The Bar Trial of Jack Thompson (Part 6): Bully Case Judge Testifies

March 25, 2008 -

Whatever you think about Jack Thompson, there are times when he can play the media like a Stradivarius. And so it was that he managed to hold the attention of both the mainstream and gaming press for several weeks in 2006 while he sought to block the release of Rockstar’s Bully in Florida.

Thompson’s unusual suit, which charged that the T-rated Bully was a public nuisance, came before Judge Ronald Friedman on the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court. In an early-round win for Thompson, Friedman ordered Take Two to produce the game for an in-chambers viewing prior to its retail launch.

That would be Thompson’s only victory in the case, which quickly turned contentious (anyone surprised?). Thompson blasted Friedman endlessly following the judge’s ruling that he would not grant Thompson's petition to block Bully’s release. Thompson upped the ante by announcing that he would run for Friedman’s seat in 2008. We note that Thompson does not appear to be following through on that claim.

For his part, Judge Friedman wasted little time in filing a complaint against Thompson with the Florida Bar. The Friedman complaint was one of several on which the Bar opted to take Thompson to trial last November. In this multi-part series GamePolitics has been publishing excerpted transcripts from the video game-related portions of the Thompson Bar trial. Today's edition covers the direct testimony of Judge Friedman. Due to the length of Friedman's testimony, Thompson's cross examination of the judge will appear in the next installment.

( In the excerpted transcripts that follow, RF is Judge Ronald Friedman. JT is Thompson, TUMA is prosecutor Sheila Tuma and DT is Judge Dava Tunis, who is presiding over the case…)

TUMA: Can you tell us what Mr. Thompson asked you to do to make the determination of entering an injunction [to bock the release of Bully]?

RF: He wanted me to review the game and prohibit its distribution, which was scheduled a few days later, maybe a week later.

TUMA: Did you entertain his request?

RF: I did... I heard arguments from both sides. The counsel for the defendants [Take Two] did not think it was necessary to do any of this because under the First Amendment, they had a right to make the distribution.

Mr. Thompson believed this video was so bad that it should be prohibited from distribution to teenagers; and as bad as he made it sound, I indicated that I would in camera view the entire game. I ordered counsel to provide the equipment as well as somebody who could operate the equipment - I wouldn't know how to do it - and have him come down from, I believe it was New York.

They met - Mr. Thompson was present as well - in my chambers and proceeded to play the video. Now, even though I indicated that I would watch the entire game, they had I think what they call a cheater. They can skip from one spot in the game to another spot, etc. So it wasn't necessary - they indicated it would take about 200 hours to view the entire game, which of course would have been day and night for a long time.

I viewed somewhere bewteen and hour, and hour and a half of the video from spot to spot to get an idea of what the game was and, hopefully, the worst parts of the game. I made the determination - and I set a hearing for the following week - but I made a determination while I was watching it that it did not rise to the standard that would be required to prohibit the game under the First Amendment, which would be a standard of something that would incite to immediate violence.

While I found the game offensive... I wouldn't want my granddaughter watching it and it probably should have a different rating, that is, a mature rating rather than a teenage rating. That's not my call. That may be for the legislature or Congress or some other body, but under the First Amendment, they had the right to make that distribution...

TUMA: I would like you to look at Exhibit 48... Can you identify that letter, please?

RF: This is a memorandum from Jack Thompson to myself by e-mail and it is dated... October 13th, 2006... "Now that you have consigned innumerable children to skull fractures, eye injuries from slingshots and beatings with baseball bats without a hearing as to the danger, let me tell you a few things, with all respect for your office and with no respect for the arbitrary way in which you handled this matter-"

JT: Let me object, as I did yesterday [during Blank Rome attorney Rebecca Ward's testimony] to reading portions of the letter. Obviously, the full context is the letter itself... Of course, the fact that Ms. Tuma is doing this underscores the reason why she's doing it. She's trying to highlight some portion of this out of context. It's improper. It's also reversible error [on appeal].

DT: Do you have any response, Ms. Tuma?

TUMA: No, Your Honor, the same response as yesterday [that the full letters are submitted as evidence for Judge Tunis' review].

DT: Okay. The objection is overruled and Judge Friedman is available for cross examination. The Court is not going to limit your questions regarding these documents that are in evidence.

JT: Your Honor, I don't like to argue with you, but just to protect the record. The opportunity for cross examination has absolutely nothing to do with what the prosecutor is doing and what's improper that she's doing. And that is she can't have this witness or any witness testify to anything out of context... So having said that... Can I have a standing objection?

DT: Yes, sir...

TUMA: If you can go to the third paragraph...

RF: "What you conducted in your chambers, Judge, was the equivalent of Iran leading U.N. weapons inspectors around the country, taking them to places where the illegal activity was not occurring... I couldn't care less what you did to me. What I care is that you, through judicial arrogance, have hung countless kids out to dry at school that will now be meaner and more dangerous. Next time you promise a hearing, I'll bring a parent with me whose kid is in the ground because of a kid who trained to kill him or her in a violent video game. Try mocking that person, I dare you."

TUMA: Can you tell the Court who that letter is copied to?

RF: Defense counsel, the media and the Florida JQC [Judicial Qualifications Commission, i.e the agency that monitors judges].

Tuma: ...can you move to Exhibit 49? ...Can you tell the Court what that document is?

RF: "Verified motion to recuse presiding judge."

TUMA: And that was to recuse you in the case of Mr. Thompson?

RF: Yes, ma'am.

TUMA: Can you go to page two of that Exhibit, please? ...In paragraph 10, can you read the sentence...?

RF: "The late respected Dade Circuit Court Judge Reah Pincus Grossman, when she returned to the practice of law could not abide appearing before this judge, and now the undersigned [Thompson] knows why."

TUMA: Do you know Judge Grossman?

RF: Very well.

TUMA: Is she deceased?

RF: Rumors of her demise are greatly exaggerated.

TUMA: Is that a no?

RF: She is not deceased.

TUMA: Can you tell me, have you had a conversation with her regarding the statement that Mr. Thompson has made in this pleading?

RF: I was shocked to learn she had died. So I called her office, only to find that she had not. I spoke with her and she was just as shocked as I was about these pleadings.

TUMA: Can you tell the Judge what she told you if she ever spoke to Mr. Thompson?

RF: She said she didn't know Mr. Thompson, she has never spoken to Mr. Thompson, and she certainly didn't agree with anything alleged by Mr. Thompson.

TUMA: Thank you. Can you now read paragraph 11...?

RF: "The behavior of this judge was abominable, which was made all the worse by the fact that he engaged in these childish antics in front of the media in the courtroom."

TUMA: Thank you... can you please go to Exhibit 50...?

RF: This is a letter from Mr. Thompson to myself dated October 17th, 2006... "When the victims start contacting me, I'll tell them how you prevented the hearing and didn't review the entire game before you unleashed it upon them. I have never run into a more discouraging abortion of justice than in your courtoom. But it's not about me, Judge Friedman. It's about these kids. You think the riot in the OD -" that's the Orange Bowl - "was bad? Just wait."

TUMA: Thank you. Can you look at Exhibit 51 and identify that for the Court?

RF: A letter from Mr. Thompson to myself dated October 18th, 2006... "Gee. Care to go for violating 10 of your own orders in one week, Judge Friedman? How about your oath of office? We can count that as one... I'm wondering where this judicial misconduct is going to take us all... I have a pretty good idea, even if you don't. The great thing about our system of law is that it was spawned in the crucible of throwing off the yoke of a tyrant."

TUMA: Can you look at the next Exhibit...

RF: This is a [Thompson] pleading in the same case... "The Court then unethically and improperly then proceeded to enter his ruling in contravention of its own order... He then denied Thompson's request to cross examine and the Judge then violated his own order to view the game to completion, topped off by his childish and unethical refusal to conduct a hearing the next day as he had ordered... If this [Friedman's] Court is so foolish as to enter a show cause order [for contempt, against Thompson] as Take Two requests for trying to remedy this Court's unethical misconduct... then the aforementioned federal civil rights action will be amended to add this judge."

TUMA: Thank you. Can you please look at Exhibit 53?

RF: ...This is a news release entitled, "Dump the Bully Judge." ..."Thompson has chosen his opponent carefully, incumbent Ronald M. Friedman. Friedman is the man... unleashing upon America's preteen and teen children the extremely violent Columbine simulator video game Bully."

TUMA: And if you could go to the last of the media news release?

RF: ..."Circuit Court Judge Ronald Friedman is the embodiment of what more and more citizens understand to be the greatest domestic threat to liberty, a tyrannical judiciary that thinks it is above the law."

TUMA: And if you now look at Exhibit 54 and identify it for the record.

RF: This is a letter from Mr. Thompson dated October 24th, 2006 to the Attorney General of the United States... "Now [Take Two's law firm] Blank Rome is at it again, having enlisted a pliable Circuit Court Judge, Ronald M. Friedman, to abuse his contempt power to try to throw me in jail for for blowing the whistle on the judge's incredible misconduct and Take Two Blank Rome's as well. Judge Friedman... has improperly paved the way for a Columbine simulator video game to be sold to children. Interestingly, this game also contains gay sexual activity. Real cool stuff for 10-year-olds, no?"

TUMA: And this letter was also cc'd to Blank Rome, the media, congressional Democrats and yourself?

RF: That's correct.

TUMA: Can you please look at Exhibit 55?

RF: ...It's a letter from Mr. Thompson dated October 24th, 2006 to myself... "Dear Judge Friedman: Transmitted herewith is my application for [your] recusal... If you cannot decide whether or not to grant it, then I would suggest flipping a coin. Heads I win, tails you lose...

TUMA: Can you look at the next exhibit 50 and identify that for the Court, please?

RF: ...This is a pleading in the Bully case [from Thompson]... "Defendant's [Take Two] position - and it appears to be this Court's position as well - is that it can order secrecy worthy of a Star Chamber in order to shroud its misconduct from any review of any kind, judicial or public... However, this court has indicated that it looks with favor upon the notion that it can use its contempt power to cover up from judicial and public scrutiny its misconduct... Judge Friedman has even drawn his pleasant judicial assistant into this cover-up, the Judge's misconduct charade... This court now appears to be in full court press to abuse its contempt power to keep the lid on how thoroughly it botched its duty to have a real judicual inquiry into whether... the sale to school children of this Columbine simulator, poses a safety risk as the Miami-Dade School Board found unanimously that it did."

TUMA: "Thank you. Can you now look at Exhibit 60?"

RF: ...A [Thompson] pleading in this case... "...This is not acting like a judge. It's acting like a Bully. How ironic. How appropriate. No wonder this [Friedman's] Court had no problem with hundreds of fists landing on students' faces. He [Friedman] beats up lawyers for fun himself..."

TUMA: Can you please look at Exhibit 62 and read that for the record?

RF: ...A [Thompson] pleading in this case... "Judge Friedman was hoodwinked by Take Two employees who sat there in his chambers and presented to Judge Friedman with unsworn testimony with no cross examination by Plaintiif [Thompson], to which Plaintiff objected on the record, by falsely stating this [Bully] is not a violent game and that violence is uniformly punished in the game. These were lies which this Judge swallowed hook, line and sinker... Is this Judge [Friedman] going to admit to the whole world that he was taken for a ride by Take Two; that he violated his own orders in not reviewing the game to conclusion; and that his own misconduct was a travesty that explains why we are sitting here with tens of thousands of these [Bully] units sold abd played by minors?... Does a single sane person... think that this judge... is going to prove himself  to have been fooled by a porn to kids video game company that is now know to have placed homosexual acts in this game sold to 10-year-olds?"

TUMA: ...If you can look at Exhibit 64...

RF: This is a transcript of proceedings before myself on October 25th, 2006 in this [Bully] case... My recollection is that there were two matters that were supposedly to be heard. One was the matter of contempt that the defendants [Take Two] were seeking  [against Thompson] and the other was the [Thompson] issue of recusal [of Judge Friedman].

TUMA: Did you recuse yourself in this case, Your Honor?

RF: I did... Because I filed a complaint with the Florida Bar... As the Court has heard... I thought that the conduct of Mr. Thompson was unprofessional and violative of his oath as a lawyer in the state of Florida. I thought, number one, while I found it offensive and I, like everyone else, don't like to have my name besmirched; nevertheless, even if everything he said about me was true - and it was very hurtful to me - it was an abuse of his oath because it was demeaning to our system of justice and the court system, and I couldn't tolerate that.

TUMA: Thank you. Can you now look at Exhibit 65...

RF: That's a letter from Thompson to myself, October 25th, 2006... "Here's a tip for you, Judge. I don't just practice law. I save lives from reckless jurists like you... I serve those broken-hearted people, not arrogant tyrants like you... I'm a lot of bad things, but I'm not a liar. You are. You promised and ordered hearings that never occurred and you even told the nation that you reviewed a video game that you didn't even see but for one percent of it. You then came out before the cameras and pronounced the game perfectly safe. You're the kind of guy who would wave into the intersection a child to be run over by a semi. I'm looking forward to my judicial race against you and win or lose, you're going to be exposed as the prevarictator and a facilitator of violence and porn to kids that you are. You will never agree to a debate in our race because you can'yt control that situation. You won't have a Sheriff to shut me up. America's a great place where citizens get to cleanse the public dole of thugs like you. I'm looking forward to doing just that..."

TUMA: If you can look at Exhibit 66, Judge...

RF: This is entitled, "An open letter to the Florida Bar about the Bully judge," dated October 27th, 2006... "There's a transcript of the bizarre seance he [Friedman] held in his office with Take Two employees giving him testimony, not under oath, and preventing cross examination by me. I call it the Kim Jong Il guided tour of North Korea to find where the nukes are not..."

TUMA: I just have one last question. Can you explain to the Court the effect that Mr. Thompson's conduct and sending you these letters have had on you?

JT: Objection, relevance.

DT: Overruled.

RF: Well, I think I previously said it hurt me to see in writing or even hear somebody demean me the way he has. But I was even hurt more for our judiciary because I wear the robe - and it's not about me. It's about our system of justice and the respect that's due to the judiciary.

NEXT: Jack Thompson cross-examines Judge Friedman... 

WHILE YOU'RE WAITING: Check out this amazing video of Thompson's appearance in Judge Friedman's court, filmed by Niero of Destructoid.


Geebus. Can JT is going to be buried under a mountain of stupid letters he's written. I love the irony that he's getting slaughtered by his own hand.

Good going JT. A winnar is u!


Yeah, It probably was, but I thought it also served to demonstrate how detached JT is from reality and everything in between cloud cuckoo land.

Both of the videos are down GP.....Jack Thompson is one of the worst lawyers ever even without his clouded views

Wow...this is just pathetic. I can't believe that the judge hasn't just stood up, waved his gavel in the air, and said, "ENOUGH! I can't take this shit anymore! It's the same thing, over and over! Mr. Thompson, you are hereby disbarred, so go sit in the corner and think about what you've done!"

"Also, you're an idiot!"

Thompson just keeps digging his hole deeper and deeper...

God knows what he'll do though if he's disbarred. *shudder* He might even try and run for public office. "Senator Jack Thompson", now THAT's a scary thought.

Part of Narcissistic Personality Disorder is an inability to STFU. The sheer bulk of offensive letters, emails, forum posts, court docs is effectively proving to be his undoing.

Jack has only one person to blame in all of this.

GP: "Yes, Judge Friedman made it clear that Jack completely got Grossman’s death wrong… Jack explains that - sort of - in the next segment."

I can't wait to see THAT explanation. Will he pull the "figuratively speaking" card? Will he pull the "I meant what would happen if you continued to be reckless" card? Will he pull the "she would die of embarassment, IN THE PAST" card? Will he blame Friedman's staff for misinforming him? Will he claim her staff called HIM? Stay tuned!
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@ Blindgibbon

From what i understand, Jack makes a point of pissing everyone off, so that if they act against him, he will claim they were unfairly biased.

I imagine that Judge Tunis is more than aware of this, and is forced to act like a saint, in order to make sure the entire hearing is not invalidated by Jack's legal trickery.

Jack is a wretched human being, who clearly hates himself, and therefore wants everyone to suffer.

Pity then Judge Tunis and Shiela Turna who are forced to bite their tongues in order to ensure justice is properly served.

Hmm, I need to go hurry and play GTA to calm down!!!


"TUMA: I just have one last question. Can you explain to the Court the effect that Mr. Thompson’s conduct and sending you these letters have had on you?

JT: Objection, relevance.

DT: Overruled."

Do i recall incorrectly, or didnt JT consistently refer to the emotional distress of the grieving mother in regards to that murder case, just before? Hypocrite much?

@Captain Sensible: I have a feeling Mr Thompson would go lower than anything you, or I, or any of the readers here think is possible and I'm sure we will eventually see it wrriten about here as well.

[b]RF[/b]: Rumors of her demise are greatly exaggerated.

[b]TUMA[/b]: Is that a no?

[b]RF[/b]: She is not deceased.

Can you say classic? :D

Ok, but a little more serious now, those letters to the judge, they're aweful, not to mention those press-releases. Assuming he treats all his targets like this, how has he not been accused, tried and found guilty of slander, harassment, defamation and probably quite a few other charges???

I do find it very amusing that JT is essentially riding his own trainwreck to disbarment. :)

I've been reading all of these since Dennis has started posting them. Jack just sounds like a sore loser and a petulant child in almost everything he says and does both in regards to the immediate proceedings as well as in almost every communication cited as evidence.

TUMA: Do you know Judge Grossman?

RF: Very well.

TUMA: Is she deceased?

RF: Rumors of her demise are greatly exaggerated.

TUMA: Is that a no?

RF: She is not deceased.


@ Paul

after reading these transcirpts I can say with 100% certainty the last thing I would be scared of is Jack Thompsons "legal trickery" as this would imply that he infact has some workable knowledge of the law.

@Jack Thompson:

Have you at all started to dig your way out from under that mountainous pile of exhibits? If not, you should get to it, chop-chop. It'll be a while digging before you hit any air.

Hmmmmmm... it seems like JT's ego-maniacal rantings will really be his downfall. I imagine that they could have drawn the evidence on this out for several days if needs be.

Isn't this something like watching a train wreck in progress? Ya can't bear to watch it, but yet ya can't turn away from it...


I like how he can't even object to this crap.

I have to disagree with those of the "He's just deliberately throwing his license away so can he claim martyrdom and a Christ-like sacrfice, etc. etc." school of thought. My though is that Jack is about to have his license taken away because he's dumb. Not martyrdom. Just incredibly dumb.

TUMA: Is she deceased?

RF: Rumors of her demise are greatly exaggerated.

TUMA: Is that a no?

RF: She is not deceased.

omfg. this judge is awesome.

I actually can see him thinking that if he makes the judge and opposing council angry and if he can make them show their anger, he can point to that as bias and a cause for a mistrial. It would never work, and even if it did it's just a temporary solution at best, but it would allow him to keep his license for another day, and therefore would be a victory to him.

However, Judge Tunis is having none of that, and I bless her for it.

Wow, I'm suprised Jack actually kept his trap shut through most of that!

GP: Well, he made a standing objection for the record to the reading of excerpts from the Exhibits, so there was really nothing for him to do... He has a LOT to say in the next segment when he cross examines Friedman.

Honestly, I'm gonna hate to see how nasty Thompson gets o nthe judge. If how he was toward the first of the Take Two attorneys is any indication.


actually im enjoying watching this

"My though is that Jack is about to have his license taken away because he’s dumb. Not martyrdom. Just incredibly dumb."

I agree. HE may feel he's going down as a martyr for the cause, but yeah, in the end, he's the (figuratively speaking, of course :P) suicide bomber standing at the only embassy gate that doesn't have a bunch of targets, who forgot to pack the detonator. Or explosives... ;)


And then he trudges sadly home to face reality for another day...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

I think this could be submitted as evidence to the wealth of SPAM (that's all it is really) Jack tries to clog up the legal system with.

Jack misrepresents Judge Pincus so he can publicly mispresent Judge Friedman who won't aid his effort to misrepresent Bully.

What's that called? A lie, cloaked in falsehood, and wrapped in bullshit.

just for those who don't know...

The "rumors of her death have been greatly exaggerated" line is a quate from Mark Twain after the rumors of his death had been spread.


"after reading these transcirpts I can say with 100% certainty the last thing I would be scared of is Jack Thompsons “legal trickery” as this would imply that he infact has some workable knowledge of the law."

My thoughts exactly.

Of course, this doesn't stop him from accusing his opponents of using legal trickery. Like evidence, or testimony, or... laws and such things... Cheaters! ;)
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...


How low is "low?" Whale poo-poo low.


"The “rumors of her death have been greatly exaggerated” line is a quate from Mark Twain after the rumors of his death had been spread."

Get the feeling that this is some wild and crazy adventure out of Innocents Abroad? Like any minute now Jack is going to don a tophat and announce that he is really the great French tourist guide... Bill Goldfinger...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap... ol' JT has really dug himself a hole with the bashing comments to Judge Friedman. how can you show that much disrespect for a man in his position? just from reading these transcripts from the last few days..I would have called the case closed and disbarred him. save the taxpayer some money. he has put his disrespectful and unprofessional comments in Black and White..

Sorry, GP.

@Dracis & Captain Sensible

GP, what do you find most amazing about the video you linked? For me, "sigh and gaze at the ceiling" the giant sign makes me giggle with insane glee.

i cant wait for jackass to cross examine the honorable judge friedman

(you guys think this is a train wreck ill bet money the cross exam makes this look like a picnic)

Is Judge Tunis male or female? I feel really stupid for not knowing because I know it was said somewhere.

TUMA: I just have one last question. Can you explain to the Court the effect that Mr. Thompson’s conduct and sending you these letters have had on you?

JT: Objection, relevance.

DT: Overruled.

You know, I think Jack forgot what he is in court for. He keeps going off onto tangents about Take Two, but then he tries to object on the basis of relevance to the effects of his own actions, which the most relevant thing here. Does he really have no idea why he is there? Or does he have a set of dice, and on one it has things like "Objection", "Move to Strike" and on the other things like "Relevence", "Heresay" and he just rolls them each time a new line of questioning starts.

What was so funny and different about this one is that there is very little of the witness talking, and very much of just reading the things Jack sent.

I'd like to make a prediction. In the next update, Jack will attempt to villify the witness by pressing why he didn't play the whole game. Then he will go off on a tagent about how he was justified for doing what he did because he was worried about the children. And neither one is really relevant.

KayleL Says:

GP: The links you have to the videos have been taken down by youtube.

GP: really? I wonder why… Hmmm…

Considering YouTube is now the property of Google (a highly visible company), I'd wager that Jack Thompson placed legal threats against the moderators of Youtube, etc. etc... He's done the same thing to Wikipedia over his own article [it's well documented in the discussion page], so now they heavily restrict what is placed on their website about him, just to avoid the trouble.


Female. In most languages, names ending in "a" have a better than good chance of being female.


the honorable dava tunis is female

(in case your wondering why im using the correct titles even though im not in court the fact that they both have dealt this long with jack and havent snapped, this has earned them a lifetime of respect in my book)

@ Delin

Judge Dava Tunis is female (google is your friend)

@JDKJ & Azhrarn

I know, which only makes my failure more complete.

I had thought so, but wasn't sure.

The video was enjoyable. I enjoyed how he kept pushing the contempt motion after the judge recused himself and said that he wouldn't be hearing the contempt motion.

What I want to know is, has Jack not said anything about GP publishing this series on his trial? I've been expecting a tantrum this whole time, demanding you pull it from the site.

@ pwcapone

I'm pretty sure JT has threatened GP after the first edition of this series.

I think the best part of this is that when Thompson first wrote those and GP published them, we all told thompson of his errors, yet he( I believe he was able to post at that time) just kept calling us names (most notably comparing us gamers to the hitler youth).

now everything we gamers said back then is coming full circle

GP did say that Jack demanded that the only way that it should be allowed on is if it were in it's entirety, which would have been impossible. Jack was trying to use his typical scare tactics, which had their typical result...Failure.


The part I like is when Judge Friedman says (I think, the audio wasn't the greatest), "Bailiff, if Mr. Thompson raises that sign again, cuff him." I tend to think that's what was said because Jack ain't never raise his sign again afterwards. That's some fall out ya chair stuff, right there.

Jack Thompson is a great guy!
He should go into constructions!
I mean look at him digging that hole! wooot!

He digs deep and digs fast!
(sadly he keeps forgetting to leave a way OUT of his holes)

@Jack Thompson
seriously... this is so unbecoming of you.
remember, even if you fight with the right motives for the right reasons, doing it the wrong way is just as bad as having the wrong motives.
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :


Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenI told Sega if it releases Yakuza 1&2 HD and Yakuza 5 in North America, I'll buy them. So far, they don't seem to be swayed.07/31/2015 - 5:11pm
Craig R.Too many gamers were harassing and abusing long before Baldwin decided to 'legitimize' the lunatic fringe, but that term certainly made the lunatics easier to pick out of the crowd07/31/2015 - 4:58pm
Craig R.Which is why the entire GG crowd looks like a giant bad egg07/31/2015 - 4:55pm
Craig R.Irony: the people who are feeling hostility toward their 'gamer' identity are often those who are most hostile to everybody else07/31/2015 - 4:55pm
Andrew EisenIt's not about gamers at all, it's discussing the harassment and abuse that Sarkeesian and Quinn had suffered. So yeah, not a great title but not an attack on gamers either.07/31/2015 - 4:48pm
Andrew EisenI agree than many of the titles are kinda bunk though. For example, Ars Technia's "The death of the 'gamers' and the women who 'killed' them" doesn't really work for the article.07/31/2015 - 4:47pm
Andrew EisenAnd I still don't see how articles like Polygon's "An awful week to care about video games" can be construed as an attack.07/31/2015 - 4:25pm
Andrew Eisen18 total? I've seen several lists and the total has never been above 14. The most popular collection seems to be 9 on Aug. 28 then three more on Aug. 29, Sep. 2 and Sep. 3.07/31/2015 - 4:24pm
Infophile@Goth_Skunk: Your distaste for TMS is noted and given exactly the respect it deserves. The fact that you don't like a site doesn't mean they can't be right. In the linked article, they are.07/31/2015 - 4:06pm
Goth_SkunkAnd the worst volleys are the ones being fired by the kind of people who should be standing up and saying 'Hey! This isn't cool! Stop that!'07/31/2015 - 4:05pm
Goth_SkunkNow let's come full circle: One such confrontationally titled article is easy to dismiss. Within a day, nine similarly titled articles are written. Within 4 more days, nine more articles are written. This can't be ignored. This is a blatant attack.07/31/2015 - 4:04pm
Andrew EisenAnd that's totally fine. I too often skip articles and videos based solely on an unappealing title.07/31/2015 - 3:56pm
Goth_SkunkPersonally, I would not waste time reading an article with such a blatantly confrontational title.07/31/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenGoth - Depends on how the article was written and what it actually said.07/31/2015 - 3:49pm
Goth_SkunkThis is like going fishing and castign a HUGE net that captures tuna, dolphins, sharks, cod, and salmon when all you really want to capture are clownfish.07/31/2015 - 3:48pm
Andrew EisenPerm - If the specific make and model are made clear, I have no problem with the article saving space by refering to them as "these cars" or whatever.07/31/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_Skunk... Hasbro's widening horizons..." would it not make sense that some would object there is no distinction being made between a reactionary brony and a stable-minded brony?07/31/2015 - 3:47pm
Big PermCars are being recalled because they explode. Editors Note at the end: Not all cars, only this specific make and model07/31/2015 - 3:46pm
Andrew EisenI still feel it was clear that they were admonishing a particular and very specific type of gamer. It's why I had no problem with any of the articles (especially since about half of them weren't really about "gamers" anyway).07/31/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_Skunk@Andrew: If a columnist had written a "Bronies Are Dead" article, but in the article stated: "Note: I'm not talking about every guy who watches MLP or who self-identifies as a brony, just the type of reactionary holdouts that feel so threatened by..."07/31/2015 - 3:45pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician