Guess Who Hopes to Attend Take Two Shareholder Meeting?

March 14, 2008
EA's hostile takeover bid will be the main event at Take Two's shareholder meeting on April 10th, but there may be a sideshow as well.

Game industry nemesis Jack Thompson has written to the investor relations department at T2 with the following request:
I am a Take-Two shareholder and have been for quite sometime.  I desire to attend and participate in the April 10 shareholders meeting, particularly as to the EA offer.
 
Please advise immediately where the meeting is and whether I will be allowed to attend and talk.  I hereby specifically request my placement on the agenda.

In late 2005 Thompson claimed to have purchased an unspecified - but assumed to be small - amount of Take Two stock with the intent of gaining admission to the company's stockholder meeting.

While Thompson's request references the EA takeover bid, we'd bet the ranch that he will somehow relate EA's pursuit of Take Two to his standard game violence rap.

But what we really want to know is, assuming Thompson is granted access to the meeting, will he bring his bullhorn?

Comments

He has had those stocks for a long time guys... kinda to be able to sit on the meetings....

silly boy...

Someone buy me a plane ticket and some stocks! I wanna watch the show!

I want to hear Bruce's speech, I can picture it now!

Bruce: "HEY LOOK I'M IMPORTANT TAKE TWO SUCKS! HEY YOU SHUT UP I'M MORE IMPORTANTER THAN YOU! HEY SHUT UP! I'M IMPORTANT SOMEONE PAY ATTENTION TO ME!"

Someone bring the vidja camera!

@JackDon'tKnowJack

And if he doesn't attend he'll claim he requested and was denied the information.

And with how well versed he is in law, I doubt he'll know he's entitled to this by law.

The person* bankrolling Jack's stock purchases and out-of-town trips to shareholder meeting and trips up to Tallahassee to answer to the Supremes, etc. (and it damn sure Jack himself because he ain't made a honest dollar in years) should really ask themselves: I am actually helping or hurting him?

_______________

* I have my suspicions but out of respect for GP's wishes that Jack's family members not be unneccessarily dragged into the mix, I've declined to specify.

Recommended response:

"Due to requests by EA personnel that you not be involved in EA takeover bids (see: http://gamepolitics.com/2008/03/05/ea-wants-no-help-from-jack-thompson-i... ) and implied legal threats against this company (see: http://gamepolitics.com/2008/03/06/jack-thompson-fires-back-at-ea-claims... ), we at Take Two formally deny your request to participate in the stockholders meeting.

We also further request all future correspondence to be made through Take Two attornies due to the aforementioned legal actions you have proposed."

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Anyone else reminded of that old lady from Futurama?

"I own one share of Planet-Ka-Jigger and I demand the floor!"

According to Oren Wunderman's evaluation, his family and friends interviewed as part of the evaluative process don't see a thing wrong with his mental state or the way he goes about his "crusades."

But, then again, Wunderman did conclude that Jack's mentally fit to practice law, so we all know what that report's worth.

JT's kinda like that annoying little kid that complains about how mean all the cool kids are when they're not around and then tries to get into their secret club meetings where nobody likes him.

@TJLK:

That's not his message. That's the pretext behind which Jack furthers his true agenda: his own self-aggrandizement. If you know don't that, with all due respect, you don't know Jack.

wow... just wow...

oh, and ...

*sigh*

*Head asplodes*

WTF? He has STOCK in them? Can they buy it back? =)

WTF? What is going on with JT? Now he is invested in Take-Two? WTF? I just don't know what to say....

He just wants to take attention away from something that doesn't involve him. This is also where he will try to take credit for the hostile takeover- he will claim to have orchestrated the entire thing.

Anyone giving odds? I got $10 on him bringing the bullhorn.

I bet he only owns like 10 $ worth of shares.

Alyssey, I had no idea....

*Looks at Title*

OH CHRIST! It's Fat Bastard! I love Goldmember..

@DeusPayne

I will raise you £10 (About $20)

I'll put odds that he doesn't own enough stock to even warrant an invite to a shareholder's meeting.

Can anyone enlighten (And hopefully entertain) me as to the.. Oh bugger it, why did he bring the Bullhorn in the first place?

You don't have to have an "invitation". You show up at the door of the meeting with proof you own any stock at all and you're let in. See here for the instructions for last year's meeting. If it's a general shareholder's meeting, he would be notified via the address of record on his stock certificates (or via his broker if he runs it that way). Instructions for how to end up on the agenda would also be included.

Does he think he just fell through the cracks, or is he not eligible to be there under some bylaw and is trying to get around it? Or is this just publicity nonsense?

T2 Guy 1: "Hey, guys. Janet Reno wants to know when the meeting is."
T2 Guy 2: "3 O'Clock, March 31th."
T2 Guy 1: "My bad. It's not Janet Reno. It's Jack Thompson."
T2 Guy 2: "3 O'Clock, April 1st."

The Guess Who are going to the T2 shareholder meeting? Sweet. I want tickets. :P
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

I'm willing to bet they will refuse his admission to the meeting. Jacko has been nothing but a pain to Take Two for a long time and they have nogood reason to believe that he will be anything less if they allow him in to speak.
I'm half hoping they do allow him in. The very moment he steps up to the podium, someone dressed at Carl Johnson will come out and beat his ass.

@Momgamer

Considering he's suing the company, there might be some obscure "you're not allowed in while the case is still in court" rule. ;)

But yeah, blithering that he "needs" an invite, when as a shareholder he's entitled to attend anyway?

Wait, what happened last year? Wasn't he going to attend then? Did they block him, or did he just chicken out and not show up?
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Let him in, let him talk for 2 minutes and let him sit down for the rest of the meeting. I don't think ideas of morality are going to sway the stockholders visions of increasing profit. Even if he threatens a lawsuit (again) he is well known to be a failure, possibly soon to be disbarred.

@Jabrwock

He got too pissy last year to be allowed in. Oddly, he didn't bother to show up anyway.

oh axia777 sorry I meant silly boy to Mr. JT, not you!!!!

Sorry sorry sorry!

To the surprise of absolutely no one.....

If he really was a shareholder, he would have received (or will receive) the information from Take Two about where the annual shareholder meeting will take place.

The invites go out to every shareholder in due time.

It's typical the dumbshit does not know this.

Jack probably owns a single share.

This makes buying stock in T2 very compelling.

I don't know if he's coming with his bullhorn, but I bet he's coming with some bullshit.

Oh, and I bet the value of his holdings in Take Two that he has NO idea how to add his items on the meeting agenda.

He will not be able to just shout them from the floor in the meeting, because they're run on a very tight set of rules.

About the only thing he can do is vote on existing agenda items, and since he owns roughly .0000000001% of the stock, his vote will carry exactly the same sort of weight his legislative efforts have done so far.

Idiot.

I think it will depend. If he's talked to them before, they probably won't let him talk again. If he hasn't then it's a 50/50 chance (dependig on if they are familiar with him).

Personally, I have a thing about letting someone talk at a shareholders meeting who has been quoted as saying he "will destroy" the company. See, destroying a company often has a detrimental effect on stock prices.

I expect they will thank him but politely decline seeing as the agenda is already full with majority stock holders. $10 doesn't get you a life time forum at a stock holders meeting.

Then again, my only experience with a stock holders meeting is that one episode of Futurama... you know the one, right?

@Pixelantes Anonymous:

Jack knows he'll get his invite. He's gotten them before. It's a legal requirement that they send him one every year. But he'd much rather play dumb and write some letter of inquiry to T2 because he can then cc his silly letter to every media outlet in the world in hopes of see his name in print. Spell it with me: A-T-T-E-N-T-I-O-N W-H-O-R-E.

I hate T2. I will not rest until I have toppled them and will dancing on their ashes. I am sworn to the other-throw of T2. T2 is a bane on the public and society. God is going to smite them (JBT claimed this but as always God seems to be busy elsewhere)

Oh, may I buy some T2 Stock please?

I fool is said to be born every minute in JBTs case it seems to have been 2.

I have stock in TTWO and if Jack Thompson is their so will I. MomGamer you are 100 percent correct!

[...] Link [...]

@MonkeyPeaches

That's pretty what he said he was getting, for the sole purpose of attending share holder meeting and confronting Eibler.

"will he bring his bullhorn?"

Please, the guy is living bullhorn. He doesn't need to bring one, he IS the bullhorn.

@Pixelantes Anonymous

If his past "debates" are any indication he'll likely get escorted out for interrupting people and talking as loud as possible.

The only reason he's attending is his perceived self importance has him believing he'll get Take Two taken over, while ignoring that even EA isn't stupid enough to cancel GTA, though he is also likely hoping EA will cave more easily to pressure. OR he's hoping they saturate it like they do everything else.

I know it's an academic point because Jack's essentially dishonorable and had no intention of abiding by the terms when he signed it, but his settlement agreement with T2 doesn't leave him much room to publicly criticize T2's products or their marketing of those products -- shareholder or not.

And, if you ask me, T2 deserves whatever they get from him. He's breached it before any number of times and they didn't drag him back to court like they should have. Now he's feeling emboldend. Serves them right. Bunch o' wussies.

Eric, do you have a camcorder? Is a camcorder allowed? A pocket tape recorder? (taser joke removed)

Am just curious what goes on behind open doors.

He'll just sit in the corner and call everyone stupid.

He just can't stand to have nobody looking at him for five minutes, can he? XD

(Sigh) Dennis, don't give Jack ideas, please?

He can show up, but to demand to speak on the agenda? He may need to show cause.

Heh.

Prediction:

He won't get the attention/importance he is looking for (if any) and will rant and rave (and sue) about having his rights violated. This from a man who has been trying to violate the rights of everyone else.

He's not making it past the entrance.

For once, he does something without involving a lawsuit or a campus shooting.

I'm ALMOST impressed.

Oh, Christ...
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraThink so yes, since the judge didn't allow them to add ips at will. :P05/23/2012 - 6:23am
ConsterTPB works fine for me (didn't work the day of the verdict). Apparently they switched IP addresses, meaning Brein has to re-sue to have that added to the block-this list?05/22/2012 - 8:16pm
ZippyDSMleesigh...was playing anice game of empire at war and then boom crash...hope new oparts come soon ><05/22/2012 - 1:17pm
Andrew EisenI still say the particular word or phrase the MPAA uses to describe what it's fighting against is the least of its problems.05/22/2012 - 1:12pm
ZippyDSMleeMPAA finally admits piracy is not the same as stealing, kinda http://tinyurl.com/chtcf8p05/22/2012 - 11:55am
ddrfr33k@EZK Bwahahaha! @Michael: Yeah, several news sources have said that google DNS can bypass the TPB roadblocks.05/22/2012 - 11:38am
Michael ChandraWeird, I can still visit piratebay. Wonder if Google DNS is related to that, or I simply have an exotic ISP?05/22/2012 - 9:03am
Lisa PhamNo harm done, E. Zachary Knight. :)05/22/2012 - 4:50am
Uncharted NESBSA Claims Half of PC Users Are Pirates- http://slashdot.org/palm/17/12/05/22/0051216_1.shtml05/21/2012 - 11:18pm
E. Zachary KnightAh. Missed that. My mind just connected DDR3 with ddrfr33k and ran with it. Oh well.05/21/2012 - 10:12pm
Lisa PhamHe also mentioned the game "Shadows of the damned" which is on PS305/21/2012 - 8:08pm
E. Zachary Knightddrf33k, I think Zip is referring to computer hardware.05/21/2012 - 7:33pm
ddrfr33k@Zip: Excellent game. It's a trip.05/21/2012 - 7:09pm
Lisa PhamIanC - if you read/looked at the report (PDF and written) then you'd see where they failed and why. Some games have come close to passing and some have passed. The list of games evaluated. http://www.reclaimyourgame.com/content.php/18-RYG-Evaluations05/21/2012 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMaybe I'll luck out and the Wii version won't have this retail exclusive DLC nonsense.05/21/2012 - 5:12pm
ZippyDSMleeBought new guitar...trying to find a nice DDR3/mobo combo under 200$ sicne I need new ram thats 100$....fun times..... picked up shadows of the damned tho!!05/21/2012 - 4:56pm
E. Zachary KnightYeah, that's how I feel about retail exclusive DLC too. ;)05/21/2012 - 3:37pm
RedMageThat's what I started to figure too. They seem to have trouble coming up with an effective scare tactic. At one point they referred to it as "online looting" which just sounds stupid.05/21/2012 - 3:34pm
E. Zachary KnightOf all the sucky suckiness that ever sucked. Lego Batman 2 will suffer from sucky retailer exclusive DLC. Suck! http://tinyurl.com/ckq67vg05/21/2012 - 3:30pm
E. Zachary KnightAs for Dodd, I think it is mostly that he realizes that calling copyright infringement "theft" is bad for PR and that they need to change tactics. Just like how they went from using "piracy" to using "theft."05/21/2012 - 1:48pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician