Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

February 5, 2009 -

Yesterday, GamePolitics broke the news that Madden publisher Electronic Arts paid the National Football League Players Association more than $35 million in licensing fees during 2007.

We asked a couple of financial gurus to comment on the eye-popping figure, which is buried within a massive document filed by the NFLPA with the U.S. Department of Labor.

Wedbush-Morgan financial analyst Michael Pachter told GP:

The [Madden licensing] deal is likely a guarantee of around $50 million total, and $35 million [going] to the players makes sense. The old deal was around $15 million per year, and I know that it went up substantially when renewed in 2005.
 
[EA sells] around 5.5 million copies a year, so they're burdened with [about] $9/unit in licensing. That's reasonable, on par with the royalty paid to the console manufacturers.

So, Mike, yesterday GP speculated that the league would get at least as much as the NFLPA from EA. Are you saying we were wrong and that the NFLPA actually gets more than the NFL?

Most definitely.

 

The product is the players, and the league used to get most of the money. The reason the royalty went up was the players, not the league. The league looks at the game as a marketing tool, but the players want to be paid for their likenesses.

Meanwhile, analyst Doug Creutz of Cowen and Company termed the $35 million paid by EA to the NFLPA "a gigantic number," adding:

I’d estimate Madden generates $350-400 million in revenue for EA annually.

 


Comments

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

Those fees are insanely high.. i dont see how they make it

 

Cookie Stuffing Guide

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

Because of the ban on other games on using player likenesses and names, EA has a virtual monopoly on football games.  I like Madden Football, but I'd like to have the choice between competing game designs.  Lack of competition is not good for anyone - it encourages the sort of stagnation that we've seen in EA's sports line-up in the last few years.

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

Of course Madden makes that much. What other NFL choice do people have? None, because of these assholes at EA and their exclusive deal!

When Jack Thompson runs his mouth, does anyone really care what he has to say anymore?

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

I don't think giving approximately 10% of revenues from Madden to licensing is too big of a chunk for EA to pay.  

www.20sidedwoman.blogspot.com

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

Keep at it, take down Madden.  I am sick of that carbon copy game.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

Then don't play it? Why are you trying to encurage the prevention of people who ligitimatly like playing the game?

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

If they lose the deal, the NFL will likely take some time signing another exclusive deal if they ever do.  I want more developers making NFL games, because I actually enjoyed the fact of developers competing to make a good game every year instead of EA only owning it and doing a roster update.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

But there are people who ligitimatly like Madden (crazy I know!). Why do you want to encurage the death of madden, and as a result people who like the game can no longer play it anymore?

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

They won't be losing anything, they will always have the last copy EA made, they just have to make the roster update themselves with the create a player. (or with the last version that has that)

Maybe another company will make football games those people like too, but the majority of Madden fans from years past are sick of this recycling of the game.

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Nido Web Flash Tutorials AS2 and AS3 Tutorials for anyone interested.
How to set Xbox 360 Parental Controls

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

Madden is the Tony Hawk Pro Skater of football games. People want NFL, there is only one choice. That doesn't mean it was good by any means. I played THPS because I enjoy skateboarding.. not because I like Tony Hawk. Now that I have an option to choose a different game (skate), I certainly will.

Backbreaker looked to be a Madden killer if the NFL would allow the license. But the shitty players in the league demand too much for their likenesses. Horrible role models.

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

True, but that's because NFL is an actual license. If people want American football, you can go somewhere else for that. Are you the same person who complains about the fact that Activision is the only company that can make spider-man games?

Re: Analysts Weigh in on Madden's Mega Licensing Fees

"Backbreaker looked to be a Madden killer if the NFL would allow the license. But the shitty players in the league demand too much for their likenesses. Horrible role models."

 

Yes....how dare they ask to be fairly compensated for using their likenesses....

 

It wasn't the players.  The League gave EA sole video game rights.  That means no NFL video games that isn't Madden.  You wanna blame anybody, blame EA for asking for such protection.

 

 

"You know what I wish? I wish all the scum of the Earth had one throat and I had my hands about it."

"You know what I wish? I wish all the scum of the Earth had one throat and I had my hands about it."
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will we ever get Half-Life 3?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaTama31Are... Are you guys suggesting that the content of the "Gamers are over" article is *less* inflammatory than the title?10/02/2014 - 7:58am
quiknkoldhey James, Boycotts are not Censorship. Supreme Court NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982)10/02/2014 - 7:37am
Michael ChandraWhat's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. That said, the name says it all.10/02/2014 - 7:34am
E. Zachary KnightYes.10/02/2014 - 7:29am
ConsterQuestion: is Kefka on drugs, or is he secretly a conspiracy theorist character from a TV show?10/02/2014 - 7:21am
james_fudgeEnjoy my comedy stylings.10/02/2014 - 7:10am
james_fudgehttp://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/10/02/It-s-been-real-GameJournoPros-prepares-to-close-its-doors10/02/2014 - 7:09am
InfophileAnd the headlines-only part is particularly depressing, as in most sites, they're not even written by the author of the article. So the author has to field tons of complaints about what the editor decided to title their article.10/02/2014 - 6:25am
InfophileAE: Most people don't. This has been tested - I remember an article slipped in a request in the second-to-last paragraph to use the word "banana" in your comment if you read that. It took over 50 posts for a banana.10/02/2014 - 6:24am
james_fudgeprh99: Whether you agree with the article or not, fighting alleged censorship with censorship is hella lame10/02/2014 - 4:27am
james_fudgewhoever made that decision at Intel will regret it later on down the road. Boycotts are tricky business.10/02/2014 - 4:26am
prh99The unflattering characterization "They don’t know how to dress or behave." & "‘Games culture’ is a petri dish of people who know so little about how human social interaction..." probably didn't help.10/02/2014 - 1:52am
prh99Probably not many as it was purely a vindictive move. The headline alone was plenty of ammo, but for those that did read and complain..10/02/2014 - 1:42am
Andrew EisenI wonder how many of those who complain about that article actually read past the headline.10/02/2014 - 1:37am
prh99http://intel.ly/1tjh1AH http://bit.ly/1rGPHOY http://intel.ly/Zu6go9 it isn't surprising "Gamers are over" didn't go over very well.10/02/2014 - 1:34am
Papa MidnightCan you parlay that to #WriteAGawkerArticle? The cesspool of horrid crap over there extends far beyond Kotaku.10/02/2014 - 12:34am
Andrew EisenWow! Intel dropped Gamasutra due to GameJournoPros? Over Matt Matthews? The only Gamasutra guy in the group? Who hasn't written a single thing about #GamerGate at the site? Where did you read that?10/02/2014 - 12:32am
Neo_DrKefka#WriteAKotakuArticle "#GamerGate is responsible for breaking millions of Intel powered macbooks after angry SWJ hipsters slam them shut" or "How Toxic Processors from Intel causes sexism. "10/02/2014 - 12:15am
Neo_DrKefkaSo Intel has dropped Gamesutra due to there support of your Gaming News Cabal Fudge. Anti GamerGate article soon? Or like your e-mails are you hoping this narrative dies down soon?10/02/2014 - 12:14am
Andrew EisenWell, time to eat some dinner and work on the Hyrule Warriors guide until bedtime!10/02/2014 - 12:11am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician