New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

April 16, 2009 -

A new video game advocacy group has been stepped onto the scene.

The Entertainment Media Council, created last year, but officially launched this week, is led by CEO Morgan Ramsay (left). Ramsay formerly served as head of the San Diego chapter of the International Game Developers Association.

A press release on the EMC website offers some details of the group's mission:

Entertainment Media Council is pursuing a broad agenda for advancing the interactive entertainment business in the United States.

“With interactive entertainment in the midst of a sea change, the need for a navigator is more pronounced than ever,” said Morgan Ramsay, president and chief executive officer at Entertainment Media Council. “We are embarking on a mission to solve the most challenging problems facing the industry today.”

Entertainment Media Council will harness the collective intelligence of an inclusive assembly of entrepreneurs and corporate leaders to support and focus on entrepreneurship, organizational innovation, social responsibility, environmental sustainability, professional diversity, and globalization.

As to video game industry experience, Ramsay's LinkedIn Profile says that he "held roles" at Sony Online Entertainment and SCEA.

Gamasutra reports that EMC will seek start-up capital from corporate sponsors and private investors.


Comments

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

Sorry but I have to ask.  We need this guy and his org.  why?

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

Whilst it's always good to see fresh thinking join the fray, I only have a limited memory for acronyms...

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

Why are there no whites in Ramsay's eyes?

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

I see Hurley from "Lost".  Anybody else?

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

So noone will shoot him.

"Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes."

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

Not a guy I'd want to meet in an alley, especially if he was giving me that look, and holding a picture frame over the rest of his face.

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

And what's with the beard but no moustache? The only one I've ever seen successfully pull that look off is Abe Lincoln.

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

Well, they have Greg Boyd and Cindy Armstrong on board, so it's a good start. Best of luck to them.

-- Dan "SWATJester" Rosenthal; Executive Director, http://www.gameslaw.net

-- Dan Rosenthal

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

EMC joins the brawl!  -Super Smash Bros. announcer on EMC.

It´s a conspirancy, I tell you! They are after me. -Jack Thompson on EMC.

 

I really hope they got a more aggresive aproach than the ECA on videogames issues.

 

The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com/

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

As noble as the goals are, I can see plenty of gamers immediately writing off the CEO as an idiot since his experience came from SOE.

I don't see how an advocacy group will help spread innovation within the industry. We have developers taking risks, it is just they aren't marketed well or gamers just won't bite and part of that is the fact that the customers that would dig that stuff, is in a minority.

Also, with these tough times, I don't see how they'll be able to stay afloat with funding like that... I think most investors wouldn't bother.

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

"I don't see how an advocacy group will help spread innovation within the industry."

Entertainment Media Council is more of a hybrid association, combining elements of trade associations and professional societies. We're also more interested in the innovation of organizations, business models, and the processes used to deliver value to consumers than the creation of new products. While product innovation is an inevitable result of our work, it's not our focus. We're concerned with the business side of the industry, such as governance, finance, marketing, operations, etc.

Re: New Game Industry Advocacy Group Launches

Hey how things are sold and distributioned to the populace is something in bad need of innovation... the current way games are made(to much overhead) mediocre balance in profit taken in.... DLC might make things better if you get back to polishing the products set development cycles longer and allow a 2nd lesser paid team do some of the bug work and polish over the year after the game is released  so the main team can start the next product and release non critical content (like game of the year edition style upgrades to control,features,content,cheats,ect) as a whole expansion for 30 or in parts for 2$ a pop that amounts to 2 or 3 times the whole package price.

 

I mean putting out  DLC without fixing and finishing/polishing the Gdamn games(Starwars unleashed,Bioshock,ect,ect,ect) is just plain bad and has forced me and others not only to ignore DLC but get away from modern gaming.

 


Gore,Violence,Sexauilty,Fear,Emotion these are but modes of transportation of story and thought, to take them from society you create a society of children and nannys, since adults are not required.


http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightThe Daily WTF has a nice run down of some of the impact to software that the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage has. http://thedailywtf.com/articles/i-m-not-married-to-the-idea07/02/2015 - 7:45am
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician