Activision Returns to E3

February 2, 2009 -

Activision's back!

The Entertainment Software Association has issued a press release which offers new details on E3 2009. But the biggest news is that Activision, which was not an official exhibitor at E3 2008, will be on the show floor when E3 opens in June.

While Activision will be exhibiting at E3, it has not, apparently rejoined the ESA's membership ranks.

As for ESA, the game publishers' trade group seems to be improving its P.R. efforts.  E3 2009, for instance, has a great-looking new website and the ESA has also established an official E3 presence on both Facebook and Twitter,
 


Comments

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Well, I'd take activision displaying anything at my event as a negative. "Hey, look, we've reskinned one of our old games, bought a better graphics engine, added ridiculous amounts of DRM, and expect you to pay full price for it, just like a real game!"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Is E3 bringing Sexy Back? I know it took it away the past couple of years. Although IMO E3 has always been promises about Fable-esque games and looks at demos which will never compare to the real thing rather it be being far better or far worse.

But it was still nice to see the newest shit coming out.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

PAX is and has been for some time the replacement for E3; it has a much better atmosphere, more entertainment instead of showcasing, and a focus on fun instead of polishing up your crappy game (Too Human, I'm looking at you.)

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" Pinky: "I think so, Brain, but we're already naked."

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Wish list for E3:

-Old E3 back, before it's fall a few years back.

-Open to the public. No more of this "Press and developers only" bullshit.

-Admission prices no more than $10 a person. Any higher and it's bullshit.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Let me get this straight.

Admission to E3 (priority pass) back in 2006 was at least a few hundred dollars, I believe.  Even the ESA's half-assed Entertainment for All was between $50-$100.  And you want the old E3 back but only want to pay $10 to get in, otherwise it's "bullshit"?

Is that what you're saying?

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

You forgot the "Open to the public" thing. And I'm saying that the public shouldn't pay so much money to get in.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Game on, brothers and sisters." -Leet Gamer Jargon

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Why?

And you're forgetting that "open to the public" has nothing to do with the price.  It just means it's okay for non-industry types to attend.  And I know what you're saying, you said it already.  I want to know why you think that normal consumers should pay so little for an E3 similar to the ones before 2007, when the admission price for the old ones was much higher.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

I dunno 25 a day,250 for the whole thing or 500 for VIP status, sounds good to me and they can make moeny off that.


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Activision Returns to E3

I have no idea how much it costs to put one of these things on, so I'm not really in a position to tell whether the price is unfair.  All I can do is choose to pay it or not.  That's why I want to know how Shadow came to his little $10 admission price conclusion.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

The public should pay more!  The average jackass isn't an investor, part of the industry, or anyone with anything to bring.  They're just coming to get a sneak peek at what's coming up in the world of videogaming.  They don't have any reason to be there other than that they wish to be there, and thus should pay more.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

It will be interesting to see if E3 can rise from the ashes of last year.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Activision Returns to E3

I know I hate Activision, but hooray. Anything to get E3 back on its feet to me is a good thing.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

"I know I hate Activision"

Why?

Re: Activision Returns to E3

bad buisness practices, bad public relations, an ego the size of Russia, I could go on.

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Which is why they're not only still in business, but also top ranked among video game publishers?

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"

Re: Activision Returns to E3

And I can't not like what they do?

Re: Activision Returns to E3

Of course you're free to not like them, my point is that if their business practices and customer relations are so bad, then they wouldn't be so successful.

Didn't mean to imply that you weren't entitled to your opinion, sorry.

"There is no sin except stupidity." - Oscar Wilde

"De minimus non curat lex"
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
Michael ChandraMind you, if someone makes a mountain out of a molehill with a secret agenda as motive, it'd be fine.09/18/2014 - 5:48pm
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenI'd really only count three as being "death of gamer" articles and only one as arguably going a bit far with "gamers are young white dudes" stuff.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenMost are really just a look at the crap that happened the previous day when Sarkeesian's new video came out and almost all are exceedingly clear that they're talking about the specific gamers who are being obnoxious.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Yep, I had only seen two. I looked at the 12 you sent and while I had seen a few of them, I didn't think to count them. Some aren't about gamers at all. One's just highlighting two others. One is a Gamasutra community member blog post.09/18/2014 - 5:15pm
Michael Chandrawould clearly not apply, since they weren't used as shield. It's more "hey, just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm CISWASP."09/18/2014 - 5:08pm
Michael ChandraIn comparison though, the more extreme views would be fairly countered with "you don't speak for me". But the batshit crazy people tend not to even use others as the shield to defend their batshit crazy ideas and insults, so at that point #notyourshield09/18/2014 - 5:06pm
Michael ChandraWhich is of course real silly because when there are so many horrible stories and statistics too, it's utterly irrelevant whether some don't mind.09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael ChandraIn this context it would be women claiming they don't see a problem with the stuff, so stop claiming women don't like it!09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael Chandra"You don't speak for me. I am not your shield. You cannot use me to defend your own opinion."09/18/2014 - 4:59pm
Michael ChandraAE, if we leave aside the falsehoods some use with the term, the idea is regarding minorities and such.09/18/2014 - 4:58pm
Michael ChandraKrono did just a bit earlier in the shoutbox prh99.09/18/2014 - 4:56pm
Andrew EisenI still don't get the what #notyourshield is supposed to mean. Who is unfairly using who as a shield for what?09/18/2014 - 4:43pm
prh99Didn't said anything about #notyourshield or it's origins. Assuming your comment was directed at me.09/18/2014 - 4:28pm
prh99Leigh Alexander is right though, no one has to cater to them (trolls). I think a lot of them would likely continue playing even if scantily clad women were omitted or protagonist was female.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael ChandraSo no, normal gamers feeling attacked was not what sparked #notyourshield and only a fool would suggest otherwise.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael Chandra#NotYourShield was kickstarted by 4chan people, so don't go and make nonsense claims about that.09/18/2014 - 4:20pm
prh99those toxic individuals conduct their trolling under. It could have easily been under the Men Rights banner etc, they are just generally unpleasant and angry people who can't stand people disagreeing with them. 09/18/2014 - 4:00pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician