U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games in Juvenile Lockups

March 24, 2009 -

A Liverpool University Professor told a committe of Parliament that violent young offenders have access to violent video games and movies within U.K. detention facilities.

As reported by the Fleetwood Weekly News, Professor Kevin Browne made his remarks to the Home Affairs Committee:

If you go into local authority secure units or young offender institutions you will find that they are able to borrow from the library DVDs and computer games that are completely inappropriate given that they have been convicted of a violent offence.

They could borrow films like Rambo and violent video games like Carmageddon despite the fact that we recognise they are some of the most vulnerable people in society.

Browne blamed the problem on "laxity" by corrections officials said that violence caused by video games should be considered a public health issue.

GP: The Home Affairs Committee is chaired by Labour MP Keith Vaz, a longtime critic of violent video games. On the committee's website, Vaz explains Prof. Browne's March 20th appearance:

Throughout our inquiry we have tried to explore the reasons why  young people carry and use weapons. Several witnesses have suggested that exposure to violent entertainment such as films or video games may trigger violent behaviour.  We are therefore pleased to take more detailed evidence from Professor Kevin Browne on research in this area.

 


Comments

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

Man, now I want to go to UK jail.  Carmageddon is an awesome game!

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

Simple solution: Have the librarians follow the ratings on the box, and limit it to the OK for everyone titles. 

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

From someone who works in a federal priosn, its all a joke! And we wonder why 3/4 of them are brought back and our crime rate is so high. Granted I work in a low security prison but COME ON My training in boot camp was harder than this. These punks in juvie shouldn't get squat they have that freedom of choice to break the law and hey did and they need to be treated no differnt than any adult. They should get 3 hots and a cot nothing more.

 

 

 

 

For those who oppose and view video games as murder simulators...When are you going to FINALLY oppose and view firearms as murder weapons?!?!

"With free speech either all of it is ok or none of it is." Kyle Broflovski

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

Kids go to these places to be punished, not to have a fun time. So what if they get bored? Because you know what? They had freedom of choice not to commit crimes. Do not give them any games at all, they are serving punishment.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

I'm not sure how I feel about video games in juvie.  On one hand, they're getting their violence fix, which isnt good, but at least it's not turning them into hardened (physically) criminals.  It'd be like taking away exercise equipment in adult jails.  Turn those hardened criminals into soft pudgy couch potato criminals.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

Actually, it probably doesn't make sense to give violent offenders access to violent media.  Of course, we here at gamepolitics know that violent games don't make normal peope into violent criminals.  The research supports this.  But the research also supports that those predispositioned to violence are attracted to violent media, and may even be influenced by it.

We're constantly on edge here, waiting for someone to blame video games for everything.  But we have to be open to the fact that they do influence SOME people.  Juvinile halls are probably not the best places for GTA and Far Cry, as they're chock full of kids already prone to violence.  Give them Wii Sports, Skate 2, or Mirror's Edge.  Although, I'd get a kick out of the throught of a bunch of thugs playing Cooking Mama.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

Um.. why the particular emphasis on 'violent' games and movies.

Offenders having access to ANY games and movies should cause outrage.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

They have to be given some form of mental stimulation, they can't just be expected to stare at the walls all day.  How is a movie or a game much different than a book?

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

well for most of the types that end up in those places, books are not nearly as entertaining... not to mention that books tend to provide more thought than other mediums... sure movies and games can do the same, but you can easily assume that those are NOT the kind of movies and games they will want to watch/play

it's not like movies and video games are the only mental stimulation they can be given... really, places like that should remind them that this is what happens when you break the rules and laws...loss of freedom, loss of real entertainment and so forth... you want freedom and entertainment you straighten up and start flying right

 

though if you did want to provide them with movies and games, why not limit their selection to stuff that will do better to stimulate them in a positive way, or maybe even teach them something, instead of stuff that could be called "mindless entertainment"... it is afterall supposed to be a correctional facility

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

When its a game that costs 50p fair enough.

 

Its when you hear stories (especially recently) about offenders having access to dvd players, wiis and 360s that gets me annoyed.

Whilst there are regular hard working citizens that abide by the law, who CANT afford a wii, or 360 or games etc, then THEY should be given the games etc first. Simple as. Reward those who abide by the rules, not those who dont.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

Those who abide by the rules are rewarded with the right to reward themselves at their own expense. Aint consumerism great?

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

As opposed to those who f-ed up and get the cool things they'd only get illegally otherwise?

Lovely rehibilation system ya got thar

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

It damn well should, but then we get into some ridiculous human rights-based argument about helping offenders since punishing them somehow makes things worse.

There was an incident maybe ten years ago where youth offenders were given holidays in a bid to stop them re-offending. I'm deadly serious. In fact, a quick google has results:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/minister-calls-for-report-on-offenders-crime-holiday-inquiry-launched-into-chalet-burglary-spree-by-boy-sent-on-therapy-break-1375223.html

It's even worse than I remember.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

Whilst I certainl don't hold with the idea of prisoners having access to games, it's nothing to do with violence, and I take offence at the claims that there is 'evidence' of a link between the two when there is none, that is faux science at it's best, jumping from 'influence' to 'is the cause of violence in', I'm not impressed with the good Professors' leaps of logic in that department.

My problem with it is that it's supposed to be a jail, maybe if people didn't get to play video games and things whilst serving a custodial sentence, they'd be a little less inclined to go there again?

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

Carmaggedon? Srsly? Welcome to 1995...

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

God forbid that these innocent prisoners have their young minds corrupted so.

--------------------------------------------------------

Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! -Glenn Beck

-------------------------------------------------------- Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! GET OFF MY PHONE! -Glenn Beck

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

We are therefore pleased to take more detailed evidence from Professor Kevin Browne on research in this area.

Of course you are, seeing that this is exactly what you want to hear.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

Yes because in Juvenile Hall you can drive a car and run people over just like in the game. And did you know that Carmmergeddon is an over decade old game?

Still, I'm of the opinion that these are detention facilities, not like Magic said, leisure centers.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent ...

Looks like detention facilities are still like leisure centres

"Several witnesses have suggested that exposure to violent entertainment such as films or video games may trigger violent behaviour."
There it is, the usual theory. They're looking for a specific 'trigger' so they can go: "AHA! There it is! 'X' is the cause! Remove 'X' and you have no problem! Huzzah!", as if videogames are the single, direct cause of violent behaviour.

Re: U.K. Prof: Youthful Offenders Have Access to Violent Games

they'd be spot on too, you know, if it wasn't the violent entertainment like Mr Vaz is always trying to claim

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
MattsworknameDitto kotaku, Gawker, VOX, Polygon, ETC07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MechaTama31So, between pulling a game from one chain of stores, and forcing editorial changes to a media source, only one of them strikes you as being on the edge of censorship, and it's the game one?07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Andrew EisenHave gamers ever tried to ban a product? Can you be more specific? I'm not clear what you're getting at.07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Mattsworknamethey should have expected some kind of blow back. But I didn't participate in that specific action07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MattsworknameAndrew Youd have to ask others about that, I actualyl didn't have much beef with them till last year, so I can't speak to there history. I simply feel that gamesutra chose politics over gaming and chose to make enimies of it's prime audiance. For that,07/28/2015 - 8:40pm
Andrew EisenI'm still not clear on how Gamasutra was lacking in accountability or what it was lacking in accountability for.07/28/2015 - 8:38pm
MattsworknameAndrew: You and I agree on most of that. I don't diagree that there should ahve been other actions taken. Now, I do want to point something out, casue Im not sure if it's happened. Have gamers ever tried to have a product banned?07/28/2015 - 8:37pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician