MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

March 20, 2009 -

Aeria Entertainment has announced that it will allow same-sex avatars to wed in its Dream of Mirror Online game.

The MMORPG is free to play. Aeria's revenues are based on micro-transactions for in-game items, including virtual wedding rings.

According to Massively, which tracks all things MMO-ish:

The same-sex aspect of this marriage system is simply one of the many [new] features, but it hasn't been added as just an afterthought. It's been a popular topic of discussion among DOMO players since the game's launch in Fall of 2007.

This marriage system allows couples to embark on a series of challenging quests where they can plan their in-game wedding, complete with dream locale, wedding outfit and even a perfect set of rings. Once married, the couple will be granted unique features which include the ability to summon their significant other to their location, as well as special healing abilities during battle.


Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Might as well go all the way in the game and include marriage counselors for the couples who have issues, if were making it like real life why not.

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Is this a stunt to get people to play a game in which if it wasn't for this event a good majority of gamers would of never heard nor played this game?

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Been playing SMT Imagine (based on the Nocturne/Persona universe) which is another Aeria supported title (fun game too btw) and cannot really say I am surprised.   Not overly alarmed either.  Homo and Bi sexuality is a reality.  One can either accept it, hide in a closet or come out of said closet (puns intended).   LOL it as always been out there (if avoided) that you never really know the true age or gender of the person you cybered with in a game.. now I guess it matters even less. 

BTW that ALOT of AP (Aeria Points) for those rings, I mean the good weapons in SMT runs around 400-500 AP.

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Doesn't Ragnarok online most private servers and many MMO private servers have this option? So the official/legal version of the games are just catching up to some of the things that make people choose private servers >>

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

I want to direct everyone's attention to this part of the report....

"Once married, the couple will be granted unique features which include the ability to summon their significant other to their location, as well as special healing abilities during battle."

The people I have played games with (who are also completely addicted to Korean MMOs) will tell you right off, any advantage you can gain for your character over other people's characters will put you over the top and secure you a high rank on the server or keep you alive in PvP longer. As hot-button as this topic is I'm willing to believe that players simply wanted these advantages for themselves and their friend without having to trash their existing character because it didn't match up politically...

Edit: Yes I know some people are very serious about the marriage option but as games and gamers go, it looks to me like an inventive way to establish an in-game buddy system with perks. Remember Soul Linkers in RO?

"Well, I ask it 'Why?' and then it says 'Look over there!' and I turn to look... and theres nothing there so I look back and it's gone..."

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Haven't played it.

But, it just shows how irrelevant, technically speaking, who can and cannot be married truly is.  I mean, simply leave out a programming gender check of the proposed couples.  That's it.  That's all there is from a technical aspect.  Outside of that, it's just personal, religious, and/or political differences that deny individuals, in the real or fictional world, that prevent individuals from being married.

Now, a game that provides the technical aspects of multiple spouses, allows divorce, contracts, benefits, and even the negative aspects in technical terms in the game.  Now THAT would be a REAL programming challenge.


NW2K Software

Nightwng2000 has also updated his MySpace page: Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Now if Dreams of Mirror wasn't so creepy looking...

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Isn't that the defining styles of Korean mmo's?

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Hey now, I met my wife on a Korean MMO. Nexus infact.

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Well, yeah.  Half the time when I try out free Asian MMOs, I feel like a pedo.  The other half, I'm too bored with the gameplay to care what the characters look like.

Is Dreams of Mirror actually worth checking out?  I sort of gave up on Free-to-Play trash filtering out of the East.  The point of same sex marriage would be kind of moot if no one is playing it.

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Hmm, well, if you look at the game from certain perspective, same sex marriage will mean kids who touch the game will suddenly become gay, meaning the game will have to be brought down to make certain people happy.


Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

But if kids who touch the game suddenly become gay, they won't have a problem with same-sex marriages, right? So as long as they don't tell their parents, there's nothing to worry about.

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Well this is going to piss off certain groups with "higher morals".  This will cause anarchy... ANARCHY I say!!!

"I'd far rather be happy than right any day."

Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

my god! This will be the downfall of (virtual) society!!!


Re: MMORPG Will Offer Same-Sex Marriage Option

Think of the virtual children!

***Homicide-free video gaming since 1972!***

***Homicide-free video gaming since 1972!***
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician