As GTA IV Launches, Harvard Med School Author Advises Parents: Relax

April 28, 2008 -
Today's Seattle Post-Intelligencer features a front page article on GTA IV which includes an interview with one of the authors of Grand Theft Childhood: The Surprising Truth about Violent Video Games.

Authors Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson are both members of the Harvard Medical School faculty and the recently-released book has been widely acclaimed by the video game community for its reasonable - and unqiue - perspective on video game violence.

Kutner told the P-I:
For most kids and most parents, the bottom-line results of our research can be summed up in a single word: Relax... We have a long history of panicking over the introduction of new media. We have no evidence this is different.

The real question is which kids if any are at significant risk, and can we use behavior involving violent video game play as markers as what kids [should watch].

If you're looking for more of Kutner's thoughts, the Toronto Star has an excerpt of Grand Theft Childhood in today's edition.

The Post-Intelligencer story also features interviews with a concerned parent, as well as with What The Play editor John Davison and Hilarie Cash, author of the upcoming book Video Games & Your Kids: How Parents Stay in Control.

GP: Big thanks to GamePolitics reader Phantom for the tip!

Comments

I know of the Toronto Star article, didn't get a chance to read th whole thing though.

Kutner?

Ignore him, would you listen to anyone who has "That guy from Harold and Kumar" on his resume?

I read the seattle article this morning. It's funny, but you can tell that the writer really doesn't want to give games a fair break. For instance he/she brings up that several studies have linked violence with videogames but doesn't explain that the link is not causal.
Still, I guess that's as close to objective as we can get from the media.

@ Vinzent

Yeah I saw the same thing... Still it WAS a lot better than most.

The author did seem let down that Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson didn't go game bashing. :)

Yeah, it surprises me when these parents hear about "GTA?!? OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG SAVE TEH CHILDREN WTFWTFWFTWFTFTWWTF!!!!1111ELEVENELEVEN111ONE111!!!!!!!PORK!!!!!" when we have much bigger issues that are actively happening, like the economy (without sufficient funds, you can't buy little Tommy his daily mac & cheese), $4.00/gallon gas (little Tommy will have to walk on his poor little feet all day long, and the Iraq conflict (little Tommy will never sleep knowing the fact that his daddy could be drafted or, worse yet, those scary terrorists will kill him in his sleep). All these issues are happening right NOW, and here in Washington, we have 8 hours and 14 minutes until GTA IV starts corrupting Tommy's wee wittle mind. Stay cool, gamers.

I should read this book!
I'll add it to my list.

It's much easier than done when you have so many people trying to sway everyone else's judgment on an industry that somehow is different from every other media genre on the planet.

I guess it's a good thing that kids don't like to read books or we would be in real big trouble.

Correction:

easier SAID than done....

darn this cold

[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptToday’s Seattle Post-Intelligencer features a front page article on GTA IV which includes an interview with one of the authors of Grand Theft Childhood: The Surprising Truth about Violent Video Games. Authors Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl Olson are both members of the Harvard Medical School faculty and the recently-released book has been widely acclaimed by the video game community for its reasonable - and unqiue - perspective on video game violence. Kutner told the P-I: For most kids and most parents, the bottom-line results of our research can be summed up in a single word: Relax… We have a long history of panicking over the introduction of new media. We have no evidence this is different. [...]

The SF Chronicle also has an article about the release tonight that talks about the controversy, the financial TT and EA deals, and even about the lofty cinematic ambitions of the game. And the best part is that He-who-must-not-be-named wasn't named once!!! Woohoo!!!

Betcha he's royally pissed about it as is going to harrass them and attempt to commit faxcide unless they put his name in the article... after he's done trolling the forums here of course.

http://www.sfgate.com/flat/archive/2008/04/28/chronicle/archive/2008/04/...

@GryphonOsiris

And the best part is that He-who-must-not-be-named wasn’t named once!!!


Are you talking about Voldemort?

(Harry Potter joke)

*Head explodes*

Unfortunately, the calm voices of reason will always be overwhelmed by the panicked screaming of the extremists and their fear-mongering.

At first glance, I saw the paper today (with that article right in the center of the front page) and thought, "Oh, great, here comes another slam." But they actually played it pretty much down the middle, and even listed Gamerdad as another resource parents could turn for further information.

Major props to the P-I today. :)

Read the article on Toronto Star and enjoyed it :) .

@Shadow, Gryphon:

That's what the guys at the site in my link call him, when we have to mention him.

and in before 'overeducated'. :P

I want to read that so bad!!

Good advice. It's what I've always said: CALM DOWN!

Have we learned nothing from books?

"Don't Panic" works better.

@ Dark Tetsuya

Exactly, nothing for him to Google there for his Ego surfing.

@Gryphon:

Yeah... he does come up in conversations, but more of a footnote to end the show with (I'd say 'as it should be' but him disappearing off everyone's rader is really 'as it should be'...)

I read and enjoyed the Toronto Star article, but... Um... "The video game Halo involves shooting an unrealistic gun at a giant alien bug."?

...eh? (lulz)

Definitely #1 on my book list.

CH-CH-CH-CHILL THE F$CK OUT!

It's hard getting a copy of that book from my part of the world. I'm asking my aunt in NY to get it.

Ahh, relatives :)

Relax. Amen to that.

I just found this:

http://gamerdadforums.redbirdsolutions.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=5476&p...

Please read the post from momGamer as I think her post sums it up quite nicely. Her tale of her her son playing GTA IV is just -ehm- funny and explains that you can do other things than steal, maime or kill in the game.

And 4 US dollars for a gallon of gasoline? Try about 8 US dollars for a gallon a gas ? (or about 2 US dollars a litre...)

'Harris and Klebold enjoyed playing the bloody shoot-'em-up video game Doom, a game licensed by the U.S. Army to train soldiers to effectively kill.' - The Media

Sorry, just made me laugh, Doom has NEVER been used to train, thats a complete media-promoted myth.
How the heck can the army train to kill insurgents in a pixelated game where you can hardly make out a red devil creature from the background?
Right sure, it really shows you how to kill, and in case you did not know, the army prefears to train soldiers to use the weapons, desensitizing the last on their mind, and in most cases is not done since it can lead to soldiers refusing to kill.


But anyway, the artical is good, and does show you the media are over reacting, I wish Jack Thompson would read reports from actual members of harvard medical school instead of finding a self proclaimed 'child' psychologist and getting her to bad-mouth video games.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Best decade for video games?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew WilsonI know most of my friends first saw robotech when it was on Toonami in the mid 90s, but it is possible that a fan who watched it in the 80s are in a position to do it.03/27/2015 - 1:04pm
Andrew EisenRobotech was mid 80s. Fans of the show (who were kids when it aired) are my age and older.03/27/2015 - 1:01pm
Matthew Wilsontiming. anime only really became widely known in the US in the mid 90s. if we assume it was mostly kids watching it, they still wouldnt be high enough in managment to be given full creative control yet. it would still be another 5 to 10 years for that.03/27/2015 - 12:59pm
Andrew EisenI agree. Now what makes you think that there is no one in power who cares about (or has the ability to) make a good adaptation?03/27/2015 - 12:47pm
Matthew Wilsonits not about pratice, it is about people who understand it getting in to positions of power.03/27/2015 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonallot of the comic book characters that have been turned in to good movies started in the 70s or earlier.03/27/2015 - 12:32pm
Andrew EisenWell, if it really does take two generations of practice to get it right, we'll never get good live action adaptations of anime if no one starts making them.03/27/2015 - 12:31pm
Andrew EisenWhat have you seen that would make you say that?03/27/2015 - 12:30pm
Matthew WilsonIt took 2 genarations of comic book reader before we got good comic book movies. I imagine that will be the case for anime as well.03/27/2015 - 12:28pm
Matthew Wilson@AE yes if they have people that understand the content give it a shot, but as far as I can tell that does not look like it is happening in this case.03/27/2015 - 12:26pm
Andrew EisenI understand the skepticism but I don't think "this will never work" and "no one should even bother" are very healthy attitudes.03/27/2015 - 12:11pm
Andrew EisenWhy would you doubt that? A lot of writers are my age and older, the perfect age to be fans of the content. All I'm saying is it's not impossible to get a good Robotech movie. In fact, it's more likely today than any other time.03/27/2015 - 12:11pm
Matthew Wilson@AE the difference is in the case of marvel the writers and directors clearly understand the source content. I doubt many of any of them are that way with robotech, or any anime for that matter.03/27/2015 - 11:10am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.playstationtrophies.org/news/news-15838-Sony-Cuts-the-Price-of-PlayStation-TV-Today.html Sony cuts the price of the Vita TV in the UK, still wont force developers to make their stuff compatible with it.03/27/2015 - 10:49am
Andrew EisenMechaCrash - It's true, there are a lot of examples of crap adaptations. But there are increasing numbers of great adaptations such as the Marvel movies. That said, it's certainly going to be an uphill battle at Sony, especially with Tom Rothman around.03/27/2015 - 10:45am
ZippyDSMleeOh live action crap...I dunno with hollywood being stuck in the 90s grimdarkblack mode I can not see how anything would work well other than SNK or Akira.. then again Akira is a bit of head trip...03/27/2015 - 10:11am
MechaCrashI meant Hollywood in general. If they did a Robotech movie, it'd just be a slightly tweaked Macross, because usually when people talk about Robotech, they just mean the first third. Nobody cares about the Masters/Southern Cross or Invid/MOSPAEDA stuff.03/27/2015 - 9:36am
ZippyDSMleeYes Macross is good..... robotech....not so much..... Now Pizza Cats that's the definitive TV dub, if not best dub ever I'd put it up there with COwboy Bebop just becuse the Pizza Cats dub is fun as heck and crazy,Medabots and Fighting Foodons are decent.03/27/2015 - 9:20am
InfophileAged well plot-wise, I mean. The animation is showing its age, but if you don't mind that, the plot holds up quite well03/27/2015 - 6:52am
InfophileRobotech may be 30 years old, but it's actually aged pretty well. Plus, one of the three Japanese franchises that went into making it, Macross, is coming out with a new series soon. So it's far from forgotten or out-of-date03/27/2015 - 6:50am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician