Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

August 1, 2008 -

Last month Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) keynoted E3 2008, where he touted the Lone Star State as a destination for game developers.

Today, developer Pixel Mine issued a press release announcing that its newly released PC title Fireteam Reloaded is the first game to receive a production grant under an incentive bill passed in 2007.

Fireteam Reloaded can be played online for free. Extra maps and special items are available as microtransactions. Pixel Mine President David Reese, a native Texan, commented:

This is an exciting time to be a part of the entertainment industry in Texas. We have been privileged to work with several very fine local video game and film production studios in Texas and look forward to seeing what they’ll be showcasing at [Austin Game Developers Conference] in August.

GP: While the Texas incentives are a financial plus for developers, they are not without political strings attached. As The Daily Texan reported when Gov. Perry signed the bill into law:
The bill requires the office to consider "general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the citizens of Texas" when considering grant applications. The bill also requires submission of a final script to determine if changes occurred during production would conflict with these standards.
We have confirmed that state officials did review Fireteam Reloaded for content, but did not mandate any changes.

 


Comments

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

I'm all for freedom of ttnet vitamin speech and allowing rent a car game makers to put whatever they want in games, but there's one thing about this app that has me scratching my head.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but from araç kiralama the previous article araba kiralama on this I gathered that players can use Google maps in-game to find the other (real-life?) dealers in their area.  If this is the case, has travesti anyone considered what's stopping someone from using this app to actually move drugs between hands for reals?

But majority araba kiralama of their outrage araç kiralama stems from what it could DO TO children, not the content itself.  Talk to one of these people and you'll find they don't think any books kiralık araba should be banned from children.  Mention American Psycho and they talk about kiralık araç the redeeming value of using imagination to construct a story.  Reading, no matter what the content, is largely viewed as a consequenceless activity for people of any age.  The reason why I mention American Psycho is because of the content itself.  Gaming never has and likely never will have any scenes where someone has sex with a severed head.  Not gonna happen.  Yet despite this, they'll fight tooth and nail to protect their children from two boys kissing in Bully but whatever they read is harmless... yeah.

The entire arguement is kiralık oto based upon a social normality inflicted by luddites who can't figure out the controls for Halo so it's frightening and terrifying and obviously the cause of youth violence on the rise even though, in reality, it's in decline (which is actually a HUGE suprise given minibüs kiralama the economies status).  In  a perfect world, we would have parents that actually parent.  The idea of sales restrictions on media on oto kiralama any form to accomidate parental unwillingness to get involved with their child's life is the real problem to me.  Here I am, 32 years old, and being held up at a self-scan rent a car needing to show ID before I can buy a $10 M rated game all because Soccer Momthra can't be bothered to look at the crap Billy Genericallystupidson does in his free time.  It's too hard for her, so I have to suffer?

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

"The bill requires the office to consider "general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the citizens of Texas" when considering grant applications."

Wait, they do know they're talking about a state notorious for not giving a crap about beliefs and values, right?

Not saying it's true or not, but seriously, our "beliefs and values" vary from person to person; they're not universal. To try and define people as under a single belief or values system is pointless; it's only a step toward censorship.

Game content and actual public opinions should define eligibility for a grant, not some government pundit's interpretation of what people believe. More often than not, the latter is skewed in favor of said person's own opinions. When said person is put in control of something like who gets a grant or not, things have a tendancy to get ugly quick.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

Oh, and one more thing.

During the Renaissance, most artists were part of a guild that set strict rules over what was considered "art." As a result, creativity died, and every painting done under the guild was just like the others. When artists started giving the guild the finger and using their own styles, what happened next revolutionized art as a whole.

What I'm seeing here is pretty much the same thing; governments are trying to set strict standards over video games using measures like this, and thereby stifling creativity in favor of censorship. Because creativity gets stifled by government rules, innovation dies; soon every game will be just like the others. I think we all know what needs to happen next.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

Where's the evidence for that? Since they've given the tax break to a war game, it seems that those political strings are only going to kick in in extreme cases. More people have to apply for the grant before we can jump to conclusions about the standards they're using.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

I don't really have a problem with this. The government gives the breaks, so the government can lay down the conditions under which developers are eligible to receive them. Nobody's being told they can't make games of any particular type, just that if they want an taxpayer-funded assist, they have to play by certain rules.

 

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

I keep hoping that one day the gaming industry locates its testicles and tells the government to shove these tax breaks up their ass.  Its nothing but a way for them to try and control the content of games without seeming too draconian.

 

 

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

This bothers me a lot.

 

I really don't think that you could pass a film subsidy bill like that. People would cry censorship. But video games don't have the same kind of art cred so blatant censorship is apparently fine.

 

The worst part is that the standards seem totally arbitrary and they can easily be used for politically motivated attacks.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

They already have attached strings to a film tax break. I mentioned it before. Several times. Tax breaks, lowering taxes on complying companies and individuals, are not subsidies, which is government money used to keep prices down by buying at market and selling low.  They've allowed a violent game a tax break. What about that is "censorship"?

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

Because, in theory, you couldn't make "Texas: Land Where We Rape Everyone At All Times".

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

You can, you just won't get tax breaks. At the moment there only exists a carrot, not a stick.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

Wait, what standards are specified? I'm actually thinking that those strings woul probably apply to AO games, but what else?

Plus side, nice to see people are taking advantage of the tax breaks.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

Basically "Don't Mess With Texas". Like, you can't portray Texas as evil or something. Meh. It's their money, they can put whatever strings they want.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

That's true, but if those strings are going to be ridiculous, it's better for developers to know that before making any decisions with the hopes or expectations of grant money.

Re: Texas Awards First Grant to Game Developer

Given that they gave it to a war game, it doesn't seem like the strings will be that ridiculous.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
prh99A good reason to stop reading reguardless of view pointhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli.09/20/2014 - 5:22am
Andrew EisenWell this is unique! A musical critique of the Factual Feminist's "Are Video Games Sexist?" video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4s7cV4Us409/20/2014 - 2:41am
Andrew EisenSome locked threads. Some let them be. So, no, I'm not seeing a problem here. No corruption. No collusion. No ethical problem with privately discussing ethics.09/20/2014 - 12:48am
Andrew EisenAnd still, in the end, Tito made up his own mind on how to handle his site. All 150 or so members went off to handle their own sites in their own ways. Some talked about it. Some didn't. Some changed disclosure policies. Some didn't.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenThere were two comments other than Kochera and Tito's. One pointed out the Escapist Code of Conduct, another comment was in support of Tito.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenKochera privately expressed his disagreement on how Tito decided to do something. No, I don't consider that crossing a line nor do I consider the exchange an example of the group pressuring him.09/20/2014 - 12:36am
Kronotechnical reasons. Anyways, I need to get to sleep as well.09/20/2014 - 12:29am
KronoAnd he wasn't the only one pushing Tito to censor the thread. If Tito had bowed to peer pressure, we likely wouldn't have gotten this http://goo.gl/vKiYtR which grew out of that thread. Said thread also lasted until a new one needed to be made for09/20/2014 - 12:28am
Krono@Andrew So it's an example of Kuchera crossing the line from reporter to advocate. And an example of the group pressuring for censorship.09/20/2014 - 12:21am
E. Zachary KnightAnyway, I am off to bed. I will probably wake up to all of this being knocked off the shout box.09/20/2014 - 12:20am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, that is the type of reading too much into things that bugs me. Ben did no such thing. Greg had the last word in that part of the exchange. The rest was about how to approach the story and Quinn.09/20/2014 - 12:19am
Andrew EisenSo?09/20/2014 - 12:13am
KronoExcept that the forum thread wasn't harassment, and Kuchera continued to push for the thread's removal after Tito made it clear he didn't consider it harassment.09/20/2014 - 12:12am
Andrew EisenPersonally, I see nothing wrong with someone offering their opinion or the other person making up their own mind on how to run their site.09/20/2014 - 12:06am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, I read nothing of the sort in that email chain. I read Ben giving advice on what to do when a forum thread is used to harass someone and spread falshoods about them and others.09/20/2014 - 12:05am
KronoThat's exactly what Ben Kuchera was doing to Greg Tito.09/19/2014 - 11:58pm
Krono@EZK So you see nothing wrong with one journalist pressuring a journalist from a different organization to not only not run a story, but to censor a civil discussion already taking place?09/19/2014 - 11:56pm
E. Zachary KnightI write for a number of blogs and talk to people who write similar blogs all the time for tips and advice. I see nothing wrong with that.09/19/2014 - 11:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician