In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New Game Violence Study

November 7, 2008 -

This week, GamePolitics has been tracking public outrage over Kaboom: The Suicide Bombing Game, a no-budget affair created by an amateur and posted online.

While the game is admittedly in very poor taste, there's not a lot to be done about it. As a non-commercial offering, Kaboom is not subject to any content rating requirements. And, since it is hosted outside the U.K., it would seem to be beyond the reach of English law.

But such logic has never been known to stop British Labour MP Keith Vaz, who has now taken his objections to Parliament. Vaz had the following exchange yesterday with MP Harriet Harman, Leader of the House of Commons:

Vaz: Has my right hon. and learned Friend had the opportunity to look at early-day motion 2416? (quoted):

[That this House condemns the creation of the online computer game Kaboom which asks the player to replicate the actions of suicide bombers; believes that this game is offensive to the families of those killed by suicide bombers and devalues all human life; further believes that this game depicts an unnecessary level of violence; is deeply concerned that vulnerable people under the age of 18 are able to access and play this game; calls upon the game's creator to show sensitivity and responsibility by removing it from the internet; welcomes the findings of a new study from Iowa State University which recognises the link between violent video games and aggressive behaviour; and calls on the Government to revise its regulation of violent video games.]

[The motion] refers to an online computer game called "Kaboom", which asks players to replicate the actions of a suicide bomber. Does my right hon. and learned Friend agree that that is offensive to the families of the victims of suicide bombings and that it devalues human life? I have raised this matter on several occasions at business questions and in other debates. What action are the Government taking to remove such material from the internet or, at the very least, to approach service providers to ensure that they take appropriate action? Children and young people will be able to have access to those games. Could we have a debate on this important matter?

Harman:
The Government are concerned about the effect on children of violent internet and video games, which is why we commissioned the Byron review. That set out how we need action from parents, from the industry itself and from the Government to ensure that there is proper control of content and clear labelling to protect young children. I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend's long-standing interest in these issues, which he had even before he became Chair of the Select Committee on Home Affairs. Under his leadership, the Committee has taken a strong interest in such matters. I bring to his attention the fact that on Thursday 13 November, in Westminster Hall, there will be a debate on the question of harmful content on the internet and in video games.

GP: Vaz is referring to the game violence study published by Dr. Craig Anderson earlier this week. Anderson's work has been challenged by Dr. Chris Ferguson of Texas A&M

GamePolitics will be tracking Parliament's game violence debate on Nov. 13th.


Comments

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Remember, this is the country that bans video ames ads AFTER they stop running. film izle

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

another jesus jack jones thompson orginal burger... coming right up!!!!!

Jesus Jack Jones Thompson.... is dead... (funeral udruge, followed by Celebrate :D )

Jesus Jack Jones Thompson loves you, so kill for his amusement so we can get money for the new "People's Temple of Jesus Jack Jones Thompson"

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

OH GOD, THE HAMBURGLAR'S RETURNED!!!

_____________________________________________

Jack Thompson: future Good Burger employee of the month

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

"FACE PALM"

Never underestimate the power of idiots in large amounts.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Its like raining the thought police down on a news corp for printing a unpopualr story/ieda...wow...FAIL.....

I is fuzzy brained mew =^^=
http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
(in need of a bad overhaul)


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

This game was posted online like 6 years ago. Old and boring. Why are they even bothering?

 

 

The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. ~ Benjamin Franklin

Yes, I am a liberal. I also believe in a strong military, less government, and the right to bear arms. 

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Remember, this is the country that bans video ames ads AFTER they stop running.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Very simple questionm y friend. They are bothering because it furthers their own agenda. They take offense and put forth that anyone can play these and as such they need to increase regulation of totally unrelated games. He wants to get these things in place before people who know what is going on speak up.

The games that this guy has latched onto in order to push his ideals down other people's throats have nothing to do with what he is attempting to do, they are mearly a straw man. He waves them around like a flag, and while everyone looks over there, he picks their pocket of all sense and reason.

Vaz should be ashamed at the circus he is attempting to create.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

All lies and jest.
Still a man hears what he wants to
hear and disregards the rest.
 

-Paul Simon

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

One the game is hosted in America ... and it seems the UK has the same problem that the good ol USA has you are not our boss your leaders are not our leaders that means your whining and your laws have no weight here so get over it. 

Two; we have this annoying document that was a result of the UK called the Bill of Rights it has this little section called the First Amendment which protects Freedom of Speech guess what the game falls under that’s right Freedom of Speech guess what that means not even our own government is capable of pushing for it to be taken down. 

And last but not least this game is what 7 years old?  God why don’t you find Custards Revenge and whine that innocent child can pull down an emulator, pull down a rom of this game, and then rape a poorly pixilated Indian over and over cause god that game is so relevant.

Frankly I know its pointless to post the above here but I am constantly amazed at zealots; it must be fun running around with blinders on.

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Just so they will shut the hell up, the creator should put a screen up that ask how old the user is.  The guy has the right to make any type of art he wants, even if it offends people.  The university I went to had 2 deers having sex in missionary position even.  It offended a crap load of conservatives, which is most of what my state is, and they failed at getting it removed.

It is IMPOSSIBLE for them to make the guy remove it from the internet.  They may be able to get him to if they offer the right amount of money, but other than that, they can only ASK that he at least put a BS how old are you screen up, just like what most porn sites have.  He can even have the default set to 18.  I would put a note below it that it was not because of the UK I did it too if I was him.  Make sure this isn't a political victory for them, even though it would be a stupid one if it was.


---
Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
Financial Calculator for anyone interested in seeing the basic run

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

>Just so they will shut the hell up, the creator should put a screen up that ask how old the user is.

Yes, because the legally-enforced age rating system on commercial games in the UK stopped everyone complaining about those.

Oh, wait.

/b

Re: In Parliament, Vaz Debates Suicide Bomber Game, Praises New

Ach, ze narrow mindedness of zat generation. Ze tot horse iz flogged once more.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corphttp://www.ign.com/videos/2014/12/17/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-tetris-ps4 I give up on ubisoft12/17/2014 - 6:01pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://comicbook.com/blog/2014/08/16/exclusive-original-unaltered-cut-of-star-wars-trilogy-to-be-rele/ Yeah, this'll never happen.12/17/2014 - 5:03pm
NeenekoThey have and exercise control over which games are allowed on their privately controlled 'open forum'. Their endorsement is fairly minimal since it is only 'we do not reject this', but it is still an endorsement of sorts.12/17/2014 - 3:58pm
NeenekoHistorically there have been issues with libraries allowing some groups but not others. Perhaps 'endorsement' is too strong a word, but their editorial control IS a preapproval process, even if the standards are pretty minimal.12/17/2014 - 3:56pm
E. Zachary KnightLet's put this a different way. My local library allows any group to reserve and use multipurpose rooms. That does not mean that the Library endorses all events that take place in those rooms.12/17/2014 - 12:54pm
E. Zachary KnightValve's editorial control comes from removing problem games and accepting games to Steam. They make no claim over any games otherwise.12/17/2014 - 12:52pm
E. Zachary KnightNeeneko, It is not at all a form of endorsement. Grenlight is an open forum for game developers to pitch their game to Valve/Steam and Steam users. Does Valve have some editorial control? Yes, but not to the point that they preapprove games.12/17/2014 - 12:51pm
Neeneko@EZK - I disagree. Greenlight is built off Valve's brand. While not an explicit endorsement, it is a form of it, otherwise Greenlight would have no value over other platforms.12/17/2014 - 12:05pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.latino-review.com/news/exclusive-viola-davis-bags-amanda-waller-role-in-suicide-squad Latino Review says Viola Davis will be Amanda Waller. History of Latino Review says "wait for a REAL news site to confirm".12/17/2014 - 10:48am
PHX Corphttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/17/7407869/assassins-creed-unity-glitch-broken-problems-xbox-one-patch -Facepalm- Screwup means Assassin's Creed Unity's patch is the 40GB full game on Xbox One12/17/2014 - 10:17am
PHX Corphttp://www.theverge.com/2014/12/16/7401769/the-mpaa-wants-to-strike-at-dns-records-piracy-sopa-leaked-documents Sony leaks reveal Hollywood is trying to break DNS, the backbone of the internet12/17/2014 - 10:05am
E. Zachary KnightA Game being on Greenlight is not an endorsement of said game by Valve, Steam or anyone related to Valve or Steam. Greenlight is a combined sales pitch to Steam and its users.12/17/2014 - 9:51am
E. Zachary KnightThe Life cycle of a Greenlight game: A game gets made->Developer puts it on Greenlight->Gamers vote for it->Valve decides it is worthy of a Steam release->Game is sold on Steam. While the game is merely on greenlight, it is not available for sale on Steam12/17/2014 - 9:50am
InfophileGreenlight games may in the future be sold through Steam. A game there may be "greenlit" and then sold on Steam proper, or it may not, and never actually be sold on steam. That quote refers to them selecting some games from Greenlight which they will sell12/17/2014 - 9:39am
MechaTama31"Today we’ve Greenlit another batch of 50 titles to advance through Steam Greenlight, and be offered worldwide distribution via Steam." Am I missing something here? Because it sounds like Greenlight games are sold through Steam.12/17/2014 - 9:00am
MechaTama31From the Greenlight page: "Browse through the entries here and rate up the games you want to see made available via Steam"12/17/2014 - 8:59am
MechaTama31Greenlight games aren't sold through Steam? Then what exactly *is* Greenlight?12/17/2014 - 8:58am
prh99I just wish if they are going to curate (as selective and rare as that is) for content, they'd do little for quality (like does this game actually function at all). Personally, I avoid GreenLight and Early Access like the plague because of lax standards.12/17/2014 - 1:34am
prh99EZK: My point wasn't that they are responsible for people's purchase decisions, but that their policies and criteria for approval needs some work. As far as refunds go, you know it's bad when EA has a better policy. EA, former worst company in America.12/17/2014 - 1:21am
Andrew EisenAnd 'Hatred' is back on Steam Greenlight. No comment from Valve so far as I've seen.12/17/2014 - 12:14am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician