With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge & 30 Others Denied, Jack Thompson Will Boycott Sanctions Hearing

May 28, 2008 -

Much has happened on the Jack Thompson front Since GamePolitics broke the news last week that Judge Dava Tunis had recommended to the Florida Supreme Court that the controversial attorney be found guilty on 27 counts of professional misconduct.

With a sanctions hearing scheduled before Judge Tunis on June 4th in Miami, Thompson has been tirelessly pushing his position that Tunis has no legal authority due to an issue with a forged loyalty oath (but not forged by Tunis -  more on that below).

Thompson also tried to subpoena 33 people for next week's hearing, including Take Two Interactive Chairman Strauss Zelnick, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Judge Ronald Friedman, who presided over the notorious Bully case in 2006. Judge Tunis denied that motion, however, citing procedural errors made by Thompson's side.

And, with federal lawsuits already pending against the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court, Thompson has  filed yet another suit in U.S. District Court, this time naming the State of Florida as defendant. In the new case, Thompson yet again invokes the loyalty oath issue and seeks to block the Bar from proceeding against him.

In a separate federal court filing, Thompson refers to the June 4th hearing as a kangaroo court and vows not to attend unless U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard strikes down a Florida Supreme Court order which bars Thompson from filing anything with the Florida Supreme Court unless signed by another attorney.

Finally, in a just-issued filing with Judge Tunis, Thompson seeks a stay of next week's sanctions hearing while demanding a mental health exam. Thompson complains in the document that he "has put up with this 'Jacky is whacky' charade long enough."

So that's the recap... What follows are some details regarding the loyalty oath issue.

While Thompson has sought to cast Judge Tunis in a highly negative light by saying that she was the "beneficiary" of a forged loyalty oath, an investigation by the Miami-Dade State Attorney's office indicated that a clerk apparently signed the oath without the knowledge of Tunis and two other judges. GamePolitics has received these comments from Eunice Sigler, a spokeswoman for the Miami-Dade Courts:

There are two separate and distinct documents being addressed. One is called the Oath of Office and the other is called the Oath of Loyalty. The Oath of Office is a document which, when properly executed, allows a judge or any other constitutional officer in the State of Florida to act in their official capacity in office.
 
First and most significantly, when Judge Tunis was appointed to the County Court bench in 2000, re-elected for a term beginning in 2003, and elevated to the Circuit Court bench in 2005, she properly executed the Oath of Office each time, as required by section 5, Article II of the Florida Constitution, before beginning her duties as a judge. These documents, provided by the Governor’s Office, were found to be in order by the Department of State as well as the Division of Elections for the State of Florida, and are not required to be notarized. That Oath of Office includes the promise to “support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the Government of the United States and of the State of Florida,” which incorporates the less specific Oath of Loyalty specified in section 876.05, Florida Statutes.
 
The second document, called the Oath of Loyalty, applies to all public employees and elected officials of the State of Florida and has no effect whatsoever on any judge’s authority or jurisdiction to act and therefore has no legal consequence as to the decisions made by any judge while serving on the bench.
When new judges as well as all new state employees begin their employment, they are given certain documents to sign.  If those individuals are employed within the court system, the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) provides them with a packet of documents to sign. When Judge Tunis received this packet at the beginning of her service on the bench in 2000, the Oath of Loyalty, required by section 876.05, Florida Statutes, was not provided to her for her signature. However, it appears that several days later, this Oath of Loyalty was completed with a forged signature and improperly notarized by a former AOC employee, then placed in the judge’s file without her knowledge.
 
When Judge Tunis first became aware of this on January 31st, 2008, she immediately executed the Oath of Loyalty, which has been properly filed.
 
As stated before, the Oath of Loyalty has no effect whatsoever on any judge’s authority or jurisdiction to act and therefore has no legal consequence as to the decisions made by any judge while serving on the bench.
 
The Eleventh Judicial Circuit takes any prohibited act by a court employee very seriously. Accordingly, a request has been made that the State Attorney and Inspector General investigate the forgery and the actions of the former AOC employee, which have unfortunately victimized Judge Tunis and other judges.
 
 

Indeed, the State Attorney's investigation into the loyalty oath issue found that Judge Tunis committed no wrongdoing whatsoever.

GP: While Thompson is pulling out all the stops to either remove Judge Tunis or postpone next week's sanctions hearing, neither appears likely to occur. Thus, the wheels of justice are moving inexorably toward the June 4th court date. At that time, it is expected that Judge Tunis will recommend penalties against Thompson that could include disbarment. From that point, it will be up to the Florida Supreme Court to issue a final ruling.


Comments

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully ...

I wish these people sorry ISDE interests oto kiralama

12345

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Nintendo is indeed selling SOME of these on the Virtual Console but not even close to all of them. While i agree in part to his piracy he was filling a market that Nintendo failed to recognize. Maybe someone doesnt want to buy a Wii. maybe they just want a console with 50 - 100 NES games on them?? maybe just maybe?

but no Nintendo wants everyone araba kiralama to buy the Wii. thats their excuse but thats not what copyright is supposed to protect. i am real sure that the makers of 10 yard fight were losing sleep because they were missing out on their $0.00025 worth because they didnt get royalties from this player. *smirk*

my question is, should Super Mario Bros. be banned from public domain forever? isnt 23 years enough time for Nintendo to have made their profits?

If you have followed the Steamboat Willie case regarding Mickey Mouse you can rest in your bed well at night knowing that the MOUSE will still be under copyright law, away from public domain after your great grandchildren are in nursing homes. That is beyond ridiculous dont you think??

Gallagher can araç kiralama say all he wants, but I strongly rent a car believe it's due to his crappy leadership and E3 being a joke. ESA's Board of Directors need to find a way to get out rent a car of this horrid contract with this Bush cronie before there's no one left on the Board.

Btw, I think Atari and Midway will drop out too, but mostly travesti because  these guys have done nothing ttnet vitamin or little and need to start saving costs.

YES.

Now I don't have to get off my ass for the important shit anymore!

Whats next, ordering pizza from Xbox live?

Wait... I think that sounds like a good idea.

But I think voting should MAKE you get off your ass, and see outside or a second while you go vote. I mean, your picking the president of the United States of America for God's Sake... least you can do is drive down there and punch out a card.

Another funny joke within his demands for psychiatric evaluation

I read through all of his rants - yes I do have alot of time and find them amusing.  He loves to play up how much he is the victem despite all the wonderful things he has done for the world......

Anyway I read through his demands for the psychiatric evaluation and had to laugh at one statement that he made in his demands:

"Thompson also moves as a condition of this testing that it be videotaped and that Dr. Oren Wunderman, the esteemed forensic psychologist who examined Thompson and found him perfectly sane,be allowed to observe the testing by another, either in the room during the testing or through a one-way window.  Dr. Wunderman is an honest man and a superb forensic psychologist recognized by The Bar as such.  Dr. Wunderman has agreed to this and he endorses this motion made by Thompson."

Not sure if anyone else pointed this out but wouldn't that in fact negate the examination by another psychologist.  We are well aware that Dr Wunderman is of the same church as dear Mr Thompson and shares his views regarding religion almost exactly the same.  In fact it was Dr Wunderman who signed off and completed the recent voluntary assesment of Jack when he was told to have one done earlier in 2007.  There was much speculation and I believe downright disbelif that this psychologist could be in any way a fair evaluation of Jack's mental health as he shares the exact same religious beliefs.

Anyway just thought to laugh as if the Florida Barr does agree to have Jack evaluated by a psychologist - there is no way in hell that they will agree to the stipulation that Jack gets to pick a second oppinion from a psychologist that he chooses himself by hand.

I do not know if anyone else laughed at this - but I did :).

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

The AVGN should give Thompson a call once this is over.

Join the YouTube Boycott! Avenge the suspension of PlayItBogart and the hacking of Armake21!

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

so, no other judges or lawyers properly filled out their paperwork except for Jack?

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

I like how Jack is asking for another mental health check, since he's been waving around the results of the one he got in the past.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

The thing about him being found 'sane' actually works against him as well, because it then proves that he isn't delusional, but instead that he is a outright liar and an asshole. Perhaps he wants to be re-examined so he can fail, like you said, and use it as an excuse, but I doubt it. Knowing him he wants to prove for the sake of his ego that he is completely sane. Of course, as I said before, it just proves him as a liar.
 
You know, if all of this were a Chess game, most of us would have him in check or check mate in about 10 moves or less.

 

"The Good, the Bad, and the Videogame" Reviews on the best, worst, and controversial issues of Videogames. gryphonosiris.blogspot.com/

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

If this were a chess game, Jack would not only already have been checkmated, but his king already taken, yet he'd still be moving the rest of his pieces, insisting he's not beaten.

He's got pluck.

 

 

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

June 4th? That's my birthday! His disbarment would be the best gift I've ever recieved.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Ooooh, I know! We can cut his law license into little pieces and give them out as party favors!

/birthday-party yay

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Why is JT demanding a mental exam anyway?  I don't recall the court alleging that he is mentally unstable.  Perhaps he is unable to differentiate between the comments he reads about himself on the internet and actual court comments.

Or, he just wants to fail the test as a means of getting out of this- make it look like the persecution of the courts/games industry has stressed the poor little crusader out...boo hoo.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

The thing about him being found 'sane' actually works against him as well, because it then proves that he isn't delusional, but instead that he is a outright liar and an asshole. Perhaps he wants to be re-examined so he can fail, like you said, and use it as an excuse, but I doubt it. Knowing him he wants to prove for the sake of his ego that he is completely sane. Of course, as I said before, it just proves him as a liar. You know, if all of this were a Chess game, most of us would have him in check or check mate in about 10 moves or less.

"The Good, the Bad, and the Videogame" Reviews on the best, worst, and controversial issues of Videogames. gryphonosiris.blogspot.com/

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Excellent observation. No one but Jack thompson has put his mental health at issue in this matter (apart for the Bar's settlement offer which included the requirement that he be psychologically eveluated). Certainly none of his misconduct charges implicate his mental health. I suspect it's just another puff of smoke to add to his smoke-screen.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

/agree

It's another delaying tactic.  Nobody mentioned the potato, there is no potato and no one is accusing you of having a potato... but if you stand up and scream "WHAT ABOUT THE POTATO???" then people are going to stop and say "What potato?  Is there a potato?  Should we be looking into the potato?"  In theory, you can potentially buy more time.

Realistically, this might work if he hadn't been using these same tactics for so long that his gambits are as transparant as air.  (Well... most air, anyway...)

Potato?

So when all is said and done, Jack Thompson's only claim to fame will be "The Potato Defence". hehe...

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

"I'm not wacky!" shouted the little diapered man in the Napoleon hat as he stomped his way through the produce section of the local supermarket, flinging subpoenas for Santa Claus and Frosty the Snowman left and right.

Honestly, if Grand Theft Auto really does drive someone to becoming a mass-murdering sniper, I think we all know who that someone is likely to be.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Jack, do you have a statute citation for that mandatory removal?


Ya know, one of those little Bluebook citations that usually read something like
 

32 Ohio. Rev. Code Ann. 1312 or something (I don't know the Florida citation format off the top of my head but I had to do extensive research on Ohio law last year).  If you don't have that...well then...don't be quoting or citing statutes.

Also, what does the case law say?  Again, those citations that are usually something like:

Thompson v. Florida, 321 F.2d 311, or Thompson v. Virginia, 112 Va. Cir. 213 (again those are totally fake case cites, just reminding you what they look like).

Does the case law say anything about what happens when the Judge is not provided the loyalty oath but corrects that oversight?  Does it change the validity of previous rulings?  Come on Jack, you are a lawyer (for now) at least pay lipservice to proper citation or reference.  You generally aren't allowed to just make arguments in court without SOMETHING to back it up.

Tell me you have at least ONE precedent, I seriously doubt this is an issue of first impression.

Also, what about Supreme Court and first amendment issues.  "Loyalty Oaths" run afoul of certain religious beliefs, Jehovah's witnesses I KNOW have issues with "swearing oaths" that's why when you take the stand you now are asked"

"Do you solemnly swear OR AFFIRM that the testimony you are about to give..."

Certain religions will not let you SWEAR so you are asked to AFFIRM instead.  If Florida's loyalty "Oath" requires judges to SWEAR, the oath is probably unconstitutional on first amendment grounds.

But as a First Amendment "Expert" I'm sure you were aware of that.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

The Loyalty Oath statute indeed mandates removal of non-compliant officers. But this required removal isn't automatic or easy to obtain. The statute also provides for either swearing or affirming. The constitutionality of loyalty oaths have been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Interesting, I guess one question is what does "non-compliant" mean.  After all Judge Tunis complied with the statute as soon as she was aware there was a problem.  I guess the issue is whether her simply not having signed the Oath right away would be "non-compliance" or if there is an implied requirement of "willful non-compliance"

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

On my read, the statute says (to paraphrase), "before you can legitimately take your office you must effect a valid Loyalty Oath." It doesn't appear that the fact of invalidity through forgery was of no fault of the putative office-holder is of any consequence. Effectively, you look for a valid Loyalty Oath and, if for whatever reasons you can't find one, the statute says (to paraphrase) "if no valid Loyalty Oath, then no authority to hold office, and your Boss has to take steps to remove you from the office." But that's pretty much all it says.  

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Of course, if the putative office-holder subsequently effects a valid Loyalty Oath, then going forward there's no real issue. It's going backwards to the period of the invalid Oath that's a problem.

Don't get me wrong; I'm not arguing Thompson's case for him. But I do feel that if I disregard the applicable law as I understand it because I want to see him get the shaft, then that makes me no better than him.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

So it seems that Judge Tunis' rulings from the time she took office until she signed a valid loyalty oath may be problematic (altough I don't see court deciding to overturn however many rulings that might be on logistical grounds).  Was JT's case on her docket before the oath?  Cause if JT didn't come before her until after she fixed the oath then JT is shit outta luck.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Yes, there is a period of time in which Judge Tunis was operating under the forged Loyalty Oath and making rulings in Thompson's matter. There is also a period of time in which Judge Tunis was operating under a properly executed Loyalty Oath and making rulings in Jack Thompson's matter. Put another way, the correction of the invalid Loyalty Oath to a valid Loyalty Oath occurred in the midst of Thompson's proceedings. Is this a problem with respect to the validity of any of the rulings that Judge Tunis has made, whether pre- or post-correction. I would argue not. That's was the de facto judge doctrine was designed and intended to address and cure.

But that the 11th Circuit would publicly present a statement so open to ridicule, as I think it is, about the Oath of Office curing an invalid Loyalty Oath and an invalid Loyalty Oath having no effect on a judge's authority (at least if their use of the word "authority" is intended to include authority to hold office) because all state officials, not only judges, must effect such a Loyalty Oath, frankly, infuriates me to no end. The forged Oath thing is an embarrasment. Fine. But it's also water under the bridge. Attempting to spin the situation like some swarmy politician's press agent does nothing to remove egg from face. Moreover -- and this is the part that really gets my goat -- it helps Jack Thompson in his attempts to wiggle out from under. Why not do the more appropriate thing, in my opinion, and confess that, yes, we messed up royaly but., good for us, the law provides a way for us to get around that mess up and it's called the de facto judge doctrine. It doesn't sound as nice for P.R. purposes as the nonsense they've put forth, but at least it makes some sense.

 

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

And, believe it or not, best that I can tell, it would be a case of first impression for the Florida Supreme Court . No one's ever challenged the validity of a judge's ruling on the basis of an invalid loyalty oath but for the that of the judge in the Terri Schiavo case and, I could be wrong, but before the matter ever came before the Supremes, it was mooted by Schiavo's death or in some other way resolved without the High Court ever having to address the issue. Of course, the absence of precedent doesn't auger in Thompson's favor. And may explain why he's making up his own legal precedent. 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Hopefully, if a mental exam is considered, there will be someone there to argue the point of conflict of interest in using Dr. Wunderman, or anyone else of similar religious beliefs to John Bruce, as the evaluator. 

And as to the "boycott":

Stand stock still, cross your arms, put your head down and stick out your bottom lip and and whine "I don't wanna go!"

Yup.  True to form.

GP: Thanks for changing your post comments to red.  They stand out well enough to know when they suddenly appear so I can catch them after having seen the non-commented post earlier.  I guess I can live with that.  :)

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: http://www.myspace.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

@voligne the Archon That or become the guy standing opposite the apartment in bohan in GTA IV...

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

I bet jack cuts out of his blog posting time to do all these filings, he IS fighting for the children of course, just not his own kids >.>

 

Jack, I pose a question, do you ever THINK? about your own children? after this your going to need a job to support your family, fighting for the children, a good cause, a noble one even one I am all for, but if you cannot even raise your own children why should we let you try to raise our own? Please, after this just shut up get a job and raise your offspringe to be upstanding and productive members of society.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

 

 

From Jacks official court request for mental examination:

 

"Thompson moves and demands of this referee an order mandating his mental health examination by a qualified person.  He demands that the tests that be administered be the three universally recognized objective tests, which are the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the Millan test, and the other whose name escapes the undersigned presently.  Amnesia may be a sign of early onset dementia.  That’s a joke for the humorless."

 

wow jack. just wow. you DEMAND 3 tests, yet you cant even remember them. pretty hard to accept that demand isnt it. how on EARTH have you ever won any cases if you dont know what you are demanding....... oh yeah now i remember... you dont win cases.

And i am far from 'humorless', (see i made a funny about you not winning cases just moments ago) but even i draw the line about making jokes about dementia. wow. hilarious isnt it jack. hilarious for all the families caring for victims of dementia. they all find it SO funny caring for a loved one day after day seeing them slowly degrade into a worse and worse state. damn f*****g hilarious jack. Oh im sorry, you only care about families when they are vicitms of 'cop killing simulators'. Oh wait.. that would mean you care about nobody. Well except for yourself.

 

Please if you read this answer me why you find it objectionable that people allegedly have made fun of your wife's illness, yet you feel it ok to make fun the illness of others. double standards as usual jack. its getting old. Fortunaltely we wont have to deal with you much longer. Bye Bye.

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

It really makes you wonder how he has the audacity to submit such a poorly researched, spelt and worded document.

It shows how little seriousness he places on the system that his filings should ever treat it with even that minimum of disdain, let alone his general "two fingers to the courts" actions he has taken.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

I looked over his filing considering the upcoming hearing and 'boycott', and amongst the lies (he said the Judge has 'never' signed a Loyalty Oath, but she did in January; he said he's not allowed to appeal, but in truth he just has to go through another lawyer, and 'inconvenient' does not equal 'impossible'), something struck me: his reliance, in this case, on the Sixth Amendment.

 

Now, IANAL, but I wiki'd that one, and the language of the Sixth seems pretty clear that it only applies to criminal trials.  Since this isn't a criminal case, does Jack have a leg to stand on here?

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

To be fair, Jack styles himself a "first amendment expert" I seriously wonder if he's even read the rest of them but:

You're right the sixth amendment clearly says "in all CRIMINAL proceedings." Now the right to a jury trial is preserved in civil proceedings involving for than, I think, $20.  I guess Jack could argue that's the case hear (given he stands to lost A LOT of money) but he can't say that for certain and courts love certainty.

It sounds to be like Jack hasn't actually READ these amendments he's just remembering grade school civics and going

"Hmmm, 1st amendment was freedom or religion, speech and all that, second amendment was right to bear arms...sixth amendment was oh yeah RIGHT TO JURY!!!  YAY!!!"

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Yes, the Sixth Amendment grants its therein contained rights only to criminal defendants. Yes, the Seventh Amendment grants the right to trial by jury in certain civil matters. No, Jack doesn't have a leg to stand on because Florida Bar disciplinary proceedings are neither criminal or civil in nature. They are "quasi-judicial administrative law proceedings" to which neither the Sixth or Seventh Amendments would properly apply.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Hey, can we cut JT a break here? I mean, shit, I know he's not as right in the head as the rest of us (only a very teensy tiny bit) but still, damn! Put yourselves in his shoes! What if some random blog started jumping on you for all the mistakes you make?

Shadow: Uhh, [censored]*? You do know you're posting that on GP, right?

??????: Oh, I know that, Shadow.

Shadow: *sigh* Fine. Do what you will, but if you get me flamed, you will burn. Got it?

??????: You think they'll flame you? Jeez, lighten up, Shadow!

*I censored his name because it's his real name, which nobody here needs to know. Though I think Dennis knows him from somewhere. I don't remember, though.

I AM A LOST SOUL, CONDEMNED TO HAUNT THE DREAMS OF JOHN BRUCE "JACK" THOMPSON UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS. SOMEONE, PLEASE! END MY SUFFERING!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM DOOMED TO HAUNT JACK THOMPSON'S DREAMS UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Relax Shadow. We won't flame YOU. Unlike Jackass Thompson you know we actually care about what the other guy says. That being said *attaches the flamethrower to it's swivel mount* I fully admit a part of me wants to flame JT like an FAE.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Can me and [censored] request that JT be cooked MEDIUM RARE? Please?

I AM A LOST SOUL, CONDEMNED TO HAUNT THE DREAMS OF JOHN BRUCE "JACK" THOMPSON UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS. SOMEONE, PLEASE! END MY SUFFERING!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM DOOMED TO HAUNT JACK THOMPSON'S DREAMS UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Finally, in a just-issued filing with Florida Supreme Court, Thompson seeks a stay of next week's sanctions hearing while demanding a mental health exam. Thompson complains in the document that he "has put up with this 'Jacky is whacky' charade long enough."

You know, demanding yet another mental health exam after preemptively getting one --out of fear of getting and stopping a real one -- from someone with some personal ties to you, sure doesn't sound very sane...  Not to mention all the other stuff he has said and done.

Did someone give him some Cliffs Notes or "How to pass a mental health exam for insane dummies" book?

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

“When deeds speak, words are nothing.” - Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

And this quotation seems to be quite apt for Jack's pathethic actions. If history of Jack Thompson himself would tell us anything, it would be that he's a intolerant and dictator-like faggot who takes pleasure of mocking dead gamers and taking credit from murdered victims by being an ambulance or massacre-chaser, in short, this guy should die fast.

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Of natural causes of course...

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

No matter how he should die, all we know is that despots should meet their doom.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Looks like Jack Thompson doesn't give a damn especially if he's fighting for a lost cause, or at least, a worthless cause. To be honest, this kind of person isn't really worth of our time and how I wish dictators like him will die of heart diseases or something so we don't have to suffer under their iron fists.

I may be harsh, but hey, it would be best for all of us and most of all best for the people in North Korea and Burma who are ruled by despotic faggots and their very own "Gestapos".

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

> despotic faggots

This language is not called for.  We like a little more decorum here than might be displayed on, say, XBL.

 

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

Pardon my ignorance, but what is XBL?

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

I'll say one thing, that man has energy

Where does he get the time to do all this filing? More importantly, how is he making money? From what i see, all of his time is taken up with games?

Does he do anyother work?

Boycotting your own trial?

Ok, hold on. I'm not one of those fancy law-types, but it seem to me that saying, "Unless that judge is removed, I'm not going to show up to the trial!" is a bit...how you say...stupid. There may be a reason for not showing up, for example, the trial can't go on if he's not there or something similar, but if he just stands outside saying "I'm boycotting this trial!" dosn't that mean he'll LOSE the case? Correct me if I'm wrong of course, but if I had some trial, and I said, "I'm going to Botcott this trial unless I get a new Judge!" they'd just laugh and say, "Alright, it's your funeral."

Re: Boycotting your own trial?

Actually, no.  He says he won't be at the trial if a different judge doesn't strike down the decision preventing him from filing things on his own without another lawyer to sign off on it.  I'm not exactly sure what one has to do with the other, but at least in this case it's nothing to do with the Oath of Loyalty garbage.

Re: Boycotting your own trial?

EXACTLY!

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

The louder Thompson yells, the harder he's going to get fucked.

Let's just enjoy this, shall we?

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

.....If thats true, then wouldn't that mean that a giant redwood is being made into the world's largest wodden phallus?

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: With Subpoenas for Strauss Zelnick, Jeb Bush, Bully Judge &

he's an "all bark, no bite, rotting tree" kinda douche

 

The Hills are alive

I swear to the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the instant this man gets disbarred, I am going to sing the entire score from the Sound of Music with musical accompanyment from my clan.

Twice.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenWhen I write about these massacres, I don't use the shooter's name or picture. I'm not saying everyone has to play it that way but that's how I prefer to do it.10/25/2014 - 12:44am
Andrew EisenYep, it's why the news media stopped spotlighting numbnuts who run out on the field during sporting events.10/25/2014 - 12:01am
Matthew Wilsonin media research its called the copycat effect. it simply says that if the news covers one mass shooting shooter, it increases the likelihood of another person going on a mass shooting.10/25/2014 - 12:00am
Andrew EisenAgreed. It bugs me that I know the names, faces and personal histories of a bunch of mass shooters but I couldn't tell you the name of or recognize a photo of a single one of their victims.10/24/2014 - 11:51pm
AvalongodAgree with Quiknkold. @Mecha...if that worked we would have figured out how to prevent these long ago.10/24/2014 - 11:32pm
MechaCrashUnfortunately, you have to focus on the perpetrator to figure out the whys so you can try to prevent it from happening again.10/24/2014 - 10:55pm
quiknkoldpoor girl. poor victims. rather focus on them then the shooter. giving too much thought to the monster takes away from the victims.10/24/2014 - 10:15pm
Andrew EisenFor what it's worth, early reports are painting the motive as "he was pissed that a particular girl wouldn't date him."10/24/2014 - 10:12pm
quiknkoldwell then I suck as a man cause I ask for help when necessary :P10/24/2014 - 10:07pm
Technogeek(That said, mostly I was making the smartass evopsych comment because your post seemed like the kind of just-so story that has come to dominate 99% of its usage.)10/24/2014 - 10:04pm
TechnogeekHell, Liam Neeson built his modern career around it. Cultural factors likely play a far greater role than you appear willing to admit.10/24/2014 - 10:03pm
TechnogeekSeriously, though, the idea of "because women are protectors and that's why they never commit school shootings" is, at best, grossly overreductive. There's nothing inherently feminine about being willing to kill in order to protect one's offspring.10/24/2014 - 10:03pm
MechaCrashThe "toxic masculinity" thing refers to how you have to SUCK IT UP AND BE A MAN because seeking help is seen as weakness, which means you suck at manliness, so it builds and builds and builds until something finally snaps.10/24/2014 - 10:01pm
quiknkoldthere, I'm done. And thats what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown10/24/2014 - 9:54pm
quiknkoldand I am not spouting Evopsych, technogeek. tbh I never heard the phrase till you said it. I'm going off my observations.10/24/2014 - 9:54pm
quiknkoldmoreover, the guy who did this isnt even white. He was native american according to the news report I read. Also that he went for a specific target. That's a much different picture than a certain Sandy Hook guy who will not be named10/24/2014 - 9:53pm
quiknkoldbut I am also certain nobody in their right mind is committing these shootings singing the Machoman song. these are sick individuals who have given up on life10/24/2014 - 9:51pm
Technogeekevopsych lol10/24/2014 - 9:49pm
quiknkoldWhen you suffer from mental illness, youre more likely to go by instinct. yes. I came off as sexist.10/24/2014 - 9:46pm
quiknkoldmore on somthing they are fixated on. Post Partum Depression is an example. This is why a woman is less likely to go off on a rampage.10/24/2014 - 9:44pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician