New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

July 22, 2008 -

Nearly 90 days post-launch, Grand Theft Auto IV is still raising the ire of watchdog groups.

The New Zealand Herald reports that the Society for the Promotion of Community Standards has been granted permission to appeal GTA IV's R18 rating. The group notes on its website that the appeal will be made to New Zealand's Office of Film & Literature Classification.

The SPCS quotes from a decision issued yesterday by Brendan Boyle (left), New Zealand's Secretary of Internal Affairs:

I found no evidence in the [SPCS] application to suggest that it was vexatious... I then considered whether the application for leave was frivolous (trivial, needless or unfounded, or so untenable that it could not succeed) under the Guidelines... I found that the application for leave from the SPCS appeared to be tenable in that it could possibly succeed. The application was therefore not frivolous. It is also my view that the SPCS has established an arguable prima facie case for the application to be considered by the Board.

Since R18 is New Zealand's most stringent rating, a successful appeal by the SPCS would result in a national ban of the exceedingly popular game.

GP: Thanks to GamePolitics reader Solufien for the tip!


Comments

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

Thanks good job;

Btw, I think Atari and Midway will drop out too, but mostly travesti because  these guys have done nothing travesti or little and need to start saving costs. and dizi izle

YES.

Now I don't have to get off my ass for the important shit anymore!

Whats next, ordering pizza from Xbox live?

Wait... I think that sounds like a good idea.

But I think voting should MAKE you get off your ass, and see outside or a second while you go vote. I mean, your picking the president of the United States of America for God's Sake... least you can do is drive down there and punch out a card.

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

I'm all for freedom of ttnet vitamin speech and allowing rent a car game makers to put whatever they want in games, but there's one thing about this app that has me scratching my head.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but from araç kiralama the previous article araba kiralama on this I gathered that players can use Google maps in-game to find the other (real-life?) dealers in their area.  If this is the case, has travesti anyone considered what's stopping someone from using this app to actually move drugs between hands for reals?

But majority araba kiralama of their outrage araç kiralama stems from what it could DO TO children, not the content itself.  Talk to one of these people and you'll find they don't think any books kiralık araba should be banned from children.  Mention American Psycho and they talk about kiralık araç the redeeming value of using imagination to construct a story.  Reading, no matter what the content, is largely viewed as a consequenceless activity for people of any age.  The reason why I mention American Psycho is because of the content itself.  Gaming never has and likely never will have any scenes where someone has sex with a severed head.  Not gonna happen.  Yet despite this, they'll fight tooth and nail to protect their children from two boys kissing in Bully but whatever they read is harmless... yeah.

The entire arguement is kiralık oto based upon a social normality inflicted by luddites who can't figure out the controls for Halo so it's frightening and terrifying and obviously the cause of youth violence on the rise even though, in reality, it's in decline (which is actually a HUGE suprise given minibüs kiralama the economies status).  In  a perfect world, we would have parents that actually parent.  The idea of sales restrictions on media on oto kiralama any form to accomidate parental unwillingness to get involved with their child's life is the real problem to me.  Here I am, 32 years old, and being held up at a self-scan rent a car needing to show ID before I can buy a $10 M rated game all because Soccer Momthra can't be bothered to look at the crap Billy Genericallystupidson does in his free time.  It's too hard for her, so I have to suffer?

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

Morality: Stopping you from seeing, playing or doing anything I dont like. This is an R18+ which means only adults can buy it. Adults can make their own decisions, especially when it comes to moral decisions.

Conservatives dont want "morals" they want tyrany and freedoms suppressed. I am supprised this is happening in NZ, I thought they were alot more liberal than Aus.

Most likley nobody will listen to these bible bashes.

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

There are moral gaurdians everywhere.

Like rats...

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

And like flies on rats they come and spread their disgusting disease to innocent people irregardless of consequences or (ironically) whether it would be moral or not.

Although unlike a real disease their infectious bile doesn't seem to effect die hard christians or other die hard 'moral' (I use the term only as an identifier not as a means to describe them) crusaders.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

It got an R18, why ban it?

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

Hmm, first post was eaten (because of the link to SPCS' website?)

Anyway, the reason for the banning is that the game doesn't fit their ideals, that and they have a petty grudge against our Cheif Censor and his "Gay Agenda"...

Check out their website: just google "Society for the Promotion of Community Standards"

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

Now I'm confused...

Hmm, I just checked the SPCS' website and they are appealing the rating given to the US version, which as I understand it was the one rated by our censors but not the one sold. We ended up getting the same cut version as the Aussies (Grrrr).

So even if their appeal is succesful the version currently sold shouldn't be banned as it is the tamer version. Having said that though, I'm still unclear why the cut version of GTA IV we got was rated as R18 when it was cut specifically to obtain the R15 rating (or whatever) in Australia?

Also on the subject of hipocrisy: While they are appealing the rating of GTA they also appealed against the rating of a movie about Christianity which contained violence and got the film lowered from R16 to R13.

So violence is okay, as long as its suppors their message? Nice.

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

-ConstantNeophyte: always the newb, ALWAYS.

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

I'm assuimg R18 means 18 year olds ... so in New Zealand are they saying their Adults are so weak will and weak minded that the horrors of playing a video game with animated graphic is to horrible to beyond the scope of their intelligence that it will crack the very reality they live in causing them moral, emotional, and physical damage?

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

I think it's more of a bragging rights / image thing. If you can say that you got GTA banned, you'd get major kudos from fellow narrow-minders.

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

correct Jeremy, but that's watchdog groups for ya...
To blinded by their own ambition and sense of self-importance to see that it's already labeled as high as it'll go and won't be sold to minors. (atleast not often, I doubt the measure is 100% effective)

Porn is so much more wholesome.
Silly, Hypocritical goons, all of them...

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

Which means Rockstar are going to make bumper profits for the next few weeks.

Where would their profits be without morality watchdogs I wonder?

Re: New Zealand Clears Morals Group to Petition for GTA IV Ban

I have always wondered where their game would be with out the nonstop watchdogs screaming havoc.  After all the first GTA sucked the second one was eh the third one was the second one but "3D"!.!.! and frankly all of them after that were number three rewraped with one or two new items.  In fact other than the sandbox concept which was being developed by other companies (and you might even claim other games had already capitalized on the concept) the game is just not that great; the storylines are usually lacking (imo) and the over all gameplay is really lacking (once again imo).  But I will always give them kudos for driving Jack nuts and pushing the envelope on what should be allowed in games (I come from a time when hidden sex scenes is what sold the game in the first place not outraged the buyer, good old Larry looking for love and never finding it =( )

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician