NYC Mayor, Slain NYPD Officer's Mother Criticize GTA IV

NYC Mayor, Slain NYPD Officer's Mother Criticize GTA IV

April 30, 2008
It's difficult to imagine the sense of shock and loss experienced by the loved ones of a police officer killed in the line of duty.

So it's not surprising to read in today's New York Daily News that the mother of slain NYPD Officer Russel Timoshenko (left) doesn't appreciate the cops-and-robbers animated violence in Grand Theft Auto IV. Tatyana Timoshenko told the Daily News:
For some people, it's a game. But for me, it's not funny. It was for real. It was my son. This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from.

Big Apple Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has criticized GTA in the past, added:
The kids are playing these violent games that don't exactly teach the kind of things that you'd want to teach your kids.

Pat Lynch, president of the NYPD Patrolmen's Benevolent Association President, said:
Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people.

Comments

What we can expect to happen within the year of GTAIV, given a 3 to 1 chance;

-Cop or Civilian is shot, Injured or Killed

-Criminal and/or victim places blame on GTAIV

-UNFair and UNBalanced press and lawyers and critics complain

-1st Ammendment Rights are cited, cycle repeats itself (can't wait till GTAV!)

So, instead of just repeating the usual obvious banter, come up with a suggestion that might make this more public, I don't know, like........
Jerry Springer?

Just throwing ideas...
"Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people."

wrong again as usual... the game penalizes by removing cash and in older ones weapons.
it also forces you to restart the mission if you were on one.

shooting someone in the game just like reality, the cops come to stop ya, and 9 out of 10 times they'll overpower ya before you ever get away.
granted you get up and walk away from it later on.
but irregardless there is penalty.

besides that, why do they specificly target GTA?
what about say, Mario.
stomping on things and eating mushrooms with benefit.
no complaints with bashing things skulls in and shrooming?
guess thats okay then..
@NovaBlack:

I thought it was:

Can I have GTA4?
No.
WAHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHH
Okay okay if it'll shut you up... sir can I have a copy of GTA4?
While I'm sorry for her loss, games aren't to blame. A person is responsible for their own actions.

Cue up the usual responsible for one's own actions, parents should parent their kids, etc., etc.
"Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people."

Agreed. So when do we outlaw paintball? And laser tag. And water guns. And little kids running around pointing their forefingers at each other making "Pew! Pew! Pew!" noises.
"This game teaches children to kill"
"The kids are playing these violent games "
"teach the kind of things that you’d want to teach your kids."
"wrong message to send to young people."

Do they still not realize that this isn't made for kids? :|
Always with the assumptions that gamers are total morons. "Hey, I just shot that guy in a *game* and there were no consequences! That must mean I can totally do that in real life! Wheeee!"
Yes it does have consequences...

When your fake character shoots the fake cop character with the fake gun and fake bullets, lots of other fake cop characters hunt you down and sometimes you can end up in the fake character hospital or in the fake character jail.

But apparently that makes real kids go grab their real parents real guns and bullets and go into the real world and shoot real people.

That's the problem with GTA, there are no fake parents to stand in your fake character's way and tell him fake right from fake wrong. And there are no fake politicians in the fake city to fight fake gun crimes.
I absolutely agree that the context of games, movies, books, television shows, smells, etc. can stir up emotions from our past, but that is no reason to start banning the content. How many WWII shooters are there?
"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

I'm sorry for her loss, but she's still an idiot. As if there were no crime in the world before videogames. As if cops didn't die in the line of duty before pong. She's angry over her loss, I understand that. But if she wants to honor the memory of her son, she might try attacking the real causes of crime (like poverty and corruption) instead of innocent bystanders.
If watching Robocop at the age if eight didn't cause me to go out and start shooting cops then Grand Theft Auto certainly won't

I feel sorry for the mother's loss none the less.
It simply amazes me how some people say "GTA teaches children to kill" as if GTA is the cause of all crime in the world.

NEWSFLASH! If crime didn't exist, there would be nothing for GTA to emulate. Thus, it's the opposite of what they think.

Crime causes GTA.

Also: kids kids kids kids kids kids kids kids kids kids. Does that M(17+) Mean ANYTHING to you? This. Game. Is. NOT. For. Kids. I thought we already established that a long time ago.
[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIt’s difficult to imagine the sense of shock and loss experienced by the loved ones of a police officer killed in the line of duty. So it’s not surprising to read in today’s New York Daily News that the mother of slain NYPD Officer Russel Timoshenko (left) doesn’t appreciate the cops-and-robbers animated violence in Grand Theft Auto IV. Tatyana Timoshenko told the Daily News: For some people, it’s a game. But for me, it’s not funny. It was for real. It was my son. This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from. [...]
I love the US mentality,send your kids off to on spring break where all the girls gone wild videos are filmed yet raise a fuss when they (17+) play a video game.....
I'm sorry, but this guy was apparently shot in July of last year. What does that have to do with GTA IV? The defendants are also all ex-cons that appear to be in their late 20's or early 30's. They're *adults*, not *kids*. Also, given those ages, even if they did play games as kids it wasn't a GTA game! It would been Mario, Punch-Out, StarFox and other games like that. It's just not a valid comparison.
*sigh* I guess we should ban porno when it gets released cause it teaches our kids the wrong ideals. Hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
ARRRRGH!!!

The M on the box must not stand for Mature, it must stand for Moron since these GTA games seem to attract them in droves. The games rated 17+ THAT MEANS ITS NOT FOR ****ING KIDS!!!

Also, again with the no consequences BS when your involved in shootouts. Your wanted level goes up, more cops, and even the FBI and Military get involved and if you do get killed or busted, you lose your weapons and have to start over, damn.
My money is on mommy never wanted her son to be a cop. I'm sorry for her loss, but that's no excuse to lay blame or to focus anger on something that has nothing to do with the violence her late son faced.

Again... Those in political power use such situations for political grandstanding RATHER than getting the poor woman some psychiatric help.

BTW, anyone know when this poor fellow was killed in the line of duty?
"For some people, it’s a game. But for me, it’s not funny. It was for real. It was my son. This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

Grats, you've forever cheapened and sullied the memory of your son. I cannot believe that you actually hijacked your own personal tragedy for such a &^@#ing foolish 'cause'.
*cries and later dies when the stupidity tumor explodes in brain*
so if this teaches the kids to kill....what teaches the nypd to unload their weapons at innocent civilians?
Any sympathy I have for this woman evaporated upon hearing her stupidity.
"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

I guess the formation of the kkk, nazi's, black panther party, aarion brotherhood, street gangs, and the rest of the terrorist are gamers. So much for that oppinion. YOU ARE THE COMPANY YOU KEEP!!!
M Rated Game.

That should be the only argument that has to be made, yet we gamers must constantly defend our hobby. Add all the usual arguments to the end of this post. It's too tiring to argue the same argument all week long.
@ Bungles Danforth

The same game that teaches them to taser people to death, run drugs, and act like an occupying force?
I can see why a NYC mayor would be confused about where kids learn things because it certainly isn't in their public school system. Oh, zing!
they are more concerned about kids learning to have sex with prostitutes in a video game...then they might learn it from their governor
I can identify with her loss. When someone experiences a personal tragedy, when you see that re-enacted in something else where it's regarded as entertainment; be it a movie, TV show or video game - it takes on a different kind of resonance what what once seemed trivial now becomes disturbing. Case in point; when 9/11 happened, everyone got uneasy over seeing buildings getting blown up in movies, even though that had been happening in movies countless times for decades. And while 9/11 is still a tragedy, for the most part people got over that particular unease, realizing that fantasy and reality are two different things.

Same with this woman. Since her son was a cop, of course seeing video game character shooting cops is going to make her feel uneasy. And while I sympathize, it's unfair to others to have to put their entertainment on hold out of sensitivity or to make game makers feel guilty about it. It's something that, unfortunately, has been known to happen before in real life. Rockstar is just trying to be accurate in that regard. Art is imitating life in this case.
Today mark the first day of my new campaign named : The Punic Wars were started by GTAIV... since it seems blaming crime and porn on GTAIV isn't enough to get it banned I shall blame the eradication of an empire on it then maybe GTA will be banned from being sold to kids (age being anyone who plays videogames). One of my long dead ancestor died during those wars so Take two people have his blood on their hands.

And if this doesn't work I'll start blaming supernovas on it... you have got to ban a game that can blow stars up. Who's with me? With all the lies and knowledge, I'm bound to get some TV time and newspaper time.

And stop thinking of taking weak measures like locking the games under the counter. Gather them all in the ceter of town and let's organize mass burning. We shall also have to eliminate any person that has once in his lifetime played a videogame they might be killers biding for their times when they take out their rocket launchers and try to rocket jump everywhere.

Be ever watchful unless plumbers eat mushrooms to grow twice their size and start jumping on people's head to kill them.
If video games are so influential to real-life behavior, then let me ask this:

Why don't we have millions of guitar rock stars and amateur bands running around? Why don't we have millions of kids growing mustaches and 'studying' to be plumbers? Why aren't there millions of people running around, convinced they're shooting fireballs at each other? The same reason there aren't millions of kids shooting each other because of GTA.

The vast majority of people who play games are stable and sane, and they can differentiate between reality and a game. The poor souls who would fall prey to their own imaginations with a video game are the same kids who would make the same mistakes if they read a book or watched a movie. Video games are only a convenient scapegoat.

And I also assert that video games do very little in the way of 'training' a person to kill. Does a video game teach a person how to aim and fire a real gun? How to load it? How to unjam it (if applicable)? Does a video game teach a person how to properly hold the butt of a rifle to your shoulder so the recoil doesn't totally throw off your aim? Does a video game build the physical strength needed to carry a large firearm, or the large amounts of ammunition most of these psychopaths carry?

The answer is a large, resounding no. The people who are able to account for all the things above have already had training or experience (hunting, ex-police/military), and they lack the mental stability to realize what they're doing is wrong.

I know how to use a gun. I play GTAIV. Why haven't I killed anyone yet?
i think we can successfully blame COD 1,2 and 3 for causing World War 2.
@Bungles Danforth
so if this teaches the kids to kill….what teaches the nypd to unload their weapons at innocent civilians?

I know you get to play as cops in "25 to Life".
Vinzent stole my comment, so I'll have to make a new one...

See, where they go wrong is that GTAIV is a game, even if it is a mature game.

What do you want from a game? Should you BLEED if you get shot in the game? Whould you have prefered if people actually DIED when they "lost a life" in Pac-Man?

There are repercusions in the game if you do something bad, however, in this game you are a relatively bad guy. Why? Because they have a lot of the good guy games already covered. It is a pretty untapped market.

Tell you what, you make a "MacDonald's Smile Game" and put it up against this one, maybe you can use sales pressure to push it out of the market. Maybe I'm actualy the reincarnation of Ghandi as well.

Movies with an anti-hero are common. This game is no more detailed or realistic then them, actually a lot less. It isn't a kids game so saying that it teaches kids this or that is hogwash. The moment you tell us that an adult can't play a game because kids might get their hands on it, is the moment that you also condem all movies, writings, alcohol, cigarettes, and guns with that exact same argument.
If anything GTA taught me never to mess with the police. No matter what picking a fight with them will eventually end badly for you.
@ Arad

Under-achiever...
Playing cops and robbers has no consequences and shouldn't be allowed

Playing war has no consequences and shouldn't be allowed

See Mike, I can do it too, make me mayor
playing tag shouldn't be allowed becuase it makes someone 'it'. When someone is 'it' they are being unfairly discriminated against.
I'm sorry, but if your child is actually 'learning' from a VIDEO GAME, you need to rethink your parenting skills. Period.

I've gone over bullcrap 'opinions' like these far too many times before.
Lady, it sucks that your son died, but really, stop with the game blame. I can go into so many details and arguements, but I don't feel I need to. Just stop. As for you Bloomberg, shut the fuck up. The shit you claim is RETARDED. Everyone and their mommas' know that. A goddamn game can't teach a kid to kill, for reasons that have been pointed out by everybody. Also, what about kids who train in some sort of martial art? A lot of kids do that, and yet I don't see them tearing ass all around punching people in the ribs. That's because they were taught to be responsible with what they know. It's not that hard.
every time I hear them speak about videogames I keep remembering Farenheit 451... oh that's right gamers don't read books never mind serious books. sorry I forgot.
@ Guiguibob80

isn't that a movie?
@JohnnyD, but more so to all similar commenters
"but that is no reason to start banning the content. How many WWII shooters are there?"

To be fair, no one's talked about banning the game in this instance. We are quick as gamers, and commenters, to assume criticism is a call to ban or censor content, when in fact, no solution has been presented by the critic.
I don't know if they made a movie about the book by Ray Bradbury. But it's the book I keep thinking about.
@Tubatic
I think the problem we gamers have is they treat us like we should be ashamed of our hobby. This is why we respond like this. They are saying we are likely to be killers, criminals and violent persons. I am offended by the way they treat us. I prefer to respond with humor, but this is not everyone's way of responding.
@ Guiguibob80 & Dungles Danforth

LOL! I don't think there's a Farenheit 451 movie. A video game of it would have some awesome irony though.
Ok so I ready the article and saw her son died in July of 2007. Almost a year ago.

Lady... GET SOME COUNSELING NOW!
You know, you'd think there'd be SOME risk of death or injury being in the force.

Although I have much respect for the police for fighting on our behalf, the mother is simply seeking something to blame for her loss.
Sucks son died but damn it Mourn the loss instead of trying to blame on something you clearly don't understand.

"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

This pissed me off. Criminals comes from a sick twisted mind that don't think straight. Almost like this "Mom"...

Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people.

Then if there are No Consequences, then why the fuck do we have cops then? Doing Nothing. Hit a cop car Cops hunts you, Hit a person cops hunts you, Drive drunk cops hunts you, kill a person or groups of people cops hunts you. They more like KILL you untill every part of your body is full of holes.
GTA4 has barely been out after a day and already blame is being passed for a crime. Well, that was quick.
Just because someone is offended by Gta doesn't mean we all can't play it
I mean for example, should we forced to not read Batman and Robin because Arthur Ally thinks it supports being gay?
@Bungles Danforth
I think you're talking about Farenheit 9/11. Well, I could be wrong
"For some people, it’s a game. But for me, it’s not funny. It was for real. It was my son. "

I'm truly sorry for your loss, but I don't care about how you feel about this game. I don't care who finds it funny and who doesn't - I myself enjoy it and that's all that matters to my. Conversly, my opinion should not matter to you. Now that we accept that, realize the world does NOT revolve around you just because you suffered a loss - while horrible, we all suffer them.

"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

Prove this game teaches children to kill. Then, with your implication that this game causes criminals, prove that it does. And explain how it was possible that criminals existed before video-games did. Like, thousands of years. Then explain how crime has dropped as video-games became more mainstream and popular.

"The kids are playing these violent games that don’t exactly teach the kind of things that you’d want to teach your kids."

So don't let your kids play them. But since I HAVE ACTUALLY PLAYED THE GAME, I know for a fact that it does not TEACH YOU that there are rewards for killing police - in fact, it teaches you there are LIFE AND DEATH penalties. And those "points" everyone says you get for copy killing, which is actually money, you LOSE for doing it.

"Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people."

Actually, there is TONS of in-game consequences. If you say that in-game consequences have no real-life affect, then you acknowledge that in-game rewards have no real-life effect. It doesn't work both ways.

Another ignorant idiot who can't back up her claims. I'm deeply sorry for your loss, but that doesn't excuse stupidity.
Why does everybody keep assuming that this is meant for kids?
@Justin:

"And there are no fake politicians in the fake city to fight fake gun crimes."

This made me LOL for some reason, maybe its all the "real" politicians being up in arms every time a new one of these dares to be released...
@Loudspeaker:

Farenheit 451 Movie and game
@ Justin

I just wanted to say.... I loved you post

Awsome

;-)
Are these people fucking serious? Where were they when kids were playing cops and robbers with their friends in reality? Cowboys and Indians? Army? Boys by nature cling to violence and acting this stuff out, but instead of pointing sticks or water guns at one another and screaming "patewww patewww" they're having their stupid parents buy them GTAIV and killing virtually. Take your pick, they're both violent, aggressive acts...

Also, if you don't like it or think it's distasteful then don't play it. I'm pretty sure 99% of people who watched American History X thought the content was deplorable and shocking, but there's more to it than that... Banning content simply because it may offend people (to a degree here folks) takes away from our freedoms. If we lived in that reality there would be no TV, no books, magazines, games, sports, religions etc...
Dear Mrs Timoshenko

I am sorry for you loss, but I have no sympathy for someone who is scapegoating something just because it is "cool" to do so. When you have matured a bit and understand it is a game NOT meant for children, feel free to try again.

sincerely DCOW
IT'S NOT FOR KIDS.
ONLY FOR ADULTS.

If an ADULT can't separate a GAME from real life, why arent they sectioned?!
“Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people.”

Bullshit. These people never played GTA IV. Being in a shoot out with a cop never happens unless it is on your terms, and then it still leads to the same issue. Most time you're shooting at a cop, there are five million cops shooting back at you. Perhaps dying in a video game is not a bad consequence in a game since it obviously doesn't stick, but I've found my self being far more cautious in GTA IV than I have been in the past games. Fleeing from the cops can be easy, but it can be a bitch as well on this game.

Me and Roman decided to go to a bar and have a little beer. Afterwards, I decided I'd drive us back. Needless to say some poor citizens of Liberty didn't go home that night (including Roman by the end of it all since he went to the hospital). Let me tell you, there are consequences for drunk driving, and fleeing from the cops is no fun while drunk.

That just brings me back to the point that I think Rockstar did, in a small sense, program this game to have more of a consequence for doing illegal things far better than previous games that I could survive for half a hour destroying everything and everybody in my path. I will not do that on this game. I may attempt it, but I do not think I'll last for more than 2 minutes with a three star much less four star rating (not even gonna go to five).
''The kids are playing these violent games that don’t exactly teach the kind of things that you’d want to teach your kids''



um SO DONT LET KIDS PLAY THEM

GOD DO I HAVE TO GO AROUND AND TATTOO THIS ONTO EVERY INDIVIDUALS BODY SO THEY NEVER FORGET THE CONCEPT, BECAUSE IT SEEMS STRANGELY DIFFICULT FOR SOME PEOPLE!


here is the entire GTAIV crisis summed up in 2 lines:

Kid : can i have GTAIV?

Adult: ............ NO.....



wow .. wouldnt make the best plot for a movie. Not quite long enough.
You shouldn't even trust the NYPD after those three cops were aquitted of murder.
Everyone references the kids these days...

Pre-teens and teens are much more tech-savvy and have a stronger sense of common sense than previous generation. In fact, most of the stuff in GTA IV isn't foreign to anyone over the age of 15 or 16. By this point, they're not children anymore, so that point is moot. What I'm trying to say is that this game isn't marketed to kids, and this game is as likely to be banned and pulled off shelves as HBO is likely to pull the "programming" from their midnight run.

Lol.
This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from.
I hate how people think that criminals are easily made. Criminals know they are doing is wrong, and they choose to be wrong.

If Criminals are made, then they act as they do because they look at the world as something that tortures you. If the world doesn't help you, then you hate the world. If you grow up in an abusive family or really bad bulling, then you feel like you have the right to abuse back.

Video games just doesn't do that to you. Video games allow you to express your feeling in the video game and not in the real world. Video games are helping, not hurting.
"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from".

I believe that criminals have more chances to come from bad environments (poverty, violent home life, gang neighboorhood) than fake bad environments on a tv screen.
"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

Hey I wonder where they came from before the invention of television.
We are not born with knowledge of society's morals. If a child sees something he likes, they'll probably go ahead and take it. If they see something they don't like, they might well attack it. Then, as they grow up, they are taught right from wrong and are hopefully punished when they mix the two. You simply cannot become old enough to play GTA (even illegally) and understand what's going on without also knowing you shouldn't try this at home.

Suppose someone out there plays GTA and decides that, hey, that looks fun and they should totally see if they can beat the cops in real life. How is this GTA's fault, exactly? More importantly, aren't the police given a little warning that criminals might try to kill them?
@Brandon - in GTA4, when you die / get hospitalised you don't lose your weapons.

Rockstar Game Design team FTW!
"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

Well yeah since there were criminals long before video games were ever invented (for some reason Jack the Ripper springs to mind).
"This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

I did not know video games exiisted throughout Al Capone's prime (sarcasm).

@Ken
I 100% agree.
I think these people who like to lash out at the internet and gaming culture seem to think that we actually care and that some level of empathy stretches ALLLL the way across the inter-tubes, but it doesn't. Ya, it sucks that someone died, but what can you do? Bitching won't make them come back. Yelling at people you don't know won't honor the memory of a loved one.

You can't take yourself this serious in front of the face of an anonymous mass like gaming culture, or gaming in general. You're going to get flamed, belittled, and emotionally destroyed by some of the nastiest arm-chair philosophers in the world.

The worse part about this Mother's situation is that she's making a spectacle of herself by diving headlong into the spotlight so she can spout the same ill-informed crap that she heard some other mouthy, self-righteous, jerk-off say before her. Oh, boo hoo, you THINK games are bad, and you want everyone else to take your retarded opinion to heart because someone died in a situation that may be vaguely connected to a scape-goat subject.

It's not even about the games anymore.. It's like everyone is clawing for their 15 minutes of fame by taking a pot-shot at the current generation.
There are numerous causes for violence. I doubt GTA is the but for cause, as in "but for GTA the video game such and such police officer would have not been shot." While violence as entertainment in a video game is offensive to many people who don't regularly play video games, horrific mind numbing violence in U.S. history predates video games by generations. Want to see how gruesome and violent society was before television, the internet at R*? Check out this photo history of racial violence (lynching) in the U.S. at http://www.withoutsanctuary.org/main.html but beware IT'S NOT for the feint of heart. Keep in mind that it only became illegal to send postcards of these atrocities in the 1930s. There are also children present in some of these pictures, with smiling adults.
BTW, the point of my above post was not to offend or gross out. I merely wanted to counter the assumption by many modern media violence critics that media causes violence with a counter example from an age where there was only print media, but horrific violence was still a problem. Arguably much moreso than it is today. Whatever causes people to be violent is way more complex than being able to play make believe violence. Much easier to blame Elvis, comic books, rock, then rap music, and now "violent" video games than undertake a serious study of the human condition. Politicians latch onto the anti-GTA bandwagon because it's so much easier than talking about cheap guns, poverty and other more salient contributions to causes of violence.
Yeah well if the NYPD has taught us recently with the whole Sean Bell trail is that apparently its wrong for people to shoot cops in a video game but its ok for cops to shoot people in real life.
I think these people have a good point. After all, there were never any crimes before video games.
I just thank goodness that Conan is coming out in the Summer.

If this had been released in Winter you can imagine all the kids suffering Pneumonia as they run around the streets in furry pants trying to cut the heads off people in their mad psychotic 'game rage'.
Yup, as its obvious to every non-gamer, these games are real life simulators training our kids to be nutbags. I fear for our streets when Conan is released !!!
I's sorry your son died but then being an ignorant and stupid person placing blame on a style of game kids were enacting in a much more real manner with pop guns and etc loses any and all pitty for you. the rest of the officers family is still ok. in my mind the mother is no better than a drink best man at a wedding hitting on the bride and reaching for a feelsy.
"For some people, it’s a game. But for me, it’s not funny. It was for real. It was my son. This game teaches children to kill, then they wonder where criminals come from."

Crime has been around since, i don't know forever. Did you know when the goverment created the 18th amendment it also created organized crime in the U.S.
"and what do i say to a dead cops wife (or mom), cops kill my people everyday that life" maybe the skinheads mom should start a website for all the unarmed blacks the NYPD have shot over the years
@Matt - that's not really a fair argument here, is it?
@destijlcat: Don't assume because someone doesn't have hair that they're a skinhead (a term meaning white supremacist, amongst others).
Devil's advocate time!

Let us suppose that GTA is a cop-killing simulator. Now, we'll ask the GP audience, most of whom have probably logged numerous hours in Liberty City and the like: What's the easiest, safest, and most efficient way of killing a cop?

A) Shoot them.
B) Run them over.

Anyone reckon that GTA trains you to take option A?
@Matthew: Never let the facts get in the way of a (hysterical) good story. Fact.
@SteveUK

to be honest i call everyone with a shaved head a skinhead
Most crimals come from poor families that cant afford the basic necessarities in life. People who are greedy and dont care where the money comes from and many othe factors play a role.

What gets me is that when "The Godfather" came out, it was recognized as a classic, and a startling look at organized crime. But now that GTA4 is out, it's being called mindless violence. i personaly havent played the game, but most of my friends habe. there is always an interesting story in these games. These games should be consider interative movies. the story in this is orignal and about survival.

Being involved in a shootout in a video game has no consequences and that is the wrong message to send to young people.


Sure it does. You lose all your weapons (and they are expensive in GTA4 because money is hard to come by) and some cash. Plus, more often than not, it leads to failed missions.

Just sayin' is all...
im sorry for the loss, but people have to learn how to blame on the right things. we just can't keep saying

"its the games fault its the way he was palying it."
Re: NYC Mayor, Slain NYPD Officer's Mother Criticize GTA IV

GTA4 should not be banned.  I enjoy the game myself.  I can see, however, why it may not be considered morally right to have fun slaughtering police officers even if fictional.  I would contend that GTA adds to the already rampant demonization and hatred for cops that subsists in many urban areas around the US.  I doubt that GTA would drive anyone to kill unless they were already unstable enough to kill someone.

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/24/08 at 01:45pm
Dark Sovereign: A fitting metaphor lumi
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:21am
lumi: their own. Looks like they're arguing with ghosts...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Ooh, and to prove the validity of their arguments, they've deleted all the comments from the gamers/outsiders, and just left
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:20am
lumi: Wow...there's worse invective and vitriol on that first feminist site's comments than in most gaming forums I've read...
Posted 07/24/08 at 11:19am
SimonBob: You guys can read the feminist blogs? One of 'em has over 1400 comments -- my browser locks up when I try to load the page!
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:49am
M. Carusi: That's probably the message to describe hardcore feminism in general. :P
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:35am
Tom90deg: Meh, it seems like most of the comments are "I'm right, and it you don't agree with me, you're a girl-hating masonogystic pig!"
Posted 07/24/08 at 10:30am
M. Carusi: Those comment walls on the feminist blogs complaining about FP are generating some hilarious content.
Posted 07/24/08 at 08:48am
E. Zachary Knight: @ lunatic, What you see is what you get. Once a comment gets pushed off it is gone forever.
Posted 07/24/08 at 07:39am
sortableturnip: Best...comments...ever: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2008/07/06/jack-needs-your-help.aspx?pg=5&view=threaded
Posted 07/24/08 at 05:42am
sortableturnip: Alteffor: I 2nd that motion. GP you should have a special section for all of JT's correspondence to you
Posted 07/23/08 at 10:13pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Lunatic: Nope. Ever fading if I'm not mistaken.
Posted 07/23/08 at 08:05pm
LuNaTiC: is there a way to view old shouts? sorry if its a noob question.
Posted 07/23/08 at 07:07pm
gamepolitics: momma didn't raise no sock puppet
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:15pm
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Jack is a repressed man. Don´t be surprised...
Posted 07/23/08 at 06:07pm
GryphonOsiris: So Jack admitted paying for gay porn... all I can say is wow... just wow...
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: to the case, and he's been on 60 minutes once!
Posted 07/23/08 at 05:09pm
lumi: GP, you should mention you'll be filing a legal injunction against him if he doesn't comply. Phoenix Wright will be attached
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:32pm
Alteffor: You should add a section to the site for anything Jack CC's to you. It's always entertaining to read the stuff he writes.
Posted 07/23/08 at 03:31pm
Matriculated: Does anyone know when the Supreme Court reaches their decission?
Login or register to post shouts