
While EA's bid to acquire
Grand Theft Auto publisher Take Two Interactive appears stalled, a Take Two shareholder has sued the company.
As reported by the
Los Angeles Times, T2 stock owner Patrick Solomon alleges that Executive Chairman Strauss Zelnick and his team kept EA's offer a secret from shareholders while they arranged a sweeter deal for themselves:
The suit spotlights the board's decision Feb. 15 to increase ZelnickMedia's management fees and bonuses to what it calls "an exorbitant" $16.5 million, from $3.8 million, in the event the company were sold. The suit also questions a provision... that would grant ZelnickMedia 780,000 shares if the company were sold before March 31, 2009, and 1.5 million shares if it were sold after that date. At $26 a share, that stock grant would be worth $20 million to $39 million, depending on when the transaction closed...
The controversy over compensation has threatened to tarnish a squeaky clean image that Zelnick has cultivated since his days as a music industry executive.
"If Strauss Zelnick keeps telling people he's a Boy Scout, someone should ask him what merit badge he expects to get for this," said Jeff Brown, a spokesman for Redwood City, Calif.-based EA.
Comments
Remember, kids, this isn't about Rockstar, it's about EA wanting a real monopoly over football (sports) games, instead of the almost-monopoly they have now.
I really don't know what the law is regarding these sorts of things, but am curious...
As Anon said, Rockstar is owned by Take Two. They would have to purchase the Rockstar brand back from Take Two or EA if the merger happened. Either way I highly doubt it would happen.
Isn't that incentive to sell, not tell EA to stuff it and fight every attempt at hostile takeovers?
I'm confused.
You don't understand the story. T2 told EA to stuff it until May when GTA IV was released. They needed toime to ensure that they had lined their pockets before the sale. They needed to finalize the these measures to throw a bunch of money at Zelnick and otehr board members before considering selling the company.
In other words, they want to sell, but only when it is profitable for them.
Poison Pill provisions are a perfectly legit way to defend a takeover, not some magical 'let's make ourselves rich!' mechanism. In fact if it looked like EA were going to go for it they would probably up it farther.
If GTAIV is a big take off game, and it should be, then the Take2 stock should soar and the comapny will be worth a lot more then it is today. What EA was trying to do is buy the company while it was cheap then rake in the rewards. That's just good business sense. However, I frown unpon these mudslinging tactics where the CEO's are insulting eachother and trying to make the others look dirty.
Basically, what it comes down to is EA wants to buy it befre GTAIV and T2 doesn't want to sell until after GTAIV.
Doubt it, I think JT said it was another game developer. Won't put it past him ot latch onto this case though.
"They needed toime to ensure that they had lined their pockets before the sale. They needed to finalize the these measures to throw a bunch of money at Zelnick and otehr board members before considering selling the company."
And everyone else's. Severance packages for all employees went up too, in case EA decided to "clean house" after the takeover. Management (not including Zelnick et al) would get 1.5 times their salary (for 18 months) for being fired without cause, employees full salary for 6 months.
Neeneko summed it up nicely. Poison pill provisions. Make T2 a really expensive bullet to bite, should it manage to accomplish a hostile takeover.
"You can have the company, but then you'll have to pay out the CEO millions."
Makes EA's shareholders pause for a second to think about it. If they desperately want T2, they'll have to pay up.
The timing is more anti-EA too. They clearly want T2 before GTAIV comes out, and the shares deal means Zelnick gets more if he holds off selling until one month after the release of GTAIV, at which point the stock price for T2 will be much higher (likely why EA is trying to buy it now...) Which will be better for shareholders all around.
The problem is this won't fly. On the surface it looks legit, but when you take into account that GTA has ALWAYS been T2's best seller he is doing what's best for the company and it's shareholders. The major point behind this suit is a shareholder is claiming he's not getting the same deal which isn't true. Sure, Zelnick will get more because the stock will go up with the release of GTA IV, but so will this guy who's complaining about the deal.
I don't see where the shareholder has a lot of ground to stand on. Sure Zelnick gets less if EA gets T2 now, but so does he.
Its very easy to sue in America, and those filthy lawyers made sure you can't do anything without them. Also, there are a lot of lazy/weak people who don't want to take responisbility for themselves or the ups and downs of life.
Might explain all the whithered squirrels though.
I imagine some companies might dump the stock in fear of over speculation. The stock prices begin to rise as the game release date nears, but if they don't hit their projected sales mark then it could level off or fall and if you're trying to make money from the quick turn around of stock then it isn't a stable bet.
Remember GTA3?
"This is America! You can sue just about anyone, for anything, and probably win!"
Hmm maybe Take Two isn't trying to get money, maybe theyre trying to get it so high EA says "Screw it"
EA's "80's Atari" business model of putting out tons of crap games because there are few if any alternatives will put the industry in a huge slum if they are able to continue eating up the smaller competitors.
Yup, they must be fools thinking Grand Theft Auto IV will do the same thing for them...
a151af5284341b1f8b3d...
Post new comment