Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

March 19, 2009 -

Over the years, video games have been linked to societal ills ranging from poor academic performance to extreme antisocial behavior.  So perhaps it came as no surprise when the game industry reacted poorly to U.K. health group Change4Life’s “Early Death” ad which visually linked the sedentary nature of video game play to dying before one's time.

Several game industry types spoke out against the ad while trade magazine MCV and trade association Tiga (representing UK game developers) went as far as to submit official complaints with U.K. ad watchdog the Advertising Standards Authority.

Less than two weeks later, the ASA has decided not to take any action against the ad. In its ruling the ASA said:

Most readers would understand that the ad was discouraging a sedentary lifestyle and used the example of playing a console game as an illustration of the type of behaviour which might lead to long-term health problems if no exercise were taken alongside more sedentary activities.

Interestingly, the ASA also said that it received a complaint from someone not affiliated with the video game industry:

One parent objected that the ad was offensive and harmful because it frightened her young child who became scared that she would die if she played video games. The ASA Council sympathised with those concerns and understood that the reference to future health might, for some, be upsetting. However, it considered that the ad was unlikely to cause undue fear or distress to parents or children.

You can read the ASA’s entire response at MCV.

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Correspondent Andrew Eisen...


Comments

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Well, that is the umpire's/refferee's desicion.

I guess we can all just get on with the game and just play videogames. Don't listen to those people who try to make us feel bad then.

They can say what they like about Videogames. But it does not mean that I am not going to play them just because of what these people say.

 

TBoneTony

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Eh, big deal. So they made a dumb add. I can't see it hurting the game industry, or even really the image of gamers in the long run.

--------------------------------------------------------

Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! -Glenn Beck

-------------------------------------------------------- Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! GET OFF MY PHONE! -Glenn Beck

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

If they want to show a picture of someone doing something sedentary leading to death they should take a picture of one of themselves sitting at a desk at work.

 

www.thelobbyist.net

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Doesn't the second quote invalidate the first?  Obviously it wasn't clear that the ad was about a 'sedintary lifestyle."

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

 Indeed... it's essentially what the game industry was worried about and that what the group behind the ad said would not happen.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

I am still offended by this ad. Not because of the negative portrayal of gaming and eating cake, but of the negative imagery used in the campaign as a whole.

I nthe US we have several successful youth excercise and healthy eating campaigns that do not resort to such shock advertising. They have ads of kids having fun while playing outside. They have ads with kids enjoying fresh fruits and vegetables. They have no need to go negative, because there are plenty of ways to use positive reinforcement for their goals.

After having read the UK's advertising standards, I think this ad is in violation of them simply becausee it is using blatant scare tactics. Had this ad been produced by anyone less high profile than the Change4Life, they probably would have pulled it.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

You obviously haven't seen any of the other health campaigns in the UK or the safe driving campaigns. Nearly all use scare tactics, and the mentioned ads are very mild when compared to other adverts we have (particularly the safe driving adverts that like to show lots of dead children), the safe drinking adverts also tend to show quite a bit of gore.

And that is one of the problems with the Americans viewing this advert, they don't understand the surrounding culture (particularly that with health campaigns) and also that of a more liberal society and media. Although of course I'm not saying that you're not allowed to comment on such matters, but a further understanding of the culture helps to understand the context that this advert exists in.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

So that makes everything all right? Since your whole culture revolves around negative advertising, it is okay to use? Glad that is cleared up.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

I'm saying that this advert isn't exceptional, a lot of adverts are like this, there is nothing making this a special advert. This is not what many want to believe, part of an anti-gaming conspiracy. For us in the UK we've seen it all before (negative health campaigns) and are used to it. A few gamers complaining about this advert won't make an ounce of difference to the style that the government takes for its health campaigns. Anyway I can't see a problem with a negative campaign, I mean it's not like a positive campaign isn't the same sort of propaganda.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

I do have to agree wtih you on that, the last thing I would want my kids worrying about is an early death (if I had any), positively reinforcing exercise and being acitve is a far better tactic than scare campaigns like this.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Meh I wasn't really offended by this ad, it's not like it's the only one they've made for this campaign. On a side note though, wouldn't it be far more effective if they showed some fat kid playing? I see plenty of fat little kids walking around (surprise they usually have fat parents...) but they show a kid who doesn't really look like his health is suffering or anything.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Didn't the UK government remove public game advertisements that scared children? 

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Yep, but here's the part that's simply offensive to me.  Those complaints were made by adults that were worried that the ads might scare children.

 

At least one complaint on this ad came from the parent of a kid.  The kid was afraid that she was going to die soon because she played video games.  Then the advertising standards agency said the ad wasn't likely to cause anyone undue stress and anxiety.

 

Frankly, England should be banned.

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

While I agree with the ASA over this issue, I can't help but wonder if they would have rejected action if the kid had been watching movies in the ad or would they have said something like:

"Cinema, being a legitimate and culturally valuable expression or art is unfairly disparaged in this ad. Perhaps if the ad contained a wholly valueless activity, such as playing video games, it would have made its point without infringing on an art form."

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

Well they didn't, stop assuming that they believe in certain things when they haven't said so, this is the reason why the games industry didn't like the advert and gamers believe in an anti-gaming campaign, because they are reading more into it.

One parent objected that the ad was offensive and harmful because it frightened her young child who became scared that she would die if she played video games.

I find this hard to believe. Wouldn't suprise me if this actually came from one of the games companies themselves as the advert has had limited release at this point. (Although I am technically guilty of the above, believing more than what there really is).

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

"One parent objected that the ad was offensive and harmful because it frightened her young child who became scared that she would die if she played video games."

That, quite honestly, is harmful. And highly disturbing, as the parent doesn't see anything wrong with her own child being scared of dying. I hope that parent explained what the ad was really saying...

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

I have to agree with them on this one.  The ad isn't anything to get worked up over when there's far more important things to get mad about.  Like, say, the absence of an 18+ rating for Australian video games or more Jack Thompson-authored video game legislation.  :P

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

As I suspected. The text in the ad was factual and not particularly controversial. Most of the complaints were about the headline and the implication of the image - the fact that some were offended is not enough to limit basic freedom of expression.

The ASA were always going to look at the whole thing. They were therefore unlikely to take any action.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

 "Most readers would understand that the ad was discouraging a sedentary lifestyle..."

Then why use video games? What does cybernatography have to do with a sedentary lifestyle? Why not use TV? Or books! 

Continuing to relate games to sloth and obesity: THAT'S the problem right there.

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

When you use a book though, people assume "oh, he's just enriching his mind" but tilt the book up about 90* and you see that he is reading Mein Kampf, suddenly it's not so enriching anymore. Oh look, Jimmy is reading The Communist Manifesto!

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

As the ASA said - the image was an illustration of the point about a sedentary lifestyle.

As an illustration the image chosen was of one sedentary activity - the fact it could have chosen others does not per se invalidate the choice it made.

Are you suggesting limiting freedom of expression in such a way that I cannot state an illustrative example unless I also state all possible examples?

Re: Watchdog Group Rejects Complaint Over "Early Death" Ad

You just gotta love when any fascist group supports their own actions with the old "It's ok, we mean well" excuse. It's no news that an overly sedentary lifestyle can lead to health problems, and it's sad that this group (like most others) defends a purposely written scare tactic that does nothing but make the idiots who listen to these people panic.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Benjamin Franklin
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will an M rating hurt Batman: Arkham Knight's sales?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Net Neutrality: let the lawsuits begin! (Which were going to be filed if the FCC moved to even so much as corrected a typo in their previous rulemakings)02/26/2015 - 6:59pm
Matthew WilsonThis is a interesting long form article about xbox live since halo 2. http://www.polygon.com/a/the-second-generation-of-xbox-live/page-102/26/2015 - 6:01pm
ConsterJust take pride in joining the group of net neutrality nations, even if it's only temporarily.02/26/2015 - 1:24pm
Matthew Wilsonfcc passed net neutrality. now lets hope they dont screw up the details. ps I am not holding my breath on that one.02/26/2015 - 1:03pm
ZippyDSMleeIf I could stand blizz I would do what I do in Facebook and use zippy, they can screw off if they do not like it.02/26/2015 - 9:31am
Michael ChandraAh. Now THIS is a good reason to not want to enable RealID: Anyone with your email can try adding you as a friend, leading to complications if they find out you're using it but declining their request.02/26/2015 - 5:15am
Michael Chandra(Also, why the hell would you not announce this?? Now people think they got a bug.)02/26/2015 - 5:11am
Michael ChandraThe only argument against the second that I've read so far is 'I'm afraid I'd accidentally RealID instead of BattleTag someone'. How secure are the RealID databases anyway?02/26/2015 - 5:10am
Michael ChandraIt's a silly argument detracting from the two main issues: Is this safe (so RealID only enabled but not given out through twitter in any way) and is it problematic to force people to 'use' RealID without actually sharing it with others?02/26/2015 - 5:10am
Michael ChandraGot to love how people immediately bring up 'yeah I don't see a problem with using my real name, it's not as if people can find me with it'. Maybe not you, but that doesn't mean others cannot be found.02/26/2015 - 5:08am
Michael ChandraSo apparently it's because they wanted to tie it to Parental Controls and didn't want to make a separate parental control for it due to that taking effort.02/26/2015 - 5:03am
ZippyDSMleeWhy do they have billing account name and user name confused? Never understood that....02/26/2015 - 3:29am
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-25/google-s-computers-learn-to-play-video-games-by-themselves that is fairly impressive.02/25/2015 - 9:21pm
MechaCrashA universal ID among all of your characters across all games is a good idea. Making it use your real name instead of a screen name of your choosing is a horrible idea.02/25/2015 - 5:45pm
Michael ChandraThey also said posting on the forums was optional. To be honest, I really do NOT get why you'd introduce a new feature, brag about it and then secretly put a lock on it.02/25/2015 - 4:52pm
InfophileTwitter integration is a lot more optional than the forums (which was the last place they tried to enforce real names). So I don't see the backlash being as strong this time, especially since they aren't adding the requirement to an existing service02/25/2015 - 12:59pm
Michael ChandraIn the Real ID info, it's an optional thing for friends. Enforcing its usage for tweeting seems rather unnecessary.02/25/2015 - 12:14pm
ZippyDSMleenothing like a a few crashes inbetween moveing 400gb of data....02/25/2015 - 12:09pm
Michael ChandraOkay, so Blizzard's memory officially only goes back four years, as they cannot remember the backlash last time they tried forcing people to use their real names.02/25/2015 - 12:09pm
IvresseOnly context I can provide at the moment is the response from Blizz customer service: https://twitter.com/BlizzardCSEU_EN/status/57060293549676544402/25/2015 - 11:31am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician