U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark Knight

August 5, 2008 -

Labour MP Keith Vaz, long a critic of violent video games, has taken umbrage to the BBFC's rating of new Batman flick The Dark Knight.

As reported by The Register, Vaz and Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith object to the film's 12A rating, which means that under 12s can see The Dark Knight if accompanied by their parents:

...Vaz said: "The BBFC should realise there are scenes of gratuitous violence in The Dark Knight to which I would certainly not take my 11-year-old daughter. It should be a 15 classification."

 

Vaz, who has previously railed against video game violence, wants to get the BBFC before his committee's hearings on knife crime later in the year. Presumably its representatives will be required to explain what they think they're doing fostering violent knifey rages in children...

 

The BBFC has defended its rating, admitting that while it was a "borderline" decision, the violence is in over-the-top comic-book fashion and does adhere to the guidelines for a 12A certificate. With a 15 certificate, said spokeswoman Sue Clark, "Younger teenagers would not have been able to see it, and they are the very people who are going to love it. We would have ended up with far more complaints from people who wanted to see the film and couldn't."

 In light of Vaz'z criticism, it's interesting to note that the BBFC will soon take over video game rating chores if the British government has its way.

 


Comments

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

How about a magic trick?

I'm going to make this pencil disappear...


TA-DAA!!  It's gone!

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

A perfect candidate for the new Academy Award I will invent: Scene Most Likely To Ruin Your Shit.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Then maybe The Sith Lords should have been given an R rating also, seeing what happened to Anakin at the end.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

"The BBFC should realise there are scenes of gratuitous violence in The Dark Knight to which I would certainly not take my 11-year-old daughter"

Protip: DON'T FUCKING TAKE HER TO SEE THE MOVIE IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT!!!!!!

 

COmmon sense, so rare it's a super power

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Protip? I'd say that's a tip even AMATEURS should be aware of.

COmmon sense, so rare it's a super power

I await the next superhero movie: The Logical Knight

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Anyway, Vaz's daughter is 11, so she wouldn't be allowed entry in the first place. Moreover, the 'A' stands for "Advisory" so it's precisely this kind of rating that empowers parents by leaving the ultimate decision up to them.

-- teh moominz --

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

"Moreover, the 'A' stands for 'Advisory'"

In the context of the rating 12A?  No, no it doesn't.  It means Adult supervision.  A 12 rating means any 12 year old can walk in and see the film on their own.  12A means that they need an adult with them to be able to see it.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

The UKs 12 is like the US's PG 13 I see now problem with it getting a 12 rating.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Honestly, I think this movie could be a reason that maybe the MPAA should make a new rating, in between PG13 and R. I'd honestly have given this movie a 15, because it was pretty dark and gruesome, but not gory. Definatly not R, but stronger than PG13. Basically, not for those under 13, but shouldn't be rated R

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

You see? This is why we like the BBFC!

Also, there's no way the BBFC will kowtow to as inconsequential an MP as Keith Vaz. He really is a laughing stock, almost as maligned as Julian Brazier. If the BBFC were to be forced to acquiece to his demands (a tricky legal conundrum as it is), there would be a public outrcry not last seen since the BBC was almost shackled by the Hutton Report.

-- teh moominz --

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

"We would have ended up with far more complaints from people who wanted to see the film and couldn't."

So classification is attribbuted based on how many people will complain about it...

You see? This is why I hate the BBFC!

They always come up with stupid reasons to justify their decisions. It's like the Manhunt 2 / Eastern Promises cases: For Manhunt 2 it was distasteful and risky so it had to be banned. For Eastern Promises it was artistic expression and people know it's just a movie.

I wish the games industry would refuse to launch games in the UK and Australia for a few months to see how that would work out.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

No - classification is partly based upon who the intended audience is supposed to be. Also, this is a rezaction to a complaint, so bringing uip counter-complaints is entirely within context.

So you dislike the BBFC for protecting the interests of people who want to go and watch the movie? WTF are you on?

Manhunt 2 is a) an isolated incident and b) ultimately to do with the murder of Stefan Pakeerah, neither of which have any bearing on this. I think you're just hating on them 'cos they don't neatly fit into your preconceived world view.

-- teh moominz --

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

You pretty much validate my whole comment even though you clearly did not understand it.

"this is a rezaction to a complaint, so bringing uip counter-complaints is entirely within context"

It may be in context but it is not at all admissible. Classification should be a clear process adherent to existing rules and guidelines. It is already subjective enough as is. If you start to consider who might or not complain about it when classifying a game then anything is possible.

"So you dislike the BBFC for protecting the interests of people who want to go and watch the movie? WTF are you on?"

I should like them because they let people go and watch this specific movei? It's not about this specific movie, it's about the BBFC's duties and responsabilities and how they justify their actions in general. I think they do a very poor job in explaining their decisions.

"I think you're just hating on them 'cos they don't neatly fit into your preconceived world view."

I don't mean to be confrontational but I could say the exact same thing about you. I explained my reasoning and of course I could be wrong about it.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Can I point out that ratings are inherently ALL about taking the general population's preconceived world view?  When rating they go with the moral majority when drawing the line.  With Manhunt 2, they felt the game had gone beyond that line, but the VAC felt otherwise.  The BBFC have in statements before and since then acknowledged that they have to move that line in accordance to the judgement.

Where ratings are concerned, you cannot appease everyone as going with the view of the 'general' population is merely that.  What they CAN do is follow guidelines and stick to their guns in the face of any criticism if they feel that their decision is the correct one.

It is worth noting that some of those who complained about the BBFC not originally giving a rating to Manhunt 2 citing political pressure are also complaining about the 12A rating being given in the face of such political pressure.  You cannot have it both ways.  I believe these 2 examples, which contradict the conspiracy theories, merely prove the BBFC's worth as an independant body.

Incidently, the 12A rating is relatively new to the cinema ratings.  If it were still 12 or 15, I suspect it would have been given a 15.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

If The Dark Knight was a game, the BBFC would rate it 15, and that's if we're lucky.

/b

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Actually, you may be right for the wrong reasons.  I thought much of the violence in Dark Knight was almost classical Greek in its presentation; after the opening sequence, almost all of the major violence was done in an offscreen manner (no blood trails, mangled corpses, or whatnot.)  Take the pencil sequence, for example: the guy just drops out of frame.  It's almost comedic.

On the other hand, a video game would certainly demonstrate the violence onscreen due to most of it being performed by the player.  No fun not being able to see what you're doing, right?  So if the violence is of a level to warrant the higher rating (blood, pummeled enemies, depends what path the designers take) then it would be fair to quantify it as such.

I'd be quicker to condemn the BBFC if they gave the same rating to a game as to the movie simply on the basis of their sharing subject matter.  That'd be a big disservice to the people who are supposed to be relying on the ratings as a guide to what they, or their children, should and shouldn't be playing.

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Seems my post was swallowed at some point by GP.  Cant even get a log in at the moment despite using the direct email address asking what is going on and multiple attempts to send password again...

12A is a film only rating that gaming does not have due to cinema being a single showing and games being play when you want therefore if the decision between 12A and 15 was borderline, then an equivilent game would be 15 for sure.

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Looking at teh alst batman game it would be realistic but minus blood and gore.

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)

 


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Best comment by far!

 

Holy Logical Batman

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Hmmm... good point, well made.

-- teh moominz --

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Oh spare me, what a load of nonsense. Got any proof of that, or are you just assuming that the BBFC are playing a game called "PEGI" the purpose of which is to hand out ratings without looking at the material?

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

mommies/bunchakneejrks

The UK has 12 and 15, its mreo reasonable for the film to be sloted to 15 and if a game was made depending on certain tigns it could be 15 as well and thats befor you add any blood/gore. 

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)

 


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: U.K. Video Game Critic Keith Vaz Has a New Target: The Dark

Evidence? Piss off beemoh, I know you mean well but that's a trollish statement right there.

MASS EFFECT. That is all.

-- teh moominz --

-- teh moominz --
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
prh99A good reason to stop reading reguardless of view pointhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli.09/20/2014 - 5:22am
Andrew EisenWell this is unique! A musical critique of the Factual Feminist's "Are Video Games Sexist?" video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4s7cV4Us409/20/2014 - 2:41am
Andrew EisenSome locked threads. Some let them be. So, no, I'm not seeing a problem here. No corruption. No collusion. No ethical problem with privately discussing ethics.09/20/2014 - 12:48am
Andrew EisenAnd still, in the end, Tito made up his own mind on how to handle his site. All 150 or so members went off to handle their own sites in their own ways. Some talked about it. Some didn't. Some changed disclosure policies. Some didn't.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenThere were two comments other than Kochera and Tito's. One pointed out the Escapist Code of Conduct, another comment was in support of Tito.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenKochera privately expressed his disagreement on how Tito decided to do something. No, I don't consider that crossing a line nor do I consider the exchange an example of the group pressuring him.09/20/2014 - 12:36am
Kronotechnical reasons. Anyways, I need to get to sleep as well.09/20/2014 - 12:29am
KronoAnd he wasn't the only one pushing Tito to censor the thread. If Tito had bowed to peer pressure, we likely wouldn't have gotten this http://goo.gl/vKiYtR which grew out of that thread. Said thread also lasted until a new one needed to be made for09/20/2014 - 12:28am
Krono@Andrew So it's an example of Kuchera crossing the line from reporter to advocate. And an example of the group pressuring for censorship.09/20/2014 - 12:21am
E. Zachary KnightAnyway, I am off to bed. I will probably wake up to all of this being knocked off the shout box.09/20/2014 - 12:20am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, that is the type of reading too much into things that bugs me. Ben did no such thing. Greg had the last word in that part of the exchange. The rest was about how to approach the story and Quinn.09/20/2014 - 12:19am
Andrew EisenSo?09/20/2014 - 12:13am
KronoExcept that the forum thread wasn't harassment, and Kuchera continued to push for the thread's removal after Tito made it clear he didn't consider it harassment.09/20/2014 - 12:12am
Andrew EisenPersonally, I see nothing wrong with someone offering their opinion or the other person making up their own mind on how to run their site.09/20/2014 - 12:06am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, I read nothing of the sort in that email chain. I read Ben giving advice on what to do when a forum thread is used to harass someone and spread falshoods about them and others.09/20/2014 - 12:05am
KronoThat's exactly what Ben Kuchera was doing to Greg Tito.09/19/2014 - 11:58pm
Krono@EZK So you see nothing wrong with one journalist pressuring a journalist from a different organization to not only not run a story, but to censor a civil discussion already taking place?09/19/2014 - 11:56pm
E. Zachary KnightI write for a number of blogs and talk to people who write similar blogs all the time for tips and advice. I see nothing wrong with that.09/19/2014 - 11:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician