E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

October 23, 2008 -

Reports this week which claimed that E3 2009 would be at least partially open to the public were just wrong, it would now appear.

Yesterday game publishers trade group the ESA, which owns E3, issued a press release detailing the new format. And you're probably not invited. Here's what we know:

  • Dates: June 2-4, 2009
  • Location: L.A. Convention Center
  • Invited: "all qualified computer and video game industry audiences, including international and U.S.-based

When we asked ESA P.R. guy Dan Hewitt to clarify whether the public would be eligible to attend, he told us:

There will be opportunities to view the E3 Expo and learn about what's going on at the show, but it won't be open to the general public.

The show will be capped at 40,000 attendees, well up from the ghost town feel of this year's 5,000 attendee flop, but just a bit more than half of E3's peak years of 2004-2006.

ESA boss Michael Gallagher was interviewed on the new E3 format by Destructoid. Among his comments:

We have a much, much broader audience than the targeted show that we ran the last two years, which was very focused on press-only and really U.S. press. This is meant to target international press, mass media, as well as just gamer press. It's meant to look at retailers in particular.

 

We moved it earlier in the year to make it more relevant to the retail environment. We're looking [for] developers, business partners, hardware and accessory manufacturers. It's a much broader audience, which is much more traditional, or shares more in common with the older versions of E3.



Comments

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

One more nail in the coffin people?

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

One more nail in the coffin people?

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

I well theres always next year.  Eventually ESA will get their heads out of their behinds and finally hear what their wallets are saying.

And to be honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if more of the industry leaves the ESA and start their own E3.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Why can't E3 be a week long event, which is closed to the public from monday to friday and then opens to the public on Saturday and Sunday.

This would mean that the gaming companyies could talk to the press do any buisessness stuff they needed to in the week and when the weekend came go into full overblown hype mode and hand out lots of cheap plastic things.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

ESA seems to be nothing but a bunch of idiots.

What do they expect to accomplish by letting industry employees and media be the only ones in?

I hear about good upcoming games from my friends who make it to various expos and I tell my friends about the games I see at E For All and PAX. Word of mouth is very powerful.

Ben Burgess

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

New headline from the ESA, "And in a related story, I like pie!"  Yep, we have a definite case of bloated ego related moron syndrome here.

"We do not hear debates about teaching whether the holocausts happened or did not in history classes, so why should we even entertain the notion for Intelligent Design?"

"If you really want to enslave people, tell them you are going to give them Total Freedom." - L. Ron Hubbard

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Yay, the ESA keeps proving it's jsut a bunch of suits and they have no qualms with alienating who practicalyl pays their salaries.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

Mysterious suitcases full of money can change anybody's opinion.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

 Wow, talk about a failboat. They're just hammering more nails into the coffin, meanwhile PAX and Blizzcon and similar, run by people with a clue, will continue to grow and be successful.

The game industry exists because of consumers. Not letting consumers into gaming trade shows is absolutely retarded, and recent history has shown us this is true.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

"Cartman land is going to be awesome, but you can't come."

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

So, in other words, after more than two years, millions of dollars wasted, and tons of bad press, they've finally started to realize that "scaling back" E3 to almost nothing was a bad idea?

-Gray17

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

E3 is back! ...but it's not. Gotcha. Lulz.

******************** "Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedom

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

And this is where they are going to go wrong...  should have scrolled down before posting in the newer one...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: E3 2009: Bigger, Not Public

They really should stop beating this dead horse with a stick. Not only is it starting to make a distressing smell, it's beginning to leak unsavoury fluids too.

 

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Poll: Is it censorship when a private retailer decides not to sell a particular video game?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
WonderkarpFudge, for some reason sometimes when I access Gamepolitics on my phone, it shoots me over too my app store. I think its the Ads05/28/2015 - 9:58am
WonderkarpI'm not perpetually offended. I'm an regular viewer of South Park. I have a problem with people saying gamergaters are school shooters. That and lets be honest. I dont like MechaRash05/28/2015 - 9:55am
Ivresse@MechaCrash: I'd like to refer you to the words of Stephen Fry: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGA3QGHW8AARsax.jpg05/28/2015 - 9:43am
Wonderkarpalright Fudge05/28/2015 - 9:27am
MechaCrashWhat good is being one of the perpetually offended if you don't make sure everybody sees just how offended you are?05/28/2015 - 9:02am
james_fudgeYou two can reasonably slug it out in the article in question if you want :)05/28/2015 - 8:59am
MechaCrashI wasn't expecting you to drag it into the shoutbox, either. Just when I think I have you pegged, you prove me only MOSTLY right.05/28/2015 - 8:55am
MechaCrashWhat argument? You made a joke in bad taste. I made a response joke in similar bad taste. And you are going berserk with...okay, not the flavor of HOW DARE YOU I was expecting (I thought you'd No True Scotsman, instead you dodged it entirely).05/28/2015 - 8:52am
Wonderkarpfyi, thats a self made "REDACTED" to make Mr Fudges life a little easier.05/28/2015 - 8:50am
Wonderkarphow is calling somebody out for being a [REDACTED] throwing a Tantrum? Is it cause you cant dispute my argument?05/28/2015 - 8:46am
MechaCrash"Grow a thicker skin," says the person throwing a tantrum that's filling the shoutbox.05/28/2015 - 8:40am
Wonderkarpbeen a bombing had Sarkeesian spoke, because there would be an increase police presence and nobody is THAT STUPID to make a threat like that and follow through. This isnt the movies05/28/2015 - 8:35am
WonderkarpIts what you make of them. GamerGate in DC had a bomb threat. Police were there, but GG continued to enjoy themselves and have a good time. Bomb Threats in general, you give them to the police and continue your business. I guarantee there wouldnt have05/28/2015 - 8:34am
MechaCrashhttp://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58521856-78/sarkeesian-usu-video-feminist.html.csp Remember the talk Sarkeesian had to cancel because of death threats? Yeah. That's the thing I'm talking about.05/28/2015 - 8:30am
WonderkarpI'm not defending Bomb Threats. They are idiotic and have no place in society, but as somebody who lived through several bomb threats I can tell you they are weak05/28/2015 - 8:29am
WonderkarpSchool Shootings on the other hand are violent events that end the lives of children and come without proper warning due to mental illness and gun laws.05/28/2015 - 8:28am
Wonderkarpcause Bomb Threats are what you make of them. No successful bombing in the US has had a threat posted about it beforehand. Boston Marathon? Okahoma City? You either handle it with caution or dont handle it at all. most of the time ar done as stupid pranks05/28/2015 - 8:27am
Infophile@MechaCrash: One difference is that there's actual evidence linking GGers (or their ideological allies) to bomb threats, and no link to school shootings. For instance, we hate Jack Thompson here, but let's not accuse him of eg. committing grand theft auto05/28/2015 - 8:26am
james_fudgeGo to your corners and let the cutman do his work.05/28/2015 - 8:21am
MechaCrashHm, yes, "lol aGGs make bomb threats" is vastly different from "lol gaters threaten school shootings." Yes, I see the error of my ways! ...wait, no I don't, I see that you're still a hypocrite who can dish it out but not take it.05/28/2015 - 8:21am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician