Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When Tipsy

December 5, 2008 -

It's like the arcade classic Frogger, but with a beer buzz.

Grogger, an online game developed by, believe it or not, the city council of Melbourne, Australia, is designed to remind players that it's dangerous to stagger across the road after drinking.

As reported by news.com:

The character can pick up beer bottles as they go, which slow their reaction times, while water bottles help the player continue on their way. They win if they make it across the road without getting "smashed" by a vehicle.

 

Melbourne City Council commissioned the game in an effort to reduce the amount of pedestrian accidents the city sees each year, 70 per cent of which result in injuries. The council estimates around 716,000 people visit the CBD each day, with more in the holiday season.

Melbourne will be holding a live Grogger event with players competing on a big screen later this month.

GP: We gave Grogger a try - sober, mind you, at the time. It's actually a lot of fun in that nostalgic, 8-bit way.


Comments

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

"...it's dangerous to stagger across the road after drinking."

Easy to remember while sober, tougher to remember while you're staggering across the road after drinking.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

I guess it's OK to play as an intoxicated character in this game, but not in GTA. 

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

That is because this is sponsered by the government. As we all know the government only sponsers good things while the video game industry only creates evil things. It is simple really.

If the government wants to create a training simulator to train people to successfully cross busy roads while drunk, they must have a good reason. But video game companies only make those kinds of simulators to destroy our youth and culture.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

One word: Jaywalking

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Ironically, jaywalking is the safest way to cross a street, unlike those designated crosswalks... Other fun facts are that roads with bends or curves are safter than straight roads, roundabouts are safter than intersections, and thin roads are safer than wide roadways.

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Australia? Weird, since their politicians just hate videogames....

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

I feel kinda weird that I was analysing it from a gameplay perspective as I was playing it.  It'd be quite a bit better if you didn't immediately start walking in funny directions from just one beer -- there should be some degree of leniency, otherwise the drunk/sober mechanism serves no purpose (ie. beer is just another thing you have to dodge, because you're p.much going to die if you touch it.)  But from a public service viewpoint, that's exactly the message they want to put across, so it makes sense.

Anyway, it's good for a Frogger clone I suppose.

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Watch out for the invisible cars, they can get you, haha.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Somehow I think the problem has more to do with drunkenness and poverty than race.

Oh, and how much more racist can you get?

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Were you meaning to reply to me and my comment about the aboriginals?

 

If not, please disregard.  If so, please understand that I'm not attempting to make a blanket statement about aboriginals, and especially not their RACE.  Their culture, perhaps, but not their race.  Humans have the same potential, generally, no matter where they're from, with certain minor physical differences (tendon placement, the *STUNNING* efficiency of the typical aboriginal digestive system [no really, look it up - it's amazing!], etc.) that can be easily overcome or compensated for with hard work.  I don't want to say that every human is the same, as that is absolutely not true, but there are no differences so great in general between the various ethnicities that they are inherently limiting, and indeed they are usually very benificial.

 

The only point I was trying to make is that the cases where aboriginals in Alice Springs and the surrounding communities are killed because they fell asleep in the middle of the road are sad, and the current efforts don't seem to do much to help.

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Against which race?

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

 

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Australian Aborigines are a class of peoples who are identified by Australian law as being members of a race indigenous to the Australian continent.

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

How are you finding racism in this?

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

If only they could make an effective tool to remind the aboriginals not to sleep in the middle of the street.  Most don't have a problem, but for some odd reason the ones in Alice Springs make a habit of doing just that - it's so bad that they have TV ADS reminding them not to sleep on the road, though I doubt their effectiveness.

 

I wish I were joking.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician