Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

September 4, 2008 -

The Orlando Sentinel reports on the development of Burn Center by 360Ed, a local startup. The training game is designed to teach medical professionals who are not burn experts to deal with mass casualties from an event such as an explosion

The Sentinel notes that 360Ed partnered with the University of Florida College of Medicine and the Florida Department of Health on the project. 360Ed CEO Ben Noel, formerly of Electronic Arts:

September 11 awakened us to the fact that we have to prepare for these mass-casualty type of events, and the best way to prepare is modern technology, simulation and games. Instead of simulating it in a field experience, which can be very expensive, we are simulating it on a computer, which can be played over and over...

 

They said, 'If we give you a playbook, can you make like a Madden football for mass-casualty emergency response?' I said, 'Yeah, we aren't creating any new technology here; we'd just be taking content to places it hasn't been before.'

As the game begins, players are told that bombs have just exploded at a theme park:

The first phase is a race against time in which the player has to quickly assess and triage 40 victims. The second phase takes place in the intensive-care unit, where players make treatment decisions during a simulated 36-hour period. To get training certification from the American Burn Association, players must reach a certain score.

 

Burn Center isn't for the faint of heart. The game features screaming people, many of whom have gruesome burns and are covered in blood. In fact, some of the 360Ed team had a hard time looking at the real photos provided by UF to ensure the graphics in the game were realistic.

 


Comments

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

I looked to see if there was a way to get a copy of this (short of finding an e-mail address to ask.. their site is a little.. bare) with no luck. I want to see what they did for their work. Not from a poke and scream kind of thing but from a "Wow this is what they really do? I'm learning.." type thing. I hear about these cool simulations but there is never any information for someone like me to have access to them. Bleh.

---- There is a limit for both politicians against video games, and video games against politicians. http://www.goteamretard.com

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

I agree. Video-games can never be used as pure training. As a suplement? It would work beautifully. It could assist alongside from future doctor's training, to be better deal with the potential of these horrible kinds of things.

Help yes, replacement of regular training...I hope not.

"Nurse, the X-button is suppose to start the triage right?"

"...Doctor...don't tell me, you've never..."

"Where is that controller! R2 for scalpel!"

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

While I feel it wouldn't be as effective as actual training, it should help. I probably would have read too much into this before the study linking video games to better surgeons, but now I think the idea has realistic potential.

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

I kinda want to play it...

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

Poke the patient and make 'em scream!

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

What rating do you think this game will gt if rated by the ESRB? I would imagine it would be "M" because it apparently is pretty graphic. As a guy that has Triage training, I rather want to see how this game actually works so I hope it will be readily available. (But I would'nt hold my breath)

But if it was....would the soccer moms of the world demand that the game be censored or banned because it is "too graphic and violent?"

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

It doesn't say what platform its for, though I assume since the company is named 360Ed that it will be for the 360... unless Microsoft violates its own policies, the game will be required to be rated by the ESRB.  Content not run by those nazis isn't allowed. 

 

I imagine since it is a "serious game" and will likely have limited distribution (heaven forbid people learn to handle emergencies by themselves) the ESRB might give them a break and let them have an M so that it will be allowed on the console.  Normally any game with even a bare whiff of realism gets rated AO and banned.  Yes, BANNED.  Microsoft, like Sony and Nintendo, have both sworn that their consoles will never boot an AO rated game.  And making a game that could boot without them approving it would violate the DMCA and land you in prison, so it is an airtight ban. 

 

Soccer moms don't matter any more.  Gamers were dumb enough to allow the ESRB to take over the world of videogames out of a petty fear that government would start regulating videogames (which it obviously would NEVER be allowed to do) so now they have all the power.  They're psychotically ultraconservative and they will only get more so.  They will continue to make their standards stricter and more secret as time goes by in order to justify their own existence.  If you dream of a future where videogames make important artistic statements, or sweep you away with powerful, disturbing, or uplifting imagery informing you of the human condition and the things that every other form of art can do... forget it.  Gamers fucked themselves entirely.  The ESRB will never allow it.  In the mind of the ESRB, people aren't full of blood, they don't have bones that can snap, they never fight, they don't have nipples, penises, vaginas, or a sexual nature that starts in utero and ends only with death.  Any game that conflicts with that view will be rated harshly, and any that tries to make people give thought about these subjects will be banned by them. 

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

At the same time, I'm always interested in seeing how newer, powerful simulation techniques can greatly benefit in training and education for everyone from emergency responders to elementary school students. It's still largely a positive development to have these tools...even seven years later, heh.

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

 Not to disparage anyone because I do think that stuff like this is very imprtant, but using the phrase "September 11 awakened us to..." is sort of silly now.  I mean, if it really was 9/11 that begat this idea then these guys dropped the ball somewhere in the past 7 years.  

Unless Burn Center is the Duke Nuke'em 4 Ever of the serious games movement, of course.

Re: Burn Center Game Trains Docs for Mass Casualty Events

You do realize that not everything can find funding quickly, even in the wake of a national disaster right? Especially considering the company was only founded in 2006.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Whose next half decade of superhero films are you most looking forward to?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightDefinitely a good answer. That is the way I lean. If you actively chose to stop gaming, or just stopped out of habit, then yeah, you are no longer a gamer.10/30/2014 - 11:45am
Matthew WilsonAE i agree, but it is worth pointing out the fact that that is whats happening.10/30/2014 - 11:45am
quiknkoldbehavior to warrant having a Title that doesnt involve a piece of paper.10/30/2014 - 11:43am
quiknkoldwaiting in line. Thats not being a Gamer. Thats akin to me reading a Pamphlet in line and calling myself an active reader. or watching a movie trailer on a tv in walmart and calling myself an active movie goer. There has to be some form of repetitive10/30/2014 - 11:42am
quiknkoldbeing A Gamer is a Conscious decision. I am consciously engaging in this form of media and showing some form of enthusiasm. The only person I Wouldnt call a gamer is somebody who has a random game on their phone just to kill 5 minutes cause they are10/30/2014 - 11:41am
E. Zachary KnightSo how much time must pass since the last time you played a game before you are no longer a gamer?10/30/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew Eisen"Plays" is present tense so the clarification doesn't seem necessary to me.10/30/2014 - 11:18am
quiknkoldI would change that from "One who plays games" To "One who currently plays games". Like my friend as a kid playd games but then he stopped and hasnt for the last decade+ so I wouldnt call him a Gamer.10/30/2014 - 11:16am
Andrew EisenHmm, that sounds like a great idea for a series of articles! I bet they'd be well-received and not taken the complete wrong way at all!10/30/2014 - 11:12am
Andrew EisenThat's right, gamer simply means one who plays games. That's it. The idea that "gamer" refers to something very limited and specific, well, that's no longer applicable in this day and age of mainstream gaming.10/30/2014 - 11:12am
Andrew EisenMatthew - As I said last night, that is not a bad thing. Different types of reviews to serve different interests is a GOOD thing and should be encouraged! There is not, nor should there be, only one way to review a game or anything else.10/30/2014 - 11:01am
ZippyDSMleeAnyone see this? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/29/1339617/-Cartoon-Gamergate-Contagion-Spreads?detail=facebook10/30/2014 - 10:55am
E. Zachary KnightNeeneko, Matthew, yeah, there is no "wrong" way to review a game. It all depends on who the reviewer wants reading the review.10/30/2014 - 10:48am
quiknkoldhas their own stream, you are a gamer. I think the only prerequiset is to Play Games for Enjoyment10/30/2014 - 10:21am
quiknkoldI always felt the Gamer Identity was expressing an enthusiasm for Gaming in general. There are different degrees to that. If you say "I love this game and play it, lets see what else" with Ipad game, you are a gamer. If you are a retro game collector who10/30/2014 - 10:20am
NeenekoIt is long overdue, and things will probably settle down when they accept that the industry does not cater to them and them alone and go back to posturing within their own subculture.10/30/2014 - 10:10am
NeenekoThe community has always been split, with many factions within it, and they used to not interact all that much. Now they are having to confront they are not alone and thus not the one twue gamer identity.10/30/2014 - 10:09am
CMinerMW: The two are not mutually exclusive.10/30/2014 - 10:05am
Matthew Wilsonthe gaming community is going to split in to 2 groups. one wants games reviewed as product, and the other as art with all the social critique that comes with that. at this point i dont think it can be stopped sadly.10/30/2014 - 9:56am
NeenekoIt is a wonderful example of the heart of the issue, people accustomed to being part of defining value slamming into people who have other values.10/30/2014 - 9:53am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician