In Australia, GTA IV Censorship May Force Government to Tweak Rating System

May 15, 2008 -

The censorship of Grand Theft Auto IV will likely force the Australian government to add an R18 rating by year's end, according to The Australian.

GamePolitics readers will recall that some of GTA IV's sex scenes had to be cut in order to qualify for the current highest rating, MA15+. Without the edits, the game would have been banned by Australia's Office of Film and Literature Classification.

Greg Bondar, who heads the Game Developers Association of Australia told The Australian:

I think the release of GTAIV is a defining moment; it goes to show how far the games industry has come. The ratings system has not kept up.

The Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia also supports adding a R18. IEA chief executive Ron Curry said:

Anecdotally, there was always a lot of hostility towards the classifications, but that is softening now as people are becoming more comfortable with games as just another form of media.

 

Comments

Re: In Australia, GTA IV Censorship May Force Government to

LOL gotta laugh about the australian national whore association um my opinion is bring r18 there have been some games ive wanted to play but were banned cause of some whining bitches after they approve R18 games all we have to do is wait for the X18 games and then we can go into a porn shop in desguise and say were "buying a game"

Re: In Australia, GTA IV Censorship May Force Government to

Freyar wrote:

"Despite what many people think, there are decensy [sic] levels in video games that even the most hardcore gamer is uncomfortable with."

Firstly, you're contradicting yourself there.  If many people don't think it, then there AREN'T decency levels most hardcore gamer would be uncomfortable with.

As a gamer myself, I doubt very much that there are decency levels that go beyond what my comfort level would permit.  These are games and no matter how excessively violent or obscene, what happens happens to pixels, not people.  In my view videogames have been kept waaay too repressed for waaay too long.  In terms of violence I'm perfectly comfortable with a game like GTA IV which shows multiple homicides and drug use.  In terms of sex, games need to get a whole lot more graphic before I'll be happy with the portrayal of sex in videogames, because I think sex is a fun and harmless activity which needs to be portrayed with some level of maturity in games - i.e. let's see more of it and much more realistically.

In short, games like GTA aren't for kids and it's about time the industry stopped treating us all as if we were 8 year-olds.

I "bought" the leisure suit

I "bought" the leisure suit larry game that was banned, only because I was curious to see how it was going to destroy society, turns out they banned it because the game was total shit...

Re: In Australia, GTA IV Censorship May Force Government

I have already brought a few things from Amazon.com that are banned in Australia.   

I wonder if the massive

I wonder if the massive pre-order cancellations followed by massive importing of the uncut and cheaper version had anything to do with this.

I'm glad to see that

I'm glad to see that Australia is now seriously looking at adding the R18 rating...  However, I think this is all due to those gamers who refused to purchase the censored Australian version.  This decision from my perspective looks like it was made due to pressure by retailers who saw only a small chunk of those GTA sales numbers.  I'd love to know how many people have GTA in Australia and of those how many purchased it from a retailer in the country versus imported it.  The reason I'm making this speculation is simple.  Before GTA IV was released Australian and New Zeland government representatives both condemned the game and added that R18 was a mistake.  Now suddenly they've "seen the light".

...I'm guessing that light was the loss of tax revenue due to the sale of copies of GTA IV and those which the game industry employs in the country.

At any rate, start stocking up on champagne my aussie gaming bretheren!  The day you've all been waiting for is approaching!  Woot for R18!

"Volume helps to get a point across but sharp teeth are better."

I wonder if they'll let us

I wonder if they'll let us do a trade in At least they're starting to come around that people over the age of 15 live in this country. And it's not like retailers lost millions of dollars in pre-orders and now are so overstocked that they have to sell the game near cost in some cases...

Ah, yes.

Censorship will never bring anything good. Hiding something away from someone will create aggression and tension, which could end in them importing it in (and breaking laws) or something even worse, which we can only speculate. The government believe that censorship will create a nice thick layer of ignorance and that people will turn the other cheek.


Allow the individual to make a judgement on it, instead of enforcing one.


I'm not sure if I ever

I'm not sure if I ever posted it but I've done a comparative analysis of the uncensored & Australian versions (err through perfecly legal means, no mention of questionably legal imports) and the differences are negligible and frankly laughable. The lapdances seem to be the same & there's no nudity in the strip club in both versions. The ONE difference that I've seen is the hookers (AGAIN).

In the uncensored version you can select a level of service and there's a degree of animation to accompany them. You get to see a fairly long ranged view of a fully clothed handjob ($20), blowjob ($50) or girl on top in-car shag ($70).

The Australian version has no ability to select the level of service and the camera angle is locked to a ground level shot behind the car. Thats all I've seen thats different.

My suspicion is that the Australian Hookers Union (I'm assuming one exists with absolutely no evidence) would have been up in arms about the idea that they might provide anything less than top quality service. They may be whores but they have professional pride damnit!

Its quite sad that in order

Its quite sad that in order for us to get the R Rating, we need all of the Attorney Generals to agree to it, and there is just one person who objects to it, therefore it cant happen. Even sadder that I'm from the same state as him.

- Tim Kowalenko

- Tim Kowalenko

Maybe you could vote him

Maybe you could vote him out. You know with a 5.56mm "vote"? (JOKE)

The situation with state attorneys general is really annoying, especially when they need a unanimous agreement to change something so simple as a media rating rather than a simple majority vote. Why can't we just say "Stiff shit South Australia, we're having it and thats that, grow up." (it is the SA AG that's the source of the problem isn't it?)

Yeah, its the South

Yeah, its the South Australian AG who is causing all the trouble. I may even write a few letters to the local members of parliament and the AG, though i doubt that would have any effect...

It happened before with all

It happened before with all other forms of art. I wonder what the next generations will invent that will make us want to censor them :)

Nueral based video games

Nueral based video games that result in someone actually being present in the virtual reality to the point where smell, touch, taste, sight, and sound can be transferred through. I don't know about you, but I can't see myself wanting to ban that.

That's a good step forward

But why has it taken this long to get a R18 rating?

"as people are becoming more comfortable with games as just another form of media. "

Our generation is slowly taking over.

This is pretty much the

This is pretty much the truth. Despite what many people think, there are decensy levels in video games that even the most hardcore gamer is uncomfortable with. Besides, if a majority of people prefer to have the material available, then it should be. (Those that disagree can start a debate about The Virginia Plan versus  The New Jersey Plan elsewhere.)


---- There is a limit for both politicians against video games, and video games against politicians.

Banning the content from

Banning the content from rational reasonable adults is something that should never have happened in the first place. I hope they do allow for a method for any legal adult to have the freedom to view and consume whatever media they wish.

---- There is a limit for both politicians against video games, and video games against politicians.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
RedMageI'm still disappointed the 360 never broke into Japan either. It had a bevy of great RPGs in the late 2000s.04/23/2014 - 9:48am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician