L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to Supreme Court

February 28, 2009 -

While Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown ruminate over whether to file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court over a 9th Circuit ruling that California's 2005 video game law is unconstitutional, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times offers some advice:

Don't.

From the L.A. Times editorial:

The [California] law raised a multitude of constitutional concerns. First... one of the definitions of "violent" was too broad. A game was violent if a player "virtually" harmed not only human beings but "characters with substantially human characteristics" (good news for centaurs and bipedal hedgehogs). But even when that language was severed from the rest of the law, the appeals court said the statute was unconstitutional...

Important as it is, the court's legal analysis doesn't identify an easy alternative for parents who are justifiably concerned about the effects of violent video games, films or comic books on their children. But the primary responsibility for protecting minors from potentially harmful influences lies with parents, as it did long before video games were a twinkle in a programmer's eye. Parents don't need a law to urge makers of video games to strengthen their current voluntary ratings systems. More important, they don't need permission from a legislator or judge to keep an eye on what their children are doing -- or playing.

GP: BTW, the pic at left is none other than Gov. Schwarzenegger as portrayed in a violent video game. It's safe to assume that he was paid for the use of his likeness...


Comments

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

I fail to see why most pols need to appeal this (or any) game law- they already have something to mention in their campaign ads simply by voting for the legislation in the first place. Mission accomplished. 

Regardless of whether the law is overturned, they can still make the campaign commercial like thus: "[INSERT NAME HERE] fought for families to protect our children from harmful videogames"  Done.

The only pols with any real, practical reason to appeal these things to hell and back are the few who are truly pushing the nannystate/theocracy. 

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

The governator was a hypocrit for signing this into law.

Legislating violent media when he himself made money from violent media.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

It would be easier to have a IQ test for parenting..... IE keep people stile until they show they are capable of parenting right...

 


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

I would like to say that the law is not a shickel, it is a sledge hammer,

and anything that those Christian pandering politicians say does not even take the real law into account.

Perhaps they need to do their own research into the 1st Admendment and understand that they can't force anyone to do anything.

Politicians just don't understand the 1st Admendment or even they have never even understood a single thing about Videogames to begin with.

 

TBoneTony

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

Here's hoping they don't appeal it. Gives Jack more of a chance his case will be heard.

(Yes, I want them to hear his case. Makes him look even more stupid when he fails.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------



"A Chrono Trigger is anything that unleashes its will or desire to change history!" -Gaspar

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

If JT's Case Comes Crashing down around his ears It'll be hilarious

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

"Good news for...bipedal hedgehogs"

Gotta give the paper serious credit for the sonic reference

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

Certainly a better example could be used than Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines with the image taken from IGN? With no mention that the "violent game" was rated T. There's plenty of hypocrisy out there for Ahhnold, why not use something more fitting? Granted IIRC the law would include this game, but still.... It was rated T...

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

Still a guy who made a career making R-rated movies that are incredibly violent and very adult in content advocates what people should and should not watch? Whether his likeness was in Teen rated game...he has Conan The Barbarian, Terminator, Predator, etc etc under his belt.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

And the budget just passed right? Though the recession's still going on, so I'd like to think 'violent videogames' would be a hell of a lot lower on people's lists than say, finding/keeping a job. *eyeroll*

300 Episodes and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/

400 Episodes, TEN YEARS and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/ | Voice of Geeks Network - http://www.vognetwork.com

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

It's no wonder California is broke with their stubborn attitude towards this law it's getting really really old...really fast and I think when it comes up...Arnold and Yee should be outta our government...-_-

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

The law is unnecessary and here is why:

-Minors buying M-rated games is very rare to begin with.

-Most stores have policies not to sell M-rated games to minors.

-Enforcement of those policies is very good and getting better every year.

-All games are clearly rated so it's easy to tell by glancing at the box if it's appropriate for your child.  You can even look at the box when your kid brings it home from the store.  It's not too late!

-All consoles have parental control so if you're too damn lazy or incompetant to pay attention to what your kids is doing, lock out M-rated games and junior won't be able to play it even if he does manage to buy it.

-Rating and content descriptors not enough?  In addition to the new summary at the ESRB site, the web is littered with oodles of info on whatever game you're not sure about!

-After all this your kid is still playing an M-rated game?  Don't worry, contrary to popular belief, it won't hurt him.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

More like don't bother.

It's dead no matter what those self righteous jerks try.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

I would think the only reasonable thing for them to do right now would be to appeal it.  That way their pretty much bankrupt state can put off paying those industry legal bills a while longer.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

Just let it DIE. You FAILED. Give it up, before you waste MORE taxpayer money. Just accept that there's no chance this will make it onto the 100 cases the supreme court hears a year.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

hmmm....major newspaper advocating parents taking charge, and not law making to restrict games.

Slight amount of disbelief, but good none the less.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

LA TIMES FTW!!

Now if only some of their illiterate politicians could get someone to read the article to them.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

California's economy can't be THAT bad if they have money to waste on crap like this...

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.otakutimes.com
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

 

----
Papa Midnight

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

maybe their economy's bad BECAUSE they waste money on crap like this

岩「…Where do masochists go when they die?」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to ...

I think the Guv is not going to appeal it period(due to the Economy being in the shitter)

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: L.A. Times: Don't Appeal California Video Game Law to

It's simple. Want to teach a parent how to regulate what kind of games they play? They should use the parental control settings and set it so that the console won't play anything over a Teen rating.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknamejob they wanted without the unions getting involved. The problem is, it has some unexpected side effects, like the ones Info mentioned07/07/2015 - 8:49am
MattsworknameThe problem being, right to work states exsist specificly as a counter to Unions, as the last 20 or so years have shown, the unions have been doing this countries economoy NO favors. The right to work states came into being to allow people to work any07/07/2015 - 8:49am
Infophile(cont'd) discriminatory. This can only be done for protected classes which are outlined in law (race, sex, religion, ethnicity everywhere, sexual orientation in some states). So, a gay person could be fired because they're gay and have no recourse there.07/07/2015 - 7:27am
Infophile@Goth: See here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/firedforbeinggay.asp for a good discussion on it. Basically, the problem is that in the US, most states allow at will firing, and it's the burden of the fired person to prove the firing was ...07/07/2015 - 7:25am
Goth_SkunkAssuming that's true, then that is a fight worth fighting for.07/07/2015 - 6:58am
Yuuri@ Goth_Skunk, in many states being gay is not a protected status akin to say race or religion. It's also in the "Right to work" states. Those are the states where one can be fired for any reason (provided it isn't a "protected" one.)07/07/2015 - 6:07am
Goth_Skunkregarded as a beacon of liberty and freedom that is the envy of the world, would not have across-the-board Human Rights laws that don't at the very least equal those of my own country.07/07/2015 - 5:47am
Goth_SkunkI find that hard to believe, Infophile. I have difficulty believing employers can *still* fire people for being gay. I would need to see some evidence that this is fact, because as a Canadian, I can't believe that the United States,07/07/2015 - 5:46am
InfophileFor that matter, even women don't yet have full legal equality with men. The US government still places limits on the positions women can serve in the military. And that's just the legal side of things - the "culture wars" are more than just laws.07/07/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd that's just LGB issues. Get ready for an incoming battle on rights for trans* people. And then after that, a battle for poly people.07/07/2015 - 5:41am
InfophileA battle's been won. In many states employers can still fire people for being gay. And in many states, parents can force their children into reparative therapy to try to "fix" being gay. Those battles still need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:40am
Goth_Skunkand now they've switched to battles that don't need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:37am
Goth_SkunkIn my opinion, it was the final legal hurdle denying homosexual couples final and recognized statuses as eligible spouses. But even though this war's been won, some people are still too keen to keep fighting battles,07/07/2015 - 5:28am
Goth_SkunkAnd it's a trend I don't mind seeing continue. Same-sex marriage was at long-last made definitively legal by SCOTUS, and it's about time. I'm glad it's finally happened, as it was desperately needed.07/07/2015 - 5:25am
Infophile(cont'd) It started long before that. Perhaps the American Civil War comes to mind?)07/07/2015 - 3:59am
InfophileOn Goth's linked article: Historically speaking, there may have been cycles, but remember that the left has steadily gained ground. Is there a good reason to expect that to be different this time? (Oh, and no, Culture War 1.0 wasn't with the Baby Boomers.07/07/2015 - 3:59am
Goth_Skunk"THIS VIDEO IS PROBLEMATIC:" About Social Justice Warriors, by J.T. Sexkik. Excellent video. http://ow.ly/PgGnD07/07/2015 - 3:22am
Goth_Skunkand repeats the cycle, over and over. Presently, the far left culture is overreaching, and is about to lose their stranglehold on power.07/06/2015 - 10:01pm
Goth_SkunkAs far back as the 60's, according to the writers. The culture war moves in cycles from one generation to the next. The left rebels against the right, takes over, overreaches to the point where the right rebels right back, takes over, overreaches ->07/06/2015 - 9:58pm
MattsworknameGoth, what "Comming overreach" , the media and goverment have been overreaching for years07/06/2015 - 9:34pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician