Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult" Negotiations

October 21, 2008 -

Newsweek's N'Gai Croal reports that the new, publicly accessible E3 was born of "long, bruising and politically difficult negotiations."

Although Croal does not specify which entities were hashing out the E3 2009 formula, such talks would presumably include the ESA, which owns the show, the ESA board of directors, ESA member companies and, possibly, representatives from the city of Los Angeles.

The new E3 will run June 2-6 at the L.A. Convention Center. Croal's Level Up blog includes comments from his unnamed source on the deal:

It was a long journey to get there, politically. After vehemently opposing a bigger show three years ago--to now go back to the board, admit a mistake, and advocate for a bigger show. It reflects well on the [ESA] and the [ESA] board to recognize they made a mistake and, regardless of how it would look publicly, go ahead and fix it.

 

The [big] three [console manufacturers'] positions are opposed, indifferent and mildly supportive--not going to say which is which—to adding a consumer show on the back of the media and business summit.

GP: Croal's source credited EA with leading the push to a new format. Indeed, EA CEO John Riccitiello was on record as among those who hated the awful 2008 show.

If we were guessing as to the Newseek source's comments on the big three, we'd say that Sony was opposed (strapped for cash), Nintendo was indifferent (making big money either way) and Microsoft mildly supportive.


Comments

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

Sony is Opposed. They were the one of the companies who pushed for the change after E3 '06.

Microsoft is indifferent: They did well at both versions of the event.

Nintendo is mildly supportive: They often had the most impressive showing at E3 events the way they once were and have seemed to be half-assing it ever since the change over. They even backed E4All which was an even more open version of E3.

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

 I actually think it was Nintendo who was mildly supportive. Afterall, they were the only one of the big three that went to E4All last year.

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

Good news for me, now I'll finally be able to attend the old E3 ... or any E3.

Nice to know the ESA can admit a mistake.

I wonder where this leaves E for All.

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

Here's the breakdown:

Microsoft: Mildly supportive (Those guys LOVE being in front of a crowd)

Sony: Indifferent (Read: Indifferent)

Nintendo: Opposed (Bigger crowds scare grandma)

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

They could always have 2 days closed and 2 days open...or something like that.  Sheesh what an annoying problem.

 

Foaming at the mouth

Foaming at the mouth

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

Well, the small E3 show opened the door for PAX to become the biggest consumer orientated show of the year, and of everyone that I know that went, they thought it was much better.

KEEP IT CLEAN!

KEEP IT CLEAN!

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

...they should have realized this after their first attempt with this kind of show...  All well, ESA can go back to trying to screw over consumers with supporting more DRM crap for all I care now.  They lost all support I would ever consider giving them, which used to be a lot.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Newseek: E3 2009 Format a Result of "Politically Difficult"

I agree with your guesses there.

Oh, and you forgot a 'w' in Newsweek twice. :p

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@pm I doubt it. Google seems to be distancing themselves from G+07/25/2014 - 9:31pm
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician