House Subcommittee Explores Virtual Worlds, Simulcasts on Second Life

House Subcommittee Explores Virtual Worlds, Simulcasts on Second Life

April 2, 2008
markey-avatar.jpgYesterday's congressional visit to Second Life is chronicled by the Washington Post.

The Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, chaired by Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), heard from executives of Linden Lab (publisher of Second Life), IBM and other firms. The meeting was simulcast within Second Life, a Congressional first, according to Markey (seen in SL avatar form at left). WaPo reporter Mike Musgrove writes:
A virtual depiction of the Rayburn House Office Building meeting room was projected on television screens on the wall, so that real-world attendees could take a look at the small virtual crowd that logged on for the event. Attendees logging in from Second Life, meanwhile, could watch the proceedings in a video screen projected on the wall of the virtual room.

The subcommittee had questions about the potential for money laundering and whether children were safe in online worlds. This being Second Life, of course, there was some silliness:
As the politicians and the witnesses discussed the potentials of the online virtual world, the online visitors logged on in Second Life chatted away on the screen in conversations that ranged from the topic at hand and beyond:

"I think senators are superdelegates but not all reps."
"I love flip4mac."
"They should really move the x and the c away from each other on the keyboard." (this following a warning that the video might freeze for "just a sex.")

Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) joked that Markey arranged the hearing only to find out how to level up in World of Warcraft. Markey had previously participated in a climate change conference via Second Life.

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) fretted about the potential for child pornography and fraud in online games.

A video webcast of the hearing is available at the subcommittee site.

UPDATE: Liz Losh at Virtualpolitik offers her take on the subcommittee hearing and is troubled by some of the comments made by the congressional reps serving on the committee.

Comments

[...] another good waste of Congressional time and money they held a hearings about virtual worlds. Just to try to demonstrate how “with it” they simulcast in Second Life. As you would expectmembers showed their ignorance about online worlds. Not as bad as the whole “steroids” thing but almost as bad. read more | diggstory [...]
as if second life wasn't boring enough
I'm sure all three people that are still on second life had a wonderful time
"Lets show how out of touch with this generation we are by going on an MMO barely anyone plays"

Seriously... Is this game even valid anymore?
Hey, it might not be all bad.

Like they might find out that the online world is acutely fun and meaningful even though they are not learning anything....

But yeah, talking to people online is fun, but not as fun as blowing someone up in a Videogame.
I read in a Reuters article that they want to make sure terrorism doesn't happen in 2nd Life.

Lmao
Well, when a group of them meet up Second Life, I don't really know who their intended audience is. Are they just using it as a medium for teleconferencing?
Man... second life. Why don't they just hold conferences on 4chan? At least there, they'd have an audience.
It'd be nice if they picked a game that... I dunno had people on it. But I suppose listening to a politician standing in Orgrimmar as an Orc Hunter would be a little... odd.
And nobody pelted them with dicks?
Am I the only one who's excited about the prospect of virtual reality becoming a common element of our lives? When I was a kid, this was the future, right up there with flying cars and robot butlers. The government might be unpopular, but getting them on board at this early stage seems like the surest way to keep the developments coming.
Thank you Congress for wasting my tax money responcibily!
Addendum

I use to want to play Second Life, then I thought "Why the hell would I want to play a boring 3d representation of reality when I could just go outside and live my First Boring Life for free?"
[...] GamePolitics wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptYesterday’s congressional visit to Second Life is chronicled by the Washington Post. The Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, chaired by Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), heard from executives of Linden Lab (publisher of Second Life), IBM and other firms. The meeting was simulcast within Second Life, a Congressional first, according to Markey (seen in SL avatar form at left). WaPo reporter Mike Musgrove writes: A virtual depiction of the Rayburn House Office Building meeting room was projected on television screens on the wall, so that real-world attendees could take a look at the small virtual crowd that logged on for the event. Attendees logging in from Second Life, meanwhile, could watch the proceedings in a video screen projected on the wall of the virtual room. [...]
“Uh…the only reason I believe your…uh… avatar, is holding this hearing is to learn how to get past the…uh…7th level of the…uh…the world of warcraft. Unfortnuately this hearing is only worth 2 xp points.”

*facepalm*
Why are our politicians so desperate to capture the Furry vote?
@ Viral

I...er uh... like to say....er uh... that Second Life...... suck compared to my err uh... reeal life... er uh... person.

ANd Kennedy is still fun to make fun of all these years later!

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/05/09 at 05:09am
mentor07825: It certainly was a lively day in the shoutbox Andrew.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:38pm
Michael Chandra: Waiting for an ugly game in beta to get released. And gotta go to bed now, sleep, study for exam all day.
Posted 11/04/09 at 09:25pm
JDKJ: 'Sup, Chan?
Posted 11/04/09 at 08:57pm
Michael Chandra: And I missed it due to playing a game =( I wouldn't have minded witnessing this 'game' instead.
Posted 11/04/09 at 07:41pm
Andrew Eisen: Well, that certainly was a lively day in the ShoutBox.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:56pm
JDKJ: And that's something for which Reagan is guilty. He completely messed up the airline industry with deregulation. And it's never really recovered since.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:52pm
Shaoken: @JDKJ: Fair enough. Wall Street deserves a lot of blame, but so do Republicans/other polis who were against regulation.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:51pm
Shaoken: Of course I bet he's laughing; most of the blame is going to go on Obama, and he's going to have to spend all 8 years solving it
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:50pm
JDKJ: Apart from the wholly public economy, I don't think it's fair to place the blame or credit at the feet of any President. The President has very little to no control over the factors influencing the much larger private econony (e.g., monetary policy).
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:49pm
Shaoken: You would think Bush would have learned that, but he did the exact same thing.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:43pm
Shaoken: To reflect on the recession of Regean's time, I'd say he caused it. You don't cut taxes and increase military spending
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:25pm
JDKJ: @A_L: And a full bird colonel ain't nothing more than some four-star general's grunt. That's the way the chain of command works in this man's army, Soldier!!
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:18pm
Valdearg: Can you tell him that blinking text and rotating gifs went out of style in the 90's?
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:18pm
Valdearg: @A_L: You can stomach that excuse for web programming? Nothing like flashing links and sirens to start off your day!
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:17pm
JDKJ: Then either Glenn's stealing all his shit from Matt or Matt's stealing all his shit from Glenn or maybe they're both getting it from the same shit source but, either way, you sound a lot like you're reading from over Glenn's shoulder. Trust me.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:14pm
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: you confuse military grunt philosophy with officer or special operations philosophy. Also, I don't watch beck, I read drudge report.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:07pm
JDKJ: @Val': I quit tuning in to watch Beck's program when I figured out I was getting a daily summary of his show from Austin Lewis on GamePolitics. No need to hear the same crap twice.
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:05pm
Valdearg: @A_L: If you aren't a mindless Beckite, why do you quote thier talking points almost verbatim?
Posted 11/04/09 at 06:02pm
JDKJ: Absolutely it's opinion. But I don't think it's entirely far-fetched. Military philosophy places much stock in "group think" and "shoot first, ask questions later" and "when I say jump, you say how high" etc., etc. It ain't opinion without some basis.
Posted 11/04/09 at 05:57pm
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: that would be your opinion, rather than fact. But if you believe i'm big on 'blind adherence', you're a poorer judge than you like to believe.
Login or register to post shouts