In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota Newspaper Takes a Swipe at ESA

July 4, 2008 -

The Entertainment Software Association took a victory lap this week, announcing the recovery of $65,000 in legal fees from Minnesota after the state abandoned further appeals of its failed 2006 video game law.

An editorial in yesterday's Duluth News-Tribune, however, dinged the ESA while acknowledging that Minnesota's fine-the-buyer legislation law was "flawed":

From the outset, the law skirted First Amendment rights and targeted the wrong people - minors... The logic was counter to that of more effective laws to protect minors, such as penalties to bars that allow underage drinking or fines to stores that sell cigarettes to kids.

 

...Though [Attorney General Lori] Swanson had indicated then she would continue to defend it, this week she cut her losses. Hence, the $65,000 of legal fees.

 

"Minnesota's citizens should be outraged at paying the bill for this flawed plan," Michael D. Gallagher, CEO of the video game trade association, said in a statement.

 

He's right, but what about his group's members who make and market games depicting sexual exploitation and violence as fun?

 

A little outrage is due there, too, for creating the problem in the first place.

Via: West Central Tribune (the Duluth News-Tribune link isn't working as I write this)


Comments

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

A little outrage is due there, too, for creating the problem in the first place.

Yes, surely the ESA and other gamemakers are not already given enough grief about messing everyone's kids up.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

"violence as fun"

So the newspaper in question will be the first in line to advocate for restrictions on:

boxing, ice hockey, football, competitive budo sports, movies and japanese game shows

eh?

Never mind the fact that children play violently from the moment they can play. When they're toddlers, they bang and throw their toys around, when they grow a little they'll play cops and robbers (or indians and cowboys a few decades ago), when they go to kindergarten and school they gonna push and shove other kids to establish a pecking order. And all this violent play is absolutely normal. Just like playing violent video games.

-- http://pixelantes.blogspot.com/

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

And suddenly I find myself wanting to defend the ESA.  The journalist wants to bitch about the content while acknowledging 1st amendment rights?  Can you imagine applying this arguement elsewhere?  "Sure the police were wrong to harrass him, but it's his own fault for choosing to be jewish in the first place".

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

the only problem I see here is how the Minnesota government is going to explain themselves for wasting 65k of tax dollars on trying to create a stupid law.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

In some states that a bargin!

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

What a badly written editorial.  The focus was the settlement money, but then it veered off and started yammering about something else.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

First thing I thought was "Yay! My town's paper was mentioned!" Second thing I thought was, "People in my town are stupid!" Also, doesn't the editorial strike anyone else as a little...contradictory?

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

I wonder if he realizes that media is marketed to the imature(mentaly) not THE IMATURE(minors)........

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)

 


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

What about them? The members of the ESA creating violent and sexual laden games don't cost taxpayers a dime!

I fail to see the comparison.

Take that, non-existent problem!!!!

He's right, I'm outraged! Damn you video games, movies, books, music, television, and LIFE!! Extra damn to LIFE for creating all the things that these horrid pieces of entertainment are based upon!!!

 

Seriously though, his statement is pretty unfair to all the other things that depict violence and sex. I really don't know what games he's talking about when he says "sexual exploitation", and the generalization that "games depicting violence as fun" seems to put it as though he views all games containing violence to be nothing more than trivial action games (action movies, meanwhile, are fine), whereas most of the truly good ones depict violence in a much more serious and dramatic tone, as something that shouldn't happen, but has to for the sake of whatever the hell the story is about. Even GTA doesn't exactly put violence in a positive light, since attacking people in the game should only be done when nessaccary, lest you attract the attention of the police. The only reason it's fun is because it's so interactive. So no sale on getting outraged over a non-existent problem. I have more important shit to do, like wait for all the violence caused by the written alphabet, the paperback novel, comicbooks, heavy metal, and Power Rangers to go down like those researchers promised.

 

-If shit and bricks were candy and tits, we'd all be livin' large. For information on games and psychology, look up: Jonathan Freedman(2002)Block & Crain(2007)Grand Theft Childhood, by Harvard Medical School researchers Larry Kutner and Cheryl Olson

Reality/////////////////////////////////////Fantasy. Seems like a pretty thick line to me...

Small news article in the newspaper

I was reading my local newspaper when I saw an article titled "Police: Boy stole cars," which said that a 12 year old boy stole 3 cars in 2 weeks.  He's to appear in court for three counts of grand larceny.  This seems to me exactly what people would blame video games for, specifically GTAIV.  I'd be interested to see if anyone implicates that in his trial.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

Here we go again, blaming games for everything that goes wrong in society. Minnesota's the one that created the problem. While I'm not happy with the ESA for turning the other cheek when it comes to these controversies, Mike's right. You can't relate games to tobacco, alchohol, and firearms. We're talking about art, not harmful chemicals.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

"Hooray for protecting the First Amendment. Boo for actually exercising it."

Someone's bitter.

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

"...the law skirted First Amendment rights..." -- Good, glad you understand that.

"...but what about his group's members who make and market games depicting... A little outrage is due there, too, for creating the problem in the first place." -- WHOA, whoa. Did you forget about the First Amendment bit? So soon? Granted, the same Amendment is protecting you should you WANT to be outraged, but the fact of the matter is that you cannont attack those who make speech (like games) you disagree with without jepordizing your ability to make those criticisms.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

Hipocrisy, they has it.

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

'He's right, but what about his group's members who make and market games depicting sexual exploitation and violence as fun?

A little outrage is due there, too, for creating the problem in the first place'

 

Sorry, maybe 'his group's members' got confused as to what was acceptable, due to the fact its perfectly acceptable for films, book, and art, to depict sexual exploitation and violence, but for no apparent reason, videogames are  somehow different.

heres a hint, apply the standards across the board to all media , and maybe it would be clearer that this was a 'problem', but if you aint gonan do that, i suggest you keep your hypocritical mouth shut!

 

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

Problem? What problem? I don't see any problem. So we should all just be happy to go back to the days of strict self censorship?

Not once has any anti-video game law passed constitutional muster. And yet they keep coming. And taxpayers keep having to pay. Games are no different than movies, books, or any other media. Not all of it is suitable for children, and it shouldn't be the responsibility of the developer or publisher to raise someone's kids for them.


 

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

Please, can sopmbody point me in the direction of these sexual exploitation games?

 

-- teh moominz --

-- teh moominz --

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

Well, there are such games.. Except that they're made and sold in Japan, which kinda does make their point, well, pointless.

I may be wrong, but last I checked, they didn't have such games in the US.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oooh! You mean there are people around with the mythical "Common Sense"?

Re: In Wake of $65K Video Game Law Settlement, Minnesota

All I'll say is look at J-List.

"He's right, but what about

"He's right, but what about his group's members who make and market games depicting sexual exploitation and violence as fun?"

What about them? Also, there are no games that depict sexual exploitation as fun. Before anyone responds with "hookers in GTA!", ask yourself how much fun it is to watch a car bounce on a screen. Sure you might have a little juvenile laugh the first time you see it but it's a gimmick after that.

" A little outrage is due there, too, for creating the problem in the first place."

What problem? The alleged but as yet completely unproven "effects" of violent video games on kids whose parents should not be letting them play them in the first place?

Re: "He's right, but what about

"The alleged but as yet completely unproven "effects" of violent video games on kids whose parents should not be letting them play them in the first place?"

If the bad effects are unproven, why should parents not be letting kids play violent video games?  I think you're arguing against yourself here.

If you believe violent video games are harmless (as I do) you really need to stop arguing that kids shouldn't be allowed to play them.  By arguing this way you're conceding defeat.

Video games have no harmful

Video games have no harmful effects on kids, I am fully sure of that, but that doesn't mean that kids should be allowed play them. The reason being is that they display themes and imagery for mature adults that kdis should not see. I don't think anyone would argue that the book Stephen King's IT is harmful, but at the same time you would not let a child read it.

If a kid plays GTA or some other violent game, he isn't going to turn into a killer, but he might start asking his parents awkward questions "Dad, what does "f*ck" mean?", etc.

Violent video games have harmful effects? No. Inappropriate at times for young children? Yes.

-

Careful dude, the last time a guy posted something like that everyone dogpiled him with insults and acusations of retardation. I believe it was in the story where this small town sherrif was bitching about GTA and claimed it was being marketed to eight year olds or something like that...what was that dude's name...drkmatter or something- anyway, everyone was such a bitch to him that he never came back, at least not that I heard of. It was kinda fucked up...uhh...anyway...yeah... I agree with you though, I never understand why people get all riled up about this shit, I look at it as a convenient and safe  way of helping kids come to terms with all the fucked up shit in the world.

 

 -If shit and bricks were candy and tits, we'd all be livin' large. For information on games and psychology, look up: Jonathan Freedman(2002)Block & Crain(2007)Grand Theft Childhood, by Harvard Medical School researchers Larry Kutner and Cheryl Olson

Reality/////////////////////////////////////Fantasy. Seems like a pretty thick line to me...

Re: "He's right, but what about

The problem of impoverished families having to leave their young children unattended while they work two or three jobs and can't afford to pay for daycare or a babysitter because their money is ripped away from them by the government to fund unconstitutional bills.

Re: "He's right, but what about

Well if that's the case then violent games shouldn't be a problem. The families won't be able to afford them.

- The 9 most frightening words a person can ever hear: "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help"

- Stand back! I have an opinion, and I'm not afraid to use it.

Re: "He's right, but what about

If you're implying that said families are forced to leave their kids with violent games and that is the problem  then you're wrong. Said parents could easily take the video games with them or set parental controls on their consoles (all next gen and current gen consoles have them).

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
RedMageI'm still disappointed the 360 never broke into Japan either. It had a bevy of great RPGs in the late 2000s.04/23/2014 - 9:48am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician