Retraction

Retraction

March 13, 2008
Shortly after posting one of today's stories, I realized that remarks attributed to a political figure were actually made by callers to the radio show in question.

I apologize for this mistake. The story has been removed and I'm glad we were able to correct the situation quickly.

-GP
Posted in

Comments

@Gameboy

Yeah, I missed it, too. So can anyone here tell me what this is all about, please?
@ Ebonheart

Thanks for clearing it up for me and Nekowolf. I kinda wish GP would fix the earlier post and re-post it so I could read for myself though... All well I can dream.
@ Sam

Thanks for holding onto that for us. Unlike Jabrwock, I think the comments were just sad, but to each his own.
@Ebonheart

"Peter acually was qouting an historical event."

Yep, Voltaire.

"In some cases I refuse to defend someone’s right to free speech when its blatantly racist and hate mongering."

Even the founders of the US constitution realized that there were limitations. Otherwise they would have put in stuff like "even if you are slandering, libeling, fraudulently representing yourself, or inciting riot". The trick is unless your speech is violating some criminal law, it's not supposed to be touched.
@King of Fiji - Mr. Thompson, if you're reading this maybe you should make some retractions for the many lies you spread on a daily basis.

As you may know, Jack Thompson cannot be bothered with the opinions of the people he thinks aren't human. He's above it all. He doesn't lie. His words, thoughts, and actions lie!
/sarcasm
He wouldn't correct a mistake if he was paid money.
Nicely done. Keep up the good work in your blog.
Forgiven
Ah...I wondered where my comment had gone lol. Good catch.
you move quick, Dennis. gj.
Wow, that was quick.
What separates the true winners from the true losers? the ability to admit "I messed up, but I'm not going to hide it"
Still scary that people believe that kind of thing. That you can ball up a group of people and make the claim that they are all liars. I understand it was a caller, but doesn't some sort of hidden fact checker kick in and say "you know what, I don't see how this statement could possibly be true." The only way you could defend a statement like that is to defiine a liar as someone who has lied at some point in his life. I bet even Mother Teressa lied when she was three or four. I mean, I'm an awesome guy, handsome, young, rich, bowl 300 games regularly, but even I couldn't say that I've never lied. But to say that all Musslims are liars, you would have to have a screw loose. I just worry about a person who would call a show to make that kind os statement.
However, yikes. Now I'm kinda wishing I'd listened to the whole thing before my blood got boiled.
@ MOgbert

It is scary. It is even scarier when it happens close to home.

A few weeks back I had a "debate" with my cousin about Obama and everything she said was pretty much summed up in that retracted article.
Wow it must have been a fast retraction. I was away for like 30 minutes and all I see is this retraction headline.

So I take it, that some radio show was discussing Bilal's art project and the debacle that followed it? And apparently some listeners are morons who spout off at the mouth?
And this is why I love GP, a mistake happens it's admitted openly, honestly and immeditly once the mistake is caught. It's nice to see that there are still reporters there who care about truth than about the story.
@ Ebonheart

Actually, I would say it is nice to see a reported that cares about the truth AS MUCH AS the stories. He has to have a love of this to keep it going, and a respect for it (and all of us) to admit a mistake and fix it. I have enough trouble just keeping my own site running and updated with everything in my life, so I appreciate the work that much more.
sensationalism FTW, GP try and cut back on it alil its good for the diet ^_~
@ Nekowolf

THere was a comment that was extremly racist agianst muslims that was attributed to Mirch, apprently it was actually a caller, and so were a few other comments. Was retracted and I guess Dennis is fixing it before it's reposted.
Mistakes happen. The fact that Dennis took the time to apologize for the mistake is what makes GP so great.
Mr Thompson if your reading this maybe you should make some retractions for the many lies you spread on a daily basis.
I was really getting worried about the state of things when an elected official could say "I heard all muslims are liars and their mosques should be destroyed" and not be politically hanged.
I have a copy saved in my RSS feed. I pasted the quotes only, and re-attributed the source to "comment". This way at least everyone can get a kick out of what was said...

http://www.heyrenn.com/misc/gp-mirch.html
Al Roney: Do you want the Sanctuary for Independent Media to pull the plug like RPI did?

Mirch: No, I have no opinion on that.


...what a load of crap. I'm sure you shed tears, then, as you shut down the Sanctuary for 3 inches of door space, right?
btw, thank you very much, Sam!
@ Gameboy

Anytime, thankfully Sam has a copy saved so you can read what it said exactly.
Mistakes get made ,after all, no one is perfect.
Thanks Sam, even if with the comments re-attributed, it's a laugh. Human stupidity continues to amaze me on a daily basis...

Bob is such a liar, he claims he has no opinion on whether it should be shut down or not, but he is on the record stating that the Sanctuary should cancel the exhibit, and that he feels it's beyond the limits of what free speech should be. Sounds like he only holds an opinion when he's not being confronted directly.
Thanks for keeping that gem up, Sam, and boy what a diamond it is! For some reason, as I was reading it, Bill O'Reilly came to mind XD
No problem guys. Glad I could help :)
@ Jabrwock

As far as human stupidity goes, people prove there is no such thing as rock bottom. They may hit the bottom, but at that point they start digging.
@Gameboy

Gotta disagree with you there. There's a difference between going asking what Muslims think about your game (however misinformed your knowledge of the game is), and starting out your question by telling a story about how an "arab-Christian friend from the Middle East" told you all Muslims are liars. He might as well have just come out and insulted Balil right then and there, instead of hiding being "well someone else said it, not me".

I'm aware of how little regard arab-Christians have for Muslims (I know an arab-Christian myself), but jeeze.
Sorry if I came off as harsh there. I meant "disagree that the comments were sad". I found them incredibly assenine.
Heh, I read the original story, went to log in, came back to comment, and it was gone. Thanks for showing the kind of integrity that all gamers should have.

At any rate, no matter who said it, the reference to Bilal's piece as a "board game" makes me wonder if the people complaining about it are lumping it in with tabletop RPGs -- roll a 6, blow up the president. Talk about bonuses to initiative...
(Um, which is to say, not that anyone should have the initiative to murder somebody. Can I retract that last sentence?)
@ Simon

6? You missed big time, your shot whent wide to the left and hit a window. Also the secret service now know where you snipe nest is.

You needed to roll 6 20's in a row.
@ Jabrwock

No problem. Been posting here for a while, so I knew you wouldn't attack me over some minor thing like that. I think we both agree that the people who made those comments were ignorant (to me blatant ignorance and ignorance of your ignorance is sad/pathetic). You just laughed at them. That's the difference.

@ Simon Roberts

LOL! Oh my god. I would play that game! I don't even play table top RPGs, but that would be awesome. Er, wait a minute...

Yeah, the people commenting on his game didn't even seem to know what they were calling(?) in about. Its like going in for new tires and having the mechanic look under the hood.
@gameboy

"Yeah, the people commenting on his game didn’t even seem to know what they were calling(?) in about."

Welcome to talk radio. ;)
I didn't see the originally before the retraction but after reading the quotes I have to say that alot of those people are so idiotic and closed minded that it sickens me.

To quote Peter Griffin on how I feel about the whole thing "I don't like what you have to say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
@ Mrmoo

Peter acually was qouting an historical event. In some cases I refuse to defend someone's right to free speech when its blatantly racist and hate mongering.
@ King of Fiji

That would meant hat JT has to admit that he is actually wrong, and he is convinced that he can NEVER be wrong. Ergo, no retractions from him ever.
@ Jabrwock

Ahh thank you. I've never been able to remember his name.

Unfortunetly times have changed, it's now "I support freedom of [insert freedom here] unless I disagree there for you don't have the right."
thanks for all the nice comments. Your support means a lot. I'm just glad that I caught this myself and fixed it quickly. Lesson learned: listen to the entire program and not an excerpt!
@ GP

You would think that after years o reporting on pundits and bigots going on rants after hearing partial information, you would have learned that already. ;)

I am glad to see that you are willing to correct yourself. Keep up the good work.
What Was The Story?
@ GP - better watch out! Like the New York Times and the Cho-CounterStrike story, Jack Thompson will start using your retracted story as fact!
I retract my scumbag comment. My chills, however, remain.
Here's audio of the radio show. I didn't see the deleted post so I don't know if it had a link to the audio or just a transcript.
http://blip.tv/file/736718/
The audio is excerpts from the radio show so I don't know if it is representative of the callers or not but the callers in that audio clip are just sad.
I've tracked down the full audio of the radio show. It is available here:
http://www.wgy.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=al_rone...
they are listed as "Free Speech or Terrorism" parts 1-4
oops I mean 1-6 and there's another 2 parts on the topic as well. I've not listened to the whole thing so I don't know when the main people involved are on.
This is why I like GP.

Loads of other websites would have kept it up for the controversy (i.e hits) and would never have posted again to apologize.
[...] gamepolitics.com retraction — some of the quotes may have been from callers, and not Mirch. [...]

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm
Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am
lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am
SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am
M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am
Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am
M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am
E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am
sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am
sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm
LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm
gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm
GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm
Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm
Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Login or register to post shouts