today? If so, find the analogical counterpart and deliver it to JT. Maybe it will end this once and for all.

Ever wonder why broccoli is reluctant to play checkers?

The answer lies in trepidation. We are creatures of the shoelace, lost in purple.

The koala knows.

divx full movies download