G4's Adam Sessler Interviews "Grand Theft Childhood" Authors

G4's Adam Sessler Interviews "Grand Theft Childhood" Authors

April 17, 2008
Gamers will definitely want to catch Adam Sessler's G4 interview with Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson, authors of Grand Theft Childhood, a new book that is gaining enormous attention in gaming circles.

Discussing concerns that violent video games cause real-world violence, Kutner said there's "absolutely no evidence for that."

The authors also viewed video games as a "marker of social competence," noting that boys who didn't play video games were at a higher risk for getting into fights and having other problems at school.

The authors did note that boys and girls who play only violent games for 15+ hours per week have a higher likelihood of getting into trouble at school.

All in all, Grand Theft Childhood goes a long way toward debunking past criticism of games by researchers, pundits and media opportunists.

Comments

That seems to be the only problem; they're only saying what we've been saying for years.

Now, the title does sound like something JT would write. Hopefully, that will help reach non-gamers and anti-gaming extremists.
Clearly if someone is playing 15+ hours of exclusively violent videogames and is completely uninterested in any game that you don't get to smash someone's head in, well they probably have some issues. But even in that situation, their gaming preference is an indicator, or a symptom, of their problem, not in any way a cause of it.
@Delin:

Agreed... I saw it last night, though I definetly agree on the 'preaching to the choir'; but its not like failx noise would ever have them on. :(
This is madness. Their book doesn't raise people's kids for them like videos do. The book just advocates stupid ideas like parental responsibility, becoming informed about children's media interests, etc. I say we wad them up in a giant ball with a few cows, mailboxes, and houses, then launch them into the sky to make a new star.
Nice to see Kutner and Olson getting some media attention, but why not from the mainstream media? I want to see these two get attention on networks like MSNBC or CNN.

PS: Don't hold your breath as far as Fox Noise is concerned. They will not give them air-time or they will not get a fair shake if they do get air-time.
@Delin

Fat chance in hell of them getting on anything but G4 then
Goddamn Dish network took my G4! Is the interview available online?
@ GRIZZAM 512

Its not like their is anything good on G4 anymore anyways, they combined g4 and tech tv, and proceeded to completely destroy them both and piss on the remains.

The only good thing left IS X-play, which is great, but the rest of the lineup... well... I would rather watch static.
Wait the anti-game studies test if you shock a person in another rooms while a person in a lab coat tells you to keep going?

They do know about the Milgram Experiment right!???!
You know the one that found that the majority of the population will torture and kill people if told to do so by an authority figure...

I now don't trust those studies at all...
I just saw it on Kotaku. It's a great interview, it's just too bad that they were preaching to the choir on G4. Get these people on one of the major media networks. The TRUTH must be heard.
It's nice to see Adam Sessler interview two people defending the truth from the likes of people like Jack Thompson. Can't wait to see it. :)
@Delin
It'd be nice if a major news network would do an interview with them. It'd be a good story "hint hint at any networks that read this blog." They should try and get on the Colbert Report or The Daily Show if they haven't already. The Colbert Bump does wonders. I'd be slightly nervous if Fox "News" wanted to interview them though as I'm sure it would be spun into oblivion.
[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptGamers will definitely want to catch Adam Sessler’s G4 interview with Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson, authors of Grand Theft Childhood, a new book that is gaining enormous attention in gaming circles. Discussing concerns that violent video games cause real-world violence, Kutner said there’s “absolutely no evidence for that.” The authors also viewed video games as a “marker of social competence,” noting that boys who didn’t play video games were at a higher risk for getting into fights and having other problems at school. The authors did note that boys and girls who play only violent games for 15+ hours per week have a higher likelihood of getting into trouble at school. All in all, Grand Theft Childhood goes a long way toward debunking past criticism of games by researchers, pundits and media opportunists. [...]
I saw this on G4. I find it funny how teens who play violent video games a lot does get more aggressive, but not playing them at all also makes them just as aggressive.
@Talouin

Colbert would be great and give them endless book sales, but even then the message wouldn't be getting out to the people who need to hear it; the parents. I would love to see these guys sit down with one of the morning news shows and get 5-10 minutes just to talk about all of their findings, and explain them all. Get some facts in the mainstream instead of reactionary nonsense.

We've got a properly done study that says what we've been saying all along. It's time to use it.
@ KayleL

I don't remember the details or which journal articles has that kind of results or elaboration on not playing video games.
So this is my elaboration: video games are being played by practically every kid. So not having one might mean possible troubles: ridicule or ostracism from those who have video games, a lack of common ground with other kids or one less means of social bonding with others. If you think of the amount of time kids playing together on video games, at least there's some benefit of friendship.
Linkie no workie.
@KayleL
They did NOT say that playing violent games, even in an extreme excess made kids more aggressive, they said that one extreme of boys and girls that played them extensively were at a greater risk, but they were clearly trying to keep open the point of view that those kids were like that before, and even if they weren't, it was a rare exception as most of the kids who played even excessively were not effected in the same way at all.

@Delin

Agreed, but its important that WE have the knowledge, this is one more big hit we have to pit against any anti-game pissant who chooses to engage us in debate.
well ive played about 15 hours but i feel no aggression.
I myself, I admit, am addicted to video games. The games I play the most are violent shooters such as Gears of War, Grand Theft Auto, and recently I've been playing Dark Sector which is pretty violent.

Now I also do some volunteer work at the Humane society. I do not treat the animals with any sort of cruelty at all. Usually, before I go to the Humane Society shelter, I play Gears of War with Chainsaws and all. I don't feel in anyway violent.

I remember awhile ago telling Jack Thompson about this via email. He just replied "Why don't you tell the familys of the victims of Columbine that you think the fact that you volunteer at the Humane Society will bring their children back" :P
Oh and I plan on picking this book up today. It looks interesting.
@KayleL

It's almost like whether or not someone plays violent video games, that person could get more aggressive. Like the playing of violent video games is irrelevant to figuring out why people get more aggressive.
@Iliad

It's basically the gamer's MTV.
I would love to see these two debate Jack Thompson or any other of these anti-game nutjobs. Of course Jack would probably accuse them of being "paid off" by the industry.
Yeah right - G4's Adam Sessler, the go-to guy for game companies who want to hype their latest garbage. Yeah, I'll REALLY make sure to tune rght in to see what inciteful questions the hack of the century asks.
wait... JT never counted this book...

oh.. right.. it doesn't fit into his mold of "truth" even it's more true than ANYTHING he has ever spouted!
a good interview. If they had more time I would have like them to go more in depth of their answers and explain the results.
Wow, these two just blew my mind. I'm so accustomed to hearing a litany of falsehoods and misconceptions in this type of interview that the unexpected deluge of intelligence threatened to overwhelm me.

I overdosed on intelligence. I liked it.

At any rate, this book sounds like damned good reading. I'll be picking up a copy.
Someone should send a copy of this book to JT. Just to see what his reaction would be. I'm imagining it as I type this and all I can say about it is... "ROFFLMFAO"
@MasterAssassin:

Besides he wouldn't do it without being paid so... whatever. :P
[...] Gamepolitics’s coverage of the book can be found here. While a fair majority of what they say is standard, one part that stood out to me was their mention that “video games are a marker of social competence.” [...]
Very interesting findings. I am curious about some of the details they didn't have time to get into. For instance:

My son plays a lot of Halo, which they would classify as a violent videogame I imagine. However, about half of his time playing Halo is spent building things in forge and being silly. Games are moving beyond our ability to classify them so simply as either violent or non-violent.

Second, when they say that "the kids who don't play videogames at all are at greater risk for getting into trouble. It says something about their social relationships," they should distinguish between single player and multiplayer, online game experiences.

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/06/08 at 01:57pm
BlackIce: It might be just a bit too late now.
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:07pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Jack, Jack, Jack... When will you learn?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am
tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am
gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am
tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am
Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am
gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am
Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am
Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am
gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am
Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am
Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am
gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am
infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm
eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm
Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm
Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm
Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm
Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm
Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Login or register to post shouts