Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When Tipsy

December 5, 2008 -

It's like the arcade classic Frogger, but with a beer buzz.

Grogger, an online game developed by, believe it or not, the city council of Melbourne, Australia, is designed to remind players that it's dangerous to stagger across the road after drinking.

As reported by news.com:

The character can pick up beer bottles as they go, which slow their reaction times, while water bottles help the player continue on their way. They win if they make it across the road without getting "smashed" by a vehicle.

 

Melbourne City Council commissioned the game in an effort to reduce the amount of pedestrian accidents the city sees each year, 70 per cent of which result in injuries. The council estimates around 716,000 people visit the CBD each day, with more in the holiday season.

Melbourne will be holding a live Grogger event with players competing on a big screen later this month.

GP: We gave Grogger a try - sober, mind you, at the time. It's actually a lot of fun in that nostalgic, 8-bit way.


Comments

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

"...it's dangerous to stagger across the road after drinking."

Easy to remember while sober, tougher to remember while you're staggering across the road after drinking.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

I guess it's OK to play as an intoxicated character in this game, but not in GTA. 

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

That is because this is sponsered by the government. As we all know the government only sponsers good things while the video game industry only creates evil things. It is simple really.

If the government wants to create a training simulator to train people to successfully cross busy roads while drunk, they must have a good reason. But video game companies only make those kinds of simulators to destroy our youth and culture.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
MySpace Page: http://www.myspace.com/okceca
Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1325674091

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

One word: Jaywalking

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

--- Official Protector of Videoland!

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Ironically, jaywalking is the safest way to cross a street, unlike those designated crosswalks... Other fun facts are that roads with bends or curves are safter than straight roads, roundabouts are safter than intersections, and thin roads are safer than wide roadways.

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Australia? Weird, since their politicians just hate videogames....

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

I feel kinda weird that I was analysing it from a gameplay perspective as I was playing it.  It'd be quite a bit better if you didn't immediately start walking in funny directions from just one beer -- there should be some degree of leniency, otherwise the drunk/sober mechanism serves no purpose (ie. beer is just another thing you have to dodge, because you're p.much going to die if you touch it.)  But from a public service viewpoint, that's exactly the message they want to put across, so it makes sense.

Anyway, it's good for a Frogger clone I suppose.

---
The Mammon Industry

---
Fangamer

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Watch out for the invisible cars, they can get you, haha.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Somehow I think the problem has more to do with drunkenness and poverty than race.

Oh, and how much more racist can you get?

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Were you meaning to reply to me and my comment about the aboriginals?

 

If not, please disregard.  If so, please understand that I'm not attempting to make a blanket statement about aboriginals, and especially not their RACE.  Their culture, perhaps, but not their race.  Humans have the same potential, generally, no matter where they're from, with certain minor physical differences (tendon placement, the *STUNNING* efficiency of the typical aboriginal digestive system [no really, look it up - it's amazing!], etc.) that can be easily overcome or compensated for with hard work.  I don't want to say that every human is the same, as that is absolutely not true, but there are no differences so great in general between the various ethnicities that they are inherently limiting, and indeed they are usually very benificial.

 

The only point I was trying to make is that the cases where aboriginals in Alice Springs and the surrounding communities are killed because they fell asleep in the middle of the road are sad, and the current efforts don't seem to do much to help.

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Against which race?

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

 

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

Australian Aborigines are a class of peoples who are identified by Australian law as being members of a race indigenous to the Australian continent.

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

How are you finding racism in this?

Re: Grogger Game Reminds Players Not to Cross the Road When

If only they could make an effective tool to remind the aboriginals not to sleep in the middle of the street.  Most don't have a problem, but for some odd reason the ones in Alice Springs make a habit of doing just that - it's so bad that they have TV ADS reminding them not to sleep on the road, though I doubt their effectiveness.

 

I wish I were joking.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician