Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

January 5, 2009 -

There's no word on what he played, but Sir Salman Rushdie told UK newspaper The Times that he indulged in some computer games while dodging a fatwa issued by Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini from 1988 until 1998.

Khomeini lodged the death sentence against Rushdie following the publication of his 1988 novel, The Satanic Verses. The book was regarded as blasphemous by some segments of the global Islamic community.

GameCulture notes, however, that Rushdie was rather dismissive of games in a 2008 interview with Stephen Colbert:

I think video games, YouTube, you know, these are the things that will change the world. Because when people see what garbage everybody else is consuming, they want it too.


Comments

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

As Zach de la Rocha said, "The critics rush me like Salman Rushdie".

GameSnooper

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Yeah, I'm not sure I disagree or feel particularly put out by that comment either.

And even if he is a 'literary snob' he would have a point. Novels are still well ahead of videogames in terms of having examples of profundity in their works. But I doubt that's what he would be pushing towards. There's garbage in every medium, and I'd imagine he'd feel the same way about a lot of popular fiction.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

I think he meant that as a joke, in part. But he also meant it as being something positive. He's saying American and western culture in general will destroy Islamic fundamentalism. Its our "soft power" that will defeat the terrorists, not our military. They can withstand the assault by our miltary, but they cant last against Disney, Hannah Montana, Hollywood, Grand Theft Auto, etc...

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

First waterboarding and now Hannah Montana? Doesn't the US have any humane tricks left up its sleeve?

[/bad joke]

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Well, considering that for every one great game from '88 to '98, you had a dozen shitty ones, I can't say blame him for the garabage comment.

Then again, he could just be the kind of person who thinks the novel is the end-all be-all of the human experience, and that everything young people are into pales in comparison. I run into waaay too many poeple like that, I'll tell you.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

 Well if he was in hiding for 10 years, and all he can do is play video games to pass the time...

 

Then i'd get sick of it too...  i can play a game 2 weeks and then get sick of it and find other things to do.  and he wasn't a gamer to begin with, he played because he had nothing else to do.

 

you can imagine after 10 years he's sick and tired of it

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

 In 1998 he would have been playing Half-Life. Now he probably just sees commercials for GOW2 which look exactly like Die Hard 5.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Let us not forget the internets true gift to humanity: boatloads of (free) smut.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

I wonder what games he played that would cause him to label them all as junk.  There were some bad games out during the 1990s, but some great games too.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Considering that the bulk of games _are_ garbage and how consumerism works, I'm not sure I disagree with him.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Yeah. Dismissive? Maybe. Accurate? Definitley.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Though, in all fairness 'Junk Media' has existed in various forms for centuries in almost every culture, it just that it has the technology to proliferate far faster these days. There are catacombs under Cairo with Heiroglyphic graffiti in it, the original YouTube, as it were.

 

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Graffiti is nothing to do with youtube. The original youtube would probably have been a public area where people came and acted out shitty scenes from plays while someone sang a pop song from the time across the action, and then other idiots all said 'OMG UR TEH GREETEST' and gave them 5 star ratings despite a complete lack of originality, ability or talent.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

You mean like Speakers Corner in London, which has also existed for several centuries?

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

 Egads, people have differing opinions?! Unacceptable.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Heh.  Quite true ^_^ The internet has sped up the issue but fundementally chaged nothing.

Re: Author Salman Rushdie Gamed While Dodging Decade-long Fatwa

Dismissive of games or not, he's right about YouTube.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenWhat I find most amazing is the fact that Yiannoppoulos's evidence doesn't in any way support his claim. And I still fail to see the lack of ethics in discussing the ethics surrounding public interest vs. personal privacy.09/19/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOh yeah, some outlets sensationalize things (especially with the chosen headline). No argument there. As far as gender issues not being widespread? I'm inclined to disagree but I suppose it depends on what specifically you're talking about.09/19/2014 - 3:43pm
SleakerI think I've been qualitatively informed by those Factual Femenist videos that there isn't reallly a widespread gender issue, and that there are select news outlets that try to sensationalize things.09/19/2014 - 3:37pm
james_fudgeI'm just going to leave this here before someone else does:http://yiannopoulos.net/2014/09/19/gamejournopros-zoe-quinn-email-dump/09/19/2014 - 3:21pm
NeenekoI have met some real jerks and slimeballs in gender activism, but when I hear the idea that there are many 'not nice' people it comes across as code for 'uppity people who do not know their place'.09/19/2014 - 12:10pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Many of the people pushing gender issues aren't nice people? I'm sure not everyone's a sweatheart but so far, everyone I've seen with such a critique had absolutely nothing to back them up.09/19/2014 - 10:46am
InfophileI think there's a qualitative difference between a site and a hashtag though. GP can ban anyone from commenting, so they can have the image they want. But anyone can use any hashtag and try to poison it. Granted, that hasn't happened to the other one yet09/19/2014 - 10:13am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, your comparison to GP does not work. We do not need to get rid of GP, because no one associates GP with trolls and abuse. The same can't be said for gamergate.09/19/2014 - 10:09am
Krono@Michael You don't remember the "other hashtag" because no one actually uses it. We're talking 836,983 uses of #gamergate over it's lifetime, and 8,119 for the "alternative". 47,129 uses on the 18th vs 41. With #notyourshield at 140,133 uses & 5,209 uses09/19/2014 - 9:48am
Kronoresearch it. Changing tags to get away from trolls would be like wiping GamePolitics and restarting under a new name to get away from people calling Jack Thompson a filthy names in the comments section.09/19/2014 - 9:35am
Sleaker@quiknkold - seems like all that page is is a bunch of random developer opinions and rumors that we're supposedto do what with?09/19/2014 - 9:31am
Kronoas an opportunity to push back against them. It's one of the things muddling the issue. @conster A new hashtag would do nothing to improve anything. Trolls will simply follow to the new hashtag, and it will confuse the issue for anyone attempting to09/19/2014 - 9:25am
Krono@Andrew aaah. Yes, I'm sure there's some of that. Part of the problem is many of the people pushing gender issues are not very nice people. Basically the latest incarnation of moralists we've seen in the past couple decades. Naturually some will take this09/19/2014 - 9:23am
quiknkoldhttp://www.nichegamer.net/2014/09/real-gamedevs-sound-off-regarding-the-gamergate-controversy/09/19/2014 - 8:35am
MaskedPixelanteMeanwhile, in news that actually DOES matter, Scotland voted "NO" to Scottish independance.09/19/2014 - 8:20am
ConsterSeriously? "We shouldn't make a new hashtag - it's better to associate ourselves with psychos than to decrease our visibility"?09/19/2014 - 7:54am
Michael ChandraI forget what it is exactly, but there already is another hashtag that some use, exactly to separate themselves from the abusive behaviour. So don't bother lying to me.09/19/2014 - 7:06am
quiknkold2 to 3 or more09/19/2014 - 6:53am
quiknkoldMichael Chandra : I'll say this. The only reason they havent used another hashtag is because it would look like a form of dividing the arguement. Using another Hashtag has come up, and they feel like if they made a new hashtag, it'll split the debate from09/19/2014 - 6:53am
Michael ChandraYou want a debate? Build a wall between you and the poisoned well. Make clear you despise it, despise the behaviour. Then get into the other issues you are troubled with, and don't say a single word again about the poisoned well.09/19/2014 - 3:46am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician