Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

June 30, 2008 -

The Entertainment Software Association (ESA), which represents the interests of video game publishers in the United States, has issued a press release announcing that the state of Minnesota will reimburse the industry to the tune of $65,000.

The figure represents legal fees incurred by the video game industry in its court challenge to Minnesota's unusual 2006 "fine-the-buyer" law.

As passed by the Minnesota legislature and signed into law by Governor (and potential Republican VP candidate) Tim Pawlenty (left) in 2006, the law would have turned traditional video game legislation on its head by fining underage buyers of M-rated games $25. Virtually all other video game content bills have sought penalties against retailers.

There were some other noteworthy aspects to the Minnesota situation:

U.S. District Court Judge James Rosenbaum, who ruled the law unconstitutional, borrowed his law clerk's Xbox to check out some violent games while considering his ruling.

Former Minnesota Attorney General Mike Hatch (D), who defended against the industry's constitutional challenge in its early days, described violent video games in a court filing as "worthless, disgusting speech" and "speech of very low societal value."

Minnesota appealed Judge Rosenbaum's decision's to the 8th Circuit Court, but lost. A request for a review by the entire 8th Circuit was also turned down.

The state's only remaining recourse was the U.S. Supreme Court. Judging from the settlement with the game biz, Minnesota A.G. Lori Swanson has apparently decided not to pursue a Supreme Court decision, but we've got a call into Swanson's office to confirm that.

The ESA originally sought $73,332 in fees in a motion filed in August, 2006. The $65,000 figure indicates that a little bit of negotiating went on.

ESA CEO Michael Gallagher weighed in on the $65,000 payment:

Minnesota’s citizens should be outraged at paying the bill for this flawed plan. Minnesota’s public officials ignored legal precedent and instead pursued a political agenda that ultimately cost taxpayers money. Courts across the United States have ruled consistently that video games are entitled to the same First Amendment protections as other forms of art, such as music and literature...

 

Politicians need to realize that the key to protecting our children from inappropriate media content is not haphazard legislation, but rather parental education. Video games have a first class ratings system supported by retailers, opinion leaders and parents.  It would be a far better use of public funds to help support this system, rather than continue to pursue unconstitutional legislation that works against it.    

GP: In a way, it would have been fascinating to see the Supreme Court make a ruling on this issue.


Comments

Jeez

My "Net connection has been out,I must've missed alot.Who are we pissed at right no?

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

 The politicians who pass unconstitutional laws need to have their pay docked or some other public humiliation inflicted on them.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

I'm a big fan of bringing back tar-and-feathering.

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Meh, too bad it wasn't a lot more just to make those idiots who can't be bothered to worry about the constitutionality of what they're trying to enact and leave it to lawyers look even worse. Politicians who try to pass "feel good" laws deserve to lose their position.

My wallet hurts!!!!

-And as always, the taxpayers are the ones who suffer.

 

If shit and bricks were candy and tits, we'd all be livin' large. For information on games and psychology, look up: Jonathan Freedman(2002)Block & Crain(2007)Grand Theft Childhood, by Harvard Medical School researchers Larry Kutner and Cheryl Olson

Reality/////////////////////////////////////Fantasy. Seems like a pretty thick line to me...

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Fuck.

 

Thank god I forwarded my rebate towards next years taxes.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

GP: In a way, it would have been fascinating to see the Supreme Court make a ruling on this issue.

Be careful what you say GP. I rather things stay the way they are with a united front by the circuit of appeals. Though it supports our chances with winning in the SC, I've read plenty of cases where the SC went the otherway regardless of a united front. I say lets keep things the way we are with us on the winning side and not take unnecessary chances.

Risk v. Benefit

Yeah, the risk of them deciding against us is frightening indeed. But if they decide for our side, we are done with all the legislation, the tax burns, etc. Forever. But yes, if we were to lose, it would SUCK! You know Jack would be claiming victory all over the site.

 

 

-If shit and bricks were candy and tits, we'd all be livin' large. For information on games and psychology, look up: Jonathan Freedman(2002)Block & Crain(2007)Grand Theft Childhood, by Harvard Medical School researchers Larry Kutner and Cheryl Olson

Reality/////////////////////////////////////Fantasy. Seems like a pretty thick line to me...

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Two things to note here.

1) As long as politicians can milk these "feel good" laws to make voting constituants happy, they'll keep making and trying to pass them.  All kinds of bills like this are passed yearly, and most of them get shot down soon after.  Videogames are the big thing right now, so expect to see more of these, no matter how many have been deemed unconstitutional before them.  And it's not just morally bankrupt politicians, it's misguided politicians who have a very loud, crass, big mouthed someone whispering in their ear (high Jack!), it's morally zealous politicians who think that they're morals are "right", and everyone else is "wrong", it's completely oblivious politicians who want in on the bandwagon, and pretty much every other politician sooner or later.

 

2) To the people of Minnesota, and every other state that's had to shell out big $$ because of some moronic dolt of a politician who couldn't give up the ghost, write to your local newspapers, bloggers, TV news station, and pretty much every media outlet in your state, and let them know how your politicians wasted money on trivial, useless, and baseless legislation that has been deemed unconstitutional time and time and time again in other states.  Let them know how much their "moral zeal" has cost your state, when it could have put that money towards alternatives to legislation that would have helped with educate parents about violent videogames and their ratings, and how to buy the right games for the right age levels.  Let them know how the money could have been put towards doing other things for the kids of your community and state, like after school programs, parks, youth centers, and such.  I can garauntee you that more than a few people will be not be happy, and let the legislature know during the next election.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

As far as I know Thompson was not involved in the legislative process on this one.  The big proponent was Sen Sandy Pappas & then AG Mike Hatch as part of his lead up to running for governor, if I remember correctly. 

It is interesting that the office of the MN AG responded to my email as a constituent stating that "Under Minnesota law, this Office is obligated to defend the constitutionality of State legislation."  In many ways it seems that the AG office under Swanson was following through on obligations created by then AG Mike Hatch. 

 

 

 

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Charging gamers? I think that's actually better than the retailers or the industry itself for being charged. Maybe not as good as the employee, not the company, being fined, but at least this bill attempted to put the blame in the person who was knowingly buying a game to mature for themselves.

Still, it's a good thing that they shot it down. These video game bills are simply getting annoying at this point.

-"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." -Sir Winston Churchill

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

"GP: In a way, it would have been fascinating to see the Supreme Court make a ruling on this issue"

Seeing as how they've been ruling against our other rights (Habeus Corpus, etc.) I really don't want to see video games go all the way to the Supreme Court, not with these justices at least.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Uh...what? They just reenforced habeus corpus to the Bush regime for the third time. They also protected the second amendment.

 

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

"Uh...what? They just reenforced habeus corpus to the Bush regime for the third time. They also protected the second amendment."

 

The "Bush Regime" you are talking about put some of those judges in play that protected the second amendment. The Job of the Judicary branch (aka supreme court) is to decide if the rule of law is constitinal it is called checks and balances.  

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

So is New York next? I wish there a law that the law makers who created this bill would pay 20% out of their own pockets while those who voted on it pay 10%. M]be that might keep them from making unconstutional laws. but then again they would just give themselves a pay raise.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in:  Prosecutor considers bringing criminal charges against Take-Two for copycat criminal acts.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This Just in: There is NO law that can stick that can cause Censorship in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA you can't tell people they can't make art/media/video games....That being said RETAILERS have every right not to carry said art/media/Video Games if they choose too....SO JACK PLEASE DO ALL THE WORLD A FAVOR GAG YOURSELF!!!!!!!

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in: Never-has-been attorney tries to derail a topic AGAIN, with crap that probably isn't even true. AGAIN.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

That's not really news though is it.

Now, if the prosecutor did bring criminal charges, it might be worth a mention. Still a little dog bites man though.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in:  You're not Jack Thompson

Where the hell is your family?

Don't you have a sickly wife who needs your care?

 -If shit and bricks were candy and tits, we'd all be livin' large. For information on games and psychology, look up: Jonathan Freedman(2002)Block & Crain(2007)Grand Theft Childhood, by Harvard Medical School researchers Larry Kutner and Cheryl Olson

Reality/////////////////////////////////////Fantasy. Seems like a pretty thick line to me...

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in: Prosecutor considers bringing criminal charges against PBS for two kids getting injured copycatting Benjamin Franklin. (no, this isn't real. A cookie goes to whomever knows what I'm referring to)

岩「…Ace beats Jack」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

LOL  I know what you're talking about, Beavis and Butt-Head, which is what Jack is usually sounding like, a butthead.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

yep, although Jack sounds more like Beavis to me, since Butt-Head is ironically the smarter of the two.

岩「…Ace beats Jack」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in: loudmouth, rabble rousing, massacre chaser, attention whore lawyer Johnny Bruce Thompson faces disbarrment of 10 years after launching numerous fraudlent lawsuits with a 100% failure rate.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

You cound´t even convict a child molester... you couldn´t even convict a traffic infractor or a bike thief in a schoolyard...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/

This just in: Said

This just in: Said prosecutor is under a court order preventing him from interfering with Take-Two.

Breaking news: Said prosecutor will have to do this through another attorney as his own career is practically over.

From our Florida correspondent: Said prosecutor has tried the same thing many times in the past.

Update: Said prosecutor has failed each and every time.

Here's Tom with the weather, Tom?

Tom: Well, it's looking like someone's career is in the middle of a storm at the moment, with gale force disciplinary action coming in from the south, and severe failstone showers every time he tries anything. Conversely, everything looks pretty sunny for the video games industry!

This just in

This just in.... A Class action lawsuit it being created against Jack Thompson for slander, libel, harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation of character, vilification, Abuse of the process, Malicious prosecution, tortious interference, public nuisance, malpractice, and terroristic threatening. I hope you have a good lawyer.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in:  All of your video game cases have failed.

 

 

 

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This just in:  Take-Two will never be charged for the actions of individuals dumb enough to copycat their game. Not now, not ever.

Also, please try to keep your posts relevant to the topic of the article.

-"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." -Sir Winston Churchill

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

This is how my state spends my tax dollars? At least we didn’t lose too much money.

 

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

PWNED... But I think 65,000 USD is very little. And I wonder in what is gonna the money be expended...

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

GP: In a way, it would have been fascinating to see the Supreme Court make a ruling on this issue.

You may get that chance with California.

Glad to see another unconstitutional bill bite the dust and the politicians who signed and voted for it getting what they deserve.

E. Zachary Knight
www.editorialgames.com
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Too optimistic

While I would love to see the SCOTUS shut down Leland Yee with a loud and clear message, I don't see it happening.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Yeah, and then we'd never have to hear about it again, just like creationism.

As long as the public keeps voting for morally bankrupt politicans, we will never see the end of it.

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Is there really such thing as a "Moral" politician anymore I figured that was a oxymoron.......

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

Was this one of the pieces of legislation that Jack Thompson was behind?

Re: Minnesota Will Pay $65K to Game Biz Over Failed Law

It sounds a bit like a broken record, you'd really think they'd have learned by now.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corphttps://www.kickstarter.com/projects/iga/bloodstained-ritual-of-the-night/description apparently Bloodstained: ritual of the night will have a Wii U version(through Armature Games)05/26/2015 - 9:02pm
WonderkarpSo I found out I'm Invincible Today. I drove through a Tornado and didnt even know it. was windy and torrential downpour but I drove through like a boss. 05/26/2015 - 7:35pm
ZenEnded up giving the code to Andrew so he gets to be the other guinea pig lol.05/26/2015 - 6:53pm
ZenSo...who wants to help with an experiment and get a free game for 3DS and possibly Wii U lol? Gave a friend the Wii u OlliOlli code from the Humble Bundle and it gave him the 3DS one too. Still have a 3DS code which may give a Wii U version too.05/26/2015 - 4:35pm
Zenjust wish they had been as open about development as they were with X1 and PS4. All we got were interviews saying everything was great and then this lol.05/26/2015 - 4:14pm
ZenYeah, he brought it up again as time went on and stated it was not to be taken seriously. And I am in NO way defending people who are acting like...well....the not so nice way to say "butts". And I don't personally think they haven't worked on the game, I05/26/2015 - 4:12pm
Andrew EisenSo I can see why Bell would be ultra defensive and snippety. But, again, still not an advisable thing to say.05/26/2015 - 3:57pm
Andrew Eisennot to mention horrifically insulting.05/26/2015 - 3:56pm
Andrew EisenAgreed, even out of frustration, not an advisable thing to post. As for the rest, sounds like it thought its tweeks and optimizations would work. The idea that it was stringing everyone along and not actually working on it is nearly nonsensical...05/26/2015 - 3:55pm
Zenand looking great...yet refused to even show a single screen shot while touting their open development on X1 and PS4. People are now asking if they even worked on the game or if it was dropped in the beginning & they were keeping up appearances instead.05/26/2015 - 3:53pm
ZenI understand that, but making a blanket statement to cover an entire market like that will do nothing more than push consumers away or alienate a group. Other issues stem from the interviews and public announcements they made stating the game is running05/26/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenNot an advisable thing to post, I'll grant you.05/26/2015 - 3:47pm
Andrew EisenReading the thread, it looks like he's just getting frustrated with the obnoxious and unreasonable members of the board (most of whom signed up that day).05/26/2015 - 3:47pm
ZenNintendo users in general by stating "Yup, and if you need to pass this on, we really dislike Nintendo users." on their forum. Sincere or not, it's annoyed some fans & put doubt on the company even trying.05/26/2015 - 3:35pm
ZenThey pushed that even just a few months ago it was running great, with effects, but they just needed a few tweeks before release. I posted about this last night, but it has since cycled thru. Ian Bell also had some fairly disparaging things to say about05/26/2015 - 3:34pm
Matthew Wilson@AE @iamc they admired they cant do wiiu, and they have a valid reason for it. the wiiu is too weak.05/26/2015 - 3:24pm
Andrew EisenLied about what?05/26/2015 - 3:11pm
IanCThey outright lied, they kept pushing that it was coming out on Wii U right to they got a publisher, then went quiet. Funny that...05/26/2015 - 3:09pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.vg247.com/2015/05/26/project-cars-struggling-to-hit-720p30fps-on-wii-u/ I love that he is honest. they admited that they are at their wits end with the wiius hardware.05/26/2015 - 1:48pm
E. Zachary KnightHumbleSupport has said the codes don't expire. So That is pretty tempting.05/26/2015 - 1:38pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician