Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why to GP Reader

July 31, 2008 -

As GamePolitics reported last month, Sen. Thomas Duane (D) was the lone member of the New York State Senate to vote against a video game bill that was eventually signed into law by Gov. David Paterson. The measure, sponsored by Sen. Andrew Lanza (R) was approved by a 61-1 margin in the New York Senate.

An enterprising GP reader who happens to be a New York resident (and who wishes to remain nameless) wrote to the State Senator regarding his stance on the legislation:

Dear Sen. Duane

 

...I would like to congratulate you on your lone opposition vote on the above referenced bill... As informed citizens are aware, this law addresses none of the issues associated with video games, redundantly mandates provisions that are already in place such as per product industry ratings and console parental controls, establishes yet another toothless advisory committee, and likely constitutes a violation of the First Amendment...
 
I welcome government efforts in the form of education for parents, but do not welcome intrusive government efforts to usurp parents' role as arbiter of their children's exposure to mass media.
 
Sen. Duane's Chief of Staff, Laura Morrison, wrote back:
 
Dear Mr. [GP reader]:

 

...Senator Duane shares many of your concerns about S.6401-A.  He recognizes that there is already an effective, voluntary [ESRB] rating system in place... and that parental controls are available on all current video game consoles.  Parents should determine which games their children have access to and the marketplace should decide which games sell and which do not.  

 

Like you, Senator Duane questions this bill's constitutionality and points to the fact that similar bills have been struck down in other jurisdictions.  He regrets that he was the lone voice in dissent on this matter.

GP: It's great to see gamers involving themselves in the political process and even better to see an elected official who writes back with something more than a form letter.


Comments

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Personally, I can't blame the GP reader for wishing to remain anonymous. I understand why they would want to. I figure game-bashers like Jack Thompson will start bashing him/her for "allowing makers of violent and/or pornographic material to distribute their products to minors," or some random bullshit like that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM CONDEMNED TO HAUNT THE DREAMS OF JACK THOMPSON UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I AM DOOMED TO HAUNT JACK THOMPSON'S DREAMS UNTIL HIS CRUSADE AGAINST VIDEO GAMES ENDS.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

I hadn't actually thought of that, but now that you mention it, that's a damn good reason to leave my name out of it.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

A Democrat NOT voting in favor of government intervention?!Say it ain't so!

Just joking,but this is very weird,nonetheless.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Being level headed and logical will probably single-handedly destroy sen duane's political carrier.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

You say that like it's a BAD thing!

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Man, he'd get my vote for sure. Kudos to him

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

WOW...

 

...instead of a form letter, he got an informed letter.

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Man that was bad.

E. Zachary Knight
http://www.editorialgames.com
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

               the marketplace should decide which games sell and which do not

What kind of crazy talk is that?!!??!

</sarcasm>

 

 

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

More logic in polotics? WTF is this world coming to? :P

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

If that letter was hand written, and he referred to himself throughout as Senator Duane then he deserve to make president.

 

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

"Sen. Duane's Chief of Staff, Laura Morrison, wrote back:"

 

 

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

Must have missed that somehow....

Re: Lone NY Senator to Vote Against Video Game Law Explains Why

I am reminded of an old countpoint for the "Majority wins!" argument back in my college days:

"And who was it that yelled 'Crucify him!' to Pilate?" An angry mob. Majority wins indeed.

Good to see that people like Duane are getting elected. A shame that voices of reason like his are getting muffled out by the clattering of the bandwagon.

 

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician