Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

January 14, 2009 -

While the current state of the economy isn't much fun, The Bailout Game offers a somewhat entertaining look at the financial mess wrought by the ugly marriage of Wall Street greed and governmental ineptitude.

The web-based offering uses board game-style interface and challenges the player to selectively bailout financial institutions and the auto industry, all the while trying to keep one step ahead of recession.

Although we found the game worth a try, Ian Bogost of Water Cooler Games was less enthusiastic:

The game itself is a repetitive and seemingly meaningless trudge from square to square (bank to bank), each offering the same basic question: Do you bail out: YES or NO? No matter your answer, you'll get an animation or video with some vaguely related news bit or textual riff...

 

I was never able to determine why or how the game wanted me to chose to bail out specific banks or to let them fail, save for invoking the "Ask a Greenspan" button or following obvious hints on the playing cards. It's games like this that make me wonder if I should give up tracking them entirely.


Comments

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

The idea of playing during these tough economic times is not the best way to save our struggling economy. We have to be serious with this economic challenge; we are facing a lot of problems and disasters. And who knows what will happen next after this recession. Disaster, be it natural or manmade, is a fascinating topic. Many out there are devotees to one specific disaster, and all associated memorabilia, the Titanic.  The RMS Titanic is among the worst of maritime disasters.  Lousy materials and construction paired with a flawed design made for a very bad disaster. But it's not just the Titanic. Lots of people are fascinated with the tales of survivors, and some look into an online payday loan to get their hands on new stuff.  Read more at http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/04/08/recessions-disasters/

 

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

This entire thing was stupid. We could have either taken the economic crash because the banks were stupid, or fed their stupidity.

What pisses me off is soon after the bailout, there was a huge huge huge huge banquet held at a really expensive resort. The table cloths had gold all over them, everything. Think of cindarella got greedy, then that would have been a small corner of it. It cost them something like 50 million for that one night.

When confronted about it, the answer was 'we always do this, we'd had it planned for awhile. It's a business tradition'.

To quote a celebrity unlicensed doctor: "How's that workin' for ya!?"

Should have jailed the executives responsible for this.

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Is that quote from Dr. Phil? haha

Yes, the bailouts are bullshit.  Let the car companies die too.  They are not creating cars for our future.  If they do not invest wisely, why give them money?  Little to no stipulations with all of the bailouts...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

<i>The game itself is a repetitive and seemingly meaningless trudge from square to square (bank to bank), each offering the same basic question: Do you bail out: YES or NO? No matter your answer, you'll get an animation or video with some vaguely related news bit or textual riff...</i>

Kinda like reality, lol

But us taxpayers do the 'meaningless trudge' - moving from day to day paying taxes. The Government has a system where the members of certain banks (friends) get the bailout and banks who haven't "played the game" with politicians - get a 'no'.

Then afterwards, there's some vauge news on how the bailout's helping the citizens of the country, but oddly spending all the tax money to bailout corporations isn't hurting anything.

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

At least I can play this game at work...most games are blocked by the content filter  ;)

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

I didn't like the game because of a few things.

These bailouts are going to hurt us in the long run, the more money we put into these failing companies the worse off we are going to be later down the road.  I let all of them fail and there was a zombie depression where in reality things would be bad for a while and then finally get better assuming we continued to make wise choices regarding the economy(such as abolishing the federal reserve and ending the empire).  I kind of think the designers got their economists hats on backwards, as does most of the government and media.  But enough about my political opinions.

From a design perspective I agree with Bogost.  It was a very dull experience.  You move forward, you say yes or no and then continue on.  Sometimes you land on a square in which you have no control over.  I was hoping for an intelligent, fun and informative game but this game failed make any intelligent statements on the economy, it wasn't fun and definitely wasn't informative.  The music is cool and the graphics are pretty but it is still incredibly dull and full of failure.

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Not a great game.. you can win just by bailing out everything - and still have 500 billion in the bank afterwards.

 

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Yeah...  but it looks pretty...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Ah, greed. Source of a wide majority of the world's problems. Just don't want to part with their money.

Greed fathers corruption. Corruption creates financial problems. Financial problems lead to suffering.

[/yoda]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_Skunk"The New Totalitarians Are Here" from The Federalist. http://ow.ly/Pjz3b07/07/2015 - 11:31pm
MattsworknameThere was a time in america when we needed unions and they served a good purpose, but that time hasnt been tbe case for about 20 years or more. The same could be said of our current system for teachers in higher educatoin,but thats a whole nother story07/07/2015 - 10:22pm
TechnogeekIn large part, though, that's an extension of the level of unjust deference given to police in general. Kind of hard to find any real grievances to defend against when the organizational culture views "complains about coworker" as worse than "murderer".07/07/2015 - 8:45pm
TechnogeekThat's a police union.07/07/2015 - 8:43pm
TechnogeekNo, police unions are worse by far. Imagine every negative stereotype about unions, then add "we can get away with anything".07/07/2015 - 8:43pm
Goth_SkunkeZeek: No, I do not agree they are union members.07/07/2015 - 7:48pm
E. Zachary KnightTeachers unions are just as bad as police unions, except of course you are far less likely to be killed by a teacher on duty than you are a cop. But they also protect bad teachers from being fired.07/07/2015 - 6:29pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, so you agree they are still union members. Thankfully we have a first ammendment that protects people from being forced to join groups they don't support (in most cases any way.)07/07/2015 - 6:27pm
E. Zachary KnightAh, police unions. The reason why cops can't get fired when they beat a defenseless mentally ill homeless person to death. Or when they throw a grenade into a baby's crib. Or when theykill people they were called in to help not hurt themselves.07/07/2015 - 6:26pm
Goth_SkunkeZeek: Non-union employees have no right to attend meetings or union convention/AGM, or influence policy. The only time they get to vote is whether or not to strike.07/07/2015 - 6:24pm
Infophile(cont'd) about non-union police officers being given hell until they joined the union.07/07/2015 - 4:58pm
InfophileParadoxically, the drive in the US to get rid of unions seems to have left only the most corrupt surviving. They seem to be the only ones that can find ways to browbeat employees into joining when paying dues isn't mandatory. I've heard some stories ...07/07/2015 - 4:57pm
Matthew WilsonI am old school on this. I believe its a conflict of interest to have public sector unions. that being said, I do not have a positive look on unions in general.07/07/2015 - 3:59pm
TechnogeekWhat's best for the employee tends to be good for the employer; other way around, not so much. So long as that's the case, there's going to be a far stronger incentive for management to behave in such a way that invites retalitation than for the union to.07/07/2015 - 3:10pm
TechnogeekTeachers' unions? State legislatures. UAW? Just look at GM's middle management.07/07/2015 - 3:05pm
TechnogeekIn many ways it seems that the worse a union tends to behave, the worse that the company's management has behaved in the past.07/07/2015 - 3:02pm
james_fudgeCharity starts at home ;)07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
james_fudgeSo mandatory charity? That sounds shitty to me07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, if Union dues are automatically withdrawn, then there is no such thing as a non-union employee.07/07/2015 - 2:38pm
Goth_Skunka mutually agreed upon charity instead.07/07/2015 - 2:33pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician