The Timothy Plan, a Maitland, Florida-based mutual fund group which offers a "biblical choice when it comes to investing," has issued a
press release slamming Take Two Interactive (NASDAQ:
TTWO), publisher of
Grand Theft Auto IV.
From the release:
Take-Two Interactive... has done it again, releasing another video game that contains extreme sexual and violent content... Beyond the intense violence, blood and mayhem, during the game the character can have sex with prostitutes, visit adult clubs, request a private lap dance and drive drunk.
The Timothy Plan, a morally responsible family of mutual funds, refuses to invest in companies like Take-Two Interactive because of their involvement in the anti-family entertainment and pornography industry.
Timothy Plan president Arthur Ally (left) is quoted in the press release:
This $30 billion a year [video game] business is exploiting sex and violence more than ever in their products. We hope more parents will not continue to fall into a category that four out of ten often do by relying simply on the ESRB rating and leave their children alone while they are playing video games.
While the ESRB system is a step in the right direction, the ratings are confusing and incomplete at best.
Ally also criticized another Rockstar game,
Bully: Scholarship Education, because protagonist Jimmy Hopkins can
kiss other boys in the game.
Take Two is among several dozen publicly-traded companies listed on the Timothy Plan's
Hall of Shame. Others include Starbucks, PlanetOut, Wal-Mart, Microsoft and would-be Take Two acquirer, Electronic Arts.
While it's not clear exactly how these firms have transgressed in the Arthur Ally's view, the Timothy Plan is anti-gay, pro-life and opposed to investing in companies which deal in alcohol, tobacco, gambling or pornography.
Comments
I really hate it when the same j-offs knock on my door around 8am on sunday morning wielding the 1 billionth addition of their version of the bible and tell me I am doing things wrong. Although, I do find it funny when they go home crying after about an hour of playing "explain your nonsense".
I hate to sound like the bad guy here but if it's legal I'll invest in it, I've never considered hamstringing myself in what is essentially business. Besides on whose ethics anyway? I doubt any of these funds share exactly the same values as their investors, that being the case why gamble your finances on what is basically someone else's political cause?
Gift (who is now off to cackle madly over his diabolical financial plans).
Those who know, know that sin mutual funds (alcohol, tobacco, porn, etc) have better and more solid returns anyhow...
The Wall of Shame leaves them with no big companies to work with!!
But still, thats their pregogative... just as long as they don't step on anyone elses!
are they hypocrites?
So there!
(And, once again, I notice a complaint by someone who screams about boys kissing boys in Bully but nothing about women kissing women in Mass Effect.)
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Content Descriptors:
Blood
Intense Violence
Partial Nudity
Strong Language
Strong Sexual Conduct
Use of Drugs and Alcohol
What more could you possibly want?
Who cares. There are plenty of investors out there that are actually interested in making money.
My guess is that they only invest in Bible publication companies, unless they also print the Quran or the Tora.
Good luck folks.
Rated Mature:
Violence
Sexual Themes
WHAT COULD IT POSSIBLY MEAN?! :|
It's like the hyperreligious, anti-gay dating site eHarmony. I'd never support them, but if they find that wooing fundamentalists is a viable business model, then that's their prerogative. And if they fail, so much the better.
Now what is that called?
It doesn't look like they invest in the media industry at all (from what I read in their annual report), so this looks like a pure PR campaign to take advantage of GTAIV's hype to sell themselves.
No you are just another moron who is too damn lazy to read the ratings. M for Mature, aka not got kids. The only people who find it confusing are the people who don't bother to take five seconds to flip the game box over and read what the game contains.
"the Timothy Plan is anti-gay, pro-life and opposed to investing in companies which deal in alcohol, tobacco, gambling or pornography."
Ahh so they are closed minded morons.
"The Timothy Plan, a morally responsible family of mutual funds, refuses to invest in companies like Take-Two Interactive because of their involvement in the anti-family entertainment and pornography industry."
Once again comparing games to porn to make them look like some sort of monster that will transform kids into perverts. Where the hell is all this porn they talk about in games? I must have a defective copy because none of my copies of the games people claim contain porn, have none in them.
More Cowbell.
M Mature 17+
Blood
Intense Violence
Partial Nudity
Strong Language
Strong Sexual Conduct
Use of Drugs and Alcohol
And what, exactly, is complicating and confusing about these discriptions. Are they stupid?
I don't care for sanctimonious hate-mongering either, but business is business.
Honestly, I hope Arthur Ally and his group receive some backlash from his statements.
I guess it's a good thing that Arthur Ally doesn't or can't read books.
My guess is that nobody actually reads the Bible.
Meaning the parents don't have to do a thing.
I just checked their Hall of shame and what irritate me the most is their way of expressing their conservative christian views. If christian religion is that strict, christians might as well put themselves into cryo-sleep until their deaths. They cannot do anything fun ! poor people.:(
Re "Actually interested in making money": If you look at their index comparisons, they outperform the market. Significantly. Whatever you think of them.
"Socially/Morally conscious" funds with a competent manager have a record of outperforming the market, actually. Probably because they tend to do better research and actually pay attention to their funds. There's also selection bias of course: being that they're typically smaller concerns you don't hear so much from the money-losing ones.
I don't care for the fundie ideology either, but it's just asinine to assume unrelated things not in evidence because of it.
Like anyone cares what they think.
To violate this category you the company must "officially recognizes GLBT groups (gay, lesbian, bi-sexual or trans-sexual)".
Would recognizing that company's recognize people of an alternative sexuality mean you have in fact recognized they exist in the first place?
Maybe we should all stick our heads in the sand.
What the hell does that even mean? Do they give you thirty pieces of silver if you betray your old investors by coming over to them?
Somebody didn't pass high school...
April 28th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
M. Mature. 17+
Content Descriptors:
Blood
Intense Violence
Partial Nudity
Strong Language
Strong Sexual Conduct
Use of Drugs and Alcohol
What more could you possibly want?
I know, that's soooo confusing and incomplete...
You're hitting the oldest bell there is. This concern has been more than adequately addressed already to equally ignorant people. Also, that lists of "Hall of Shame" companies is very trendy... I'd like to see how they screen the less well-know money makers.
"Beyond the intense violence, blood and mayhem, during the game the character can have sex with prostitutes, visit adult clubs, request a private lap dance and drive drunk."
For a game that is not released yet, he seems to "know" an awful lot about GTA4 to make claims like that. To that, I say:
POST PROOF OR RETRACT.
I am not saying he's wrong, I'm actually pretty sure that most of that is in the game. However, I'm waaay beyond tired of these organisations and individuals making baseless claims without anyone making them provide PROOF to back it up, and yet they're still taken seriously. They don't need to provide diagrams, videos or pictures of the "obscene" material, all I ask is to include a quote from a developer/publisher or a link to factual evidence that can back up the statements.
Also, I like the last paragraph where he plugs himself for potential interviews and talkshows. Give me a break.
It's like suggesting all forms of media should never cater to adults just because minors MIGHT see it. I dunno about you, but i wouldn't like it if every channel on the TV was PBS. I know that's going to the extreme, and it's not what they're literally suggesting, but that's honestly what people like that sound like, and it just pisses me off.
The way I see it is that they must have already received their copy early and have completed the game since they seems to be experts as to what the contents of the game is PRIOR to the release.
Just another j-off spreading propaganda.
Really, I do believe in free speech but I also believe that anyone who's intends to spread information that is completely false should be fined a substantial amount of money when in public form.
LEFT BEHIND GAMES!!! 0,012$ each share, it's one hell of a deal! Now that is a biblical choice!
Get it while you still can, who knows, it just might cost twice the price tomorrow (I mean, it "could" be worth a cent more tomorrow)
I would like to emphasis the word CAN. The game doesn't force ya to have sex with prostitutes and, in past games, it was something you needed to find out you could do or hear it from someone else. Complaints like this only help by making minors (and even some adults) go "what? I can do that? how?!"
You are taking that too literally, read the whole book and you will understand. Please do not attack someone's religion just to make yourself look cool. You look ignorant in reality.
However, I think The Timothy Plan is ridiculous, they are hypocrites, but not for the reasons handofcrom cited.
If you think that treating anyone as a second class citizen is immoral, then they are for attacking gays.
If you don't invest in a health clinic because they might give someone an abortion, then you are looking at a large number of hospitals that try to help the sick but are grosly underfunded.
They are an investment firm! They are there to make money and further the gap between the rich and the poor.
They are immoral.
Now if you will excuse me, my TT stocks need looking after.
I'm glad this guy isn't running my portfolio...
He's got more than 5, blue-chip stocks on his list. EPIC FAIL.
@ Chuck
Where did you see that info on their index? Please link.
I had my financial guy look them up and their performance is ok, but they're considered a high risk when compared to other mutual funds.
Arthur Ally mentioned that the ESRB ratings are incomplete yet he never says a word on how "Unrated" dvds are truly unrated which is also true for a lot of movies that are shown on movie service companies on cable and satellite like HBO/Cinemax, Starz, and Showtime (a lot of the adult programming on Skinemax has a rating of NR or Not Rated) and books have no rating system at all.
lol yeah... i mean how many games have nudity in now...
um i can think of.. err.. oh yeah about one...
Just look at how many games on nintendo in the history of the company displayed sex and violence.
Now, the term "violence" is subjective. Honestly, how many people here think that the Mario series is a violent game and how many think that it is not a violent game.
I have met many religious individuals that have been, in my opinion, brainwashed into believing that all video games are violent. Same thing with loud music with no lyrics what so ever.
Well technically no game can be violent. As I have said before, psychology defines violence as the intentional harm of another human being. Therefore, videogames cannot be violent the same way it's not violence when a three year old wrestles a teddy bear. There is no intent to harm(because it's a game) and there is no living thing to harm at all(because it's all pixels). All that aside, it seems downright juvenille to deem Mario "violent". TURTLE STOMPER!
In the real world, you face choices. How can you create a virtual world in which choices are taken from your control. Can you kill someone in the game? Yes, just like in real life. Will you be rewarded in the short term? Again, yes, just like in real life (usually with the contents of said persons pockets).
However, they leave out two things?
Do you HAVE to?
Should you?
These people complain about the ABILITY to kill prostitues in the game. Guess what, real life has that as well. What, you didn't know you could kill people in real life? You can. You just SHOULDN'T.
This just in, the Moral Majority has just threatened to sue God for releasing an unedited version of Life. There has been reports of gratuitous violence and inappropriate sexuality possible in Life. What's worse is that young children are also exposed to Life. A represented, when asked for a comment, had this to say; "Upon review of Life, it's obvious that it shouldn't have been released in it's preasent condition. I have word tha there is full nudity, extreme violence, foul language, and drug and alcohol use. None of this was explained upon our entrence into Life, and there aren't any options to turn these things off. And since Life is available to everyone, without regard for age, it's obvious that it should be taken off the market and recalled. If this does not happen in a timely matter, we will be forced to take legal action."
The Pope is quoted as saying "You know, maybe he has a point..."
I hate when organizations like this hide behind the word "family", it's usually because they hate anything and anyone who doesn't align with their narrow beliefs (and of course, case and point, they're usually vehemently anti-gay.)
"Beyond the intense violence, blood and mayhem, during the game the character can have sex with prostitutes, visit adult clubs, request a private lap dance and drive drunk."
The act like everything except for the drunk driving bit is new...
"... because of their involvement in the anti-family entertainment and pornography industry."
Yeah, if you say that load of lies enough it might become true...
"blah blah blah, the ratings are flawed because I don't agree with them, and blame them instead of the lazy parents..."
Noting more to say about that, except that Dennis pretty much explains it all in his closing.
I do find this hilarious though, if it wasn't for this game no one would be giving their mutual fund any attention(assuming they are actually getting potential investors' attention for this). That kind of action sure doesn't sound very "morally responsible" to me...
You didn't notice anyone reacting to Mass Effect?!
Not even the sensationalist,fraudulent lie story Fox News did on it in February(of which I saw on Youtube,thanks to GI bringing it up on a link)?!
A.
Plonker.
This is just so gottverdammt dumb, I can't say anything else about it.
But I find it incredible that just across the atlantic, a man can slam a video game because it contains possible homosexuality - and probably have quite a few people agree with him.
Umm... What? So he doesn't want parents to rely on something meant to inform them of the content in the game? He doesn't want them to rely on something that helps in making an informed purchasing decision? What?
The ESRB is NOT confusing. At the very least it takes a cursory glance to know what age range that game is for. At the very most it takes a little investigation into what the f-ing letter actually means so that you'll know what the hell it means for future reference! ARGH! What a douche.
> anyone know where I can buy Take-Two stock?
Um, e*trade? Their ticker is TTWO. You missed the bargain though, but it might still be a good buy considering the potential acquisition (which usually sends stock in the smaller company up) and the release of a hot product.
Still not sure I'd call 'em a long-term proposition tho.
Second, I went and looked at a couple of their Large and Mid-Cap funds. They are a heavy investor in Exxon Mobil. Bit of hypocrisy there?
Even with that it is odd that the Central European Distribution Corporation is on there since it doesn't even have an entry on Wikipedia and from what I can gather only sells alcohol and tobacco in Poland.
Does that mean that they despise the entire entertainment industry except for the Bible and want no violence or sugesstive material in the industry?
Perhaps, I'm reading too into this, but then again, it's not too implausible...
LOL, that was hirlarious, yet so true. :D
“biblical choice when it comes to investing,”
Funniest thing I've heard all day!!
I am not saying that Mario is violent. I am using that as an example.
The word "violence", despite what the definition may be, is all in the eyes of the beholder.
I am sure a lot of people at PETA don't like a heavy set Italian plumber stomping on turtles be it in a video game or in real life. I am sure many of them would say that is violent.
I know you always report on anything and everything that involves Video games, but is it really worth mentioning that a religiously guided mutual fund group that won't invest in Take2?
that's like asking; "if you get kicked in the nuts, does it hurt?"
Did the bible even include a "how to" guide for Biblical investing? If it did I sure a LOT of people would be rich because of the lines that say "Invest in IBM on this date and Mircosoft of this day"
Silly, gay people don't have families! Liberals don't have families! Only born-again Christians have families. This is why anything that offends them is in fact anti-family.
Personally, I wouldn't let Timmy here use a dime of my money to invest.
Anyway, I don't really see the big deal.
Just because one overprotective mutual fund group thinks GTA is the devil's spawn dosen't mean that they're important.
Seriously, had anyone on GP heard of these guys before today?
What a douchebag.
Your forgetting Aquaman got his hand cut off when put in the WORST GAME EVER.
Wouldn't supprise me if they also would be against finding a cure for AIDS because it's a good scare weapon for those who want to *shock, horror* get laid every now and then.
Yeah. Not even Peter David can make him cool.
Morally Responsible? More like morally vile to me. I'm not a fan of GTA IV or M-rated games; but this mutual plan smacks me as absolutely absurd, vile, barbaric and stupid. Makes GTA IV look like a saint in comparison which I personally think is a scary thought in itself.
Screw you Timothy Plan; and your little vile god too.
Heres to you Arthur Ally, what a douche bag.
All through out history, all the major leaders have claimed "God's Call" or the "Will of the Gods" to justify their crimes and conquests. What better way to get people behind you? If they don't trust you, they'll certainly trust "their god."
Then don't. It's not like they actually need you to do so.
You have as much freedom to not invest as much as they have to make their games.
Yeah, I got family that's like that too(more the liberal kind though). It sucks ass. Still family though, no matter how misguided they are.
That would be so sweet. I can actually see them doing that.
Strong Christian Values makes you look like you think you are better than everyone.
I am sure Jesus was not like that.
I remember a scene in the bible how when Jesus was at a banquet at someone's house and it had everyone in the village.
While many of his deciples were eating with the Priests and the Strong Religious people, Jesus was eating and taking with many of the lower common people who were prostitutes, adultrists, tex collectors, and other such people that many of the Hightly Religious people thought who lived a life of Sin.
When many of the Priests and Hightly Religious people looked at Jesus and found out that he was talking to people who were seen as sinfull people, they were shocked and upset.
But when Jesus came over, he explained that he wanted to talk to those people who were sinful.
Now from what I heard from other people about the Bible, they said that Jesus was talking to people who committed sin so he could tell them that by beliveing in him, they could be saved.
Now that is just some people's interpretation of the Bible.
For me, I interpret it as not of Jesus trying to convert sinful people into Christians, but I see this as a way that even though Jesus may not really like those types of people who commit sin in their lives, but he still respects people for who they are no matter what type of sin they have previously committed in their lives.
So yeah, I would say this sort of thing about conservatives is that sometimes they think they have read the Bible and know it, but in reality they forget about what Jesus did,
If Jesus was alive, he would not judge Grand Theft Auto 4, instead he will play it and try to do all the good things in that game and he would really have a good time playing it.
Ofcourse you can chose to do all the bad things in the game, but it is your choise if you wanted to do that.
You are never really forced to do that unless if it is a major part of the storyline that can't be avoided but you can almost forgive the game for doing so.
Any other sinful things that happen in the game is done by your own choise of if you want to be a good guy or a bad ass.
If Jesus was playing this game, he would have allot to say about Grand Theft Auto being like the modern day Bible in a Videogame form.
But that is just going by my own opinion, it is not gospal.
That's what I always hated about religion. Not only do you have squabbles among seperate religions, you also have squabbles among the different sects of the same religions. My family is mostly Lutheran(I'm non practicing), so we all interperate the Bible in a different way. Hell, there's Christians, Calvinists, Catholics, Lutherans, those snake handling ones, Roman catholics, Irish Catholics, Methodists, etc. Lot 'o different ways of looking at the same thing.
They don't invest in TTwo, TTwo is none of their business, this is just dick-waving for attention and profit.
That pretty much summed up their. The rest of their drawl came out as I expected of another right-wing fundie group.
I find it interesting it says nothing about them not investing in arms manufacturers. XD
And that doesn't even get into the hypocrisy of basing investments on the Bible, which explicitly states not only that material wealth is sinful, but that borrowing and lending, i.e. investing, is wrong.
You may also notice that they believe insurance companies are evil, but somehow investing isn't.
"And that doesn’t even get into the hypocrisy of basing investments on the Bible, which explicitly states not only that material wealth is sinful, but that borrowing and lending, i.e. investing, is wrong."
If I remember my Bible verses correctly, it's not that "money is the root of all evil." That's a common misquotation of Paul.
It's "LOVE of money is the root of all evil."
There's nothing wrong with being rich, so long as it's earned legitimately (More than I can say for a lot of the fundamentalists, though).
''April 28th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
In the UK, tabloids would slam him for the homophobic remarks about Bully.
But I find it incredible that just across the atlantic, a man can slam a video game because it contains possible homosexuality - and probably have quite a few people agree with him''
gotta say mate agree with you 100%
why is nobody going after this guy n slamming him because of his anti gay remarks? Arent there anti discrimination laws in the US preventing this kind of stuff?
i love how these people can forget all that. very christian.
This man should be ashamed.
Please don't call them Christian. It's an insult to the rest of the genuinely good people in the community.
Disney is presumably on the list because they have no problems with hiring gay people to work at their amusement parks. I remember some Southern Baptist Churches raising a big fuss about that maybe... ten years ago.
Do I have to buy my own alchohol before picking up the controler?
Uh... what the heck is that supposed to mean?
And for gambling I'm pretty sure they will support a church rafle...
That is all.
Sinner
Actually, if you look on the second page of the Hall of Shame you will see that they only screen out 626 companies. That leaves over 14,000 companies to choose from.