GP at Penn State Video Game Conference Today

April 4, 2008 -
I'll be speaking and serving on a discussion panel today for Playing to Win: The Business and Social Frontiers of Video Games at Penn State, so the usual roundup of GamePolitics stories will be a bit abbreviated.

It looks to be an excellent conference, with speakers from all sorts of disciplines, including Jason Della Rocca of the International Game Developers Association (IGDA), ESA CEO Mike Gallagher (Gallagher was listed, but I'm told he was sending VP Stephan Mitchell in his place) , Dr. David Bickham of Boston's Center on Media and Child Health, Adam Thierer of the Progress and Freedom Foundation, First Amendment experts Clay Calvert and Robert Richards of Penn State, noted free speech attorney Larry Walters (via teleconference) and many others.

I hope to live blog portions of the conference.

UPDATE: (okay, here comes the live blogging...) David Bickham did a very nice presentation on the effects of games on children. He's a good speaker and a couple of people I spoke to here afterward commented independently that a reasoned approach like that has the potential to be far more persuasive than the hysterical rhetoric coming out of Miami. Bickham's boss is Dr. Michael Rich, who has been a healthcare-based critic of game violence issues in recent times.

On the other hand, I felt that Bickham didn't pay adequate heed to research that shows games aren't harmful to kids. I hope to ask him where the Center on Media and Child Health stands on the current Massachusetts video game legislation.

UPDATE 2: My brief (about 15 minutes) presentation has now wrapped up. I was privileged to sit on a panel titled Law on the Frontiers of Videogames with some of the best First Amendment legal minds in the country (the aforementioned Calvert, Richards and Walters) as well as Prof. John Bagby of Penn State's Institute for Information Policy.

My topic as The New Video Game Consumer: Changing the Equation. I offered my views on important video game consumer issues, talked about game consumer activism, and explained my view of areas in which the video game biz fails its customers. Oh, I also compared having the Video Game Voters Network represent gamers to having General Motors represent drivers. I'll expect to hear some noise from the ESA over that one. But it's true.

First Amendment expert Larry Walters argued that video game censorship is the "same old story" that has plagued other forms of media over the years. He argued that "family values" groups are after money and power. However, he also fretted that the recent 8th Circuit decision in the Minnesota game law case was a concern (GP has written in a similar vein). He suggested that the game industry needs to look at that decision in relation to its content, going forward. His reading of the 8th Circuit's decision is that the state might appeal and could have a chance to succeed. He also mentioned the recent news that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia opined that video game legislation could be constitutional.

UPDATE 3: Adam Thierer gave a very nice lunch time presentation on the ESRB system and issues surrounding game ratings and content. You can see Adam's Power Point here.

GP: This was a nice conference. I hope that Penn State makes it an annual tradition. I got to meet some terrific folks, including Mike Todd, who heads up the brand-new Penn State chapter of the ECA, PSU doctoral candidate Ibrahim Yucel, whose Saturday presentation on Portal I had to unfortunately miss. I also met a number of GP readers, and that always makes my day...

Comments

I can totally picture Thompson foaming at the mouth, screaming at an officer "Don't taze me, bro!" - it won't happen, though.

Good luck!

"Best first amendment legal minds in the country"
Sounds like lawyers talk for "Thompson doesn't belong here"

Anyway Dennis, this is great.

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptI’ll be speaking and serving on a discussion panel today for Playing to Win: The Business and Social Frontiers of Video Games at Penn State, so the usual roundup of GamePolitics stories will be a bit abbreviated. It looks to be an excellent conference, with speakers from all sorts of disciplines, including Jason Della Rocca of the International Game Developers Association (IGDA), Dr. David Bickham of Boston’s Center on Media and Child Health, Adam Thierer of Progress and Freedom Foundation, First Amendment experts Clay Calvert and Robert Richards of Penn State, noted free speech attorney Larry Walters and many others. I hope to live blog portions of the conference. [...]

Good luck at the conference.

Glad "you know who" won't be there.

@ Kurisu

Though it would be fun to watch he be so disruptive he's dragged out by security.

I nearly spilt my coffee because my brain automatically filled in "Penn State Penitentiary". ;)

Bring us back a t-shirt!
---
Fangamer

Ah the old alma mater. Dear old state and all that. I wish I was still there for today.

I wish I new about this ahead of time, I could've told my brother to go (I would have even paid his fee).

Penn State’s Innovation Park, where it's being held, is a beautiful complex right off the main campus, finished after my time at school. I walked around there a few weekends ago. Nice place, even with a raging hangover.

Good luck, GP!

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

Capture a video!

I looked up Scalia's record on free speech, and I don't think he'll cause any problem. He's voted against laws restricting obscenity, flag-burning, cross-burning, campaign finance, and abortion protesters. He's against a constitutional right to privacy, but I don't think that's a factor here.

Sounds like 'mostly' fun Dennis, hope it goes well!


I couldn't help but think that when you said the best legal minds of the 1st Amendement were there that 'He-who-must-not-be-named' starts foaming at the mouth, and angrily fills an e-mail with his assorted hate speech. Sadly, except for the foaming part I fear that may be true.

i wished i was at UPark :(

I hope to hear more of this. This all sounds awsome. Ive very much enjoyed reading this.

Hope the conference goes well. I think it would be awesome to meet Jason Della Rocca.
I wonder if Jack Thompson will be there...

Whoa, whoa, whoa!

I don't see noted First Amendment Expert Jack Thompson on that list. What's up with that?

Nice to see you getting recognition Dennis. Congrats and good work!

I attended the the conference and had a chance to meet with Dennis afterwards. Great presentation on consumers and the power of the gaming community. I couldn't help but chuckle when he brought up Mass Effect and Fox News.

@ GP, any chance of a transcript of your segment?

Son-of-a.... I can't believe I missed this. I was just up visiting my sister at Penn State today.

I'm gonna have to keep an eye out for things like this in the future.

[...] Also, it was a real pleasure to finally meet GamePolitics’ Dennis McCauley, who was there to speak from the gamer’s perspective. [...]
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will an M rating hurt Batman: Arkham Knight's sales?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ConsterDon't 'beauty rags' already get plenty of criticism?02/27/2015 - 9:02am
ZippyDSMleeEh still rather subjective… the haters would be better off going after teen and beauty rags and magazines than fiction, fiction follows reality and going after fiction tends to turn into a bullying fest’s… plus its fiction its unrealistic to start with….02/27/2015 - 1:10am
MechaTama31That's a pretty difficult anatomy to break.02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
MechaTama31"the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy" <-- I'm sorry, but we are talking here about the woman who can roll up into a little ball and live to tell the tale, yes? ;)02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
Andrew EisenAs far as examples that could be culled from female game characters though, that one's pretty mild.02/26/2015 - 9:11pm
Andrew EisenNot as much the heels or the suit in and of themselves but certainly the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy to show off her lady bits.02/26/2015 - 9:10pm
E. Zachary KnightWell, Samus's heels are certainly impracticable, but I wouldn't really call her Zero suit objectified. I don't really feel that the new Lara Croft is objectified either, but that is my subjective opinion.02/26/2015 - 9:08pm
Andrew EisenTomb Raider: No but we haven't seen much of anything yet. Samus: Yes.02/26/2015 - 9:07pm
ZippyDSMleeWould you call the new tomb raider objectified? WOuld Samus Aran from the new Smash bros be objectified?02/26/2015 - 9:02pm
WonderkarpI'm hoping they put the rest of the comic book ghostbusters in there. Ortiz and Rookie(From GB the game)02/26/2015 - 8:38pm
Wonderkarpghostbusters board game is doing great. getting close too a 3rd extra playable Character. Ron Alexander.02/26/2015 - 8:37pm
Andrew EisenSmurfette is not subjective. If there's more than one female character, it's not Smurfette. Anyway, as with everything on the list, Smurfette is, in and of itself, not necessarily a bad thing.02/26/2015 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenI think there's 5 women (out of 15, I think) but other than one being a bit more "hippy" than the others, they pretty much all have the same body type. Especially when compaired to the huge variety of male body types.02/26/2015 - 8:31pm
Wonderkarpso I dont see Smurfette as a bad thing. Unless like all your female characters are Smurfette. remember the Smurfs also had Sassette02/26/2015 - 8:29pm
E. Zachary KnightOne good example of the larger issues is one Anita used in the presentation, Blizzard's Overwatch game. There are a dozen men in the game with a dozen body types. But there are only 4 women with 2 body types, but 3 of them have the same one.02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
Wonderkarpthe smurfette thing is subjective to how many female characters you have. Take Sonic for example. You have Amy, who is obvious smurfette, but there's several other female characters now without that. Including the original animated seriescomics with Sally02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
E. Zachary KnightAE. Very true. I think that is where I was going, but it didn't come out right. Jack Harkness is sexy but not objectified. Whereas, a women would have to be objectified in order to be "sexy" in most games.02/26/2015 - 8:26pm
E. Zachary KnightAnd as Andrew pointed out, there is a big difference between a sexualized man, and an idealized man. But for some reason, there is no distinction between women in games. For the most part.02/26/2015 - 8:25pm
Andrew EisenI think one of the issues we run into repeatedly with these conversations is the confusion over "sexy" and "sexually objectified."02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightYet, for some reason, in orde rto have a sexualized women, she must be wearing lingerie or a bikini. Can't women be sexual and still dress for the job at hand?02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician