Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

December 4, 2008 -

Virtual Peace, a simulation project underway at Duke University, uses game technology to train users in diplomacy and crisis response skills.

Prof. Tim Lenoir is leading the interdisciplinary project, which, ironically, has received assistance from Virtual Heroes, the North Carolina developer best known for its work on the America's Army recruiting game. Lenoir commented:

We’re trying to train people how to collaborate in groups -- particularly in internationally sensitive situations. The goal is to create an environment where people can practice their negotiation skills -- and it’s a whole lot better use of the gaming engine than shooting ’em up.

Players in the game assume the roles of various crisis response organizations such as Oxfam, UNICEF, Doctors Without Borders and the World Health Organization.


Comments

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

There will always be war games, even if we exhaust WWII and Vietnam they will still be sci-fi and modern day 'what if' scenarios.

A peace making game would be a great change but how do you compete against another player? Acheiving peace without war pretty much requires co-operation between the two guys. And if both parties all ready have 'peace at all costs' on the mind I doubt it will be a big deal.

Wait there is a possibility that your citizens want war, and you have to maintain peace while remaining in office and making sure your citizens don't form their own army (declaring them as terrorists/extremists would probably work if they do form an army).

Oh well interesting concept.

----------------------------------------------------

"What for you bury me in the cold cold ground?" - Tasmanian devil

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

 At first I read this as "Duke Nuke'em Team developing peace simulator" and thought "just like actual peace, a peace simulator will not occur during our lifetime.

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

I saw the headline and thought "The Duke Nukem people are making a game about peace? Weird."

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

Looks like it could be part of Second Life.

I don't know where they get off saying "and it’s a whole lot better use of the gaming engine than shooting ’em up." because an FPS engine just does not lend itself well to this kind of simulation. Most of the work in the game is done via windows apparently not in actual avatar interaction with the enviroment. FPS engines are most useful when your actions affect the physical enviroment around you, such as shooting or even just freerunning as in Mirrors Edge. For this kind of simulation the FPS aspect is more fluff and to keep the player from getting bored, it's not really putting an FPS engine to 'better' use. Maybe putting it to a more peaceful use would be more accurate but maybe he just meant 'gaming engine' as in gaming in general and not necessarily an FPS engine.

I can't say this game would have wide appeal unless you could level up and get epic gear, maybe a mount to get from office to office faster, flying mounts could cost something like 5000g for the skill and another 1000g for the flying mount itself and allow you to be diplomatic in other add-on countries in an expansion pack, later they could add some cold northern countries and a hero class negotiator that completely kicks ass and has nice gear........

------------------------------------

I am a signature virus, please copy and paste me into your signature to help me propagate.

------------------------------------ I am a signature virus, please copy and paste me into your signature to help me propagate.

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

At first I thought this was going to be about the Duke Nukem Forever team.

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

Peace is only humdrum as entertainment if the developer makes it so.  Any game can be exciting as long as it has conflict, and there can be as much conflict in a peaceful game as in a FPS game - it's just that the tools used in resolving it are different.

In the real world, issues aren't 'solved' by violence.  The violence comes because the people on either side FAILED to find a solution.  The whole point of a game like this is to find working solutions to real world problems.

Besides, anyone who seriously believes that non-combat games can't be fun has never played Tetris.

For a really great game in which the main character kills no one, check out The Last Express.  It's very old now (it came out in 1997), but it's a lot of fun (unless you believe that no fun can be had in a game unless you're carrying a sub-machine gun).

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

Oops, I thought from the headline this would be a story about 3D Realms taking Duke Nukem Forever in a strange new direction.  It's a shame, really; I'd love to play a game where Duke hands out care packages and bottled water to impoverished citizens in a nuclear dystopia.

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

A game such as this is going to take a rather genius dev team frankly.  Peace is lovely to have in your real life, but is kind of humdrum as entertainment.  Even Shakespear knew that his audience didn't want to see people working out their problems like rational adults.  They wanted blood and killing.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

"and it’s a whole lot better use of the gaming engine than shooting ’em up."

So since it's going to be so amazingly successful we can just ignore it 'til it's the next big thing? Thanks!

It's sad when people spit on the heads of giants while standing on their shoulders.

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

Anyone else remember that fake NYT from the "Yes Men" about America's Army being repourposed as America's Diplomat?

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

yes, yes I do

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

I think we definately need more games with non violent means of conflict resolution. There certainly aren't enough. I have wanted a game like this for a while.

AS for those of you who think this will fail, what do you mean exactly? Are you saying this will not sell well? If so, you are right, but not for the reasons you think. It will not sell well, because it most likely will be given away. It is a university project and not a commercial project. University projects are usually given away.

I think that under those conditions, more people would be willing to download it and give it a try.

Games don't have to consist of players battling it out in one way or another. There are plenty of gameplay options available. It is only lazy developers and close minded players who keep the action genres in the top ten. As those types of players become a smaller and smaller part of the buying public (yes you FPS fans are a niche just a very profitable niche at the moment) You will see more and more gameplay options that include non violent conflict resolution.

Don't get me wrong. Conflict will always be a part of gaming, but conflict does not equal war. Conflict is something that drives a player or story. Without it, there can be no game.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

Without good developers and serious cash i think this is gonna fail.

"and it’s a whole lot better use of the gaming engine than shooting ’em up."

Goddamn professor trolls using their oppinions as arguments in mathers that they know virtually nothing about.

You can't compare negotiation games with fps games, because they are different genres, just as you can't compare icedancing and kung fu.

RTS gamer

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

This isn't a bad idea... but wouldn't it be more feasible to assume sales from a product that offered a bit more than "Hot negotiating action"!!

It might do better as part of a war game... to let people see both sides, and also show that some battles can not be won with conversation. Plus, as an included mode, it could be used as a mandatory aspect of completing said title. That way, the user would have to experience it.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

Re: Duke Team Developing Peace Simulator

This is the nice idea to teach the people about diplomacy and crisis response skills.

http://spudmobile.co.uk/guitar-hero-world-tour.aspx

Mario Kart Wii

Wii-Fit

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Poll: Is it censorship when a private retailer decides not to sell a particular video game?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashOh, no, I totally agree with you that Iron is being a prick and needs to stop, but isn't the usual GG suggesstion for harassment "just ignore it, grow a thicker skin, don't report it"?05/30/2015 - 9:22am
Conster...and even the more stubborn and annoying ones are downright pleasant when compared to IronPatriot's behavior. His behavior is harassment regardless of whether it's aimed at pro-GG or anti-GG people, and it has to stop.05/30/2015 - 8:55am
ConsterMechaCrash: is this about Goth_Skunk's complaint against IronPatriot? Because while I'm anti-GG and strongly disagree with a lot of the stuff the pro-GG people on here say, most of them disapprove of harassment, even if it's 'in the name of GamerGate'...05/30/2015 - 8:55am
MechaCrashMan, some people are just...so immune to noticing irony, you know? The mind boggles.05/30/2015 - 8:35am
InfophileBut hey, I'm not a mod here. It's up to them05/30/2015 - 7:36am
InfophileThat's really not conducive to a good discussion. It just puts people on the defensive. So yeah, I really think IP should try to hold back on that. I'm not sure a ban is in order unless they show they can't or won't change, though05/30/2015 - 7:36am
InfophileLooking through IP's recent posts, there are some that do add to the discussion. There are also a handful which add nothing and are just jabs or point-scoring. It feels like IP is treating the comments more like a battleground than a discussion, honestly05/30/2015 - 7:34am
MattsworknameAhh, that explains why I wasn't aware. I don't follow, like ,nor care for soccer05/30/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_SkunkThe top dog at FIFA.05/30/2015 - 6:49am
MattsworknameWhose Blatter conster?05/30/2015 - 6:42am
ConsterSpeaking of non-video games for a second, I'm seriously disappointed in people for re-electing Blatter, and disgusted by his speech afterwards.05/30/2015 - 6:32am
ConsterHe's at least 5 times as bad as GS.05/30/2015 - 6:31am
Goth_SkunkEIC of Gameranx apologizes for his recent conduct: http://ow.ly/NDBxn Frankly, I'm surprised this wasn't posted sooner.05/30/2015 - 6:31am
ConsterGS does have a point: IP, on his own, causes at least as much harassment, insulting, and holier-than-thou'ness, as all the pro-GG people on this site combined.05/30/2015 - 6:30am
WonderkarpI am not sure I agree that its Harassment, But I do agree that he doesnt bring anything to the conversation. Its too the point where whenever I see his name, I just Thumbs down and move on. Its all buzz words and accusations and rarely civil05/30/2015 - 6:22am
MattsworknameWell, best of luck on that, but im not holding my breath.05/30/2015 - 5:04am
Goth_SkunkI believe the time to pull the plug was long ago, but kept quiet knowing full well Iron Patriot cannot help themself. There is a mountain of evidence to support my claim. In my opinion, it is harassment, and it needs to stop.05/30/2015 - 4:35am
Goth_SkunkIt's not getting me down. Far from it. Nevertheless, the conduct is unacceptable and has gone far beyond what any patient human being ought to be expected to tolerate.05/30/2015 - 4:34am
MattsworknameDont let him get you down Goth, I just go look at kitten videos for a bit to get my posistive mood back05/30/2015 - 4:27am
Goth_SkunkIt is not conducive to a welcoming, open-minded environment that this site is supposed to be.05/30/2015 - 2:33am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician