BBC: Video Games Bear Byron's Brunt... Internet "Gets Away With It"

March 28, 2008
There's provocative commentary from the BBC's Darren Waters (left), who wonders if the Internet got off with a Tanya Byron slap on the wrist while video games will face new rating system and new governance of sales in the U.K.

Waters writes:
Video games have been the focus of pretty much all of the coverage of the Byron Review... The reason is simple - when it comes to legislation, only the games industry is being affected.

For the internet, specifically virtual worlds, social networks and video sharing sites Dr Tanya's emphasis is on education and awareness... this is because regulating the net and the morass of user generated content on it is a task no government in its right mind would want to tackle, because it is a geo-political nightmare.

And if you read the official statements and reaction from different quarters of the internet industry all of them are universally applauding the review. Why? Because they know they have been let off the hook, so to speak. There's no legislation, no hint of regulation, no potential fines, no requirements to implement technological change.

Comments

Internet would also affect a persons freedom of speech (at least for most cases). Pretty much the only thing the governments of the world can do is crack down on the illegal portions of it and some dangerous situations (If anyone saw the movie Untraceable, something like that).

Basically the internet is a massive New York City...

Many internet sites are bases in the US (e.g. servers and the like) so this alone would make it very difficult for anyone to regulate the internet, unless the free western world would like to be compared to say China or some Middle Eastern countries.

And isn't the point in Byron's report that even 12+ ratings should be enforcable by law? As it is in say, Finland, Canada, and yes, the UK for games that have an 18+ rating on them.

Raising consciousness amongst parents is always a good thing, I find :)

perhaps, rather than a genuine attempt to fix the (ahem) problem, its because the british government cant control the internet, but can control what is sold in stores in the uk?

Let's hope it STAYS that way.

Regulating games is one thing, regulating the internet on the other hand is another. As far as the internet is concerned, it NEEDS it's freedom to actually work.

I'm not all that surprised.

just cause the internet is vast and doesnt recognise government borders doesnt mean that it cant be regulated lol duh just take over the world!!
(although you have to make sure ireland doesnt nuke turkey[superpower joke])

Huh? I thought it specifically stated recommendations for regulating social networking sites. Of course, all I have to go on is GP's coverage of the report, I haven't had the time to read it myself yet, but that was mentioned in the last article.

"this is because regulating the net and the morass of user generated content on it is a task no government in its right mind would want to tackle, because it is a geo-political nightmare."

He nailed it right on the head. Video games are easy to regulate, because you can regulate the stores, distributors, and manufacturers. There's a physical item that is passed across a counter-top.

Not so with internet information. How do you regulate a website that may not even be in the UK? Pull a "Great Firewall of China"?
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@cppcrusader

It does. His point is that lawmakers will focus on the medium that is easier to regulate (read: games).

@cullarn

You're talking about England. They've tried the "take over the world" thing.. with lots flags, just ask Eddie Izzard. If you say that any louder, they may be willing to try again, after they make some more flags.

As for the internet getting away with it. They have, and his statements are too true. Couldn't agree more, it's something that most governments would not even attempt to regulate, due to the complex and open environment. There is no universal Point of Sale or vertex btwn content and user that a government can easily police... short of disconnecting from the entire grid.

Why?

Why?

Why?

Why?

I bet thats the question what every Brit gamer is asking. Videogames do not harm anyone you Brit politician retards.

Your people are in more debt than the US and you want to restrain one of your country's biggest money makers?

For shame...who the hell is authorized the Byron Report anyhow??

Well, to be fair it can be done. Why does the US have to be the only one to suffer having MTV online? They block it from other countries themselves. The technology is there. Youtube is blocked in many middle eastern countries due to content. The question is not "can it be done." The question is "should it be done." And the answer is no.

In fairness to Dr. Byron no one has a hope in hell of regulating the internet, all they can do is fire wall a nation off from the world; that would upset a lot of people and be rather illegal in a democracy. Games, on the other hand, are much easier to regulate and consequently get more scrutiny.

Gift.

f*cking ell.

I hate it here.

"There’s no legislation, no hint of regulation, no potential fines, no requirements to implement technological change."

That's right: there's no censorship.

Just wait until the day comes that more games are distributed via downloads rather than shipped to stores in DVD cases.

He was saying something similar yesterday too.

Byron's report takes it without question that (many) parents are pretty helpless and need the government to 'empower' them, to the point that she considers it a problem that information on consoles' parental controls may be ‘concealed in a cumbersome manual’ (para. 7.101); faced with the complications of the Internet, it's no wonder she concludes that all the government can do is try to exert some pressure on 'popular' sites and encourage parents to pay some basic attention.

@Robert Seddon

Can't all of the problems she points out be fought with an information campaign?

Even though the Byron report soberly reports the facts, the recommendations seem to ignore the facts and go for a lot of personal agenda recommendations by either Byron or the reasearch team on the report. And there are some nasty recommendations for websites, even though most cannot be regulated by the UK. Oddly enough, the recommended regulations only target industries that make a lot of money. Hmmmmmm.

Yet another case for people to stop buying from stores. If I have the choice between buying something at Best Buy or Steam, it's Steam every time.

It's just like that post Mass Effect rating bombing that book got on Amazon. While chain stores and malls are the domain of the last generation of old farts without computers, the net is ours.

Don't f*ck with us. We own the internet.

Nobody can control the Internet. Ask the Chinese government how that is going. :)

There are too many factors involved technological to successfully censor the internet.

Newgrounds dot com have many Flash games that have adult ratings....

the only thing is, Newgrounds rates them, NOT the BBFC...

Of course you have never regulate the internet because the internet is NOT commercialized.

Also...

(sings the song from Avenue Q musical)

The Internet is for PORN...

Goatse bears Byron's Brunt

http://goatse.ch

Well with any luck, this Byron report will cause all video game developers to go online with 100% digital distribution to circumvent the ratings system entirely. That will be the ultimate slap in the face of all who wish to legislate against video games.
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Michael ChandraThink so yes, since the judge didn't allow them to add ips at will. :P05/23/2012 - 6:23am
ConsterTPB works fine for me (didn't work the day of the verdict). Apparently they switched IP addresses, meaning Brein has to re-sue to have that added to the block-this list?05/22/2012 - 8:16pm
ZippyDSMleesigh...was playing anice game of empire at war and then boom crash...hope new oparts come soon ><05/22/2012 - 1:17pm
Andrew EisenI still say the particular word or phrase the MPAA uses to describe what it's fighting against is the least of its problems.05/22/2012 - 1:12pm
ZippyDSMleeMPAA finally admits piracy is not the same as stealing, kinda http://tinyurl.com/chtcf8p05/22/2012 - 11:55am
ddrfr33k@EZK Bwahahaha! @Michael: Yeah, several news sources have said that google DNS can bypass the TPB roadblocks.05/22/2012 - 11:38am
Michael ChandraWeird, I can still visit piratebay. Wonder if Google DNS is related to that, or I simply have an exotic ISP?05/22/2012 - 9:03am
Lisa PhamNo harm done, E. Zachary Knight. :)05/22/2012 - 4:50am
Uncharted NESBSA Claims Half of PC Users Are Pirates- http://slashdot.org/palm/17/12/05/22/0051216_1.shtml05/21/2012 - 11:18pm
E. Zachary KnightAh. Missed that. My mind just connected DDR3 with ddrfr33k and ran with it. Oh well.05/21/2012 - 10:12pm
Lisa PhamHe also mentioned the game "Shadows of the damned" which is on PS305/21/2012 - 8:08pm
E. Zachary Knightddrf33k, I think Zip is referring to computer hardware.05/21/2012 - 7:33pm
ddrfr33k@Zip: Excellent game. It's a trip.05/21/2012 - 7:09pm
Lisa PhamIanC - if you read/looked at the report (PDF and written) then you'd see where they failed and why. Some games have come close to passing and some have passed. The list of games evaluated. http://www.reclaimyourgame.com/content.php/18-RYG-Evaluations05/21/2012 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMaybe I'll luck out and the Wii version won't have this retail exclusive DLC nonsense.05/21/2012 - 5:12pm
ZippyDSMleeBought new guitar...trying to find a nice DDR3/mobo combo under 200$ sicne I need new ram thats 100$....fun times..... picked up shadows of the damned tho!!05/21/2012 - 4:56pm
E. Zachary KnightYeah, that's how I feel about retail exclusive DLC too. ;)05/21/2012 - 3:37pm
RedMageThat's what I started to figure too. They seem to have trouble coming up with an effective scare tactic. At one point they referred to it as "online looting" which just sounds stupid.05/21/2012 - 3:34pm
E. Zachary KnightOf all the sucky suckiness that ever sucked. Lego Batman 2 will suffer from sucky retailer exclusive DLC. Suck! http://tinyurl.com/ckq67vg05/21/2012 - 3:30pm
E. Zachary KnightAs for Dodd, I think it is mostly that he realizes that calling copyright infringement "theft" is bad for PR and that they need to change tactics. Just like how they went from using "piracy" to using "theft."05/21/2012 - 1:48pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician