ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

April 21, 2009 -

Yesterday GamePolitics reported on research data released by Iowa State University Prof. Douglas Gentile and the National Institute on Media and the Family which suggests that one in twelve people between 8 and 18 show signs of video game dependency.

We also noted that Grand Theft Childhood author Dr. Cheryl Olson of Harvard questioned the survey methodology used in the study.

Not unexpectedly, game publishers' trade group ESA has now weighed in to dispute the NIMF research. Senior VP Rich Taylor (left) commented:

This is a report more in search of media headlines than scientific truth and facts. In an interview, though not in the report itself, Dr. Gentile said, ‘It’s not that games are bad. It’s not that games are addictive.’ Medical experts, including the American Medical Association, have already rejected the fallacy of video game ‘addiction,’ and we completely agree.

Like all forms of entertainment, computer and video games should be a part of a well-rounded lifestyle that includes healthy eating and exercise. It is up to parents to determine when and how often their children should play any game. For our part, the industry already provides a wide range of tools and information, including timers and parental controls, to help caregivers ensure that entertainment software is used appropriately.

Oregon psychiatrist Dr. Jerald Block, who has been known to drop by GamePolitics from time to time, offered some additional criticism of Gentile's research, reports USA Today:

Jerald Block, a psychiatrist at the Oregon Health Science University, called the study "valuable" to the American Psychiatric Association's [upcoming] decision on whether compulsive computer and Internet use should be considered a mental disorder.

Block, an APA adviser, warns that the [NIMF] study has weaknesses. The research should be replicated because it is supported by the National Institute for Media and the Family, which he likens to a lobbying group. And the survey could have found higher game use because it was collected in January as opposed to summer. It also classifies 8.5% as addicted without a physician interview: "The people they are claiming have a problem, it's not entirely clear that they do have a problem."

UPDATE: GU Comics pokes a bit of fun at the NIMF study.


Comments

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

"Jerald Block, a psychiatrist at the Oregon Health Science University, called the study 'valuable' to the American Psychiatric Association's [upcoming] decision on whether compulsive computer and Internet use should be considered a mental disorder."

What isn't, these days? One more "disorder" added to the DSM feels like one step among thousands aimed at pathologizing anything other than perfectly "normal" behavior.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

Heh, think it'd be easier to have them define normal first then. ^_^

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

In all fairness as much as Gentile and the NIMF have an "axe to grind", so too does the ESA.  I don't think their criticism is going to carry much weight.  Criticisms from Cheryl Olson or Jerald Block will be more influential.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

The study points out some disturbing information about parental involvement - or lack thereof...

Because several studies have demonstrated both short- and long-term negative effects of playing violent video games, the survey asked the youth how they had gotten M-rated (‘‘Mature’’) video games, if they had. A large percentage of the youth owned M-rated games: 22% of 8- to 11-year-olds, 41% of 12- to 14-year-olds, and 56% of 15- to 18-year-olds (39% of 15- and 16-year-olds). Boys were more than twice as likely as girls to have obtained M-rated games, whether as a gift or through a purchase using their own or their parents’ money; 7% of boys admitted that they had purchased such a game with their own money without their parents’ knowledge.

 

 

www.exgamer.net

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

If you want to focus on parental involvement then this is the data you want to highlight:

3% of 8 to 11-year-olds had M-rated games without their parents' knowledge.  (about 8 of 400 kids)

2% for 12-14, (about 6 of 300 kids)

11% for 15-18 (about 44 of 400 kids but keep in mind, half this last group is 17 or older)

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

A large percentage of the youth owned M-rated games: 22% of 8- to 11-year-olds, 41% of 12- to 14-year-olds, and 56% of 15- to 18-year-olds (39% of 15- and 16-year-olds).

Given that some M rate games got that rating for nothing more than including a few drops of blood, I'm not exactly impressed/frightened.

or through a purchase using their own or their parents’ money; 7% of boys admitted that they had purchased such a game with their own money without their parents’ knowledge.

So in the majority of cases, they had either specific or tacit parental permission to buy them. That's not what I'd call a failure of parenting.

-Gray17

-Gray17

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

Ya, having parentl permission to play such games should not be called failed parenting by default... parents have a right to allow their kids to play those games if they wish... the only question of parenting that comes in is whether or not the parents took any consideration of the game and/or they ended up getting the M-rated game for a child that many would say should probably not be playing such games (this is indicative of a lack of care and thought in raising their child).

A good parent should be able to tell how mature their offspring are... if they really feel their kids are mature enough for those kinds of games, then they should be allowed to let their kids play those games... This kind of stuff varies from child to child; one child might be fine watching horror films, while another might get terribly tramatized, and it's up to parents to make the call whether or not their kid will be fine... the M-rating is a recommendation, not a restriction

 

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

I'd say 7% isn't bad either. When I was young we used to do things behind our parents back, such as getting 18 certificate movies etc, kids do that kind of thing. Doesn't make it right, but then, if kids did everything right, they wouldn't need parents.

I wasn't addicted to 18 certificate films, it was just that I wasn't allowed to see them, as a child, that is a challenge, much the same sort of thing applies here, which is why I consider people like Thompson so stupid for keeping attacking games like GTA IV, because he's actually making it more attractive to young people by giving it free press.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

Those actually look like really good numbers to me.  Only 7% of boys go behind their parents' backs to get mature games?  That's rather fantastic compared to the 20% of kids in high school who report regular binge drinking.  The information may be compelling but it's hardly "disturbing."

---
The Mammon Philosophy

---
Fangamer

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

When kids find something they like, they obsess over it.  When my nephew was young, he would watch "Shrek" *constantly*.

If your kid didn't want to put down a book he was reading, would people be going "*GASP* He's ADDICTED TO BOOKS ZOMGWTFBBQ!!!!1!!11!!ELEVENTY" ?  Hopefully not, and they shouldn't be for games either, as long as it doesn't overshadow things like school, playing outside, etc.  If it does, the parent should... wait for it... parent.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

Agreed, no one thought it was a big deal that I played with my dolls for hours and wouldn't stop until my parents told me to do something else.  Why should it be any different with a video game that I like?  

Kids don't know what moderation is so they have parents to teach them that.  I don't think this study should be considered seriously unless we know how much the parents are monitoring the video game usage.  

www.20sidedwoman.blogspot.com

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

When will the ECA make a statement? Oh that's right, they never do.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

HaHaHaHa. *pant* "They never do." Ha. That is a good one.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

Ah, ECAs most rabid fanboy, right on cue and without fail.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

Of course parrying the ECA's most rabid troll.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

In that case, you missed one in the article before this one.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: ESA Reacts to NIMF Game Addiction Study

I think games are addictive because fun is addictive.

--------------------------------------------------------

Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! -Glenn Beck

-------------------------------------------------------- Believe in something! Even if it's wrong, believe in it! GET OFF MY PHONE! -Glenn Beck
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOnce again, MaskedPixelante, I have no idea what the hell you're talking about. Are you talking about the Wii remake in 2010? The PS3/360 enhanced port of the remake in 2011? Something new? Please, for the love of fluffy kittens, provide a damn link.08/20/2014 - 9:57am
MaskedPixelanteSo, if I finish this game Activision claims is the GoldenEye remake, but looks suspiciously like a rejected CoD game, do I get the REAL GoldenEye remake?08/20/2014 - 8:37am
Papa MidnightWii U Games finding Solidarity with PC Gamers :(08/19/2014 - 6:09pm
Zenbuy all of the bad DLC before they even showed the main content everyone was waiting for. I paid for it, I wanted it, and I got tossed aside.08/19/2014 - 4:10pm
ZenIanC: Yep, both Call of Duty games did the same thing holding back all DLC and then releasing the day one map 2 YEARS later out of the blue. Why play what they won't support. Warner Bros canceled their DLC after promising it because Wii U owners didn't08/19/2014 - 4:09pm
Andrew EisenShe's the developer of Depression Quest. It's an interesting game (although I wouldn't call it fun) and you can check it out for free at depressionquest.com.08/19/2014 - 2:48pm
Sleakerwhat's all this Zoe quinn stuff all over and should I even bother looking it up?08/19/2014 - 2:37pm
IanCExactly Zen. The third one had random delays to the DLC and they just came out seemingly at random with no warning, and the 4th they didn't even bother.08/19/2014 - 2:31pm
ZenI may have bought both AC games on Wii U, but WHY would anyone be expected to get the game when they came out MONTHS before release that they were skipping DLC and ignoring the game? They poisoned the market on themselves then blamed Nintendo players.08/19/2014 - 1:27pm
Papa MidnightIn review, that's fair, Andrew. I just tend to take Gawker articles with a lot of salt, and skepticism.08/19/2014 - 12:07pm
Matthew WilsonFor one has a English speaking support team for devs. Devs have said any questions they have, were translated in to Japanese. then back in to English. 08/19/2014 - 11:41am
Adam802they need to realize the "wii-fad" era is pretty much over and start rebooting some old great franchises like they are doing with star fox08/19/2014 - 11:39am
Adam802unfortunatly, this seems to represent 3rd party's position on the wiiU in general. Nintendo has always sucessfully relied on 1st party but now since 3rd parties and console "power" are so important this gen, they're in trouble.08/19/2014 - 11:38am
IanCOkay, so what can Nintendo do to these 3rd parties? Huh? If a company release games late with missing content then of course it won't sell. Seems simple to me.08/19/2014 - 11:25am
Andrew EisenSakurai and Co. REALLY need to go back in there and re-pose Samus. She is so incredibly broken.08/19/2014 - 11:06am
ZippyDSMleeUntill Nin starts paying out the azz or doing much much more to help 3rd party games development, the WIIU is dead in the water.....08/19/2014 - 11:03am
ZippyDSMleehttps://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=316135481893472&id=22417313775637408/19/2014 - 11:02am
ZippyDSMlee*gets out the popcorn* this will be fun08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenIt's not as simple as "Nintendo gamers don't buy AC games."08/19/2014 - 11:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician