Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

January 14, 2009 -

While the current state of the economy isn't much fun, The Bailout Game offers a somewhat entertaining look at the financial mess wrought by the ugly marriage of Wall Street greed and governmental ineptitude.

The web-based offering uses board game-style interface and challenges the player to selectively bailout financial institutions and the auto industry, all the while trying to keep one step ahead of recession.

Although we found the game worth a try, Ian Bogost of Water Cooler Games was less enthusiastic:

The game itself is a repetitive and seemingly meaningless trudge from square to square (bank to bank), each offering the same basic question: Do you bail out: YES or NO? No matter your answer, you'll get an animation or video with some vaguely related news bit or textual riff...

 

I was never able to determine why or how the game wanted me to chose to bail out specific banks or to let them fail, save for invoking the "Ask a Greenspan" button or following obvious hints on the playing cards. It's games like this that make me wonder if I should give up tracking them entirely.


Comments

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

The idea of playing during these tough economic times is not the best way to save our struggling economy. We have to be serious with this economic challenge; we are facing a lot of problems and disasters. And who knows what will happen next after this recession. Disaster, be it natural or manmade, is a fascinating topic. Many out there are devotees to one specific disaster, and all associated memorabilia, the Titanic.  The RMS Titanic is among the worst of maritime disasters.  Lousy materials and construction paired with a flawed design made for a very bad disaster. But it's not just the Titanic. Lots of people are fascinated with the tales of survivors, and some look into an online payday loan to get their hands on new stuff.  Read more at http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/04/08/recessions-disasters/

 

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

This entire thing was stupid. We could have either taken the economic crash because the banks were stupid, or fed their stupidity.

What pisses me off is soon after the bailout, there was a huge huge huge huge banquet held at a really expensive resort. The table cloths had gold all over them, everything. Think of cindarella got greedy, then that would have been a small corner of it. It cost them something like 50 million for that one night.

When confronted about it, the answer was 'we always do this, we'd had it planned for awhile. It's a business tradition'.

To quote a celebrity unlicensed doctor: "How's that workin' for ya!?"

Should have jailed the executives responsible for this.

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Is that quote from Dr. Phil? haha

Yes, the bailouts are bullshit.  Let the car companies die too.  They are not creating cars for our future.  If they do not invest wisely, why give them money?  Little to no stipulations with all of the bailouts...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

<i>The game itself is a repetitive and seemingly meaningless trudge from square to square (bank to bank), each offering the same basic question: Do you bail out: YES or NO? No matter your answer, you'll get an animation or video with some vaguely related news bit or textual riff...</i>

Kinda like reality, lol

But us taxpayers do the 'meaningless trudge' - moving from day to day paying taxes. The Government has a system where the members of certain banks (friends) get the bailout and banks who haven't "played the game" with politicians - get a 'no'.

Then afterwards, there's some vauge news on how the bailout's helping the citizens of the country, but oddly spending all the tax money to bailout corporations isn't hurting anything.

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

At least I can play this game at work...most games are blocked by the content filter  ;)

Sortableturnip's Law: As an online discussion of video game violence grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Jack Thompson approaches 1

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

I didn't like the game because of a few things.

These bailouts are going to hurt us in the long run, the more money we put into these failing companies the worse off we are going to be later down the road.  I let all of them fail and there was a zombie depression where in reality things would be bad for a while and then finally get better assuming we continued to make wise choices regarding the economy(such as abolishing the federal reserve and ending the empire).  I kind of think the designers got their economists hats on backwards, as does most of the government and media.  But enough about my political opinions.

From a design perspective I agree with Bogost.  It was a very dull experience.  You move forward, you say yes or no and then continue on.  Sometimes you land on a square in which you have no control over.  I was hoping for an intelligent, fun and informative game but this game failed make any intelligent statements on the economy, it wasn't fun and definitely wasn't informative.  The music is cool and the graphics are pretty but it is still incredibly dull and full of failure.

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Not a great game.. you can win just by bailing out everything - and still have 500 billion in the bank afterwards.

 

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Yeah...  but it looks pretty...

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Can You Save the Economy? Play The Bailout Game

Ah, greed. Source of a wide majority of the world's problems. Just don't want to part with their money.

Greed fathers corruption. Corruption creates financial problems. Financial problems lead to suffering.

[/yoda]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
Sleakersimply oust people that do harass others.09/20/2014 - 11:34am
Sleaker@Conster - I can say the same thing if you think there's been more than a handful. Until there's an actual study on rates no one can claim to know how widespread the incidence of harassment is. Thus the best we can do is 'there might be an issue' and...09/20/2014 - 11:33am
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
prh99A good reason to stop reading reguardless of view pointhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli.09/20/2014 - 5:22am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician