A Florida Judge recently recommended that Jack Thompson be found guilty on 27 counts of professional misconduct. A federal judge tossed his lawsuit against the Florida Supreme Court on Tuesday. And the Florida Bar yesterday moved to have him disbarred for a decade.
But, don’t fear for Jack Thompson.
No dummy he, the controversial anti-game activist has his detractors right where he wants them. At least, according to Thompson.
Under the subject line of SWEET! (GP: I kid you not), an e-mail circulated by Thompson this morning cites today’s Daily Business Review coverage of his case and reads, in part:
Because of the [DBR] article, which contains my entire Objections filing, I am now getting phone calls from highly respected people who are proving to me the criminal conduct of The Florida Bar… We are meeting with law enforcement officials about that.
This is all wonderful. Light is now being shone in some very dark places, and the Daily Business Review has assisted in that wonderfully.
I am now going to win this fight, by the grace of God and because of the First Amendment, most particularly the right to freedom of the press. Certain Florida Bar officials need to hire criminal defense lawyers today. The investigations are already underway. And if you think I’m kidding, then you don’t know Jack.
So much for the sweet. Or should we say, the SWEET!
On the SOUR! side, after Thompson declared in a recent sworn federal court motion that Bar trial referee Dava Tunis had leaked case documents to GamePolitics, we pointed out that his claim – which he wrote that he was making under penalty of perjury – was untrue. We also explained that we had received the documents from Eunice Sigler, Director of the Office of Government Liaison and Public Relations for the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, pursuant to our various public records requests.
Just one day after our story debunking Thompson’s false claim regarding Judge Tunis ran, the controversial attorney filed a document with Eunice Sigler’s boss, demanding to see her official loyalty oath. Readers will recall that he has unsuccessfully targeted Judge Tunis over the loyalty oath issue as well.
Thompson’s focus on Ms. Sigler, a court administrator simply carrying out her duties, seems from here like a case of very sour grapes.