Federal Trade Commission Digging Deeper into EA's T2 Takeover Bid

Federal Trade Commission Digging Deeper into EA's T2 Takeover Bid

April 17, 2008
A press release issued by Electronic Arts this morning says that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a second request for data concerning EA's proposed hostile acquisition of Grand Theft Auto publisher Take Two Interactive.

The type of information sought by the FTC is not specified.

The government inquiry reminds us that Newsweek's N'Gai Croal reported recently the FTC might have anti-trust (i.e., monopoly) concerns. Croal's report was generated in part by comments previously made to GamePolitics by Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter, who said that T2's sports game properties are the key to the deal and GTA is just gravy. Here's what Pachter told GP in February:
For EA, sports is enough to pay for the whole [$2 billion] thing. If you get rid of sports competition, you suddenly add Take Two’s $200 million per year in sports revenue and EA doesn’t compete on price anymore. So, theoretically, they could grow that business by $100 million [per year].

Currently [EA and Take Two] compete in pro basketball, college basketball and hockey. So by taking out all of that, EA has a monopoly in sports. If these guys have a monopoly, they’re not going to cut pricing on sports games as quickly. We’ve been seeing sports games come down [in price] before Christmas the last couple of years. That’ll never happen again.

That’s worth a lot [to EA]. Everything else is gravy. GTA is just gravy…

AND, DON'T FORGET DEPT: Take Two's shareholder meeting will be webcast this evening at 6:30 Eastern Time...

Comments

If GTA is just gravy, then what is up with the timing of the takeover? If GTA didn't matter then why were all the deadlines to sell only a few weeks before GTA? Everyone knows that GTA is going to be a huge success.
Monopolies are bad for consumers, no two ways about it, and no matter how EA tries to paint it
GTA may only be gravy... but it's tasty gravy.
Gravy's the only reason I'll eat turkey.
just gravy.

not convinced myself....
GTA4 will be $400 million in gravy. And that should just be the first week. EA is a lot of things, but they ain't stupid. The dollar signs can be seen from space.
I never liked gravy. That stuff is gross. I never found GTA to be particularly interesting, either. Funny how the two should be linked in a metaphor.

On topic, I think I'd rather EA didn't buy Take Two. EA might not be as bad as the robber barons of old, but damned if it isn't trying.
Sean: you're crazy. Turkey is always good, be it gravied, sandwiched, or just plain torn from the bone. Dangit, now I'm hungry.

As I said the last time this came up, the sport correlation doesn't seem unlikely; GTA4 will be a big shot in the arm, but selling the big sports games year after year is an ongoing investment that'll pay off huge in the long run.
@ OrangeSoda:
Yeah, I never really liked gravy either, with the exception of the stuff that was served with my mashed potatoes at a local restauraunt. That actually had FLAVOUR.

All metaphors aside, I'mma listen to that webcast and try to figure out which voice belongs to JT again.
[...] The Federal Trade Commission is taking a good long look into the bid (hostile in most regards) from EA for Take2. [...]
I wonder if EA would be willing to abandon NFL exclusivicity to make this merger happen? Would the NFL be willing to do the same?
@Zerodash

Probably not.
Have you seen the story on GameSpot today?
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6189491.html?tag=latestnews;title;0

THE DEAL FELL THROUGH!! REJOICE! STRAUSS ZELNICK IS GOD!!
I'll wait until someone other than gamespot posts news...
EA needs to be broken up we don't need the Rockefeller of the Video Game Industry
I really hate platitudinous games
@Simon Roberts

I'm talking about dry Thanksgiving turkey, I'm fine with the kind you eat sandwiches with.

@Ben

Not quite, Take-Two only restated that they wouldn't cave in to EA.
Analysts talking out of their arses? SHOCK, HORROR!

Most of the regulars at NeoGAF would make better analysts than Michael Pachter. I wish I was joking...
Just more proof that EA is evil. Good thing I don't play sports games anymore. Once you have one, you have them all.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am
Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am
Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am
JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Login or register to post shouts