Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton Campaign... We Disagree

May 20, 2008 -

Much virtual ink has been spilled over Electronic Art's protracted campaign to acquire GTA IV publisher Take-Two Interactive. In the latest news - as GamePolitics reported yesterday - EA has extended its deadline until June 16th.

Variety's Ben Fritz, who pens The Cut Scene blog, yesterday compared EA's takeover bid to the seemingly doomed presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton:

EA staying in this race is a bit like Hillary Clinton staying in it -- only a complete implosion by the opposition could result in a victory.

Although GP is on record as opposing the EA-T2 merger on the grounds that game consumers will inevitably be screwed in the deal, we couldn't disagree more with Fritz's conclusion that EA's campaign is fruitless.

The deal will almost certainly get done, just not at EA's current $25.74 offering price. We note comments made to GamePolitics by Wedbush-Morgan analyst Michael Pachter earlier this month when EA secured a one billion line of credit:

[EA] need[s] to raise around $800 million to complete the [Take-Two] deal [at $25.74]. The extra $200 million is just a cushion, although I suppose it could be construed as how much higher they’re willing to go [for Take-Two]...
 

So, EA needs about 30-33 million shares to acquire a majority stake in T2 and has an extra $200 million to spend on any price increase. That's a potential $5-6 bump, depending upon the exact number of shares. When all is said and done, look for EA to own T2 for $27-28.


Comments

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Pachter != credible.  Just because he says the deal will be done is by no means an indication it will be.  Take-Two's shareholders have spoken and they don't want to sell to EA right now.  They're right too because GTA4 has deatroyed even Take-Two's own revenue expectations.  Pachter is wrong as often as he's right and why the gaming press continues to accept his predictions as certainty still baffles me.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

I'd say he's wrong more often than he's right. Out of at least dozen stories that had comments from him, he seemed to have been wrong at least three out of four times.

Buy Stock in Take-Two

By the gods, we should be buying those shares! Think about the things Rockstar and T2 have been able to give us over the last few years (scandals notwithstanding); even if these guys don't love gamers specifically, they manage to consistently give us games that make us think they do. Isn't a company like that worth protecting, particularly from the Evil Empire? If we could seriously find a way to collectively purchase the 30-33 M shares that EA would need, WE could proactively block this move and cast our lot with the creative types.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

<blockquote>So, EA needs about 30-33 million shares to acquire a majority stake in T2 and has an extra $200 million to spend on any price increase. That's a potential $5-6 bump, depending upon the exact number of shares. When all is said and done, look for EA to own T2 for $27-28.</blockquote>

Except that EA seems unwilling to part with that much money. If they aren't going to sweeten the deal now, it seems unlikely that they're going to start putting up more later.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

I know that T2 will be considering their stockholders before their fans on this, but wouldn't it be amazing PR for the company if they said they were taking their fan's opnion into consideration and deciding not to sell to EA?  I know I'd sing the praises of T2 if they did.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

T2 doesn't simply have to let this happen though.  They could begin buying up their stock, or some third party that's anti-merger could.  Basically the situation isn't quite as bleak as is being portrayed.

---------------------------------

So speak I, some random guy.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

if EA does end up taking over T2, somehow i can see, as anonymous said, the employees will end up with the shaft.  i would guess that about half (if not more) of T2's payroll would end up getting cut.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

If I were an investor I wouldn't be selling t oany company that needed or was willing to get a loan to take over a sports market.

Watching, instead of taking money away form game sales to pay it bakc, guess who's gonan pay. yep, their employees.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

And look for the Federal Trade Commission to reject the takeover as an illegal monopoly of the sports video game market.

Re: Variety Compares EA/T2 Takeover Bid to Hillary Clinton

This is very disturbing news. Is there anyway GP can poke the various regulatory comittees and see what they've been thinking. This is obviously bad for the industry, and I am overly curious as to what they are thinking about the entire deal.

---- There is a limit for both politicians against video games, and video games against politicians.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknamehttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/22/fec-backs-off-flirtation-with-regulating-internet/05/22/2015 - 1:34am
MattsworknameWell, on another subject, Saw this, and while I know it's fox news, thuoght I should share it05/22/2015 - 1:34am
MechaCrashYeah, even I think IP needs to dial it back.05/22/2015 - 12:35am
Mattsworknamesays05/21/2015 - 11:17pm
MattsworknameRE doc, everyone has a tendancy to let emotion get ahead of them, especially in an annoymous forum like the web. We have have those moments. Ip however has nothing but those moments. it's why I stopped responding to him, regardless of what he thinks or05/21/2015 - 11:17pm
DocMelonheadNo offense, but I see your behaviors in the comment sections uncalled for.05/21/2015 - 8:51pm
DocMelonheadHell, I could use both Goth_Skunk and IronPatriot as an example of such behavior between the two.05/21/2015 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenMock? Ridicule? No, we're talking about serious threats and abuse, not people being cheeky or mean. Big difference.05/21/2015 - 8:42pm
DocMelonheadIn fact I see both mocks and ridicule between both the GamerGate Supporters and GamerGate Critics.05/21/2015 - 8:41pm
DocMelonheadAs for the Harassment, well, this is the internet; people will mock and ridicule whoever they want, whenever they want, at all times.05/21/2015 - 8:40pm
Mattsworknamegoth I think all media news outlets have that disclaimer05/21/2015 - 8:39pm
Andrew EisenThat's an... interesting way to interpret that.05/21/2015 - 8:36pm
Goth_SkunkAnd re BBC vs Rockstar: Ahh. I missed that. Woops!05/21/2015 - 8:33pm
Goth_SkunkAE: The entire disclaimer is a valid reason why I don't take it seriously. Particularly the part where they say "the information contained herein may not be necessarily accurate or current." Because fact-checking, like math, is haaaaaaaaard!05/21/2015 - 8:32pm
MattsworknameI take all media reporting with huge skepticism. the Mary sue Included. that said, there not as bad Jezebel.05/21/2015 - 8:27pm
DocMelonheadYou could say that the Mary Sue only interested in Gender issues in pop culture, and they only see GamerGate as a Hate group that fight for the oppressive status quo.05/21/2015 - 8:22pm
MechaCrashWell, can't blame him for not expanding on it and missing stories here. Sealioning people demanding proof of claims and then calling them liars when they provide it is busy work!05/21/2015 - 8:20pm
Andrew EisenRe: Mary Sue - Uh, why exactly? Re: Rockstar - Yep, we reported that earlier today.05/21/2015 - 8:12pm
Goth_SkunkRockstar is suing the BBC. http://ow.ly/NgzDm05/21/2015 - 8:00pm
Goth_SkunkWhy I don't take The Mary Sue seriously, and why you shouldn't either: http://ow.ly/Ngzkk05/21/2015 - 7:55pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician