A British law firm which targets consumers who allegedly share games and movies via the Internet has itself been targeted by the UK’s largest consumer advocacy organization.
Zeropaid reports that consumer group Which? filed a complaint against law firm Davenport Lyons with the UK’s Solicitors Regulatory Authority. As GamePolitics reported in August, Davenport Lyons aggressively targeted alleged file sharers on behalf of five UK game publishers. From Zeropaid’s coverage:
The alleged file-sharers have received letters from the law firm demanding payment of £500 ($773 USD) compensation for copyright infringement, but many, most notably a non-gaming elderly couple, have been wrongly accused.
A recent Which? Computing investigation found that while working with games firm Atari, Davenport Lyons wrongly accused a Scottish couple, aged 54 and 66, of infringing copyright of a game ‘Race O7’. Since then, Atari has severed ties with the law firm. But Which? Computing has evidence from people who, after repeated letters from Davenport Lyons, have been scared into paying compensation for something they say they did not do.
The Which? complaint charges, among other things, that Davenport Lyons’ letters to alleged file sharers misstate copyright law, ignore evidence of innocence, and increase the amount demanded over time.